
Can ‘rich Chinese parents' save our great Australian Dream?
SBS Audio
14/05/2025 28:12
Credits:
Host: Wing Kuang and Dennis Fang
Producer: Bertin Huynh
Art: Joanna Hu
SBS Team: Joel Supple and Max Gosford
Wing Kuang
This podcast was recorded on the land of the Camaraygal people and Whadjuk people. We'd like to pay our respects to elders past and present and recognise their continuous connection to Country. Welcome to Chinese-ish, an SBS podcast about what is it like to be young and Chinese in Australia today. My name is Wing, and I'm a former Chinese international student.
Dennis Fang
And I'm Dennis, a second-generation Chinese Australian from Western Sydney. Wing, I heard that your parents just visited you from China recently.
Wing Kuang
Yes and they heard a lot about you and considered you a successful 28-year-old Chinese kid for being able to buy your own house and pay your own mortgage already.
Dennis Fang
Thanks, Auntie and Uncle Kuang. So I bought my own place during the middle of COVID, which for someone in their 20s seemed like a huge achievement, but the reality is quite different, because, guess what? It was funded by the Bank of mum and dad.
Wing Kuang
It's been a news term throughout the last year, like the 'Bank of Mum and Dad', which means your parents step in and help you financially to get a house. But to be frank, when I first heard of this term, my reaction was like, this is actually a really Chinese thing.
Dennis Fang
But I think the question is, in the Australian context, can our "rich Chinese parents" still help us get into the property market.
Wing Kuang
Well our guests this week can perhaps contribute to this conversation. We first have Christopher Tan, a young Australian, Chinese journalist living in Perth who has just bought his first property with his partner.
Christopher Tan
Wing Kuang
And we also have Joanne aka Bamitjoanne, a Vietnamese-Chinese Sydney-based fashion influencer who is ready to move into her own place. Is that correct?
Joanne
Dennis Fang
Now, let's start with this question, both of you, what are your living arrangements like right now?
Christopher Tan
For myself and my partner, we're both in our sort of mid 20s, the goal was to always buy a house, even if it took, you know, a long time, and that's just because of wanting to build a family of ourselves, and wanting that privacy from our family as well. It took us about sort of four years of saving, of really saving, since we started our careers. For us, our story sort of really began in July last year, when we finally got into a home which is where I am at the moment. And you took, you know, months, years of looking, of trying, of getting rejected, long lines, all these pictures that you see over in Sydney is very similar here in Perth in terms of the rental market and the housing market and Yeah, after all that persevering, we finally got into our home in July. And
Wing Kuang
How about you, Joanne? you are renting right now in Sydney.
Joanne
Yes, that's correct. I'm still living the guilt free life of living in Surrey Hills. I have a housemate. It's actually a bit cheeky, because we are renting a one bedroom, but we've turned the studio into a second bedroom so my poor housemate does not have a door.
Dennis Fang
Does not have a door. How does that work?
Joanne
It's technically like a one bed one studio, meaning the studio...It was previously used as an office, but because it's a huge it's quite a large studio, actually, we've tried to put a bed in there, and it worked. So now he has a bed. He has like a TV and cabinet and everything. He just has no windows. And I think we're comfortable with each other now that we can, like, live like that. I'm very, very fortunate that he gave me the bedroom. I actually offered and said, you know, we can do, like, once a month, you have the bedroom thing. But he goes, 'No, you're the girl. You can have it'. So, yeah, I'm lucky. But, yeah, it's tough.
Wing Kuang
But you are an influencer. I assume you work from home a lot. How could you work from home when you actually don't have a place to work from home?
Joanne
So I have a desk in my bedroom. My bedroom is quite large. I can put a desk there. He is actually a makeup artist, and he's also a content creator as well. So we've turned our dining room into a studio, and we work from there. So we don't have a dining room. We eat on the couch or on the floor.
Dennis Fang
So you've got a bit like a, what they call in the industry, an influencer house.
Joanne
Dennis Fang
Joanne
Yeah, that's a great term. Like it could be in the, I think in the LA, they call it like hype house or something. Joanne,
Dennis Fang
Joanne you are finally looking at buying your own home. What do you think triggered this?
Joanne
I definitely think it's pressure from my Asian parents, especially my mom, to purchase a house. She's always been saying, like, 'when you pay rent, you're paying someone else's mortgage. Like, you know. I'd rather you pay your own mortgage'. And she is very encouraging. She like similar to your situation, bank of mom and dad, my mom is very forthcoming about being able to support me. So I actually got my pre approval from the bank about a month ago, and I can and am ready to purchase. It's just me and my lack of, I guess, motivation to actually go out and look.
Wing Kuang
And Chris, your case is you and your partner are trying to build a family in the future, and that's why you go for a house. But is there any pressure from parents as well saying that, Oh, you two have been together for a long time, it's time to get a house of your own.
Christopher Tan
I think our scenario is actually sort of bit different from Joanne, because, well, my partner and I are the youngest in our family, both of us, she comes from a family of five. I come from a family of three, so everyone has left the nest in our family except us two. So I think for us, it's a bit different, because our parents know that we're the last ones left in our own homes, that they try and keep us for as long as we want. But ironically, because, you know, with everything we're at, with our careers and stuff, we really want to sort of lead and buy our own home.
