
Canada intends to recognize Palestinian state at UN General Assembly
Carney said the move was necessary to preserve hopes of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a long-standing Canadian goal that was 'being eroded before our eyes.'
'Canada intends to recognize the State of Palestine at the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2025,' the prime minister said.
It makes Canada the third country, following recent announcements by France and the United Kingdom, that could recognize a Palestinian state in September.
Israel blasted Canada's announcement as part of a 'distorted campaign of international pressure.'
Asked by reporters if there was a scenario where Canada could change its position before the UN meeting, Carney said: 'there's a scenario (but) possibly one that I can't imagine.'
Canada's intention 'is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms,' Carney said, referring to the government body led by President Mahmud Abbas, which has civil authority in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Carney also said it was also predicated on Abbas's pledge to 'hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state.'
– Israel rejects move –
With Wednesday's announcement, Carney positioned Canada alongside France, after President Emmanuel Macron said his country would formally recognize a Palestinian state during the UN meeting, the most powerful European nation to announce such a move.
The Israeli embassy in Ottawa said 'recognizing a Palestinian state in the absence of accountable government, functioning institutions, or benevolent leadership, rewards and legitimizes the monstrous barbarity of Hamas on October 7, 2023.'
PA's Abbas welcomed the announcement as a 'historic' decision, while France said the countries would work together 'to revive the prospect of peace in the region.'
Canada's plan goes a step further than this week's announcement by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Starmer said the UK will formally recognize the State of Palestine in September unless Israel takes various 'substantive steps,' including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza.
– Two-state solution –
Carney stressed that Canada has been an unwavering member of the group of nations that hoped a two-state solution 'would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority.'
'Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable,' he said, citing 'Hamas terrorism' and the group's 'longstanding violent rejection of Israel's right to exist.'
The peace process has also been eroded by the expansion of Israeli settlements across the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, Carney said.
The prime minister said a two-state solution was growing increasingly remote, with a vote in Israel's parliament 'calling for the annexation of the West Bank,' as well as Israel's 'ongoing failure' to prevent humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Memri
6 hours ago
- Memri
The Qatar Weekly Update (QWU) – Part Of The Qatar Monitor Project (QMP) – No. 30, August 1, 2025
Congressman Greg Landsman (D-OH) declined an invite from Qatar 1. Qatar Threatened To Cut EU LNG Supplies Over Sustainability Law, Letter Shows, Reuters, July 26, 2025. 2. Jewish Congressman Declines Qatar Invite, Calls Out Mishandling Of Gaza Hostage Crisis, Jerusalem Post, July 29, 2025. "Qatar's gross mishandling of the hostage crisis in Gaza and failure to sufficiently pressure Hamas into ending the war prevents me from allowing staff to visit your country," Landsman wrote. 3. Israel Suspects Qatar Behind Hamas 'Starvation' Propaganda Campaign, Israel National News, July 28, 2025. 4. President Barzani Praises Qatar's Stability Role, Shafaq News, July 30, 2025. 5. Former Senior Mossad Official Questioned In Qatargate Corruption Scandal, Haaretz, July 28, 2025. 6. The Go-Between: How Qatar Became The Global Capital Of Diplomacy, The Guardian, July 22, 2025. * Yigal Carmon is Founder and President of MEMRI.


Shafaq News
7 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Trump promises new plan to feed starving Gazans
Shafaq News – Washington US President Donald Trump on Friday pledged to launch a new initiative to address hunger in Gaza, saying he is 'working on a plan to get people fed,' amid growing concern over the humanitarian situation in the war-torn enclave. In a brief phone call with Axios, Trump described the crisis relief as something that 'should have happened a long time ago,' accusing Hamas of stealing and selling humanitarian aid entering the enclave. He declined to elaborate on the plan when pressed by Axios, and did not confirm whether it would involve expanded support for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) or introduce new delivery mechanisms. The statement followed a visit by US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee to aid distribution centers run by the GHF. In a post on X, Witkoff revealed he and Huckabee spent five hours inside Gaza to get 'a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.' At @POTUS 's direction, @USAmbIsrael and I met yesterday with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza — level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with @GHFUpdates and other… — Special Envoy Steve Witkoff (@SEPeaceMissions) August 1, 2025 Washington has faced mounting pressure to increase aid flows into the enclave, where starvation and malnutrition are rapidly worsening. The US-backed GHF has been criticized by international rights groups for operating only in select areas, forcing displaced Palestinians to travel long distances—often through active conflict zones—to access food. Axios further pointed out that an Israeli official briefed reporters on Thursday about Witkoff's separate meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two discussed the current deadlock in ceasefire and hostage negotiations, and the possibility of moving toward a more comprehensive agreement with Hamas. Trump declined to comment on the outcome of that meeting, saying only, 'You will see soon.'


