Tata's Agratas targets FY2027 to begin cell production in UK, clarifies timeline
In 2024, Agratas announced that it would commence the production of batteries in 2026 in the UK.
Despite two analyst notes suggesting that the production at the plants will begin by 2027, a Tata spokesperson clarified that the project remains on track to meet its deadlines.
Also read: China's shadow looms large as Tata Motors, JLR flag EV supply chain risk
'The project to set up giga factories in India and UK is on track and will commence operations from FY27 in a phased manner," a Tata Motors spokesperson said.
Analysts at Nuvama Institutional Equities and Motilal Oswal Financial Services wrote in their respective notes on 16 June, after meeting the management of Jaguar Land Rover during its investor day, that the production of EV batteries at the UK plant will begin by 2027.
'In the battery space, JLR has partnered with group company Agratas, which is constructing the UK's largest EV battery plant—to be operational by CY27E," Nuvama analysts wrote.
In 2024, Agratas announced that it would build a 40 GwH electric battery manufacturing plant in Somerset, UK. The firm is also building a 20GWh plant in Sanand, Gujarat, through Agratas, which is expected to begin production by December 2026.
'Construction will be completed in phases, with battery production set to begin in 2026," an Agratas statement on 28 February 2024.
The company has not specified the month in which it will begin production at the UK plant so far.
With both Tata Motors and its wholly-owned subsidiary JLR flagging the threat of disruption to their electric vehicle supply chain in their annual reports, the construction of the battery plant by Agratas is listed as one of the mitigation measures to deal with the risks of China currently holding a large share of the lithium-ion battery supply chain.
Also read: Tata Motors plans a premium push as competition intensifies in EV space
In FY2024, Tata Group's holding company, Tata Sons, invested ₹950 crore in Agratas, which was founded in 2023.
In the battery company's 2024 annual report, the management acknowledged the 'strategic importance of obtaining a secure supply of battery cells to power electric vehicles sold in the future".
'The investment in the company is of critical importance to Tata Sons," the annual report said.
JLR is planning to make Jaguar an all-electric brand by 2026, while Tata Motors is the largest seller of electric cars in the country. Last fiscal year, it sold close to 65,000 EVs in the country, holding a 55% market share in the country's electric passenger vehicle market.
Both JLR and Tata Motors are facing headwinds in terms of uncertainty in the global trade markets and competition in the domestic market. Tata Motors' market share has come under intense pressure from domestic firms such as Mahindra and Mahindra, JSW MG Motor and Hyundai Motor India.
JLR cut its operating profit margin guidance to 5-7% from the earlier stated 10% due to the imposition of increased tariffs in the US and the slowdown in the Chinese market.
The risk of concentration of the supply chain also comes at a time when automobile companies in the country are facing restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets by China.
Also read: Tata Motors' headcount, senior pay hikes squeezed as sales dip in FY25
According to some industry estimates, China holds about 80% of the market for lithium-ion batteries and 90% of the supply of rare earth magnets to companies worldwide.
Several companies in the country are building gigafactories to produce lithium-ion batteries locally. In addition to the Tata Group, other companies include Reliance, Ola Electric and Rajesh Exports.
These three companies received approval to build gigafactories under the ₹18,100 crore production-linked incentive scheme but are facing delays.
Due to the delay in commencing production and setting up operations, all three face the prospect of fines. The government had set a two-year milestone to invest ₹225 crore per GwH, which the players committed to building.
Primarily, the players have cited the issues with sourcing raw material required to begin battery production.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Govt may put retail trade policy on back burner as India-US trade talks enter final leg
New Delhi: The Union government is likely to put the proposed National Retail Trade Policy on the back burner, a move seen as a conciliatory gesture towards Washington as negotiations for the India-US bilateral trade agreement enter the final stretch. The retail policy, which was first proposed in 2019, was meant to address structural challenges faced by brick-and-mortar traders and small businesses due to rising digitisation and platform-driven commerce. Shelving the policy may indirectly benefit major US-based retail giants—particularly e-commerce platforms and global retail chains like Walmart Inc.—by allowing them to continue operating in India without additional regulatory oversight. Domestic retail chains such as DMart, owned by Avenue Supermart Ltd, Reliance Retail Ltd, and Tata Retail Ltd would also benefit from the policy shift. With India's e-commerce policy, originally due in 2023,pushed to the sidelines, government officials said a separate retail policy is no longer necessary. Much of what the National Retail Trade Policy set out to achieve is already being implemented through decentralised platforms such as the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) and cooperative-led initiatives like the app-based taxi service 'Sahkar', said a person familiar with the government's thinking. 'A policy is a set of actions—and those actions are being taken," this person said, citing ONDC's success in leveling the playing field across sectors. 'Creating compliances when the purpose has already been largely achieved doesn't make sense," said a second person. Both of them declined to be identified as the government hasn't made a final decision yet. A US team of negotiators is scheduled to visit New Delhi in the second week of August to resolve the deadlock over contentious issues in the talks for the India-US bilateral trade agreement. India has made several gestures, starting with the Union Budget, to improve the trade climate, but feedback from the US suggests that its focus remains largely on pushing for exports and greater market access for GM maize and soy-based products. The US's dairy industry also has been lobbying for access to India's vast consumer market. Spokespersons of the ministries of commerce and consumer affairs, the Retailers Association of India, Amazon India, Walmart-owned Flipkart, Tata Group-owned BigBasket, DMart, and Reliance Retail did not immediately reply to emailed queries. A missed opportunity India's rapidly expanding organized retail sector is expected to reach $230 billion by 2030, Deloitte and the Retailers Association of India said in a joint report in February. The report added that private consumption in India had grown from $1 trillion in 2013 to $2.1 trillion in 2024 at a compound annual growth rate of 7.2%, surpassing the growth rates of the US, China, and Germany. A draft National Retail Trade Policy had been prepared to streamline and support the development of all formats of the retail trade sector in a harmonious manner, the ministry of commerce and industry informed the Lok Sabha on 22 December 2021. According to the ministry, the policy aimed to improve the ease of doing business, ensure easy and quick access to affordable credit, facilitate modernisation and digitisation of retail trade, and develop physical infrastructure across the retail distribution chain. The retail trade policy also sought to promote skill development to improve labour productivity, create large-scale employment opportunities, and establish a grievance redressal mechanism for the welfare of traders and their employees, the ministry had said. 