Dennis Fang
Chris, do you think there's any like cultural reasons why you are choosing to buy a house, or you have chosen to buy a house.
Christopher Tan
Well I think it's just the independence. I mean, like, I feel like I don't know if I if I was back in Singapore, which is where I'm originally from, I feel like if I was living there, I probably wouldn't have been as pressured to pressured, as in from myself to move out. And that's because the housing property there is just obviously very different. It's all high rises, and you know, you'd sort of benefit a lot more by living with your parents, for example, whereas out here you have the great Australian dream, they say, the front yard, the backyard, your own home, and being able to drive and get to places, having a car ownership. So for us, it's like, it's obviously our family moved to Australia to have that better lifestyle. And as you grow up and get to that stage where you earning a good, a decent salary, where you have your own car, where, where you're sort of pretty well positioned your relationship as well, you want to take that next stage and buy a house. Is symbolic of, sort of the relationship, hitting that next, next stage.
Wing Kuang
When my parents came to visit me, as typical Cantonese older generation, one of the way they do sightseeing is to go to house inspection. But interestingly, they just don't have any interest in houses. They just keep looking at apartments. Because they were like, Yeah, apartment is modern, apartment is convenient, like, We love living close to the city. And then that's how I heard from my friends who were also looking for places that in Australia, like, if you buy a house, you actually own the land. And if you buy an apartment, then the land is actually getting divided and shared by people who live in the building. And this is when Dennis, you mentioned your story to me that your dad insists you buying a house rather than apartments because of the land.
Dennis Fang
Yes, and this is why I live so far away from work, because my dad and mom always told me that the number one investment that you can make is land, and there's no alternative. So even though I wanted to live in like Surrey Hills, some of where there's there's young people, and it's trendy, and there's events on my parents were like, No, you must live in Western Sydney. Have a big plot of land, maybe some horses. But we compromised and sort of lived in the near Parramatta, so less than very, very west Sydney. So that was a compromise.
Wing Kuang
Joanne, land, or being close to the city?
Joanne
Wing Kuang
Joanne
I think for me, I obviously prioritize lifestyle. I think my mental health is a lot better just not having to commute. I used to live with my parents. I understand what the commute like is like, but for my mom, she has a very similar mentality to your parents. So she is always like, get land. However, after looking at the prices in Sydney at the moment, she has kind of turned around and because she's kind of doing the shopping for me, she has been sending me links to apartments now. Like, she will always ask, like, is that a block of six, or is that a block of 40? The other thing she looks at is strata. So like strata, if it's expensive, if there's swimming pools, she's and that's an immediate no for my mom, because she's like, why are you paying strata such high fees, especially if you want to eventually rent it out. You're not going to live there. You You're it's coming out of your pocket.
Wing Kuang
My parents are completely different, like they were shocked by the Sydney's property prices, but they really insist looking at new apartments like
Dennis Fang
Wing Kuang
Yeah, even though I tell them, like, yeah, maybe actually new apartments are not that good, because we have had lots of reporting on the quality of these apartments. Then they were like, well, but there's, like, a modern lifestyle. If you just live in a block of four, like, the building's old and you have to maintain it, and you don't even have, like, good elevator.
Dennis Fang
Yeah, and have you guys heard of how much you actually need to earn to afford one of these places? Like in Perth, I think the figure was something close to 130 in Sydney. I think it was over $200,000 every single year. I mean, Chris, you obviously live with your partner. Is that how you're able to afford everything?
Christopher Tan
It's interesting, you mentioned that because I recently did a story with someone who worked in the fly-in-fly-out industry, so the mining industry, and that's the biggest employer in Western Australia, and it's a common perception is that people that work in that industry earn a lot of money. And so I've met this guy who was a single guy who was renting close to the city, close to the airport, and he tells me that he struggles with trying to buy a house. He reckons he is never going to ever be able to purchase a house, and that's because he's in the single income situation, whereas, for myself and my partner, being a door income, we're just getting by at this stage, but I can't even imagine, like, what we're paying now, but half in there.
Dennis Fang
And Joanne, do you think if you weren't having money from Mom and Dad, how would your situation be like,affording a place in Sydney where you are expected to turn over 200 grand every single year to afford?
Joanne
I think I would likely look interstate, so maybe Brisbane, or even Melbourne. I think the property prices are a lot more affordable, but my mum likes Sydney. She wants me to have a property here, especially the first one. So gotta do what mom says if I'm using her money, you know? Oh
Dennis Fang
yes. In our first episode, one of our guests talked about how they chose to live particularly close to their parents so they can still have the family community, the family support system. Is that something you're also looking for?
Joanne
Not necessarily for me, I think I'm into more of like a reinvesting mindset. I potentially, if I purchased something in Sydney, would live there for six months and then rent it out.
Wing Kuang
Joanne
Wing Kuang
How about you, Chris? Like you are now in Perth. Like, is it part of your plan that you end up moving back to that family circle, especially if you plan to start a family?