Shafaq News
7 hours ago
- Shafaq News
War is possible again: Lebanon's ongoing negotiations on Hezbollah's arsenal
Shafaq News After months of political back-and-forth, the issue of Hezbollah's weapons has become increasingly central in both domestic Lebanese discourse and international positioning. With time running short and diplomatic options narrowing, the debate is intensifying, signaling the potential for renewed escalation. Limited Diplomatic Window Many observers note that the possibility of removing the Lebanon file from US Syria envoy Tom Barrack is unlikely to alter Washington's or Tel Aviv's longstanding demands regarding Hezbollah's disarmament. Speculation surrounding the possible reappointment of former envoy Morgan Ortagus—known for her vocal support of Israel—has further fueled concerns about a diminishing diplomatic posture by the US in handling Lebanon's complex political and security landscape. Meanwhile, Hezbollah remains adamant about retaining its arsenal for the foreseeable future. In contrast, key international actors, led by the United States, continue to demand concrete steps toward consolidating state control over all weapons. This outlook is reinforced by a series of high-profile public statements that suggest the window for political resolution is rapidly closing. Diverging Rhetoric: Aoun's Appeal Versus Hezbollah's Defiance The Lebanese President Joseph Aoun issued a direct appeal to Hezbollah, calling for the group to hand over its weapons 'today rather than tomorrow,' framing the issue in existential terms, 'to liberate occupied territories, rebuild the state, restore international trust in Lebanon, and prevent further national collapse.' Aoun emphasized that the sacrifices of Lebanon's martyrs must not be in vain. Hezbollah's leadership, however, is far from the President's appeal. The Secretary-General Naim Qassem reiterated that disarmament is not on the table. He warned against reducing Lebanon to 'an Israeli annex,' regardless of the cost, and instead emphasized other priorities—including reconstruction efforts following the Israeli war and halting Israeli attacks. 'End the aggression and free the prisoners; only then can we have a serious discussion,' Qassem declared, dismissing any calls—domestic or foreign—for disarmament as serving 'the Israeli project,' and argued that Israel's ambitions extended beyond disputed border points, warning that disarming the resistance would pave the way for Israeli expansionism inside Lebanon. Despite the apparent contradiction between Aoun and Hezbollah, political sources suggest that a quiet but constructive dialogue is ongoing between the two sides. This conversation is expected to culminate in a government session that will formally address the state's monopoly over arms. Negotiations, Not Disarmament—For Now Lebanese political analyst Qassem Qassir told Shafaq News that disarmament is not currently on the agenda. He confirmed that negotiations between Hezbollah and the presidency continue, but stressed that any meaningful discussion about Hezbollah's weapons hinges on several non-negotiable conditions: ending Israeli aggression, withdrawing from Lebanese territory, releasing prisoners, and initiating reconstruction. 'These are firm and clear positions,' Qassir said. 'Any consideration of limiting arms to the state can only follow the fulfillment of these demands.' Qassir also emphasized that Hezbollah's heavy missiles and drones constitute 'a point of strength for Lebanon,' forming a strategic deterrent against Israel. 'These capabilities cannot be relinquished without assurances for their protection.' He further warned that the US and Israel do not merely seek Hezbollah's disarmament, but rather its destruction—whether those weapons are held by the party or the Lebanese Army. 'Israel may use the pretext of disarmament to justify a new war on Lebanon,' he cautioned. While internal discussions have floated the idea of placing Hezbollah's arms under unofficial state authority, Qassir concluded that no concrete steps have been taken by the Lebanese state toward actual disarmament. What is unfolding, he said, remains confined to preliminary consultations and general understandings. Israel Rejects Lebanese Initiative, Heightening Risks of Escalation With diplomacy faltering, many in Lebanon fear that an escalation is inevitable—possibly resembling the recent conflict that ended with a ceasefire agreement on November 27. Two developments in particular are fueling these fears. First is the continued pattern of Israeli airstrikes and targeted assassinations, concentrated in southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley. Second is a report by Reuters, citing five diplomatic sources, stating that Israel rejected a proposal from Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. The proposal had sought a halt to Israeli airstrikes as a first step toward fully implementing the ceasefire agreement. Israel has issued neither confirmation nor denial of the report. Potential Political Fallout? Beyond the battlefield risks, internal political repercussions also loom. Despite Hezbollah's entrenched role in the Lebanese government, ongoing external pressure and internal divisions over its weapons could reshape the very structure of governance. This unresolved contradiction—between Hezbollah's strategic doctrine and growing international insistence on state sovereignty—has yet to reach a breaking point. But the signals from all sides suggest that the margin for ambiguity is rapidly narrowing.