'The policy has been in the works for a long time, and we have been waiting for it. The challenges in the sector—particularly those affecting MSMEs (micro, small, and medium enterprises))—must be addressed comprehensively through this policy," said Vinod Kumar, president of the India SME Forum. The second unnamed person quoted earlier pointed to ONDC, an initiative of the commerce ministry's Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, as an alternative. The digital platform offers a bouquet of services, including ride-booking, food-delivery, and e-commerce. 'Sellers are getting onboarded without any hassle, making the process seamless," said this person. According to data available on the ONDC website, about 64 million orders were placed in 2024-25 across 860 districts, and 166,691 vendors had been onboarded. Data for previous years was not available. Kuljeet Singh, chief financial officer at GI Group Holding, a staffing solution provider in the retail sector, said delaying the National Retail Trade Policy may slow the momentum of employment growth in the retail sector. 'The policy was expected to support small traders, shopkeepers, improve access to credits, and encourage formal job expansion. Without it, growth in some areas like logistics, warehousing, etc., may take a bit longer," Singh said. 'However, in our view, retail will continue to provide jobs as it does today. This delay may be a missed opportunity but with the right steps taken later, the sector can still grow stronger."
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades
(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. Jane Street said on Monday it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, SEBI lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($560 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from SEBI detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinized. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2% at the open and fell further during the day. SEBI alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. SEBI's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16% and 25% of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10% of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. SEBI did not respond to a request for comment. Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at SEBI's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said. --With assistance from Chiranjivi Chakraborty. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Concerns rife about reckless driving by heavy vehicles on Pune-Mumbai Expressway days after fatal truck accident
1 2 Pune: Frequent travellers on the Pune-Mumbai Expressway have voiced growing concerns about reckless driving by heavy vehicles, particularly trucks, following the tragic accident on July 26 near Adoshi Tunnel in Khalapur taluka of Raigad. The incident, caused by a container trailer truck's brake failure, claimed one life and injured 18 others, with the truck ramming into 22 vehicles. Regular commuters expressed alarm over the lack of lane discipline among truck drivers, especially in ghat sections. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune "As someone who travels between Mumbai and Pune frequently, I'm constantly worried about trucks veering into the middle or right lanes when they're supposed to stick to the left," said one such regular expressway user, adding, "These trucks are often overloaded, and when you're driving in front of one, especially in the ghats, it's terrifying to think their brakes could fail, as we saw on Saturday. Govt needs to enforce strict monitoring or restrict heavy vehicles to the old Mumbai-Pune highway. " Rohan K, an actor and freelance artist who travels on the expressway weekly, said, "For the past five years, I've noticed trucks driving in the rightmost lane, especially at night, causing severe congestion near places like Amrutanjan Bridge. While they're supposed to stay in the left lane, there's no enforcement. This defeats the purpose of an expressway meant for faster, safer travel. Diverting trucks to the old highway could prevent such accidents and reduce clogging. " Sandeep Ranawat, another weekly user, said, "Large vehicle drivers just don't follow basic safety rules. Container trucks, multi-axle trucks, or trailers with significantly higher load capacities should have mandatory checks, and drivers need proper training to stick to traffic regulations. It's frustrating to see heavy vehicles overtaking in the first lane, which is meant for lighter vehicles. There should be strict enforcement — maybe one or two chances for violations, but after that, serious action is a must. " "Smaller trucks are just as bad, weaving in and out recklessly. Drivers must take annual tests, maybe online, to prove they understand traffic signs and safety protocols. Right now, we don't even know if trucks are being checked before they hit the road. Another thing is that trucks should always have a driver and helper, but I've seen plenty on without the latter," he added. According to Ranawat, drivers and vehicle owners involved in accidents like the recent expressway mishap should face heavy fines. A senior Highway Safety Patrol (HSP) officer told TOI that accidents are more frequent on the Mumbai-bound (downhill) stretch of the expressway compared to the Pune-bound (uphill) journey. "Only 5-10% of accidents here occur while travelling towards Pune, as the downhill journey towards Mumbai often involves issues like uncontrolled speed, brake failures, or clutch problems," the officer said. The recent accident, compounded by heavy rainfall, underscored these risks, he said. In response, HSP is intensifying efforts to curb violations. "We've already fined numerous drivers on the expressway and the old Mumbai-Pune highway for drunk driving in the last four months, with each fine amounting to Rs 10,000," the officer said. Lane-cutting — a significant issue not just with trucks but also cars encroaching into the left lane meant for heavy vehicles — is being addressed through a dedicated squad. "The fine for lane-cutting is around Rs 2,000, and we're enforcing this more stringently. The expressway is equipped with rumble strips in the ghat sections to alert drivers to sharp curves or potential hazards, particularly if they're drowsy," the HSP officer added.
