
Rwanda's Kagame gives cautious welcome to U.S.-brokered peace deal with Congo
American mediators 'are not the ones to implement what we have agreed,' Kagame told reporters in the capital, Kigali.
'You will never find Rwanda at fault with implementing what we have agreed to do,' he said. 'But if the side we are working with plays tricks and takes us back to the problem, then we deal with the problem like we have been dealing with it.'
The comments were Kagame's first public reaction to the peace deal facilitated by the U.S. to help end the decades-long deadly fighting in eastern Congo. The deal will also help the U.S. government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region.
The agreement was signed at the State Department, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio standing between the foreign ministers of Rwanda and Congo. Rubio called it 'an important moment after 30 years of war.'
The agreement has provisions on territorial integrity, prohibition of hostilities and the disengagement, disarmament and conditional integration of non-state armed groups.
While the deal is seen as a turning point, analysts don't believe it will quickly end the fighting because a major belligerent in the conflict — the Rwanda-backed M23 — says it does not apply to it.
M23 is the most prominent armed group in the conflict in eastern Congo, and its major advance early this year left bodies on the streets. With 7 million people displaced in Congo, the United Nations has called it 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.'
M23 hasn't been directly involved in the U.S.-mediated peace deal, although it has been part of other peace talks. The group's spokesman, Lawrence Kanyuka, said it was 'fully committed' to a separate peace process mediated by Qatari officials.
Congo hopes the U.S. will provide it with the security support needed to fight M23 rebels and possibly get them to withdraw from the key cities of Goma and Bukavu, and from the entire region where Rwanda is estimated to have up to 4,000 troops.
Rwanda has said that it's defending its territorial interests and not supporting M23 despite multiple reports by U.N. experts who cite Rwanda's military activities in eastern Congo.
Kagame maintains a hardline stance on national security, saying his country will always do what's necessary to protect itself from rebels it says are embedded within Congo's army.
'Rwanda cannot live on the whims of others,' he said Friday.
___ Associated Press writer. Wilson McMakin contributed from Dakar, Senegal. Muhumuza reported from Kampala, Uganda.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
44 minutes ago
- CNN
Djibouti detainees rushing to court as they face potential deportation to South Sudan tonight
A countdown is on for a plane of eight migrant detainees to be flown from a US Naval base in Djibouti to the war-torn country of South Sudan Friday night. Lawyers for the migrants are rushing to a federal court in Massachusetts Friday afternoon to try to block the plane from taking off. So far Friday, the migrants got a brief reprieve from Judge Randolph Moss in the DC District Court. Moss held an emergency hearing before deciding the case should be moved to Massachusetts. He has ordered the Trump administration not to move the migrants until 4:30 p.m. ET and has told the migrants' lawyers they must move fast to try to get a judge to intervene in Massachusetts. The plane in Djibouti is scheduled to take off at 7:00 p.m. ET, the Trump administration said in court Friday. 'It seems self-evident the US government can't take human beings and send them to a place where their physical well-being is at risk,' such as in South Sudan, either to punish them or to warn other possible migrants to the US of the consequences of illegal immigration, Moss said at the hearing. The plaintiffs are arguing they will face torture if they are sent to South Sudan by the US and are being deprived of their constitutional rights because the Trump administration is trying to unfairly hurt them with the deportation. In explaining the very short stay he issued Friday afternoon, Moss said he didn't believe courts should issue administrative stays that last longer than is necessary. The court drama playing out on the Independence Day holiday in the US comes after the Supreme Court ruled Thursday in the administration's favor that the eight migrants are among those whom the government could deport to a third-party country like South Sudan.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks immigrants' deportation to South Sudan one day after Supreme Court clears the way
A federal judge on Friday briefly halted deportations of eight immigrants to war-torn South Sudan, sending the case to another judge, in Boston, the day after the Supreme Court greenlighted their removal. District Judge Randolph Moss sent the case north from Washington after an extraordinary Fourth of July hearing on Friday afternoon. He concluded that the judge best equipped to deal with the issues was Brian Murphy, the one whose rulings led to the initial halt of the Trump administration's effort to begin deportations to the eastern African country. He extended his order halting the deportation until 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, but it was unclear whether Murphy would act on the federal holiday to further limit the removal. Moss said new claims by the immigrants' lawyers deserved a hearing. The administration has been trying to deport the immigrants for weeks. None are from South Sudan, which is enmeshed in civil war and where the U.S government advises no one should travel before making their own funeral arrangements. The government flew them to the U.S. Naval Base at Djibouti but couldn't move them further because Murphy had ruled no immigrant could be sent to a new country without a chance to have a court hearing. The Supreme Court vacated that decision last month, then Thursday night issued a new order clarifying that that meant the immigrants could be moved to South Sudan. Lawyers for the immigrants, who hail from Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and other countries, filed an emergency request to halt their removal later that night. The case was assigned to Moss, who briefly barred the administration from moving the immigrants from Djibouti to South Sudan until his afternoon hearing concluded. He slightly extended that bar after he sent the case to Murphy. The administration has said it expected to fly the immigrants to South Sudan sometime Friday. The temporary stay was first reported by legal journalist Chris Geidner.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Djibouti detainees rushing to court as they face potential deportation to South Sudan tonight
A countdown is on for a plane of eight migrant detainees to be flown from a US Naval base in Djibouti to the war-torn country of South Sudan Friday night. Lawyers for the migrants are rushing to a federal court in Massachusetts Friday afternoon to try to block the plane from taking off. So far Friday, the migrants got a brief reprieve from Judge Randolph Moss in the DC District Court. Moss held an emergency hearing before deciding the case should be moved to Massachusetts. He has ordered the Trump administration not to move the migrants until 4:30 p.m. ET and has told the migrants' lawyers they must move fast to try to get a judge to intervene in Massachusetts. The plane in Djibouti is scheduled to take off at 7:00 p.m. ET, the Trump administration said in court Friday. 'It seems self-evident the US government can't take human beings and send them to a place where their physical well-being is at risk,' such as in South Sudan, either to punish them or to warn other possible migrants to the US of the consequences of illegal immigration, Moss said at the hearing. The plaintiffs are arguing they will face torture if they are sent to South Sudan by the US and are being deprived of their constitutional rights because the Trump administration is trying to unfairly hurt them with the deportation. In explaining the very short stay he issued Friday afternoon, Moss said he didn't believe courts should issue administrative stays that last longer than is necessary. The court drama playing out on the Independence Day holiday in the US comes after the Supreme Court ruled Thursday in the administration's favor that the eight migrants are among those whom the government could deport to a third-party country like South Sudan.