Christopher Tan
that's always a thing, actually brought up in Asian cultures is how far or how close do you move away from your parents? And it's interesting, being the last kid I had the luxury of seeing what my sisters did, so I can make up my own mind. And interestingly enough, my second sister decided to build just about one or two roundabouts across from my parents place. I was still in the same suburb, just like she obviously thought that she would get, you know, her privacy being away from for mom and dad. But every second day, like you know that that privacy sort of gets pretty blurred that line. And obviously I saw that unfold, you know, in the months, in the years and and decided for myself that I wanted to get far away enough where they can't sort of just pop by the same day or the next day, but close enough that they can just sort of come over for dinner or whatever, and if they ever want to come visit.
Wing Kuang
Especially when you don't want to cook that night, you can just ring your parents and say that, hey, can you, like, put an extra chopstick on the table and I can have the dinner.
Christopher Tan
Well we're actually going over tonight.
Wing Kuang
There's this really strong stereotype about people living in the West that they just don't want to buy houses, like they all just want to rent, because there's a part of the individualism that's part of the freedom they want. I thought that that would be my life as well after I moved to Australia. But then the long immigration process, the longer it was, the stronger desire I have to buy my own place. I'm seeing these phenomenon in a lot of my first-generation migrant friends, especially women who are approaching their 30. Joanne, like you are born in Australia, did you notice something similar, like among your female friends circle?
Joanne
I think among my Australian born Chinese friends, they still have the mentality where purchasing property is important. A lot of my friends actually have purchased property. And way ahead in a journey, they own, like three to four properties, whereas amongst my Caucasian Australian friends, not so much. They are very much, you know, we they live in the east, they rent. They're not really thinking about purchasing houses at the moment, yeah.
Wing Kuang
Do you feel that they are prioritizing getting a house then getting a partner?
Joanne
Oh that's an interesting question. I'm not sure about partner. I don't think it's a correlation. I feel like, you know, some breakups are breakups, like they just happen, but I do think a lot of them are trying to get married first before purchasing property together.
Dennis Fang
Oh, that's interesting, because my parents came from Shanghai, and one of the things in that culture is you first need to buy a house, and then you can possibly get married afterwards. It's especially important for guys, because allegedly, what I hear from my parents at least when women are looking for potential husbands, they first need to make sure, have they got a house? Have they got a car, preferably a Tesla or something like that. And then after you've ticked all those boxes, then you become eligible for marriage. Is that something you guys have heard of?
Wing Kuang
Especially you, Chris, now you just got your new house with your partner.
Dennis Fang
Your partner demand that you had a house faster than you could get married?
Christopher Tan
I don't feel like it was a demand. I feel like that was my personal responsibility. I felt like that's what I wanted to achieve first. And I felt like that would have built the foundations, you know, rather than getting married, having kids and then going back to mum and dads, for example, and then trying to figure out that, you know, co relationships, or the situation when you were already married, for example, whereas, you know, sharing a house together, you're doing life sort of together, you know, a lot of things, and it's just so much, it's just so much easier in that way. That was just my sort of understanding of the foundations of how I wanted to, yeah, to get by.
Dennis Fang
So it does seem like at least second-generation Chinese people have kind of lost that mentality somewhat and have adopted the Western ideologies of individualism. Is that what you guys are feeling?
Joanne
I think it's not so much that I feel like maybe in the Chinese culture there's a lot of emphasis on stability, especially back then in the war times, it's a lot about, you know, like, just put your head down and get to work, and just as long as you can feed your family, then we're good. Whereas now we have the privilege to think bigger, like, it's not just survival mode anymore, especially in the Western world, like we have the privilege to think, Okay, what else is there beyond just working a nine to five, buying a house, having a car, getting married, having babies, like what I don't want to be trapped in that social dynamic of this is what you have to take off. And a lot of people get into that mindset. They take off everything, and then they're like, Wait, hang on. Why am I still not happy? I thought all these things will make me happy, but I think searching for your own, and this is getting really deep, but like, yeah, I guess, like, there's more to life than you know, ticking off the traditional boxes of what society expects of you.
Christopher Tan
Well I think it's interesting, because I had the understanding from my parents that They would have expected me to get married first, then get a house, then, you know, have kids after that, because that was the route that they took. And then they really struggled to save together, to try and buy a house and have kids and and do that, whereas I feel like in this position that I've been that I currently am, where we've already, you know, bought a house together, and now we're saving, and now we're sending, you know, at our own terms, if we want to get a new car, for example, we wanted to get some some furniture. We're saving, you know, 5050, and we're putting it together and saving at our in terms so we don't struggle. And I think that's also a privilege of being the youngest and the only and the only boy as well. Yeah, it's been really good in terms of just taking our time and having our own timelines that we want to achieve.
Wing Kuang
Now change the topic. Australian media love headline showcasing how rich Chinese people are, especially in the property markets. And most of the time they will refer this as like the rich overseas Chinese. I'm not rich. I'm definitely not rich. But how do you guys feel when we contribute to the headline about the property market?
Joanne
Sometimes I tell people I'm Malaysian. I don't say I'm Malaysian Chinese, just because of that stereotype.
Dennis Fang
How's the stereotypes different?
