I hated the Macbook notch, but this app has made me love it
Unfortunately, that is yet to happen on the MacBook. With the massive redesign across macOS Tahoe, I was again hopeful that the notch would finally find a purpose. Again, I was disappointed. Thankfully, the developer and open-source community have built some fantastic utilities that extract the best out of the boat-shaped notch.
Recommended Videos
I recently wrote about the Boring Notch and was impressed by with the premise of turning it into a hub for music playback controls, sharing files, calendar access, and even webcam preview. A week ago, I came across another notch-focused app to help you get focused work done using a familiar technique.
What is FocusNotch?
FocusNotch is a dual-purpose app. First, it turns the notch into a Dynamic Island where you see a persistent progress timer. Second, it lets you block certain websites (read: social media) at a network extension level and get focused work done.
The setup is fairly straightforward. You download the app from the Mac App Store, launch it, grant it network extension permission, and you're good to go. Next, all you have to do is take the cursor close to the notch area, and it will expand to show you more controls.
The app lives entirely around the notch. There is no dedicated window running in the background. You don't even see an active icon in the menu bar. Up front on the home section, you see a large digital stopwatch timer that you can set according to your routine.
Next to it is the section where you can add websites you want to block during focused work, such as YouTube, X, Instagram, or whatever corner of the internet that distracts you. You can add multiple websites in one go, but you can't whitelist as long as a focus is active.
Does it work?
Well, to be fair, whether this app works depends on your own discipline. The underlying idea is similar to the Pomodoro technique. Simply put, you set small targets where you engage in deep work, take a small break, and then return for another session.
Does it work? Well, it did, for me. The sight of a persistent task timer around the notch kept me from stepping away from my Mac. Only when I had finished one cycle of focused work did I take a small break, before returning for another session.
Here is what research published in the British Journal of Educational Psychology says about the impact of Pomodoro focus and self-regulated work breaks:
Taking pre-determined, systematic breaks during a study session had mood benefits and appeared to have efficiency benefits (i.e., similar task completion in shorter time) over taking self-regulated breaks.
Here is my suggestion, though. Don't set too long focus sessions, as they will only give you fatigue and eventually suppress the benefits. Depending on your work, try sessions that are like 30 minutes, and then make gradual progress. For me, sessions between 45 minutes to 2 hours worked best to finish research or write an article.
What can it do better?
There is a certain charm in apps that focus on accomplishing one particular goal, and do it in a minimalist fashion. FocusNotch falls in that category. However, I wish it could integrate a few other tricks. For example, instead of setting a single timer, it should also allow the creation of multiple focus timers separated by a break.
TimeCraft, a beautifully designed macOS utility, lets you set multiple timer-based work targets and even color-code them, as you can see below. I also wish there were a route to automatically import a list of distracting websites and whitelist them automatically based on the focus duration with a scheduler tool.
Apps like AppBlock do a fantastic job at it, and for free. 1Focus is another neat option, offering users a block-based approach to restricting websites and creating multiple lists, as well. FocusFirewall is a rather pricey alternative that runs entirely in the Menu Bar and offers a Mac-native design.
I also noticed that the website blocking system in FocusNotch sporadically conked out on my M4 MacBook Air. Of course, I mentally sidelined the thought of opening X when a focus timer was flashing atop the screen, so there's that helping hand from self-discipline.
Overall, FocusNotch is a neat little app that can help you get work done across short spells of no-distraction activity. And the fact that it gives a purpose to an otherwise useless notch, without costing you a penny, is just the cherry on top.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This CEO went from folding clothes at Nordstrom to being Jeff Bezos' right hand man—the billionaire told him to delegate to his employees more
Amazon's billionaire founder, Jeff Bezos, instilled one lesson in his former worker. It was 1997 when Coursera's newest CEO, Greg Hart was a young new hire at Amazon. He climbed the ranks swiftly, becoming Bezos' right-hand man just 12 years later. Today, Hart still points to one lesson that's shaped his leadership philosophy: 'The fewer decisions that have to go to the CEO, the faster the organization will move,' Hart tells Fortune. During Greg Hart's monotonous college job of folding t-shirts and jeans at Nordstrom, he never imagined that one day he'd be right-hand man to one of the most notable CEOs in the world—or even be an executive himself. But after landing a job at Amazon in the late 1990s—when it was a bookstore-focused startup—Hart started his steep climb up the corporate ladder. In 2009, he had worked his way up to Jeff Bezos' technical advisor, a chief-of-staff-equivalent role internally known as 'the shadow.' Now, as a new CEO of Coursera, Hart is taking the lessons he learned sitting next to the now third-richest man in the world (with a net worth of $241 billion) to transform the world of educational technology. That includes, he says, being someone who is always willing to be curious and to listen to your gut—even if the data might not back you up. 'One of the things that Jeff would regularly say is when the data and the anecdotes don't align, trust the anecdotes,' Hart tells Fortune. 'Because it probably means that you're either measuring the wrong thing in the data, or that the data is telling you something that you're just not seeing yet.' This mantra would prove especially relevant in Hart's life after he was tapped to lead Amazon's creation of Alexa—a level of success he hopes to emulate at Coursera. '(Coursera) is one of the leaders in the edtech space, certainly,' Hart says. 'But hasn't yet achieved what I would call the true breakout success that I was fortunate to have seen when I was at Amazon.' While serving as technical advisor, Hart was asked to turn Bezos' two-sentence idea for the implementation of virtual assistant technology into a product found in consumers' homes, later known as Alexa. With little background in hardware or software, Hart recalls being hesitant: 'Why am I the right person to tackle this challenge?' 'He (Bezos) was unbelievably gracious. He said, 'you'll do fine, you'll figure it out,'' Hart says. Now with more than 600 million Alexa devices sold, it's clear Hart did figure it out—in part thanks to the belief Bezos instilled in his subordinates. That lesson is one Hart says was critical in making Amazon grow from a bookstore to an e-commerce conglomerate. 'Pushing decisions down as close to the customer as possible was certainly something that I learned from Jeff,' he says. 