Djibouti detainees rushing to court as they face potential deportation to South Sudan tonight
So far Friday, the migrants got a brief reprieve from Judge Randolph Moss in the DC District Court. Moss held an emergency hearing before deciding the case should be moved to Massachusetts. He has ordered the Trump administration not to move the migrants until 4:30 p.m. ET and has told the migrants' lawyers they must move fast to try to get a judge to intervene in Massachusetts.
The plane in Djibouti is scheduled to take off at 7:00 p.m. ET, the Trump administration said in court Friday.
'It seems self-evident the US government can't take human beings and send them to a place where their physical well-being is at risk,' such as in South Sudan, either to punish them or to warn other possible migrants to the US of the consequences of illegal immigration, Moss said at the hearing.
The plaintiffs are arguing they will face torture if they are sent to South Sudan by the US and are being deprived of their constitutional rights because the Trump administration is trying to unfairly hurt them with the deportation.
In explaining the very short stay he issued Friday afternoon, Moss said he didn't believe courts should issue administrative stays that last longer than is necessary.
The court drama playing out on the Independence Day holiday in the US comes after the Supreme Court ruled Thursday in the administration's favor that the eight migrants are among those whom the government could deport to a third-party country like South Sudan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
9 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Forms a New Political Party to Challenge Trump and the Republicans
As he had previously vowed, Tesla CEO Elon Musk officially announced the formation of a new, third political party on Saturday, July 5, 2025. This dramatic move comes just hours after President Donald Trump signed his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law, a sweeping budget measure that implements massive spending cuts and eliminates nearly all federal climate and clean energy programs, legislation Musk staunchly opposed. The announcement was definitive. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' the world's richest man posted on X (formerly Twitter) at 3:46 PM ET. He did not immediately provide further details on the party's platform or organizational structure. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025This decision directly follows a highly visible poll Musk conducted on X the previous day, July 4, as Trump prepared to enact the bill that had become a centerpiece of his administration. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' Musk wrote, directly posing the question: 'Should we create the America Party?' X users were given only two options: 'Yes' or 'No.' The results of the poll, also posted on X, showed overwhelming support. Nearly 1.25 million accounts participated, with approximately 65.4% voting 'yes.' Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 4, 2025'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' the SpaceX founder declared on Saturday while announcing the party's creation. He further elaborated on his motivation, stating, 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' The formation of this party, while impactful, does not come as an absolute surprise. Musk had previously hinted at such a move last month, amid an escalating feud with Trump, whom he had publicly labeled ungrateful. This isn't the first time Musk has publicly entertained the idea of a third party. In May 2022, he posted, 'A party more moderate on all issues than either Reps or Dems would be ideal,' adding that, 'This is what most people in America want, but unfortunately it's not realistic.' However, after a tumultuous recent period in Washington where he led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) within the Trump administration, and a highly publicized rift with the President, he appears more determined than ever to turn rhetoric into political action. Musk's core belief is that neither the Republican Party, which currently controls the government, nor the Democratic opposition adequately represents a significant segment of the American population. He seems convinced that the political landscape is ripe for a new movement. This conviction is supported by recent polling data: according to a 2024 Gallup study, a substantial 43% of Americans identified as independents, while only 28% identified specifically as Republican and 28% as Democrat. Despite this apparent opening for a new political force, history suggests that third party candidates face considerable challenges within the U.S. electoral system. Historically, even strong independent bids have struggled to translate popular support into electoral victories. For instance, Ross Perot's notable 1992 presidential run captured 18.9% of the popular vote but secured no electoral college votes. More recent third party candidates, such as Jill Stein, have typically polled below 1% in national presidential elections.
Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Tariff Date Arrives After a 90-Day Rollercoaster
The world economy, beset with uncertainty for three months over Donald Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs, is about to get more clarity as the US president's deadline for trade deals arrives on Wednesday. That's when the 90-day reprieve from Trump's so-called 'reciprocal' levies ends, clearing the way for the protectionism he thinks will narrow US trade deficits and spark a manufacturing revival. The wielding of unilateral tariffs is upending a system that for decades encouraged lower barriers to commerce under rules enforced by the World Trade Organization.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Historic Medicaid cuts to come as Trump signs domestic policy bill
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump on Friday signed Republicans' major tax and domestic policy bill into law, setting into motion massive cuts to Medicaid that could remove millions of people from the safety-net insurance coverage. The legislation was sent to Trump's desk on Thursday, after months of rancorous debate in Congress. The Senate narrowly passed its version of the bill earlier this week, calling in Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking vote. House Republicans then scrambled to get their caucus in line, as moderates raised concerns about the Senate's steeper cuts to Medicaid and conservatives lambasted the legislation's growing contribution to the national debt. But the lower chamber ultimately voted to pass the megabill 218 to 214, nearly entirely along party lines. Only two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, declined to support the legislation. GOP lawmakers cheered its passage Thursday. Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said the law 'strengthens Medicaid for those who need it most.' Here are some of the healthcare provisions in the law: Medicaid work requirements. Some beneficiaries in the safety-net insurance program — including childless adults and those with children older than 14 — would need to work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to stay enrolled. Medicaid eligibility. States would be required to check enrollees' eligibility for the coverage every six months instead of yearly. The law also prevents the HHS from enforcing a regulation that aimed to streamline eligibility and enrollment for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Cost-sharing in Medicaid. Higher-income beneficiaries would have to pay cost-sharing up to $35 per service for some care. Provider taxes. The law freezes provider taxes — arrangements states use to finance their share of Medicaid funding — in states that haven't expanded Medicaid, and gradually lowers allowed rates in expansion states. State-directed payments. The arrangements that allow states to make supplemental payments for services covered in Medicaid managed care contracts face new restrictions. The law directs the HHS to revise that payment limit from the average commercial rate to Medicare rates in expansion states, and 10% above the Medicare rate in non-expansion states. Affordable Care Act subsidy verification. The law requires pre-enrollment verification of eligibility for premium tax credits that subsidize the cost of health plans on the ACA exchanges. Limit immigrant eligibility for Medicare, Medicaid and ACA premium tax credits. Only green card holders and certain classes of immigrants would be eligible for these programs. Cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The law blocks Medicaid funds for services offered by abortion providers like Planned Parenthood for one year. Rural healthcare support. The policy includes a $50 billion fund to help states support providers and hospitals in rural communities. Nursing home staffing. The HHS is prohibited from enforcing a Biden-era regulation that would have required long-term care facilities to increase staffing and have a registered nurse on-site. The Medicaid provisions of the law have been some of the most contentious. The policies reduce federal spending on the safety-net coverage by $1 trillion, according to a Tuesday estimate by health policy researcher KFF. Nearly 12 million additional people would become uninsured by 2034 under the law, according to an analysis published Saturday by the Congressional Budget Office. As such, the policies have been lambasted by the healthcare sector. Hospitals worry the growing number of uninsured patients would cause uncompensated care to soar, weighing on their bottom lines. Rural hospitals and providers that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients would be particularly hard hit, forcing them to cut services to close their doors altogether, experts say. Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association, said in a statement Thursday the impact from the law 'will reverberate for years,' leaving patients sicker with less access to care. Chip Kahn, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, urged Congress to take action to mitigate damage from the law's healthcare provisions by extending enhanced financial assistance for people who buy coverage on the ACA marketplaces, which is set to lapse at the end of the year. 'Time is of the essence,' he said in a Thursday statement. 'Without action extending these credits, we will see the gains to health care access and affordability our country has made over the years further evaporate, and too many will not be able to pick up the slack.' Recommended Reading Senate passes Trump's spending bill with massive Medicaid cuts
