
How train beloved by late Queen fell out of fashion with younger royals
Once affectionately considered one of the true spectacles of royalty, the royal train had become a financial burden, an extravagance not in keeping with modern times.
Now, perhaps inevitably, the train so beloved of Queen Victoria and Elizabeth II is no more, forever confined to the annals of history. A symbol of a bygone era.
For years, the writing had been on the wall.
The cost of maintaining the train, introduced by Queen Victoria in 1842, had attracted notable controversy in recent years, with various MPs calling for it to be scrapped.
For all of its advantages in terms of safety, privacy, security and convenience, the cost of at least £20,000 per journey had become hard to justify.
Crucially, despite their environmental campaigning, the current roster of senior members of the Royal family has increasingly preferred to travel by helicopter, swiftly choppering in and out of engagements to be home in time for tea.
A review into the royal train's future was launched after the death of Elizabeth II in 2022, marking the first hint that it had been earmarked for the scrap heap.
Several months later, Buckingham Palace aides, perhaps reluctant to let go of such a remnant of royal history, revealed that the study had been extended.
A palace source said: 'Our conclusion is that it is too early in His Majesty's reign to determine what the future usage of the train might be.'
A year further on – in June 2024 – and the picture was much the same. Aides said that the previous 12 months had been 'exceptional' because of the coronation and the King's cancer diagnosis, rendering them unable to build up a picture of the train's normal usage.
But there was no hiding from the fact that the King had used the royal train on only a handful of occasions since he ascended to the throne.
Now, finally, the train has hit the buffers, a line drawn in the sand. Its journey through so many royal eras, through so many cities and counties, is at an end.
For all of the recent reluctance to travel by royal train, Elizabeth II was incredibly partial to this particular mode of transport.
The late Queen considered the train one of the few places where she could truly relax in privacy. A mobile home from home, she could hide away in its claret carriages, safe in the knowledge that she would not be disturbed.
During her reign, the royal train became a grand statement that managed to convey a sense of normality combined with an all-important veil of mystery, its secrets hidden behind the heavy curtains pulled across the windows.
Once described as 'the most luxurious and most elusive locomotive in the history of the British Isles', it was often referred to as members of the Royal family's favourite way to travel.
The late monarch, certainly, was so fond of the train that she saved it from being scrapped in 2017, when she made it known that she believed it to be a cost-effective and convenient way for her family to travel.
Palace sources said at the time that the train was in far better condition than previously thought. There was now 'no end in sight' to its use, they declared.
Doubts over the train's future had been raised four years previously by Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, who told a committee of MPs that the current rolling stock, mostly dating from the 1970s, had only five to 10 years of service life left.
After that, he said, the prospect of replacing it would be a 'major decision', adding: 'The figures are quite staggering.'
But with memories still fresh of the fate of the Royal Yacht Britannia – which was retired in 1997 to the Queen's tearful distress –further tests were carried out on the train's rolling stock and it was duly given a reprieve.
While it may not have been the King's preferred mode of travel, the environmentally conscious monarch did have some influence; palace aides revealed in 2022 that the train was now powered exclusively by hydro-treated vegetable oil, a biofuel derived from waste products.
But even at the height of its use, the train was used no more than a handful of times a year.
A 23-year-old Queen Victoria took the royal train on its inaugural journey from Slough to Paddington, a ride she described as 'delightful and so quick'.
At the time, the train was considered particularly opulent and extravagant. Victoria was so charmed that more than two decades later, she commissioned her own set of train cars, lavishly painted with 23-carat-gold and blue silk details, largely funded from her own private purse.
For Victoria, the first monarch to recognise the importance of traversing the country and meeting the public, it was essential. For her own comfort, she prohibited the train from running at speeds beyond 30mph in the daytime and 40mph at night.
Fittingly, her final journey on board was made on her death in 1901, when crowds of mourners lined the tracks as her body was taken from Portsmouth to London Victoria en route to Windsor to be buried.
In the 1890s, the train had undergone an extensive refit, with new mod cons including electric lighting and an onboard lavatory.
Edward VII would later revamp the locomotive to resemble the Royal Yacht, its white-roofed wooden carriages boasting cooking facilities, baths and telephones.
During the First World War, George V used the train so frequently that it became his temporary home.
First bath on a train
The monarch made notable innovations, including the installation of the first bath on a train anywhere in the world as he toured the UK to boost morale.
