logo
Indigenous Indian village dismantled in the name of tiger protection

Indigenous Indian village dismantled in the name of tiger protection

France 2418-07-2025
'How is it that people believe that we are the ones destroying wildlife … when we have taken care of the forest for ages and believe wildlife is part of us?' says our Observer Shivu, who is a youth leader within the Jenu Kuruba, an Indigenous people in India. He says this is the paradox at the heart of the conflict between his village and those who run the tiger reserve in Nagarhole National Park in Karnataka state, southwest India.
Images sent to our team show men wearing the uniform of Karnataka police and Indian park rangers taking down a wooden shelter as several villagers protest. The incident took place the night of June 18, 2025, according to our Observer, who says that six large shelters – home to women and children – were destroyed.
The villagers are accused of illegally settling in the national park. But for Shivu, the reverse is true: he believes the Jenu Kuruba should never have been forcibly displaced in the 1980s, when his ancestors' village was moved to develop the Bengal tiger sanctuary in Nagarhole. Back then, there was nothing to protect the rights of his people, who, like many of India's tribal or Indigenous communities (also known as "Adivasis"), were forced to leave their land.
The Adivasis represent 8.6 percent of the Indian population overall, but make up 40 percent of forced displacements. Since 1947, more than 20 million Adivasis have been displaced to make way for development projects, including mining operations and the construction of roads and irrigation systems, along with the creation of national parks.
India's Forest Rights Act was introduced in 2006. The aim was to help right the wrongs of the past by protecting the rights of Indigenous or tribal minorities, including the need to obtain their permission in order to build on their land. The next year, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples strengthened these rights globally.
But though this legal framework exists, its respect and application remain precarious. Still, when Shivu and nearly 50 Jenu Kuruba families decided to return to and resettle in their ancestral village, Karadikallu Atturu Koli, last May, they based their actions on these laws. They began by seeking to bring proceedings against the Department of Forests, and when they didn't get a response, they decided to notify the government of their plans to settle there and move ahead with the action.
'We will live on this land or we will die on this land'
However, since their return, the situation has become tense between the village and the park authorities, who want to push them back out.
In a letter to the Forest Department, 70 local organisations standing in solidarity with the Jenu Kuruba denounce the presence of "over 120 paramilitary troops of the Forest Department, the State police, and the Special Tiger Protection Force (STPF) [that] have been deployed to intimidate members of the Jenu Kuruba tribe, with threats to forcibly evict them.'
On June 18, 2025, after the Jenu Kuruba did not comply with the Forest Department's demand that they leave, the security forces attacked their homes. Shivu told us more:
'There were children, there were women, there were elderly people who were sleeping.
We told [the security forces] that it's monsoon time and it's going to rain, and a lot of us might fall sick. It's against human rights if you take out these shelters, but they just did not listen, and they took away all the things that they destroyed.
There is a situation of fear for families and children. They might come again and forcefully evict us, but we have also decided that come what may, we will live on this land or we will die on this land.'
Shivu had not yet been born when his family was forced to leave their home in the name of the conservation of the Bengal tiger, a threatened species. For several generations, the families from his village worked in neighbouring coffee fields, returning every once in a while to their former home for religious ceremonies, such as holidays and funerals.
The park authorities say that the village of Karadikallu Atturu Koli never existed, but Shivu said that he has discovered some vestiges. He also says that his people have been taking care of wild animals for generations:
'If we had not thought that animals, forest, and wildlife are equals, would they have seen tigers at all today? We don't see wild animals and the forest as part of our self-pleasure. It is not for extracting profit. It's because we think they are part of us.
All of this was done without the consent of our people. So how can this be called a tiger reserve? This is our home, our ancestral land.'
'It is about money and tourism, more than it is about the protection of the forest and the wildlife'
The Jenu Kuruba constantly come up against the same argument from the forest authorities, who say that human presence hurts flora and fauna. And yet, many tourists come to the Nagarhole reserve.
Sophie Grig is the Asia Campaigns Director with the NGO Survival International, which fights for the rights of tribal people. She says the situation in Nagarhole is a form of "green colonialism', a term theorised to define a particular approach to conservation during the colonial era in Africa:
'This is in the colonial model of fortress conservation. It's a model that basically says, 'We need to protect these areas for animals and wildlife,' which means, 'We have to kick out the Indigenous people who live there.'
The mentality of the conservation business is, 'We are the experts from outside and we know best, and these people are backward and primitive, and they cannot be trusted with the forest; they will cut it down.' That's always been the argument. But at the same time, they welcome tourists. A lot of it is about money and tourism, more than it is about the protection of the forest and the wildlife.
Because [tourists] have been programmed to expect these places to be empty of people, they complain if they see a cow or a goat or a village because it's not what they're expecting. We see the same in Africa.'
In India, more than 600,000 people who lived in the forests have been displaced so that reserves or national parks can be set up. These expulsions, which began with the adoption of the national policy of conserving the tiger back in 1973, continue all these years later. A 2024 report counts more than 550,000 people who were evicted from the country's 55 reserves by the authorities working on tiger conservation in 2021 alone.
The Nagarhole tiger reserve and the Indian Forest Department did not respond to our request for interview. However, on its website, the reserve mentions the rehabilitation of 45 tribal sites.
According to Survival International, the government committee that's charged with deciding whether or not the forest rights will be recognised rejected the request to resettle Shivu's village on May 22. The Jenu Kuruba have 60 days to appeal the decision.
'It's a violation of the forest rights that they tried to kick them out and dismantle their houses while this appeal process is still ongoing,' Grig said. 'Every step of the way, the Jenu Kuruba's rights have been violated.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State of play in Trump's tariffs, threats and delays
State of play in Trump's tariffs, threats and delays

