
Singapore warns of elevated terror threat amid rising extremist ideologies
According to ISD's Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report 2025, 'a volatile global landscape arising from developments such as the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and continued traction of radical narratives' has intensified the proliferation of extremist ideologies, the Channel News Asia (CNA) reported on Tuesday.
Singapore, Jul 29 (PTI) Singapore's Internal Security Department (ISD) has warned that the country's terror threat remains high, citing a growing diversity of extremist ideologies and the misuse of evolving technologies such as artificial intelligence to propagate radical narratives.
Social media and messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, Telegram, X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and Instagram, as well as gaming platforms like Discord and Roblox, and video-sharing platforms like YouTube and Bitchute, have been used to disseminate extremist materials, it said.
From July 2024 to June 2025, eight self-radicalised Singaporeans — six males and two females aged between 15 and 56 — were dealt with under the Internal Security Act (ISA).
Four of them were influenced by the re-escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in October 2023, two by pro-ISIS ideologies, and the remaining two by far-right extremist beliefs, the report said, adding that all of them encountered extremist content online.
The agency also noted the uptick in the number of local self-radicalised youths, with half of the eight latest cases involving youths aged 20 or below.
Singapore's trend mirrors a broader global trend, with several western countries reporting last year that one in five terror suspects are under 18, while European countries reported that nearly two-thirds of ISIS-related arrests involved teenagers, the report said.
A total of 60 self-radicalised individuals — 48 Singaporeans and 12 foreigners — were dealt with under ISA since 2015, it said.
The agency found that online platforms featured in terrorism-related activities in four broad areas: to enable the radicalisation or to accelerate it, to facilitate recruitment for terrorist-related activities; and to mobilise and prepare for armed violence.
'The emergence of technological innovations, such as AI, also risks complicating the terrorist threat globally and locally,' the ISD said.
'Even though there is no indication that evolving technologies, such as AI and 3D printing, have been used in any terrorist attack plot in Singapore, we are seeing an emerging trend of evolving technologies featuring in local youth self-radicalisation cases,' it said.
The report cited two examples to buttress its point.
A 17-year-old ISIS supporter, detained in September last year, used an AI chatbot to generate a bai'ah – an oath of allegiance – to ISIS, while another 17-year-old far-right extremist, detained in March, used an AI chatbot to find instructions for producing ammunition and considered 3D printing firearms to carry out attacks.
'There is a need for increased cooperation between the public and private sectors, especially with technology and social media companies, to create a safer online environment,' the ISD said.
It noted that technology firms have stepped up their efforts, such as regulating and removing egregious content on social media platforms.
'However, technology companies could continue to explore further efforts in this area, including collaboration with religious and community organisations, to guide users in navigating the digital space and positively influence the online discourse,' it said. PTI GS SCY SCY
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Decries "Horrible" Hamas Hostage Video, Declines Comment of Israel's Gaza Takeover Plan
US President Donald Trump declined to say whether he supported or opposed a potential military takeover of Gaza by Israel. 'I really can't say, that's going to be pretty much up to Israel', Trump told reporter when asked if he backed Israel reoccupying all of Gaza. Trump's remarks came just hours after Israeli PM held a security consultation during which he favored a complete military takeover of Gaza. Benjamin Netanyahu is likely to convene his security cabinet on August 7 to seek approval for his plan to 'fully occupy' Trump also said he has watched Hamas' 'horrible' video of emaciated Israeli hostage Evyatar David and hoped that 'lot of people do get to see it.' n18oc_world n18oc_crux0:00 INTRODUCTION3:02 'TRUMP DOESN'T LIKE GAZA STARVATION PROBLEM'5:38 AMERICAN-ORIGIN IDF TROOPER 'TARGETED' IN ST. LOUIS6:50 UN CALLS ISRAEL'S GAZA OCCUPATION PLAN 'DEEPLY ALARMING'7:44 'HAMAS WON'T GOVERN POST-WAR GAZA'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MALE drone better than Predator, Brahmos, radar: Indian armed forces to get Rs 67,000 crore booster. Here's what's coming
Weapons cleared for procurement 87 armed medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) remotely-piloted aircraft Equipped with air-to-ground missiles and laser-guided bombs To be produced in India with 60% indigenous content via a foreign partnership Estimated cost: ₹20,000 crore, plus ₹11,000 crore for 10-year logistical and OEM support Over 110 air-launched BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles Range: 450 km, speed: Mach 2.8 Estimated cost: ₹10,800 crore Operated in combination with Sukhoi-30MKI fighter jets Eight BrahMos fire control systems and vertical launchers for older Indian warships Estimated cost: ₹650 crore Intended for warships not yet fitted with the BrahMos system Around 20 frontline warships, including the latest destroyers and frigates, are already armed with the BrahMos missiles New thermal imager-based driver night-sights for BMP infantry combat vehicles To enhance night driving and mobility of mechanised infantry Compact autonomous surface crafts for the Navy For detection, classification