He chose to sleep on the train rather than burden anyone with the need for hospitality because of wartime austerity. In 1935, he also installed the first radio on the train.
By the Second World War, the train was extensively upgraded to ensure that it was bulletproof. A 56-ton armour-plated roof, a maroon livery and a red and black coach lining were added, alongside special cabinets to hold confidential documents.
The current, rather more understated, iteration was unveiled in 1977 for Elizabeth II's Silver Jubilee tour.
It may have become more functional than flamboyant, but the late Queen did request a few updates of her own, including her own bath, which she only used when the train was stationary, and her favourite Scottish landscapes were mounted in her bedroom.
Prince Philip, meanwhile, had a bathroom shaving mirror mounted alongside his lavatory to allow him to shave while seated.
The King, as Prince of Wales, liked to entertain on board. As a young boy, he is said to have been fascinated by how the driver managed to pull the train to a halt exactly in line with the red carpet lining the platform.
The specific details of each of the train's journeys were kept under lock and key for the protection of the VIP passengers, who often slept on board in sidings.
But for all the benefits of overnight security, it was increasingly expensive to keep on the tracks.
Since a review of the train's future was launched on the Queen's death in 2022, the King has only occasionally climbed aboard, using it twice in 2022-2023 at a total cost of almost £60,000.
When, in June 2023, the monarch used the train for a solo two-day journey to Pickering, North Yorks, to mark the centenary of the Flying Scotsman, it cost £52,013 – one of the most expensive royal journeys of that financial year.
The King would not use the train again until he travelled to the Midlands in February this year, ahead of engagements at JCB in Rocester, Staffordshire, and at a brewery in Burton upon Trent. He is understood to have stayed on board overnight, having conducted various Duchy of Lancaster meetings in the area at the same time.
He was back on board in June for a journey to Lancaster in what may have been the train's swansong.
Prince William has favoured it even less, last climbing aboard in June 2021, when he and the Princess of Wales joined the late Queen and the then Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall to travel to Cornwall for the G7 summit.
More recently, Prince William has opted to travel to many official engagements by public train, at a significantly reduced cost.
The Queen is thought to have been even less enthusiastic about the prospect of travelling and sleeping on this historic locomotive than her stepson, giving it a wide berth.
Similarly, the Duke of Sussex never so much as stepped on board the royal train, although his wife, Meghan, did join the late Queen on a journey from London to Cheshire in 2018, when she was given the honour of joining the monarch on their first – and last – double-handed engagement.
Their day trip cost almost £30,000 – notably more expensive than travelling by air.
The decision to decommission the train more than 180 years after its historic first journey has been blamed on the cost of its storage and maintenance, and the 'significant level of investment' required to keep it running beyond the expiration of its current contract in March 2027.
The introduction of two new helicopters that are said to provide 'a reliable alternative' illustrates, more than anything, quite how times have changed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside the playboy princes' Royal love train where Charles had secret tryst
The Royal romance with the railways is over now that the historic train is to be axed, but it was once a favourite for princes with its nine claret-liveried carriages which boasted every luxury from baths to bedrooms KINGS and Queens have enjoyed a royal romance with the railway for almost two centuries, but now the end is signalled. Buckingham Palace accountants yesterday axed the exquisite, practical and historic Royal Train to save money. King Charles bid 'the fondest of farewells.' And so ends a love affair dating back almost to the birth of the passenger railway two hundred years ago. In November 1980, the Sunday Mirror's front page claimed it was a love train. The headline read 'Royal Love Train : Secret meetings in the sidings,' reporting two late-night trysts between Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer. The story told how Lady Di, aged 19, had been driven 100 miles from London before being ushered through plain-clothes police lines to meet her prince on a lonely track in the Wiltshire countryside. 