Drink-drive deaths up 7% in a decade - as Labour plots breathalysers in new cars for convicted offenders
It estimates 260 people died in crashes in 2023 in which a driver was over the alcohol limit.
While this represents a 14 per cent reduction on the previous 12 months, it is still higher than fatalities linked to drink-driving in 2013.
The data suggests 16 per cent of road deaths in 2023 involved drink-driving.
These new statistics come in the wake of fresh news that Labour is considering adopting EU rules around car safety features, which would mandate all models sold in Britain need equipment to facilitate the installation of in-car breathalysers.
This would allow 'alcolock' breathalysers to be fitted to cars of convicted drink drive offenders on court orders. They prevent drivers from being able to start the car's engine until they supply a legal sample of breath.
The DfT's figures show that 5 per cent of casualties of all severities in 2023 occurred in drink-drive collisions.
However, the breakdown varies across different countries.
While the 5 per cent figure is consistent for England and Scotland - the latter having stricter drink drive limits - the average is higher in Wales (7 per cent).
'In general, the proportion of collisions involving a drink-driver has been higher in Wales over the past decade,' the report said.
Meanwhile 124 people died due to drug driving in 2023, up from 90 people in 2022, the numbers show.
The Department's published data also highlights a greater proportion of drink-drive collisions occurring late at night and in the early hours of the morning, reaching a peak of 8 per cent occurring between 11pm and midnight.
The lowest proportion of drink-drive collisions occurred between 11am and midday, with 1 per cent.
The data is also evidence male drivers are over-represented in drink-drive collisions.
The majority of drivers involved in road injury collisions overall are men, with an even higher proportion of drink-drivers being male.
In 2023, 80.6 per cent of drink-drivers were male.
However, males made up only 69.3 per cent of drivers (excluding cyclists and horse riders) involved in all collisions where the gender of the driver is known.
RAC road safety spokesperson Rod Dennis called the figures 'disturbing' and a 'frightening number of lives lost' on the UK's roads.
'It's simply unacceptable that an estimated 260 people a year lose their lives as a result of drink-drivers,' he said.
'It remains the case that the proportion of road deaths where drink-driving was a cause is at a similar level to the late 1980s. Drugs, too, are playing an increasing role in fatalities and are now behind a record number of fatal collisions.
'A new approach to tackling these repugnant crimes is desperately needed. We hope this will be a key part of the Government's forthcoming road safety strategy.'
Jack Cousens, head of roads policy for The AA, added: 'While drink driving fatalities fell by 14 per cent between 2022 and 2023, drug driving deaths rose by 38% during the same period.
'This is truly shocking, and more needs to be done to stop people getting behind the wheel while impaired.
'More education, roadside testing and enforcement are key to get the message across that driving under the influence won't be tolerated.'
Nicholas Lyes, director of policy and standards at road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, says Britain has become 'stuck in a dangerous rut' of not being able to reduce the death toll on our roads.
'We must redouble our efforts on enforcement, providing the police with the necessary tools to clamp down on drink drivers while reviewing our approach to both first time and repeat offenders,' he told us.
The drink-drive limit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood.
Nowhere else in Europe has a limit above 50mg/100ml.
The Scottish Government reduced its limit to that level in 2014.
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics previously obtained by the PA news agency revealed 27,837 British motorists were convicted of drink-driving multiple times in the 11 years to 20 July 2024.
Some 372 were caught at least four times, including four who were prosecuted on seven occasions.
Labour 'considering' EU car safety tech - including breathalyser facilitation
The report comes as Labour is said to be preparing to follow European laws and mandate that all new cars are fitted as standard with a raft of safety features, including black box-style recorders and equipment that enables breathalyser installations.
Sir Keir Starmer's Government and the UK's automotive trade body has argued that differences in car manufacturing between Britain and Europe will lead to higher costs being passed on to the customer.
But critics argue that the PM would be turning his back on the nation's freedom to set out its own regulations as part of Brexit.
Lord Hendy, Minister of State for the Department for Transport, stated earlier this week in parliament that the government 'takes an explicit presumption in favour of alignment' in regard to how cars are manufactured.