and neutralisation of underwater threats during anti-submarine warfare missions Upgrade of older Israeli Barak-1 point defence missile systems on warships Specialised mountain radars for the Indian Air Force To improve air surveillance along northern borders with China Upgrade of the Saksham (Israeli-origin Spyder) anti-aircraft missile system Current range: 15 km Aimed at enhancing air defence capabilities Sustenance support for US-origin C-17 and C-130J aircraft fleets Comprehensive annual maintenance contract for Russian S-400 long-range air defence missile systems Focus on faster indigenous production Live Events BrahMos continues to be a key weapon (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The defence ministry on Tuesday approved modernisation proposals worth ₹67,000 crore, including the procurement of 87 armed heavy-duty drones and over 110 air-launched BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles. The weapons cleared under the 'acceptance of necessity' (AoN) by the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh , are aimed at strengthening strike and surveillance capabilities across all three armed Indian Air Force had used BrahMos missiles and Israeli-origin kamikaze drones during recent hostilities with Pakistan in May under Operation Sindoor . The 87 new drones, capable of returning to base after strike missions, are intended to speed up induction compared to the 31 MQ-9B Predator drones from the US, which will only be delivered in 2029– to defence ministry officials and reports from the Times of India:The MALE drones, which come with intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and strike capabilities, are expected to be inducted faster than the MQ-9B Predator HALE (high-altitude, long-endurance) drones ordered from the US for ₹32,350 crore in October last year, which will be delivered only in the 2029–30 timeframe. Officials said the need for such systems was evident during Operation India had previously used Israeli-origin Harop and Harpy drones as kamikaze systems during cross-border operations, the new drones will offer reusable strike capability and long-range BrahMos missile , jointly developed by India and Russia, has become the primary conventional precision-strike weapon for the armed forces. The missile has been deployed on warships, aircraft and mobile launchers, with cumulative contracts exceeding ₹58,000 crore to March 2023, the ministry signed a ₹19,519 crore deal for over 220 BrahMos missiles for frontline warships. About 20 frontline Indian warships, including the latest destroyers and frigates, are already equipped with the system.(With inputs from TOI)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
How Pakistan is trying hard to be a go-between for the US and Iran
Iranian President Pezeshkian's recent visit to Pakistan was driven not by the Indo-Pakistani context, but by the evolving situation stemming from the Iran-Israel military conflict and the recent US strikes read more On July 25, US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce stated, 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio met today with Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. Secretary Rubio expressed appreciation for Pakistan's continued willingness to play a constructive role in mediating conversations with Iran and its commitment to preserving regional stability. The two also discussed prospects for deepening bilateral counterterrorism cooperation, including countering Isis-Khorasan, and the upcoming US-Pakistan Counterterrorism Dialogue in Islamabad this August. The Secretary underscored the importance of expanding mutually beneficial bilateral trade and exploring prospects for enhancing collaboration in the critical minerals and mining sectors.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rubio's 'appreciation of Pakistan's continued willingness to play a constructive role in mediating conversations with Iran…' is most significant. It is an authoritative expression of US interest in using Pakistan in maintaining contacts or even as a conduit for discrete conversations with Iran. The Rubio-Dar meeting occurred a little over a month after the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Ispahan and Natanz on June 22. Earlier, while Israel's attacks on Iran and Iran's counter missile attacks on Israel were taking place, President Donald Trump had hosted Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for an unprecedented two-hour-long luncheon meeting at the White House on June 18. It will be recalled that Israel's attack on Iran began on June 13 and continued till June 24, when both countries agreed to a ceasefire. The authoritative Pakistani newspaper Dawn recently reported in its edition of August 2, 'Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir had offered to play the role during his meeting with President Trump at the White House, days before US jets bombed Iranian nuclear sites.' Clearly, at that stage, the US did not take up the Pakistani offer because it was committed to damaging Iranian intentions to enrich uranium to nuclear weapon levels. The attack done, it now appears that the US wishes to use Pakistan to enable some kind of dialogue with Iran to occur; hence, the enthusiastic American State Department statement on the Rubio-Dar meeting. The Iranians have till now not agreed to direct talks with the US. Hence, the need for an intermediary. This is not the first time Pakistan has acted as a go-between to facilitate contacts between the US and another country. In July 1971, when the Pakistani army was engaged in genocide in what was then East Pakistan, its generals enabled then US National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger to travel secretly to China from Pakistan. Earlier they had become a conduit for the US and China to exchange messages. Pakistan's help to President Richard Nixon to open up China contributed to its anti-Indian stance all through 1971 and beyond. All this is a part of global diplomatic folklore. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With so much happening in the world, especially because of the tariffs being threatened to be imposed or in the process of being imposed by Trump on a host of countries, including India, Delhi's strategic class has perhaps not devoted sufficient attention to the implications of what is transpiring between the US and Pakistan, inter alia, because of the Iranian factor. Pakistani contacts with Iran have intensified at the highest levels. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif visited Iran on May 26-27. He was accompanied by army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir. In Tehran he met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to put forward Pakistan's stand after India's Operation Sindoor. It is noteworthy that Iran, after the Pahalgam terrorist attack, approached both India and Pakistan to cool the situation. This was not unusual because Iran has always sought to project that its historical relationship with the Indian subcontinent endows it with special credibility in Delhi and Islamabad to intercede when tensions between the two countries reach very high levels. It attempted to do so this time too. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi visited Pakistan on May 5 and publicly urged both India and Pakistan to exercise restraint. Clearly, India did not agree that he should travel directly from Islamabad to Delhi. This is because Iran has never inspired, whatever it may have thought or thinks now, much confidence in Delhi. So, he went back to Tehran and travelled to India from there. He held talks with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on May 8. The two countries also convened the 20th India-Iran Joint Commission Meeting (JCM) on the same date. India was obviously repudiating any attempt by Iran to intercede in its relations with Pakistan. Besides, Operation Sindoor was ongoing on that date. Iranian President Pezeshkian visited Pakistan on August 2 and 3. This visit came barely two months after Shehbaz Sharif's trip to Tehran. It is unusual for a leader to visit a country so soon after he has met the leader of the other country. Clearly,this visit was driven not by the Indo-Pakistani context, but by the evolving situation stemming from the Iran-Israel military conflict and the recent US strikes. Pakistan had strongly condemned the Israeli attack on Iran. It had also called the US action a violation of international law. Sharif had telephonically called Pezeshkian to condemn the US attack. It is ironic that Pakistan had nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize just a day before the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said a day prior to Pezeshkian's visit, 'Iran is our close friend and a brotherly neighbouring country. We remain committed to making a positive contribution to bringing the tensions down and promoting diplomatic solutions to problems. We are open to playing that role, and we will continue to play that role.' Hence, while Iran and Pakistan wanted to use the visit to promote their bilateral ties, Khan's comment reveals one of the prominent reasons for the visit. Pezeshkian and Shehbaz Sharif made the usual noises about their countries ties: that they were bound by culture, history and faith. To emphasise its cultural aspects, the Iranian president began his trip to Pakistan by visiting Lahore and went to the grave of the poet Allama Iqbal, who is one of the founders of Pakistan's ideology. Iqbal's main body of work was in Urdu, but it was customary for many Urdu poets to show that they could write excellent poetry in Persian too. Indeed, as Persian was the official language of a large part of India till it was replaced by English in 1835 by the East India Company, those who composed verse in Urdu were accorded a higher status if they could do so in Persian as well. Now all this is in the past, for Indo-Persianate culture has not only almost completely disappeared from India but also from Pakistan. However, the Iranians want to keep alive the illusion that their cultural influence continues in the subcontinent. This is a vain exercise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Twelve Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) were signed during Pezeshkian's visit to give an impetus to Pakistan-Iran ties. They include the energy sector. It is unlikely, though, that a breakthrough will be made in the early bilateral ties because both countries have differences on issues ranging from terrorism to faith—Pakistan is majority Sunni, while Iran is that bastion of Shia mazhab. As the Tehran Times noted in its edition of August 4 on the two countries' attempts to improve ties: 'Nonetheless, major obstacles remain. The Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline is still more a matter of paperwork than reality. Past efforts to boost trade have collapsed under the weight of bureaucracy and third-party pressure. Border tensions and cross-border militancy in Balochistan persist. However, the two sides have now agreed to enhance intelligence sharing and joint counter-terror efforts. Whether this renewed commitment can withstand pressure will be tested in time.' India's foreign policy makers will have to keep a watch in the coming months on what is transpiring between Tehran and Islamabad bilaterally. However, their main attention should be on how the US is attempting to use Pakistan to get through to the Mullahs in Tehran and Qom and what price Trump is willing to pay Pakistan for acting as a go-between. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The writer is a former Indian diplomat who served as India's Ambassador to Afghanistan and Myanmar, and as secretary, the Ministry of External Affairs. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.