'Then followed hours alone together for the couple whose friendship has captured the nation's imagination,' the report continued. A second rendezvous the following night, after Prince Charles had entertained his Duchy of Cornwall tenants in Bath as part of a West Country tour, was, allegedly, 'an open secret in the village.' Conforming with royal policy, the meetings were denied. But there is no secret about the origin of the royal romance with the railway. On 13 June 1842, Queen Victoria became the first reigning monarch to travel by train. She was 'quite charmed' with a half-hour journey on the rail-road from Windsor to London, 'free from dust and crowds and heat.' Her husband Prince Albert, was not quite so impressed with this new-fangled mode of transport, cautioning the Great Western Railway: 'Not quite so fast, next time, Mr Conductor!' But the royal family became a unique part of the railway story, reflecting the nation's highs and lows through decades of war, social unrest and crises like the Covid epidemic. It could be said that the royal train is a timetable of English history. In 1883, when the country was shaken by Irish republican terrorist dynamite outrages, a threat was made to assassinate the Queen en route from Windsor to Ballater. It might have been a hoax, but the government took no chances and 'watchers' scrutinised every inch of the 600-mile journey. Unfazed, Victoria took every opportunity to travel and be seen by her subjects, and was given the first custom-built royal train by the GWR in 1897, fitted with electric lighting and a toilet, though she demanded station stops to use the facilities. Her last journey was also made by rail, when her coffin was transported to Windsor from Paddington for burial in 1901. READ MORE: Top secret WW2 message finally revealed as codebreaker, 101, says 'we were in danger' Her successor Edward VII – the playboy prince 'Bertie' - ordered a brand-new royal saloon within a year, complete with smoking-room and a day compartment in the Colonial style. In grand Edwardian manner, he explored his kingdom at leisure, visiting the landed gentry and provincial racecourses. He was followed on the throne by the altogether more serious naval officer George V, whose reign from 1910 to 1936 took the nation through World War One, the high tide of British imperialism, the rise of socialism and fascism – and the heyday of the railway. The Midland Railway built him a new royal saloon at its Derby works. But with the onset of World War Two, a secret new design took shape. In 1941, the LMS built his successor, George VI, three armour-plated saloons with document safes, in which the reluctant but deeply-admired monarch toured bomb-damaged towns and cities across the country. Post-war austerity Britain, with the railway nationalised by Labour in 1948, was no time for regal railway extravagance, and the new Queen had to wait a quarter of a century before she was presented with her first – and the nation's last – royal train in 1977. This unique set of nine claret-liveried carriages, boasting every luxury from baths to bedrooms and a dining car seating 12, is the last word in British craftsmanship. Built at Wolverton works for her Silver Jubilee, it has lasted well, with at least one refit, for almost fifty years. In future, His Majesty will usually travel around his kingdom by helicopter or car, though few would be surprised if he joins a regular service train. He is known for enjoying a visit to the 'cab', especially if it's steam-hauled, as in 2018, behind 35028 Bulleid Pacific Clan Line, built in 1948, the year of his birth. Today's train, of seven of British Rail Mark 3 design and two built for the HST prototype, has had security significantly upgraded. But it was used only twice in the past year, at a cost of almost £78,000. Axing will save an estimated £1 million a year in upkeep and maintenance. James Chalmers, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said : 'The royal train has, of course, been a part of national life for many decades, loved and cared for by all those involved, but we must not be bound by the past.' Decommissioning begins next year, concluding in March 2027, when some particularly historic elements might go on public display. Carriages of previous royal trains, including from Queen Victoria's reign, have been on display at the National Railway Museum in York for many years, visited by well over half a million people a year. There is a powerful argument for preserving the entire train on site, as the Royal Yacht Britannia was retained for the nation in Leith harbour. Save Our Royal Train! The current set includes 'her and her lounges' - initially for the Queen and Prince Philip and now for the King and Queen Camilla, a dining car with place settings for 12, a kitchen car, bedrooms, and bathrooms with staff carriages also equipped with sleeping quarters. One 75ft carriage is for the monarch's sole use, with a 3ft wide bed topped by a tartan coverlet. The room has a bedside cabinet with a wireless permanently tuned to BBC Radio 4. Several framed landscapes by Scottish artist Roy Penny hang on the walls. The loss of the royal train will disappoint not only train-lovers but train drivers, for whom driving the Royals is a special honour. There has never been any shortage of volunteers – including, on one memorable occasion, Mick Whelan, general secretary of the train drivers' union, Aslef, called urgently to the colours, when the royal driver went sick. It has to be said that the day did not go quite as intended. Arriving at its Wolverton base from Euston, the royal train was inadvertently delayed. 'Yes, well,' Mick admitted to his union's journal. 