'The fewer decisions that have to go to the CEO, the faster the organization will move.' Moving quickly will likely play in Coursera's favor considering the rapidly changing world of education, including AI's intersection with skill development. One of Coursera's biggest competitors, 2U (which also owns edX), filed for bankruptcy last year and became a private company. Coursera's public performance hasn't been spectacular, either. Its share price currently sits at about $8.50, a far cry from its 2022 IPO at about $45. But in the next five years, a predicted 1 billion people will gain internet access, according to Bloomberg, and thus would have access to Coursera's thousands of online learning opportunities, that include partnerships with both industry and universities including Google, Microsoft, and IBM as well as Stanford University, University of Michigan, and University of Pennsylvania. 'There is a huge opportunity for Coursera, not just to serve all the people who are online today and give them access to world class education so they can transform their lives, but also to do that for the population that will come online,' Hart says. For young people looking to push their careers up the corporate ladder and emulate a jump from Nordstrom to Amazon,Hart's advice is simple: Focus on learning—not on a flashy job title or cushy salary. 'Don't optimize for titles, don't optimize for salary, optimize for learning. And if you do that in the long run, it will benefit you,' he tells Fortune. And while that advice may sound on-brand coming from the CEO of an education company, treating your career like a marathon, not a sprint, and spending time discovering your broader interests is a mantra echoed by other business leaders, including Hart's former coworker, Andy Jassy. 'I have a 21-year-old son and a 24-year-old daughter, and one of the things I see with them and their peers is they all feel like they have to know what they want to do for their life at that age,' Jassy, the current Amazon CEO, said on the podcast, How Leaders Lead with David Novak. 'And I really don't believe that's true.' 'I tried a lot of things, and I think that early on it's just as important to learn what you don't want to do as what you want to do, because it actually helps you figure out what you want to do,' Jassy added. And while Jassy admits career success involves an element of luck and may include multiple setbacks, remaining persistent is what ultimately might land you a shot at the corner office. 'I feel like my journey or adventure was a lot of luck, and I think maybe one of the things I did best was not overthink it,' Jassy added to Novak. This story was originally featured on Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pony AI Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PONY) last week's 5.9% decline must have disappointed individual investors who have a significant stake
Significant control over Pony AI by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders own 23% of Pony AI Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Pony AI Inc. (NASDAQ:PONY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 24% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). While insiders who own 23% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$4.6b last week,individual investors took the most losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pony AI, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Pony AI Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Pony AI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pony AI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pony AI. With a 17% stake, CEO Jun Peng is the largest shareholder. With 12% and 12% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Toyota Motor Corporation are the second and third largest shareholders. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Pony AI Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.6b, and insiders have US$1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. With a stake of 19%, private equity firms could influence the Pony AI board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public. It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Pony AI. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pony AI better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Pony AI (including 1 which can't be ignored) . But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Obtains Permit to Spew Pollution
In the city that built the blues, Elon Musk's xAI data center has been given permission to keep polluting the air with fumes from burning methane gas — which it had already been doing so without authorization for a year. As Wired reports, Memphis' local health department has granted an air permit for the xAI data center, allowing it to keep operating the methane gas turbines that power Musk's Grok chatbot and Colossus, the gigantic supercomputer at its heart. In Boxtown, the historically Black neighborhood in South Memphis where xAI's data center is situated, Musk's unfettered pollution has ripped the band-aid off a wound that had barely begun to heal. As Capital B News reported earlier this year, the neighborhood was once home to the Allen Fossil Plant, an electrical facility that left pits of noxious coal ash and a lengthy legacy of environmental racism behind when it was forced to close in 2018. In the year since the data center opened and Colossus went online, the smog from Musk's gas turbines has been veritably choking out local residents in a district already struggling with heightened asthma rates due to its proximity to industrial pollution. "I can't breathe at home," Boxtown resident Alexis Humphreys told Politico earlier this year. "It smells like gas outside." Given that context, local activists are furious that xAI was granted a permit at all — especially because it appears to violate the Clean Air Act, a landmark federal law that regulates the kind of emissions that the xAI plant has been leaching out for a year now. "I am horrified but not surprised," conceded KeShaun Pearson, the head of the Memphis Community Against Pollution, in an interview with Wired after the permit decision came down. "The flagrant violation of the Clean Air Act and the disregard for our human right to clean air, by xAI's burning of illegal methane turbines, has been stamped as permissible." "Over 1,000 people submitted public comments demanding protection," he continued, "and got passed over for a billionaire's ambitious experiment." The new permit, as Wired notes, grants xAI the right to operate 15 turbines. According to aerial footage from the Southern Environmental Law Center, which is planning to sue the Musk-owned AI company for violating the Clean Air Act, there are as many as 35 on the site of the xAI data center — and with its track record of flagrant law-breaking, there's a good chance all will be turned on. Between the SELC's suit and the permit's year-long expiration date, there is time for Musk's massively-polluting data center to be reined in — but until that happens, Memphians will keep being choked out in their own homes thanks to their government's decision to put one billionaire's profit margins over its own people. More on xAI: Grok AI Went Off the Rails After Someone Tampered With Its Code, xAI Says