He added that the Government would be 'considering options for requiring the fitment of the safety technologies mandated by the EU's general safety regulation'.
GRS2 regulations have been introduced over a three-phase period in the EU, beginning in July 2022.
Included among the 19 mandatory features demanded for new cars entering European showrooms from 7 July 2024 is automatic speed limiters, driver drowsiness alert, Emergency Lane Keeping Systems, and 'Alcohol Interlock Installation Facilitation' - or AIIF. This would allow for the application of aftermarket alcohol interlock devices in vehicles.
Alcolocks are already used in Finland, Belgium, New Zealand, Australia, Canada and many parts of the US.
A recent poll found 53 per cent of drivers would support court-ordered breathalysers being fitted to cars of convicted drink-drivers in Britain.
'We've consistently been calling for a change in approach when it comes to reducing alcohol-related road deaths, as it's clear the status quo isn't working,' the RAC's Rod Dennis said.
'RAC research shows drivers are supportive of courts being given the powers to mandate the fitting of alcohol interlocks to offenders' vehicles to prevent them driving drunk again. This has the potential to reduce drink-drive casualties, especially among habitual offenders.
'Since 2022 we have urged the Government to consider mandating all new vehicles have interfaces that allow alcolocks to be fitted easily.
'We are also supportive of police being given the powers to immediately disqualify any driver who fails a drink or drugs test at the roadside.'
EU mandated new vehicle safety technologies through the General Safety Regulation (GSR2)
Intelligent Speed Assist (ISA): recognises traffic signs and provides an overspeed warning. It warns the driver when the speed limit is exceeded to increase speed limit compliance and reduce the severity of collisions.
Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB): a collision avoidance feature that scans the forward path of the vehicle for potential impact targets and applies braking to avoid or mitigate a collision.
Driver Drowsiness & Attention Warning (DDAW): an occupant monitoring feature using a driver-facing camera for direct driver monitoring. If it detects a driver looking away from the road for too long, it triggers warnings.
Emergency Lane Keeping System (ELKS): a collision avoidance feature using forward-facing cameras and RADARs to prevent a vehicle leaving the lane of travel.
Alcohol Interlock Installation Facilitation (AIIF): allowing for the application of aftermarket alcohol interlock devices in vehicles.
Event Data Recorder (EDR): a black box in all cars that records and stores vehicle data shortly before, during, and immediately after a road traffic collision.
Electronic Stability Programme (ESP): helps to prevent a loss of control in cornering and during emergency steering by stabilising the car if it veers off its intended path. This is generally already fitted to most new models.
Emergency Stop Signal (ESS): when brakes are forcefully applied, the rear indicator lights will flash to alert other vehicles behind the car.
Reversing Detection Systems (RD): alerts the driver to the presence of people or objects at the rear of the vehicle with the primary aim of avoiding collisions when reversing.
Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS): monitors tyre air pressure and provides feedback in real-time to the driver to prevent accidents caused by under-inflated tyres.