'Some of the carriages went one way, and some another.' READ MORE: There have been other incidents, some potentially more serious. In October 2015, a member of the Royalty Protection Branch accidentally discharged his automatic pistol during an ovenight stop in South Wales. Both the Queen and Prince Philip were on board, but heard nothing and were undisturbed. Had Queen Victoria still been with us, her reaction would surely have been: 'We are not amused!' This truly has been the age of the Royal Train. Six incredible facts about the Royal Train • The Dowager Queen Adelaide, widow of King William IV, was the first royal to travel by train, from Nottingham to Leeds in July 1840 • King George VI had an armour-plated train for visits to towns and cities, targeted by the Luftwaffe in WW2 • Two special locomotives in claret livery, 67005, Queen's Messenger and 67006, Royal Sovereign, share train-haul duties • They are owned by DB Cargo – the German state railway - and operate normal goods services when not on royal duty • Royal train drivers are chosen for their experience, route knowledge, unflappability and skill – including being able to pull up the train within six inches of a designated stop • Royal author Penny Junor says the train is 'very dear to them. It's somewhere completely private, with everything they need on board.' • Paul Routledge's Mirror Book, For The Love of Trains, celebrating 200 years of travel after the first passenger train on 25 September 1825 on the Stockton and Darlington railway, is out later this year.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Manchester Airports Group handles a record 64m passengers
Manchester Airports Group, which also owns Stansted and East Midlands airports, racked up a record year handling more than 64 million passengers in total while profits were up sharply. Total group revenues in the year to the end of March came in at £1.3 billion, up 8 per cent, while earnings before interest, tax and other deductions rose 12 per cent to £570 million. Manchester airport handled 31.1 million passengers, the first time it had exceeded the 30 million mark. Stansted, London's third airport, handled 29.1 million. East Midlands, between Nottingham and Derby, which is more of a freight hub, handled 4 million passengers. In total, Manchester Airports Group or MAG handles about three quarters as many passengers as the four terminals at Heathrow, the busiest airport in Europe. Manchester airport itself is the country's third largest airport after Gatwick. 'Our airports are engines of growth for the regions they serve,' Ken O'Toole, MAG's chief executive, said. 'As the UK's largest private investor in transport infrastructure outside London, we're creating jobs, supporting local economies, enabling trade and tourism and ensuring prosperity is shared across the country.' The long-term prospects of Manchester becoming a Heathrow of the north were dealt a blow by HS2. The over-budget, high-speed railway has been scrapped north of Birmingham but was originally supposed to go on north to Manchester, with a transport nexus adjacent to the airport connecting west-east rail links between Liverpool and Leeds and the other cities of Yorkshire and the Northeast. Manchester airport is in the last of a ten-year transformation programme and the creation of a new terminal which has not always enabled the smoothest of experiences for passengers in recent times. It hopes to get passenger numbers up to 50 million a year. • The UK's worst airport for flight delays revealed Its mainstay airlines include easyJet, Ryanair and the holiday carriers Tui and Jet2. While British Airways only flies a Heathrow-Manchester shuttle service, Virgin Atlantic has set up an international hub there alongside the other intercontinental operators Emirates, Singapore, Cathay Pacific, Turkish and a clutch of Chinese airlines. MAG announced on Tuesday that IndiGo is to launch services between Manchester and Mumbai, its first flights to anywhere in Europe or the UK. IndiGo is the main competitor carrier to Air India, which is reeling from the Ahmedabad air disaster in which 260 people lost their lives. Manchester airport hopes to get passenger numbers up to 50 million a year MARTIN RICKETT/PA WIRE Stansted, which was acquired during the forced break-up of the old BAA by the competition authorities, is the UK home of Ryanair which accounts for more than two thirds of passengers going through the Essex airport, and about one eighth of the Irish budget airline's pan-European operations. Stansted is about to go through a £1.1 billion five-year investment to stretch its capacity to 43 million a year — about the same number that Gatwick currently handles. It is asking the permission of the local council to sign off on plans to extend further to a capacity of 51 million passengers.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Mumbai to Manchester: budget airline touches down with new direct route
IndiGo, an Indian airline, launched a new direct flight route connecting Mumbai, India, and Manchester, UK. The inaugural flight landed at Manchester Airport on 1 July, establishing the first nonstop service between the two cities. The long-haul flights will operate three times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, aboard a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. This new route aims to enhance connectivity between India and the UK, fostering stronger economic, educational, and cultural ties. Return economy fares for the route start from £426, with business class tickets beginning at £870, and complimentary hot meals are provided.