Joanne
people talk about the Rich Asians. It's usually from mainland China, and I've only been to China once. Even though my blood is Chinese, I can't really relate to anything mainland China, but I relate so much to Malaysia because I grew up there. I like the food, I speak, the language, you know, the culture I understand. So think it's like a kind of like, similar to how they say you choose your friends, not your family, kind of a little bit like, I don't feel connected to China at all.
Wing Kuang
And how about you, Chris, when you are reading those headline as a reader, but also as a journalist?
Christopher Tan
It's interesting, I guess that that move just to reference that you know what you're asking the movie Crazy Rich Asians, doesn't also help in that, in that scenario, and it's interesting, you mentioned that because, as I was mentioning earlier in the program, I'm from Singapore. A lot of a lot of my friends that get to know me over time, they're like, Oh, you're from Singapore. You moved here, so you must be rich. But it's, it's not. Not quite the it's not quite the case. We like, yes, of course, we took the plane, we came over, but my parents worked really hard in Singapore to make sure we could have a life in Australia. But it's not the classic. Oh, you own a car in Singapore. You must be rich, sort of stereotype.
Dennis Fang
I do love that film, though, especially the Coldplay cover at the end. So there was this statistic from a few years ago from the Westpac Ipsos research, I believe. And it basically said that Asian Australians were much more likely to believe that their parents should share their generational wealth in the form of basically helping their children afford houses. I think the statistic was 60% versus 39% of Australians in general. What do you guys think about that? Does that sound about right?
Joanne
I did expect my parents to kind of support me in terms of housing and like, you know, the groceries and stuff, but not so much actually, physically giving me cash. I've never, like asked for money from my parents. I've always kind of lived within my means. I think experiences or stories from my Caucasian Australian friends, they are parents kicking them out when they're 18, or they're expected to kind of like fend for themselves when as soon as they start working. So I do think the mindset there is slightly different. Yes, I feel
Christopher Tan
like, from my experience, my parents growing up in Australia, they like, like, a lot of the times when I got when I was in primary school, a lot of my friends, my Australian Anglo friends, would go to the canteen, and they would be able to purchase stuff, whereas I had always had the home cooked food for lunch. And from a very young age, my parents would give me very little pocket money. And growing up, even, you know, you did ask for toys, you asked for nice, shiny kings, but they resist giving that. And I think that sort of paid off today, because I understand the value of saving my other friends that you know were given so much. And in saying that as well, my parents, they're not well off, but they're not, you know, they work hard, so they're not poor either. And the money that they keep aside from me, for example, in my scenario, was going towards my university fees, for example. So even though, when I was at a young age, I would not get all the shiny, nice toys and all that, all that money that they saved up, you know, even the red packets and all that they keep aside for me, all that money has gone towards a fund that has today paid off for my HECS, which, in theory, now during the process of buying a property, that's one factor that has allowed the bank to process me even better. Because, yeah, I don't have finances, don't have hacks, I don't have all those things that sort of weigh me down.
Dennis Fang
It does seem like that The Great Australian Dream of having a house with a front yard, a backyard, a family white picket fence seems to be quite dead in just my anecdotal experience, but among Chinese people, particularly my parents, I think they've really bought into it, and they still really believe in it, and they have, somewhat, in my experience, At least sense that dream to their children as well. So me and my brother, what do you guys think about that?
Joanne
Oh yeah, my mom definitely subscribes to that.
Wing Kuang
That's why the land is important.
Joanne
Yes, that's why she wants land.
Dennis Fang
Joanne
Oh, she doesn't really care about the fake fence. But yeah, my mom definitely still subscribes to that mentality,
Christopher Tan
If I could raise the fact of, I guess, cultural significance in that question, I feel like, yeah, my parents and even my partner's parents like us to have property with front and backyard and all that massive space, mainly because then we can host family for dinner, for reunion, dinner for Christmas and all those sort of things. And in a sense, as well, because we're hosting and other family and friends are coming in a way that, as you probably understand as well, our parents love to brag about our kids having homes and being able to have all the family together. So I feel like that's that there's that value in why they want that to happen, and it makes them proud. And I guess it makes us proud as well when we can host. And it's not just mum and dads all the time, but we all know like mum and dad, when we try and host, they always say, oh, let's just just come over. We'll prep and we'll cook.
Wing Kuang
From our conversation. There are just so much about this idea of having your own place and buying up your own property for our community. It goes beyond the symbol of being successful, but it's also about security and the sense of belonging as a migrant. But the housing market right now in Australia is so bad for young people. What does that mean to young Chinese Australians who are now looking at the market?
Christopher Tan
I mean, I can only speak from my experience, but I feel like just through my journey, yes, it is. The market is is crazy. It's very difficult, both rental and buying, and this is also partly the media responsibility in playing this up. But I feel like if you if you just keep saving, if you just keep saving and keep saving and keep having a goal. I know that gold keeps getting pushed up by the market prices, but if you keep saving, you can get there one day, whether if it's with a partner or by yourself, maybe that timeline won't be as realistic anymore. But I feel like, just with my sort of Asian sort of mentality, I feel like, if you just keep working, if you keep working harder to save, cut more costs, I feel like one day you will get in
Wing Kuang
And how about you, Joanne?