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

State of play in Trump's tariffs, threats and delays

Here is a summary of duties President Donald Trump has introduced in his second term as he pressures allies and competitors alike to reshape US trade relationships. Global tariffs US "reciprocal" tariffs -- imposed under legally contentious emergency powers -- are due to jump from 10 percent to various steeper levels for a list of dozens of economies come August 1, including South Korea, India and Taiwan. The hikes were to take effect July 9 but Trump postponed them days before imposition, marking a second delay since their shock unveiling in April. A 10 percent "baseline" levy on most partners, which Trump imposed in April, remains in place. He has also issued letters dictating tariff rates above 10 percent for individual countries, including Brazil, which has a trade deficit with the United States and was not on the initial list of higher "reciprocal" rates. Several economies -- the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines -- have struck initial tariff deals with Washington, while China managed to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties. Certain products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber are excluded from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs, but may face separate action under different authorities. This has been the case for steel, aluminum, and soon copper. Gold and silver, alongside energy commodities, are also exempted. Excluded too are Mexico and Canada, hit with a different set of tariffs, and countries like Russia and North Korea as they already face sanctions. Canada, Mexico Canadian and Mexican products were hit by 25 percent US tariffs shortly after Trump returned to office, with a lower rate for Canadian energy. Trump targeted both neighbors over illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, also invoking emergency powers. But trade negotiations have been bumpy. This month, Trump said Canadian goods will face a higher 35 percent duty from August 1, and Mexican goods will see a 30 percent level. Products entering the United States under the USMCA North American free trade pact, covering large swaths of goods, are expected to remain exempt -- with Canadian energy resources and potash, used as fertilizer, to still face lower rates. China focus Trump has also taken special aim at China. The world's two biggest economies engaged in an escalating tariffs war this year before their temporary pullback. The countries imposed triple-digit duties on each other at one point, a level described as a trade embargo. After high level talks, Washington lowered its levies on Chinese goods to 30 percent and Beijing slashed its own to 10 percent. This pause is set to expire August 12, and officials will meet for further talks on Monday and Tuesday in the Swedish capital Stockholm. The US level is higher as it includes a 20 percent tariff over China's alleged role in the global fentanyl trade. Beyond expansive tariffs on Chinese products, Trump ordered the closure of a duty-free exemption for low-value parcels from the country. This adds to the cost of importing items like clothing and small electronics. Autos, metals Trump has targeted individual business sectors too, under more conventional national security grounds, imposing a 25 percent levy on steel and aluminum imports which he later doubled to 50 percent. The president has unveiled plans for a 50 percent tariff on copper imports starting August 1 as well and rolled out a 25 percent tariff on imported autos, although those entering under the USMCA can qualify for a lower rate. Trump's auto tariffs impact vehicle parts too, but new rules ensure automakers paying vehicle tariffs will not also be charged for certain other duties. He has ongoing investigations into imports of lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals that could trigger further duties. Legal challenges Several legal challenges have been filed against the tariffs Trump invoked citing emergencies. The US Court of International Trade ruled in May that the president had overstepped his authority, but a federal appeals court has allowed the duties to remain while it considers the case. If these tariffs are ultimately ruled illegal, companies could possibly seek reimbursements. © 2025 AFP

