Judge dismisses 25 million dollar NFT lawsuit against Dolce & Gabbana's US arm
The case was originally filed in May 2024 by Luke Brown and later amended in September. The plaintiff had claimed that both Dolce & Gabbana USA and its Italian parent company Dolce & Gabbana SRL operated as 'effectively the same company'.
The brand's Dubai-based partner UNXD and Italian firm Bluebear Italia, the creator of the NFT collection, were also named as defendants.
In the latest court documents, the 25 million dollar lawsuit was found to be insufficient on the grounds that Dolce & Gabbana USA was the only US-based defendant cited, and was therefore not liable for the allegations against its parent firm.
In the suit, Brown claimed that Dolce & Gabbana did not follow through on certain perks that were promised upon the purchase of an NFT from its 'DGFamily' collection.
Among the benefits initially offered were that of physical clothing, access to events and digital outfits, all of which were supposed to be delivered each quarter. According to Brown, however, the brand had 'failed to provide the complete set of benefits' promised.
Brown also accused Dolce & Gabbana of delaying the delivery of the NFTs by a week, causing their value to decrease by 5,800 dollars. The suit says the delays occurred when the brand failed to secure approval for certain assets from UNXD.
Dolce & Gabbana USA filed to dismiss the suit in January 2025, stating that as it was a separate subsidiary to its Italian parent, which had allegedly established the NFT project, it could not be held accountable.
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald had determined that the suit lacked specific facts to prove the US entity was directly involved in the project, meaning that it was 'plainly insufficient to withstand D&G USA's motion to dismiss'.
Buchwald added: 'The court finds that plaintiff has not adequately alleged that D&G SRL completely dominated D&G USA even if D&G SRL allegedly shared some employees and office space with D&G USA.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is clearly fed up with Putin - but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump's announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant. His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge. Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion. He has blamed Ukraine and Joe Biden for the incursion but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Kyiv has a legitimate right to defend itself. Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv. But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist "America-First" base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar "deal" in which America gains financially. American weapons are to be "sold" to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv. "We've made a deal today," the president said in the Oval Office. "We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful... these are wealthy nations." 2:27 This appears to be a clever framing of the "deal". Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains. While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance. The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling. However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying. NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News. It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions. 1:49 A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe. Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons. The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% "secondary tariffs". It's thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil. This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia. But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly. 2:00 Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: "How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?" "Don't ask me questions like that..." Mr Trump doesn't really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride. Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting. If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win. But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
Cuban economy continues five-year decline, economy minister says
HAVANA, July 14 (Reuters) - Cash-strapped Cuba's grueling crisis shows no signs of improvement, Cuban Economy Minister Joaquin Alonso said on Monday, announcing growth fell 1.1% last year on top of a 10% decline since 2019, official media reported. Alonso was speaking to the Cuban parliament's economic commission where he also indicated there was little hope for improvement this year, given toughening U.S. sanctions and a complicated international situation. The import-dependent Caribbean island nation has seen foreign currency revenues fall by around 30% in recent years, causing shortages of food, fuel, medicine and inputs for agriculture and manufacturing. A lack of fuel and equipment has crippled the energy grid, leading to daily blackouts in the Communist-run country of as much as 16 hours or more. Agriculture, livestock farming, and mining have fallen 53.4% over the last five years, and manufacturing 23%, Alonso reported. The minister was quoted as saying that this year and last had been marked "by the intensified impact of the blockade, the fierce persecution of financial flows, and barriers to international transactions that have hindered payments to suppliers." Alonso said hard currency earnings this year were 9% below the same period last year while imports were running 7% above last year's rate. "Cuba is importing more than it exports, which increases the debt," he was quoted as stating. The country last reported its foreign debt as $19.7 billion in 2020.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
xAI announces $200m US military deal after Grok chatbot had Nazi meltdown
The week after its Grok chatbot identified itself as 'MechaHitler' and generated antisemitic posts, Elon Musk's xAI firm announced a contract with the US Department of Defense worth nearly $200m. The deal is for developing and implementing artificial intelligence tools for the agency. The DoD on Monday also announced similar contracts with $200m ceilings with several other major US-based artificial intelligence developers, including Google, Anthropic and OpenAI. The agency is partnering with the General Services Administration to make these companies' AI tools available for use throughout the federal government. 'Leveraging commercially available solutions into an integrated capabilities approach will accelerate the use of advanced AI as part of our joint mission-essential tasks in our warfighting domain as well as intelligence, business, and enterprise information systems,' the US chief digital and AI officer Dr Doug Matty said in a statement. The contracts deepen the US military's ties with AI developers and are poised to expand the use of artificial intelligence within the US government after Musk's so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) oversaw mass firings of workers throughout federal agencies. Until Musk's recent falling out with Donald Trump, the xAI founder was de facto leader of Doge as it gutted government agencies and in some cases pushed for departments to use the Grok chatbot. xAI's contract announcement comes after the company was forced to issue a public apology after Grok posted a string of responses on X last week that included promoting Nazi ideology and rape fantasies. The company claimed that it fixed the issue and subsequently unveiled its latest AI model with a $300 a month subscription for an advanced version of the tool. The DoD's contract will give xAI a boost of revenue as it seeks to compete with more established AI developers like OpenAI, which is led by Musk's former associate turned rival, Sam Altman. Musk has been heavily promoting xAI and attempting to use other parts of his tech empire to support its future, including having SpaceX invest $2bn into the startup, allowing it to acquire X, formerly, Twitter, and announcing on Sunday that Tesla shareholders will vote on their own investment in xAI. xAI announced the deal and the creation of what it calls 'Grok For Government' in a post on its website on Monday, detailing that in addition to its publicly available products it would create custom AI-powered applications for potential use in healthcare, national security and other public services. 'Under the umbrella of Grok For Government, we will be bringing all of our world-class AI tools to federal, local, state, and national security customers,' xAI said in a statement on its website. 'These customers will be able to use the Grok family of products to accelerate America – from making everyday government services faster and more efficient to using AI to address unsolved problems in fundamental science and technology.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Musk has long complained that AI chatbots are designed to promote 'woke' ideology and vowed his Grok product would be 'maximally truth seeking'. It has repeatedly run into controversy over promoting conspiracies and falsehoods, including earlier this year giving unprompted responses that made false claims of 'white genocide' taking place in South Africa – echoing claims that Musk has made himself. Ethics watchdogs, Democratic lawmakers and privacy advocates have expressed concerns about how Musk and Doge have implemented AI in government and gained access to sensitive data while embedded at government agencies. Doge staffers previously fed government data into a custom version of Grok's chatbot in a potential violation of privacy and security laws, Reuters reported in May.