Joanne
I think at the moment, a smart way to do it is to kind of diversify your income, the down payment that you're putting towards a house. There are some discussions about whether or not that will eventually get a better ROI than actually just putting it into a Vanguard Index Fund. So I think a lot of young people are starting to do that now at the same time, yes, eventually we will purchase houses, but the age where you purchase a house is getting later and later, and that shares a bit more of a more favorable way of investment at the moment.
Wing Kuang
Our question for this podcast is, can our 'rich Chinese parents' do help us get into the property market? What is your answer, Joanne?
Joanne
I think yes. Unfortunately, my mom is looking to sell her properties overseas just to help me purchase a house here. So and they are living so frugally, they don't go out like me. I eat out all the time. They go to Flemington market, and they buy a one kilogram of cucumber for $5 you know. So they're a lot better at saving and they're really worried that, you know, if they pass away, who's going to look after me? And they just want to feel safe knowing that I have a roof above my head, and no matter what I own the house, I'm not getting kicked out. I won't ever be on the streets struggling. So at the end of the day, it's just her love towards me and that, yeah, I appreciate that.
Christopher Tan
The main thing for me, or the main word for me, is drip fed, and I think that's from my experience. So what I mean by drip fed is you should still try and save as much money as you can by yourself, with your partner, or whoever it is, but when it gets to the point where you've put an offer when you're so close, and this is from our experience, when you're getting so close, you've got the offer, but you just need to put in a little bit more to get there. Then that's when your parents will come in, and that's why, that's what I mean by drip drip feeding is when your parents give you a little bit of money to help you pay for it, but always in mind that you'll pay them back at the end of the day. We want to pay them back, because we want to know that we own this house and we worked hard for it, and it makes you also value everything, literally everything around in this house, from the fridge to, you know, paint job, to everything that you paid for.
Dennis Fang
Thank you so much, guys. You've been listening to Chinese ish, an SBS podcast about what it's like to be young and Chinese in today's Australia. This episode is hosted by Wing Kuang and me Dennis Fang, and is produced by Bertin Huynh, with support from Joel Supple and Max Gosford. The artwork is by Joanna Hu.
Wing Kuang
Follow Chinese ish on your favourite podcast platform or head to SBS audio.com.au or the SBS audio app.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
14 minutes ago
- ABC News
Do class actions really deliver justice?
Sam Hawley: On average, there's a class action launched in Australia every week. But do they really help bring justice to groups of Australians exposed to wrongdoing? Today, Anne Connolly on her Four Corners investigation into the class action traps leaving victims short-changed and lawyers richer. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Anne, in Australia, class actions have become pretty common, haven't they? It's a really important way to address injustices in this country. Anne Connolly: Well, yes, that's what class actions are designed to do. And I mean, when there were some really major catastrophes, such as the Victorian bushfires, the Queensland floods, class actions were taken to get some money back for those people. News report: Property owners around Horsham in Victoria have banded together to bring the first class action arising from the Black Saturday bushfires. Anne Connolly: Same with the pelvic mesh issue against Johnson & Johnson. News report: The federal court found Johnson & Johnson had been negligent and driven by commercial interest and ordered them to pay compensation. Anne Connolly: There's many, and they're very varied. Sam Hawley: Yeah, and you found during your Four Corners investigation, this is a billion dollar industry, but it's not always in favour of the individual victims. So to explain this further, why don't we look at a recent case, Anne, a legal fight between more than 8,000 Australian taxi drivers and Uber. Anne Connolly: Well, I mean, I think most people remember when Uber entered the market, obviously the taxi industry was absolutely decimated. They just couldn't compete any longer. One of the taxi owners I spoke to is a man called Stephen Lacaze. He said he had a licence in Queensland, which was at the time valued at about half a million dollars. It went to being virtually worthless once Uber came along. Stephen Lacaze, taxi owner: Oh, it was devastating. People virtually went into shock. Anne Connolly: So when Maurice Blackburn, which is one of the biggest class action firms in Australia, came along and proposed a class action, he was very keen to sign up. Stephen Lacaze, taxi owner: We were friendless. And here comes Maurice Blackburn with their Bradman-like batting averages, and their 'we fight for fair' banner, and we're there with bells on. Sam Hawley: OK, so Stephen was keen to fight this. Maurice Blackburn lawyers take it on, and they get a third party, a litigation funder, to pay the costs. Just explain how that works. Anne Connolly: Yeah, so what happens is Maurice Blackburn doesn't want to go this alone. So what they do is they engage somebody called a litigation funder. And litigation funders, they pay the lawyers' fees, they support them, and if they lose, they pay all of the costs, so there is some risk. But in return for taking that risk, they want a percentage of any payout that they win. So in this case, with Maurice Blackburn, they had a partnership with an offshore firm called Harbour Litigation Funding, which is actually registered in the Cayman Islands. It's a tax haven, and there's quite a few litigation funders in tax havens. Under this deal, they said, we want 30% of the proceeds. And Stephen signed up for that, as did most of the taxi drivers. Stephen said he did that because he thought they were going to get a payout worth billions because that's how much they'd lost. Sam Hawley: So in this case, Maurice Blackburn, the law firm, ends up settling this class action. So just tell me what happens then. Are the taxi drivers elated about this? Anne Connolly: Well, the night before the trial was due to start in March last year, Maurice Blackburn brokered a deal with Uber. That