India's new voter registration rules spark protests, ‘mission of exclusion' warnings
India's new voter registration rules spark protests, ‘mission of exclusion' warnings

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

India's new voter registration rules spark protests, ‘mission of exclusion' warnings

Protests have erupted in the eastern Indian state of Bihar against a new law, which requires all voters enrolled after 2003 verify their citizenship by providing a list of documents prescribed by the Election Commission of India. The new rule, called Special Intensive Revision (SIR), was rolled out just four months before state elections. It attempts to take on the mammoth task of verifying voter identity in one of India 's most populous states. Bihar is the poorest state in India, where only 70% of births are registered and just 2% of the population hold passports. Millions lack the basic documents required to prove their citizenship and vote. Furthermore, critics say that scrutinising citizenship while excluding certain documents for verification - including India's national identity 'Aadhar' card - could be considered unconstitutional. The Election Commission of India defends the move as a constitutional clean-up — with similar voter list revisions expected across the country. But election expert and founder of the opposition Swaraj India Party, Yogendra Yadav, says the Election Commission is on a 'mission of exclusion.' "That is a very big anxiety, especially among minority groups, especially among Muslims who suspect, with good reasons, that the exercise would not be carried out in a non-discriminatory manner," he says. The final electoral roll will be released on September 30.

Indian PM Modi and UK PM Starmer ink trade deal
Indian PM Modi and UK PM Starmer ink trade deal

Fashion Network

time3 days ago

  • Fashion Network

Indian PM Modi and UK PM Starmer ink trade deal

Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Britain's "unique bonds" with India as he and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi formally signed a recently announced UK-India trade deal during talks on Thursday. Starmer hailed the agreement as a "landmark moment" for both countries as he hosted India's leader at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London. "This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India," added the British premier, whose year-old government is struggling to fire up an economy weakened by years of stagnant growth and high inflation. "We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term," he said. Starmer and Modi announced in May they had struck a free trade agreement that the British government says will eventually add 4.8 billion pounds (6.5 billion dollars) a year to the UK economy. The UK and India hope the accord will boost trade between the two countries by 25.5 billion pounds, as well as bolstering the British economy and wages. Modi, standing alongside Starmer during a media appearance, described the deal as a "blueprint for our shared prosperity". Britain and India are the sixth and fifth largest global economies respectively, with a trade relationship worth around 41 billion pounds and investment supporting more than 600,000 jobs across both countries. The accord slashes tariffs on imports of UK goods into India, including cosmetics, whisky, and medical devices. In return, the United Kingdom will cut tariffs on clothes, footwear, and food products. Starmer and Modi have met twice recently, at the G7 summit in Canada last month and at the G20 meeting in Brazil last year. Modi was also due to see King Charles III during his brief stay in Britain, his fourth visit since becoming India's leader in 2014.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store