Cybersecurity: addresses the increase in connected vehicles on European roads which require robust cybersecurity to prevent them from being stolen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Moment reckless teenage cyclist performing wheelie towards officer tackled to ground
Watch the moment a teenager who performed a wheelie on a bike seemingly straight at a police officer is tackled to the ground. Bodycam footage shared by Kent Police on Tuesday (29 July) shows the officer grabbing the youngster mid-cycle, telling him to 'stop it'. Later clips show officers issuing a section 35 dispersal order to one individual before telling them that their parents will be informed about the incident, whilst another teenager is told that their bike will be seized. Officers arrived at the scene on 26 July after receiving reports that nuisance teens were riding their bikes into oncoming traffic and performing wheelies near members of the public.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Summer riots could happen again, says police watchdog
There is 'every possibility' of a repeat of the 2024 summer riots, the police watchdog has warned, as a poll exposed ongoing deep divisions in society. Writing for The Telegraph, Sir Andy Cooke, the Chief Inspector of Constabulary, warned that factors which fuelled last summer's riots remained including community tensions, online misinformation and social media platforms that allowed hatred to be 'amplified'. He said this meant police forces had to be prepared and must not 'be caught off-guard' as they were last year when his inspectorate found that they failed to mobilise fast enough nationally, missed intelligence that would have enabled them to predict the rising threat and not got to grips with the powerful role of social media. His warning comes as an Ipsos poll of 1,000 adults revealed more than four in five (81 per cent) believe Britain is a divided society. Asked to identify the biggest source of tensions, more than six in 10 (61 per cent) cited divisions between 'immigrants and people born in Britain'. This was up from 52 per cent last year before the Southport attacks and summer riots. Eight in 10 also said they were concerned about people 'resorting to violence' to solve disagreements. That was an increase from 71 per cent in July 2024 before Axel Rudakubana murdered three girls attending a dance class in Southport. This summer has already seen violence break out at a protest over asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, after the arrest and charging of an asylum seeker at the hotel with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Protests against asylum hotels have since extended to locations across the country. Sir Andy said his inspectorate's investigations into last year's riots found no evidence of 'deliberate premeditation by organised groups'. Instead it was mostly disaffected people, influencers or groups that incited people to act violently and take part in the disorder, rather than criminal factions or extremists. 'But social media and online platforms amplified false narratives and incited participation at a pace that traditional policing approaches simply could not match,' he said, adding that police had not kept pace with the 'fast-developing nature of online communications' which meant they were unprepared. This, combined with a delay in mobilising nationally and intelligence failings, weakened forces' responses. 'The police service should not be caught off-guard again,' said Sir Andy. 'There is every possibility that similar violence could reoccur, and this fact should not be shied away from. Online misinformation continues to spread. Community tensions persist. 'The tools that amplified hatred during the summer of 2024 remain largely unchanged and largely unregulated. While not every tragedy can be prevented, forces must be better prepared for what follows. The police service must modernise its understanding of how disorder develops and spreads in the digital age. 'Forces must strengthen their connections with the communities they serve, and focus on building the trust and understanding that can help prevent tensions from escalating into violence. 'The loss of these three young lives was a tragedy beyond comprehension. As we remember them, let us make sure that the lessons are learned and changes implemented. The safety of our communities depends on it.' The poll found older people are more likely to believe Britain is divided. Nine in 10 (91 per cent) of those aged 55 to 75 think British society is split, versus 69 per cent of 16 to 34-year-olds. Reform UK voters (90 per cent) are the most likely to see society as divided versus 78 per cent for Labour and 82 per cent Tory. The 61 per cent who now believe the biggest source of tension is between immigrants and British people is a marked increase from 2019, the year of Boris Johnson's election victory. Then it was just 40 per cent before rising to 52 per cent last year before the riots. Four in 10 (40 per cent) cited tensions between ethnicities as the next biggest source of tensions, followed by 38 per cent saying the differences between rich and poor and 37 per cent referenced religions. More than three-quarters of Britons (78 per cent) were concerned about acts of violence throwing the country into chaos, suggesting that the murders of the three young girls by Rudakubana, for which he received a life sentence, has left an indelible scar on the nation. The public is critical of the role of political leaders in healing the divides that they perceive in society. A clear majority (58 per cent) believe that 'politicians in general' are doing a bad job at encouraging people from different backgrounds and with different beliefs to get on well together. Social media companies are also viewed negatively, with half (50 per cent) stating they are doing a bad job. Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, is seen as doing a bad job by 47 per cent of the public, while 45 per cent say the same of Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader. The most pressing worries for the public remain the state of the British economy (85 per cent are concerned) and the state of British public services (83 per cent concerned). Three-quarters (76 per cent) said that the rise of religious extremism was a concern, similar to August 2024 just after the Southport attacks and riots. Just under three-quarters (72 per cent) were concerned about the rise of small boat crossings and illegal immigration. Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'There is a clear and growing anxiety about the potential for violence to replace peaceful debate. 'The challenge for political leaders, who the public feel are currently failing to bridge these gaps, is to address these fears and find a way to foster greater social cohesion.' 'We must not be caught off-guard again' By Sir Andy Cooke A year has passed since violent widespread disorder erupted in towns and cities across the UK. It was sparked by the murders of three young girls in Southport: Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar. As we remember their lives and the profound grief their families continue to endure, we also reflect on the violence that broke out in the days that followed. Many of the people who took to the streets participated in unlawful and serious violence and disorder, not peaceful protests. Those who took part in the disorder put communities in fear by damaging property, targeting religious buildings and attacking people's homes. This put the emergency services under significant pressure, including the police whom offenders targeted deliberately. Officers displayed bravery in the face of extreme violence that was utterly shameful and unacceptable. Many police officers sustained injuries, and some were hospitalised. It is to their enormous credit that they kept the public safe. Over the past year, the inspectorate has conducted a comprehensive review of the police response to this disorder. Our findings, published in two tranches, reveal both the unrelenting courage of police officers who kept the public safe under immense pressure, and the critical gaps that left forces unprepared for the scale and nature of the violence they faced. We found no evidence of deliberate premeditation by organised groups. It was mostly disaffected people, influencers or groups that incited people to act violently and take part in disorder, rather than criminal factions or extremists. But social media and online platforms amplified false narratives and incited participation at a pace that traditional policing approaches simply could not match. The causes of the disorder were complex, but the overwhelming speed and volume of online content further fuelled its spread. The police service, despite the dedication and professionalism of individual officers, simply hasn't kept pace with the fast-developing nature of online communications. And forces were not equipped to deal with the repercussions as the disorder rapidly unfolded. The national mobilisation plan was activated too late. Intelligence systems failed to adequately predict the rising threat. Most concerning of all, forces had not learned sufficiently from previous instances of disorder, including the need to react to changing public sentiment. At a time of national emergency, the police intelligence strategy – necessary for forces to respond effectively – should be clear and obvious to all. 'Vital that we learn from these events' The recommendations in my reports are a starting point. But it is vital that forces learn from these events, and strengthen their response to future instances of disorder to make sure the public are kept safe. In my review, I urged the police service to improve its disorder-related intelligence systems and processes. It is positive to see that the police have worked with others to improve the provision of intelligence to national and local commanders. The National Police Chiefs Council have set up three new central teams that will allow them to better identify and quantify threats and provide support to local forces to target those intent on disorder. Nationally, the police are now better able to analyse data and deliver information quickly and accurately to seize the narrative from those that spread mis and disinformation. And just recently, we saw what can be achieved when forces adapt their approach. In Liverpool, when faced with tensions after a car drove through crowds of football supporters, Merseyside Police immediately acted on one of our recommendations from our rapid review. It quickly and proactively took the decision to provide information about the suspect involved. This early communication helped prevent the spread of false narratives and likely prevented further disorder. And the way Merseyside Police handled the release of information shows just how effective, when used in the right circumstances, this approach can be. I am also encouraged by the work done by the police, the Government and other law enforcement agencies to develop a joint national approach to disorder-related intelligence. These arrangements help to make sure mobilisation happens quickly and provides national police commanders with the intelligence they need. In turn, this helps them to make good and timely decisions that protect the public. The police service should not be caught off-guard again. There is every possibility that similar violence could reoccur, and this fact should not be shied away from. Online misinformation continues to spread. Community tensions persist. The tools that amplified hatred during the summer of 2024 remain largely unchanged and largely unregulated. While not every tragedy can be prevented, forces must be better prepared for what follows. The police service must modernise its understanding of how disorder develops and spreads in the digital age. Forces must strengthen their connections with the communities they serve, and focus on building the trust and understanding that can help prevent tensions from escalating into violence. The loss of these three young lives was a tragedy beyond comprehension. As we remember them, let us make sure that the lessons are learned and changes implemented. The safety of our communities depends on it.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Police scuffle with protesters outside hotel housing immigrants
Watch as police clash with protesters and counter protesters outside a hotel that is used to accommodate asylum seekers on Saturday (2 August). Footage shows Metropolitan Police officers scuffling with a range of protesters, many wearing face coverings, as they shout at either side to 'get back'. Demonstrators have gathered outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in central London to protest against the building being used to house immigrants, with organisers using the slogan 'Thistle Barbican needs to go – locals say no'. A counter protest, organised by Stand Up To Racism and supported by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and other groups, is running simultaneously.