would be that Uber would pay $272 million in compensation. Now, once Harbour took its commission, that came out at $81.5 million. Maurice Blackburn took its legal costs, which came to $39 million. It means that the drivers were left with just over half the payout. Now, we don't know what individual taxi drivers will get. Stephen Lacaze believes he'll get about $20,000 once all of these fees and commissions come out of his payment, which he says is nowhere near what he lost. Sam Hawley: What did Maurice Blackburn have to say about that? Anne Connolly: They said the federal court had approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, and Harbour, the funder, said that the case was long-running and there were significant risks. Sam Hawley: Hmm, OK. So, Anne, that's the case of the taxi drivers against Uber, and we're going to talk about another really concerning case in a moment. But before we do, let's just look at the system more deeply. The worry here is that the whole class action system is set up to make profits for the law firms and the funders, but not deliver the justice to the victims, right? Anne Connolly: Well, there's some people who are concerned about that. I mean, the lawyers and the funders will say, without us, people would get nothing. The problem is that what's happening now is most people think a class action begins with a group of victims, but that's not really the case anymore. Now everything has changed because litigation funders have now entered the Australian market. So what happens is, it's the law firms and the litigation funders getting together and seeing, what are these issues that we could launch a class action on so that they can make money and then they can sign up the group members? So the concern is, are they really seeking justice for people or are they actually just finding a business opportunity so that they can make as much profit as they possibly can? Sam Hawley: Anne, let's now look at another case where the victims are left with, in comparison, petty change. Just tell me about Minnie McDonald. Anne Connolly: So Minnie McDonald is a woman in her 90s. She lives in Alice Springs and she was approached by Shine lawyers to become what's called the lead plaintiff in a class action in the Northern Territory for stolen wages of Indigenous workers who worked on cattle stations and missions for little or no money. Minnie McDonald, lead plaintiff: No shoes, get up in the morning, go to work. Come back afternoon, cold. Anne Connolly: So this case relates to the treatment of people like Minnie who, along with a lot of other... ..thousands of other Aboriginal men, women and children worked for little or no pay between the 1930s and the 1970s. Look, I just think, you know, one of the things I want to say about this is if ever there was a class action needed, perhaps it was in this particular case. I mean, there's questions about why the governments didn't just actually pay people what they deserved instead of being forced to court and forced to pay out compensation. But in any case, what Shine says and what the litigation funder says is we were doing our very best to get right a particular historical injustice. Sam Hawley: So the law firm Shine takes on this class action along with the litigation funder, Litigation Lending Services, and Minnie becomes the lead plaintiff. But the thing is, Anne, we know with legal cases, there's a lot of paperwork and Minnie had to sign a lot of that and she can't read or write. Anne Connolly: That's right, she can't read or write. So Minnie had her granddaughter Elizabeth to help her. However, Elizabeth does say, you know, it was complicated. It was difficult to understand at times. So Minnie did sign one document which said that Shine's costs had increased by $10 million and she signed off on that. I asked her about it and I asked her granddaughter if they remembered it. They didn't. I asked Shine, did they check that Minnie had the capacity to understand the complex legal and financial issues around class actions? They said being unable to read or write is no indication of intelligence and that they had an Indigenous barrister who helped to cross these cultural barriers and explain the process to them. Sam Hawley: So tell me what ended up happening with the case. Anne Connolly: So there were two class actions in WA and the NT and they both settled. So they didn't go to court. In Western Australia, there was a settlement for $180 million. In the Northern Territory, it was $200 million. Which sounds, you know, really positive. But what has to come out of that are the legal costs and the commission for the litigation funder. So they're not going to end up with that much. They'll end up with at least $10,000 and some will end up with more than that. Minnie McDonald, lead plaintiff: So somebody might... get a car and just take me for a picnic somewhere, you know, have a feed. But... I didn't get enough. Anne Connolly: You didn't get enough to buy a car? Minnie McDonald, lead plaintiff: Yeah, yeah. Nothing. Not enough. Anne Connolly: On the other hand, what's happened is Shine Lawyers is going to get about $30 million for its work. And the funder, Litigation Lending Services, they will take a commission of about $57 million. Sam Hawley: And you've had a really good look, haven't you, also, at the amount the law firm Shine was actually charging. Anne Connolly: Well, that's very interesting because Shine was roundly criticised in both WA and Northern Territory courts by the judges there. In one instance, Shine was charging for law clerks, charging them out at $375 an hour, even though many of them were unqualified uni students. They hired at least a dozen barristers that cost almost $3.5 million. One of those barristers charges almost $5,000 an hour. So, you know, the legal costs are the things that's really interesting. Sam Hawley: All right. So, Anne, the law firms and the funds are making a lot of money from these class actions in many cases. They do argue, as you mentioned, that they're actually giving people a chance to have these cases heard. What has Shine told you? Anne Connolly: Well, Shine said we were the only ones who were willing to take this on. We have given Aboriginal workers a chance to tell their stories. They've received compensation and they're being acknowledged for the historical injustices that they've suffered. And they said that these cases require experienced and well-resourced lawyers. And Litigation Lending Services, they said that they're proud of their involvement and that their commission was lower than the standard market