Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight UK and EU online safety laws
The idea that big tech companies like Meta, Apple, Microsoft and others could work together against both the UK and EU law was made by Republican senator Scott Fitzgerald, who is chair of the judiciary subcommittee and an ally of President Donald Trump.
He was part of a trip that US politicians made to this side of the Atlantic recently around the topic of online regulation.
This included meetings with both the UK, EU and European member states, as well as discussions with big tech companies.
Speaking to journalists, Mr Fitzgerald said he asked Facebook owner Meta whether the businesses had been working together - but said they "wouldn't confirm that".
He added: "There may be some value in some type of united front in trying to fight these things off in Europe."
Mr Fitzgerald went on to say that he thinks the White House "certainly is interested in finding out" what the delegation discovered.
"I'm not sure if it can be elevated to a level of something that the president would talk about publicly and on the global stage, but this stuff is dangerous.
"And I think it needs to be addressed, and so I certainly expect to talk to the platforms and talk to the White House as well."
5:23
As well as Mr Fitzgerald, Republicans Jim Jordan and Kevin Kiley were also on the trip - both of whom are politically close to Mr Trump.
In a recent thread on social media, Mr Jordan accused the UK government of trying to censor US tech companies last summer during the riots that took place after the Southport killings.
He shared emails the committee obtained from tech organisations showing the UK government asking for information and wanting to know what was being done by the companies during the rioting.
A report by the UK Commons Science and Technology Committee into the events last year found that " social media business models incentivise the spread of content that is damaging and dangerous, and did so in a manner that endangered public safety in the hours and days following the Southport murders".
But Mr Jordan said that the government asking for companies to tell them what was being done to tackle reports of a "two-tiered system" was concerning.
He added that such an attempt by the UK government to get information from technology companies would "chill speech".
Mr Jordan and the delegation met the UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday.
The topic of the impact of UK law on American companies came up, in what is understood to have been a polite meeting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
New exhibition to ask 'hard questions' about Summerland disaster
An exhibition telling the story of Summerland from Victorian times to the aftermath of a devastating fire that killed 50 people will pose some "really hard-hitting questions" about the events, organisers have compiled in 2023 to commemorate half a century since the disaster, Summerland 50 – Remembering for the Future has been updated for of the largest entertainment complexes of its kind in Europe at the time, the venue was engulfed in flames on the evening of 2 August 1973, which killed scores of people Brennen said although it was "not heavy", the display could challenge some "misconceptions" about the fire and help to educate people about the disaster. The latest iteration of the exhibition includes the Justice for Summerland Campaign, which is led by relatives and survivors who have called for fresh inquests into the application, which was submitted Phoenix Law, was rejected by the Attorney General the Northern Ireland-based human rights law firm has confirmed that decision is set to be appealed. Tina Brennen, who is part of the group behind the exhibition, said it explored the history of the site at the north end of Douglas Promenade in the years "before, during and after" the said the site had "quite an interesting history" dating back to Victorian times, and the display went on to cover why the complex was built in the 1970s, the fire itself, and its aftermath, including the inquiry into the events and current campaign."It's not something you can go round and see in half an hour and be done, it's quite comprehensive," she said."It's for people to make up their own minds, we're not there to influence them, we just give the facts and ask the questions.""There's so many misconceptions about Summerland and about the fire itself, so we've simply given the facts in this case and hopefully people will come to their own conclusions."They could go away with quite different conclusions to the set they came in with." Ms Brennen, who witnessed the disaster unfold in 1973, said there were "lots of reasons" for holding the exhibition, including "remembering it so that it doesn't happen again"."It's also a question of education for not just my generation and older generations, but for particularly the younger generation," she said."The young people that came last time were absolutely astounded as to what they saw and read, and some were quite affected by it."So it gives them a perspective on it because this is 52 years ago now, a whole generation had grown up not knowing the first Summerland."Their thinking was coloured by the second Summerland, which is an entirely different concept." Ms Brennen, who has been a long-time campaigner for a memorial on the site of the former entertainment complex, is also part of the team behind an annual service at the vacant plot to remember the commemoration takes place at 19:00 at the Summerland site and will include a "wall of faces" put together by local firm ELS featuring some of the faces of those who lost their lives in the tragedy along with friends and relatives of those who service, held to coincide with the time the fire took hold, also features a wreath laying ceremony along with music provided by Ellan Vannin Pipes and Council's own service, taking place at the local authority's official memorial in the Kaye Memorial Gardens, starts at 18: Summerland 50 – Remembering for the Future exhibition is open from 10:00 until 16:00 BST each day until 9 August at the Villa Marina Arcade on Harris Promenade in Douglas. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump steps up attacks on Fed's independence amid interest rates row
