logo
Saturday afternoon Miami area shooting hospitalizes a 14-year-old, cops say

Saturday afternoon Miami area shooting hospitalizes a 14-year-old, cops say

Yahoo01-06-2025
An argument between two people turned into the shooting of a boy near a West Miami-Dade commercial building Saturday afternoon, Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office said.
After the shooting just before 6 p.m., the gunman ran away from 8000 NW Seventh St., spot of a building with insurance and financial services companies. The 14-year-old boy was taken to Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, where he's in stable condition.
Anybody who knows anything about this shooting can reach out to Crime Stoppers of Miami-Dade & the Florida Keys either online or at 305-471-8477 (TIPS).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four arrested and six people hospitalised after 'serious assault' at Sandfest
Four arrested and six people hospitalised after 'serious assault' at Sandfest

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Four arrested and six people hospitalised after 'serious assault' at Sandfest

SIX people were taken to hospital with multiple injuries following a 'serious assault' at Sandfest in Poole. At around 10.30pm on Sunday, July 13, it was reported that a man was 'seriously assaulted' by a group of unknown men at Sandfest on Sandbanks beach. Additionally, it was stated that four women and a member of security were assaulted by the group when they attempted to intervene. A spokesperson for Dorset Police said: "All six victims were taken to hospital for their injuries which include facial injuries, a broken leg, and concussion. "Following enquiries, four men – a 29-year-old from London, a 28-year-old from Fareham, a 29-year-old from Gravesend and a 31-year-old from Gravesend - were arrested on suspicion of inflicting grievous bodily harm." Police have said they have all been released under investigation as enquiries continue. Officers investigating the assault are now appealing for witnesses or anyone with information to come forward. Detective constable Bethany Milne, of Dorset Police, said: 'We are carrying out enquiries into this reported assault and are keen to establish the full circumstances. 'I am appealing to anyone who witnessed the reported incident, or has any information that could assist our investigation, to please come forward if you haven't done so already. 'This was a busy event and we understand a number of people may have also filmed the reported assault on their phones. We would urge anyone who has captured relevant footage to please contact us.' Anyone with information can contact Dorset Police at or by calling 101, quoting occurrence number 55250102002. Alternatively, independent charity Crimestoppers can be contacted anonymously online at or by calling Freephone 0800 555 111.

Man charged after alleged sexual assault at gunpoint in Fort Smith
Man charged after alleged sexual assault at gunpoint in Fort Smith

Hamilton Spectator

time9 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Man charged after alleged sexual assault at gunpoint in Fort Smith

Fort Smith RCMP have arrested a man who they allege sexually assaulted a woman at gunpoint. Police were first notified of the incident on July 14 and the complainant filed a statement on July 21. Based on that information provided, police say the accusations include the suspect pointing a firearm at the victim while sexually assaulting her, then pointing the firearm at three other people and firing the gun into the air following the alleged assault. Resources from nearby detachments were gathered under Project Guardian and an investigation was launched. Police were able to obtain a search warrant and collect evidence. A man was formally charged on July 22 and taken into custody. The 48-year-old man, whose name has not been released to protect the identity of the victim, is charged with sexual assault, pointing a firearm, unlawful possession of a firearm, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose and uttering threats. Police are asking anyone with information on this incident to phone Yellowknife RCMP at 669-1111 or Crime Stoppers at . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy
Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Famous for his fearless bravado as a pro wrestler, Hulk Hogan won one of his most notable victories in a Florida courtroom by emphasizing his humiliation and emotional distress after a news and gossip website published a video of Hogan having sex with a friend's wife. A 2016 civil trial that pitted the First Amendment against the privacy rights of celebrities ended with a jury awarding Hogan a whopping $140 million in his lawsuit against Gawker Media. Though both parties later settled on $31 million to avoid protracted appeals, the case put Gawker out of business. It also ensured Hogan, who died Thursday at age 71, and his legal team would have a long-term impact on media law. The case showed that, in certain circumstances, celebrities could persuade a jury that their right to privacy outweighs the freedom of the press — even when the published material was true. The case put media outlets on notice that 'the public doesn't necessarily like the press,' especially when reporting intrudes into intimate details of even public figures' private lives, said Samantha Barbas, a University of Iowa law professor who writes about press freedoms and First Amendment issues. She said it also emboldened celebrities, politicians and others in the public spotlight to be more aggressive in suing over unflattering news coverage — as seen recently in President Donald Trump's pursuit of court cases against the Wall Street Journal, ABC and CBS. 'I think the lasting effect of the Hulk Hogan case was it really started this trend of libel and privacy lawsuits being weaponized to kind of take down these media organizations,' Barbas said. Hogan wept hearing the verdict in a case that was 'real personal' Hogan, whose given name was Terry Bollea, sued Gawker for invading his privacy after the website in 2012 posted an edited version of a video of Hogan having sex with the wife of his then-best friend, Florida-based radio DJ Bubba The Love Sponge Clem. Clem gave his blessing to the coupling and recorded the video that was later leaked to Gawker. Hogan insisted he was unaware the intimate encounter was being filmed. The former WWE champion testified that he was 'completely humiliated' when the sex video became public. Hogan's lead trial attorney, Ken Turkel, recalled Thursday how his muscular, mustachioed client cried in court as the jury verdict was read. 'To him the privacy part of it was integral. It was important,' Turkel said. 'Eight-year-old kids were googling 'Hulk Hogan' and 'Wrestlemania,' and they were getting a sex tape. That was hurtful to him in a real personal way.' The three-week trial was closely followed far beyond the courtroom in St. Petersburg, Florida, as thousands of wrestling fans, First Amendment watchers and others stayed glued to their screens as the trial was streamed live online. Salacious details emerged about Hogan's sex life as jurors and spectators viewed. images of him in thong underwear. Other testimony focused on how New York-based Gawker practiced journalism differently than traditional news outlets. And Hogan explained to the jury about the difference between his wrestling persona and his private life. Jury rejected that First Amendment protected publishing sex tape The jury ultimately rejected arguments by Gawker's attorneys that Hogan's sex tape was newsworthy and that publishing it, no matter how distasteful, was protected speech under the First Amendment. 'Now more people, including judges, understand that it's possible to sue someone for revealing something truthful, as long as that something is deeply personal and its publication is highly offensive,' said Amy Gajda, a Brooklyn Law School professor who followed and wrote about the case against Gawker. News outlets still have broad legal protection for publishing information about public figures, even things that would generally be considered private, Gajda said 'As long as there is news value in what is published and the media can argue that effectively, they can get a privacy case dismissed very early on,' she said. ___ Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store