rates because they wanted to reflect the social justice nature of these claims. Sam Hawley: And you spoke to the head of the Association of Litigation Funders. So this is a group that represents the firms that financially back these class actions, the funds. Its head is John Walker. So what's he had to say? Anne Connolly: Well, he said, look, you know, this is a market. This is a financial market that they operate in. They're trying to get some justice for people, but at the same time they're trying to make a profit and they don't shy away from that. John Walker, Association of Litigation Funders : We underwrite the project. We'll pay everybody if we lose, but in return, if we win, then we get a share of the recovery. We don't see it as gambling. We see it as investing. It's a market, and I don't step away from that. Anne Connolly: He essentially says, look, what we're doing is we're trying to correct the bad behaviour. Even if these class members are not getting enormous sums, it's sending a message to the big end of town that you can't operate in this way any longer. John Walker, Association of Litigation Funders : I'm absolutely proud of what's happened with class actions in Australia. They're absolutely essential to create accountability in respect of the big companies and governments. Sam Hawley: But, Anne, it does sound like a system that's not really working as it should. That is for the everyday people who need it. Anne Connolly: Well, I think what happens is a lot of people look at a class action sum and they believe that the sum that's been publicised is what people are getting. They don't realise that up to half of it can disappear in fees and commissions. The other point being the only class actions that actually get funded and get run are those that turn a profit. So when you're talking about others that might be very worthy, they won't get up if the bottom line doesn't look good. I think the problem arises when you're talking about people who have really suffered, such as these Aboriginal workers in the stolen wages cases who thought that they were going to get some proper compensation and what they're getting is simply a fraction of what they really deserve. And when they do see litigation funders and lawyers walking away with tens of millions of dollars, it makes it difficult for them to understand and sometimes it can feel like they've been exploited all over again. Sam Hawley: Anne Connolly is an investigative reporter with the ABC. You can see her Four Corners report on ABC TV tonight at 8.30pm or you can catch it on iView. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.

The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Collapse in private-sector job creation as public sector surges
Private-sector job creation has collapsed as employment funded by federal and state governments soars to five times the normal rate, sparking warnings of unsustainable distortions in the labour market that are at the heart of the nation's productivity slump. Analysis of labour-market data shows that 82 per cent of all jobs created over the past two years were government-funded positions, with the private sector adding only 53,000 jobs in 2024. This marks a dramatic reversal of normal labour market trends, in which the private sector typically contributes about two-thirds of total job creation. While Jim Chalmers has ruled out discussion of industrial relations at this month's economic and productivity summit, employer groups are demanding that dysfunction in the labour market needs urgent attention. Australian Industry Group analysis shows that the historically low unemployment rates maintained since the pandemic are masking a fundamental shift in the composition of job creation, which lies at the heart of the nation's productivity slump. It warns that labour-market resilience, as shown in official unemployment data, was being supported almost entirely through government spending, leading to an excess of job vacancies in the private sector. This was unsustainable, according to the Ai Group, which also pointed to a dramatic fall in mobility rates – the frequency of workers changing jobs or roles – to a record low in 2025 that was directly linked to productivity. The analysis showed that the number of new jobs needed for the economy to maintain an unemployment rate of about 4 per cent was approximately 400,000 a year. 'Since the pandemic, this has been achieved, however, the composition of job creation has changed dramatically,' the Ai Group analysis said. 'Typically, the private-market sector accounts for about two-thirds of job creation in Australia. However, as the economy has slowed since 2023, private-sector job creation rates have collapsed. 'In 2024, the sector only added 53,000 new jobs – about a fifth of its normal level of job creation. In its place, two government-supported sectors took up the slack. 'Employment in these government-supported sectors has boomed since the pandemic, adding an additional 670,000 jobs over the last two years. This is over five times higher than the normal growth rate, and ultimately accounted for 82 per cent of all job creation in Australia. 'It was driven by significant uplift in public-sector staffing levels, as well as the rapid expansion of the private-sector (but government-funded) care-economy workforce. One of the Albanese government's key election boasts was its maintenance of low unemployment and job creation. But the bulk of those jobs have been in the public sector (where workers are directly employed by government), and the non-market sector (industries such as healthcare and education) which are driven by government funding decisions. 'Job creation has become unsustainably dependent upon government spending,' the Ai Group research said. 'Growing regulatory burden has raised the costs of private sector employment generation. Job mobility rates have rapidly declined, while excess vacancies and skills shortages have disrupted business operations and efficiency.' The public sector was the least productive part of the economy and, with public spending showing signs of easing, unemployment rates have begun to rise. Last month, the jobless rate surprised experts by jumping from 4.1 to 4.3 per cent. This prompted economists to call for the central bank to lean in further on interest-rate cuts, following its surprise decision last month to keep them on hold, to protect the economy. Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox said the historically low headline unemployment rate had created a 'blind spot to labour-market trends that are decreasing our productivity, our wellspring to national wealth'. 