No qualified surgeons on panel to advise Scottish Government
The women's health minister has since told The Herald NHS chief executives nominated "local representatives from relevant services" to become members of the group.
The group was established this year to agree on the best way to implement a service for patients seeking an abortion between 20-24 weeks in Scotland and its first meeting took place yesterday.
In an email chain between abortion providers north and south of the border this month seen by The Herald, one 24-week provider from Scotland stated: 'Unfortunately neither xx [a 24 week provider] and I have been invited.'
They told a senior consultant in touch with the group: 'I hope you can convince them that having at least one of us there might be helpful for informing decisions.'
The group was set up following concerns from campaigners and reports in this paper that later stage abortions in Scotland are almost non-existent and are only carried out under exceptional circumstances.
READ MORE:
Minister criticised for backtracking on abortion care comments
'Only one Scottish doctor is trained in surgical care to legal limit'
First Scotland buffer zone arrest as anti-abortion protests return
Ed Dorman has been an abortion provider throughout his 40 plus career in the NHS in England and has helped train the two Scottish surgeons excluded from the group.
He is urging the group to reconsider as he pointed out these two Scottish surgeons would be the people best-placed to set up a later stage abortion facility in Scotland.
The surgeon told The Herald: 'It would make an awful lot of sense for one or both of these highly skilled and highly dedicated clinicians to be involved in these discussions because they are the people who are best-placed to be involved in setting up a service for Scotland.
'It's mystifying to me as to why they have not been brought into this group.
"I hope they will think again and get the expertise on board.'
Latest figures reveal a woman is forced to travel from Scotland to England every four days to receive later abortion care.
Health boards in Scotland do not provide the care up to legal limit unless in specific cases such as foetal abnormality or a threat to the woman's life.
The cut-off for most cases currently stands at 20 weeks.
The lack of two surgeons, both qualified in providing surgical care, may also lead to the group pushing up the limit of medical abortion provisions in Scottish hospitals, Dr Dorman worries.
In 2014, the proportion of all abortions in Scotland that were surgical was 22%, however, this has now dropped to 1.9% in 2024.
Dr Dorman said this is likely due to pioneering tele-medical abortions (pills at home) during the Covid lockdown.
However, he said there is a concern that because there is no later stage abortion provider sitting on this group, the government and health boards could decide to only provide medical (i.e pill-induced) later abortion.
He said this would limit the choice for women seeking the care who may prefer surgical care.
Dr Dorman told The Herald: 'It limits the choice for women to something that is really quite traumatic and unpalatable for many of them.
'Having a later medical abortion up to 24 weeks is really quite traumatic. That's why, given the choice, the majority of people who sadly end up needing to have an abortion that late, tend to choose a surgical abortion.'
Dr Dornan added that there are circumstances where surgical abortion is "definitely safer" than medical ones at a later gestation, namely for people have had previous uterine surgery or, most commonly, Caesarean sections.
The Scottish Government's 2021 Women's Health Plan had an aim that 'all women will have a choice about how and where they access abortion care'.
During their conference in 2022, the SNP committed to ensuring abortion services are available up to the legal limit of 24 weeks for all patients.
However, this is still not the case.
Earlier this month, the women's health minister Jenni Minto told The Herald she had written to the chair of the group urging them to report back within six months and provide 'an expert view' on establishing a later stage abortion service in Scotland.
Since then, the Scottish Government has committed to pay for training for any clinician who wishes to provide later stage abortions.
Scottish Government has previously said they are working with the Scottish Abortion Care Providers network, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to improve access for clinicians to surgical abortion training at all gestations.
Ministers have said they will "present" information gathered from Health Boards to Chief Executives to help inform discussions about where surgical abortion provision could be increased.
Public Health Minister Jenni Minto said: 'I want NHS Boards in Scotland to deliver later stage abortions, to all women that need them, as soon as is viable.
"The Scottish Government is providing individual clinicians who wish to receive training to deliver later stage abortions with funding to do so. That is why there are ongoing conversations with clinicians interested in training, and more staff are undergoing training - in addition to previously trained staff.
'A Task and Finish Group has been established to ensure equitable access to abortion services up to the legal gestational limit within Scotland, as soon as possible. NHS Board Chief Executives have nominated local representatives from relevant services, who will engage with a range of service providers and staff within their regions.
'I have asked the Group to report back within six months and provide an expert view on establishing the later stage abortion service in Scotland. The Scottish Government will work closely with Health Boards to implement the service as soon as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Brits have their say on whether 10-year health reforms will improve NHS
A new Ipsos survey indicates that nearly half of the British public is sceptical about the government 's 10-year health plan improving GP appointments or A&E waiting times. The poll found that 35 per cent of respondents believe the plan will have no impact on GP access, with 14 per cent anticipating it will make appointments more difficult. Despite this widespread scepticism, key proposals within the plan, including the establishment of neighbourhood health centres and the expansion of the NHS app, garnered significant public support. Over three-quarters of those surveyed backed the creation of neighbourhood health centres and a ban on the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks. The Department of Health and Social Care affirmed the plan's popularity, stating it resulted from extensive consultation and aims to deliver improved care for all patients.