Donald Trump called on top Federal Reserve officials to seize control from its chair, Jerome Powell, if he fails to cut interest rates, stepping up his extraordinary attacks on the central bank's independence. The US president called Powell 'a stubborn MORON' in a series of critical social media posts on Friday, days after the Fed held rates steady for the fifth consecutive time. It comes as Trump faces heightened questions over the impact of his aggressive economic policy, and the White House presses forward with plans for a fresh wave of tariffs next week. Hours before the federal government released data which underlined a significant deterioration in the jobs market, Trump again broke with precedent to pin blame on the Fed – and urge it to change course. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell, a stubborn MORON, must substantially lower interest rates, NOW,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social network. 'IF HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' The Fed chair does not unilaterally set interest rates, which are decided by its rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Presidents typically respect its independence, leaving the central bank to make an objective decision – without political interference – about the best policy on interest rates for the US economy. 'Too Little, Too Late. Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster,' Trump wrote, minutes after Friday's lackluster jobs report. 'DROP THE RATE! The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Powell has repeatedly argued that the best approach for the Fed right now is to wait and see the impact of Trump's aggressive tariff strategy before cutting rates. But Trump has increasingly used the Powell, whom he appointed during his first term, as something of a piñata – repeatedly accusing him of damaging the US economy. Two members of the Fed's rate-setting committee dissented from its other policymakers' call to hold rates steady this week, and – to the president's delight – published their reasons on Friday. 'STRONG DISSENTS ON FED BOARD,' Trump wrote, claiming: 'IT WILL ONLY GET STRONGER!' By Friday evening, however, Trump's tone appeared to have changed as he told Newsmax during an interview that Powell will 'most likely' stay in his position. Trump said he would remove Powell 'in a heartbeat' and said the Fed's interest rate was too high but added that others have said Powell's removal would 'disturb the market'. 'He gets out in seven or eight months and I'll put somebody else in,' Trump said. On Friday afternoon, another member of the committee abruptly resigned. Adriana D Kugler, whose term was set to expire in January, announced she would step down next week. She did not provide a reason for the move, and will return to Georgetown University as a professor in the fall. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market,' Kugler said in a statement. Her resignation creates a vacancy for the White House to fill. Reuters contributed reporting
BreakingNews.ie
36 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Lammy not accepting Iran's claims over enriched uranium
Foreign Secretary David Lammy says he does not accept Iran's claims that the country is enriching uranium for academic purposes. Representatives from the United Kingdom, Germany and France held talks with Iran last week to try to break the deadlock over the country's nuclear programme. Advertisement Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). A central concern for western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to more than 400kg. In a wide-ranging interview with The Guardian, Mr Lammy said: 'Its leaders cannot explain to me – and I've had many conversations with them – why they need 60% enriched uranium. 'If I went to Sellafield or Urenco in Cheshire, they haven't got anything more than 6%. The Iranians claim it's for academic use, but I don't accept that.' Advertisement Mr Lammy warned that Iran developing nuclear weapons could lead to an escalation of tensions in the Middle East. Israel and the United States carried our strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June. 'Many of your readers will have watched Oppenheimer and seen the fallout of (the US building an atomic bomb),' he said. 'So it's what (a nuclear Iran) might mean in terms of other countries in the neighbourhood who would desire one, too. And we would be very suddenly handing over to our children and grandchildren a world that had many more nuclear weapons in it than it has today.' Advertisement The Foreign Secretary said he had heard Israeli arguments in favour of regime change in Tehran, but did not believe that was behind the US decision to strike. The Tottenham MP added any decision to topple the government was one for the Iranian people, with his focus 'on what the UK can do to stop Iran becoming a nuclear power'. Last month, Mr Lammy suggested that Britain, France and Germany could 'snap back' on sanctions against Iran unless the country gets 'serious' about stepping back from its nuclear ambitions. He told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee: 'Iran face even more pressure in the coming weeks because the E3 can snap back on our sanctions, and it's not just our sanctions, it's actually a UN mechanism that would impose dramatic sanctions on Iran across nearly every single front in its economy. Advertisement 'So they have a choice to make. It's a choice for them to make. 'I'm very clear about the choice they should make, but I'm also clear that the UK has a decision to make that could lead to far greater pain for the Iranian regime unless they get serious about the international desire to see them step back from their nuclear ambitions at this time.'