'While the labour market has remained resilient, with the jobless rate around 4 per cent for the past three years, in many other respects it is failing to meet the broader needs of our economy or productivity,' Mr Willox said. 'There are four key areas that are a material drag on productivity: job creation has become almost entirely dependent on government spending; a growing regulatory burden has increased private sector costs; there is a persistent overhang of excess job vacancies; and mobility is declining. 'These all make job creation more expensive and difficult, reduce the efficiency of matching jobs to employers, while disrupting productivity and sapping business growth.'' Mr Willox said there was an urgent need for the private sector to resume its role as the primary job creator 'or our labour market resilience will be at risk'. 'Regulation has pushed up employment costs since the pandemic, with growth in superannuation, workers compensation and payroll tax adding $14bn to the annual wage costs,' Mr Willox said. 'The regulatory costs for employment, on top of wages, have grown to 15.6 per cent from 14 per cent in the past three years. 'We have a plague of excess job vacancies, which disrupts business operations, make it harder to allocate resources properly and less likely to pursue new opportunities for growth.' Mr Willox said the intervention by governments to prop up job creation through their budgets had starved the private sector with about 330,000 jobs remaining unfilled at the beginning of 2025. This was 100,000 more than the historical average. 'This persistence of excess vacancies has exacerbated a further challenge for employers: a crippling skills shortage,' Mr Willox said. 'The sectors with the most chronic shortages – healthcare and social – also delivered the worst productivity outcomes, so there is a clear link between the two.' Mr Willox said the issue needed to be a central piece of the productivity debate at the Treasurer's roundtable this month. Nation A massive pro-Palestine protest brought Melbourne to a standstill as activists clashed with riot police, harassed officers, blocked traffic, and targeted fashion brand Zara – defying Premier Jacinta Allan's warning of swift action. Nation The PM's energy infrastructure tsar and a pro-renewables independent are worried concerns about one of Australia's largest proposed solar farms are being ignored.

ABC News
10 hours ago
- ABC News
Algal bloom recreational fishing response includes plans for artificial reef and reservoirs
A new artificial reef will be created off the South Australian coast to help the state's recreational fishing sector battle the ongoing impacts of the algal bloom "disaster", the state government says. The government said it was also looking to open more of the state's reservoirs for freshwater fishing "where consistent with public health advice", and boost fish stocks in reservoirs and lakes to take pressure off the marine environment. The bloom is devastating some of the state's commercial and recreational fisheries, as well as hitting parts of the economy that rely on them, such as regional tourism. The government today unveiled measures to support recreational fishers, with short-term funding of $200,000 for Recfish SA to bolster community participation initiatives, such as fishing lessons and competitions. Recfish SA's executive officer Asher Dezsery said fishing and tackle shops were desperately in need of stimulus. "They've had sales collapse by up to 70 per cent so they really need not handouts but feet through the door, they need boots on the ground, they need customers," Mr Dezsery said. The funding forms part of the state and federal governments' $28 million support package, with $300,000 to be spent on installing an artificial reef somewhere in Gulf St Vincent. "The idea of re-establishing reefs as soon as we see this bloom pass is a really important one," SA Environment Minister Susan Close said. "The faster we can help nature restore, the faster we can accelerate that recovery, the faster we'll all be able to move past the experience of this bloom and also make ourselves more resilient in the event that it returns." SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said recreational fishers were feeling the economic effects of the bloom — which he described as a "natural disaster" — even in regions that had avoided environmental impact. "The algal bloom has impacted around about 27 per cent of our coastline, which means 73 per cent of our coastline remains completely unaffected," Mr Malinauskas said. "There are whole regional communities that are underpinned by recreational fishers who book an Airbnb and go to the pub and go to the cafe and restaurant, buy equipment from the local fishing tackle shop. South Australia has several artificial reefs, and it is understood a precise location for the new one has not yet been decided. Recfish SA has strongly backed the proposal, and the government believes it will boost fish stocks and allow "real-time monitoring" of the environment by researchers and citizen scientists. "We know that artificial reefs, from interstate projects, 100 per cent assist fish stocks in recovering. They also create biodiversity," Mr Dezsery said. According to the Department of Primary Industries and Regions, recreational fishing is already permitted in several of the state's reservoirs. Recfish SA said the government was looking to expand that further, including in regional areas. "Wherever there's water, wherever there's reservoirs, council stormwater catchments — any body of water, we're trying to create freshwater fishing opportunities so people can keep fishing without putting pressure on that marine environment." Speaking before the announcement, SA Opposition Leader Vincent Tarzia said that what had been offered to recreational fishers so far had been "completely inadequate", and he issued his own call for reservoir fishing. "There are a number of things that the government could be doing to help the recreational fishing space — one of them, for example, is the government could be doing things like stocking fish and allowing some of our reservoirs, where it's safe to be done, to be fished in," Mr Tarzia said. "That would add significant value in the recreational space." Mr Tarzia has also suggested tourism vouchers, like those that were made available in the wake of the 2023 River Murray floods, could be handed out to encourage regional travel. "Any sort of stimulus that could be allowed for that sort of area would certainly be welcome."