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Thousands of people with debilitating hayfever to benefit from new drug
Betula verrucosa, sold under the brand name Itulazax 12 SQ-Bet and made by Alk-Abello, is an under-the-tongue immunotherapy tablet that contains birch pollen extract. The drug trains the immune system to tolerate tree pollen over three years of daily use. It has been recommended as an option on the NHS for people whose hayfever symptoms persist even after taking antihistamines or using nasal sprays, by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice). Severe tree pollen allergies can cause debilitating symptoms for some people during the spring and summer months, including fatigue, breathing difficulties, inflamed sinuses, itchy, watery eyes, and vision changes. Trials show the tablet can significantly reduce the symptoms of severe hayfever by changing how the body responds to allergens. The immunotherapy works by gradually increasing the body's tolerance to tree pollen through controlled daily exposure to small amounts of pollen. Before being given the tablets, patients will require skin prick or blood tests to confirm an allergy to birch tree pollen. Nice estimates that about 27,000 people in England are expected to benefit from the recommendation. Helen Knight, director of medicines evaluation at Nice, said: 'This treatment will help improve people's quality of life. 'Severe tree pollen allergies trap people indoors during beautiful weather and disrupt their work, education and family life. 'The daily tablet offers genuine long-term relief rather than just managing symptoms.' According to Allergy UK, birch pollen allergy is estimated to affect about 25% of hayfever sufferers. Amena Warner, head of clinical services at Allergy UK, said: 'Many people don't realise how awful it is having an itchy, runny nose, sneezing episodes or itchy, irritated eyes in the pollen season. 'We frequently hear from people who avoid time outdoors, keep doors and windows shut, check pollen counts and try and minimise any exposure, which takes a significant toll on their physical and emotional wellbeing. 'Nice's recommendation is so important because it provides a genuine opportunity for people to manage the root cause of their pollen allergy, offering the chance to break free from this burden and enjoy a better quality of life.' Emil Stage Olsen, general manager UK and Republic of Ireland at ALK, added: 'We welcome this positive Nice recommendation, which is another meaningful advancement for the UK allergy community. 'Our focus is now on working closely with the NHS to ensure eligible patients can benefit from this first-in-class immunotherapy.' The NHS in England will provide the treatment within three months of Nice publishing its final guidance.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Difficult' state of NHS maternity care due to Tory inaction, inquiry head says
One of the UK's most senior midwives has said inaction by the previous government over maternity care failures has led to the 'difficult' situation in wards across England and a rise in reports of birth trauma. Donna Ockenden, who is leading the biggest inquiry in NHS history into maternity failures in Nottingham, said the Conservatives had been given a 'blueprint' for how to improve maternity services but that it had not been implemented. 'I think the current government has inherited a really, really difficult picture around perinatal care, birth care and increasing reports of birth trauma. If only the previous government had done what it said it would do, that inheritance would have been very different,' she said. Ockenden is leading a review into maternity services at the Nottingham university hospitals NHS trust, the largest inquiry into a single service in the history of the NHS, with 2,406 affected families taking part. The findings will be published in June 2026. She expressed frustration over the slow pace of change after her report on the Shrewsbury and Telford maternity scandal, which found that 300 babies died or were left brain-damaged as a result of inadequate care. 'We published [that report] in March 2022 and there were 22 immediately essential actions, as well as hundreds of actions for the NHS trust,' she said. 'But with the chaos that followed in the year before the general election, things got lost and we are not as far ahead with those immediately essential actions as we should be.' Guardian analysis has found that the NHS is facing a £27bn bill for maternity failings in England since 2019, significantly more than the health service's approximately £18bn budget for newborns in that time. Ockenden said the figures left her 'deeply concerned', and she stressed that the cost of avoidable maternity harm was felt across 'mental health, other health services, the economy, the wider community, relationships, whole families and careers'. 'This is not the way it should be. I would absolutely not say that families do not deserve compensation when they have a poor outcome, but rather that if the money was invested upfront into making the service safer, then we could make significant strides towards reducing this very significant harm,' she said. She said maternity wards were also dealing with problems caused by high levels of poverty across the country. 'There are a number of families, mothers and children living in destitution – which sounds very Victorian, but I do see examples of that. I hear about it from across the country and I see examples of real deprivation in Nottinghamshire,' she said. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'Maternity services are not an island. What comes in the front door of a maternity unit is that which is out there on our streets, whether that's women living in refugee status, in homeless hostels, women who come to antenatal clinics hungry because it's a choice between giving their children something for breakfast or [the women] eating.' Last month, the health secretary, Wes Streeting, criticised what he described as 'the normalisation of deaths of women and babies' and said: 'We have women who are classed as having a normal birth still leaving traumatised and scarred.' He announced a national investigation into NHS maternity services in England, along with a national maternity and neonatal taskforce comprising a panel of experts and bereaved families. Ockenden said the news was 'encouraging' and that 'hearing, amplifying and acting upon family voices must be the golden thread that runs through it all'. 'It is my hope that the changes outlined in these plans improve perinatal services today and in the future, and drastically reduce the risk of harm. Women and families deserve safe maternity care, always,' she said.
