Defence Ministry advisory: Refrain from live coverage of operations, security forces' movement
In a post on its social media handle X, the Ministry said, "All media channels, digital platforms and individuals are advised to refrain from live coverage or real-time reporting of defence operations and movement of security forces."
The MoD said that the disclosure of such sensitive or source-based information may jeopardise operational effectiveness and endanger lives.
It also cited past incidents like the Kargil War, the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, and the Kandahar hijacking, which underscore the risks of premature reporting.
The Ministry said that as per clause 6(1)(p) of the Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021, only periodic briefings by designated officials are permitted during anti-terror operations.
"All stakeholders are urged to exercise vigilance, sensitivity, and responsibility in coverage, upholding the highest standards in the service of the nation," the MoD post said.
The Ministry also tagged an advisory of the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, which on April 6 had issued a detailed note.
The advisory to all media channels was to refrain from showing live coverage of defence operations and movement of security forces. It had listed some points of caution: In the interest of national security, all media platforms, news agencies, and social media users are advised to exercise utmost responsibility and adhere strictly to existing laws and regulations while reporting on matters concerning defence and other security-related operations.
It had also specified that no real-time coverage, dissemination of visuals, or reporting based on 'sources-based' information related to defence operations or movement should be undertaken.
"Premature disclosure of sensitive information may inadvertently assist hostile elements and endanger operational effectiveness and the safety of personnel. Past incidents have underscored the importance of responsible reporting. During events such as the Kargil war, the Mumbai terror attacks (26/11), and the Kandahar hijacking, unrestricted coverage had unintended adverse consequences on national interests," the advisory mentioned.
It said that the media, digital platforms, and individuals play a vital role in safeguarding national security.
"Apart from the legal obligations, it is a shared moral responsibility to ensure that our collective actions do not compromise ongoing operations or the security of our forces," the Ministry's advisory mentioned.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has already issued advisories to all TV channels to adhere to Rule 6(1)(p) of the Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021. Rule 6(1)(p) states, "No programme should be carried in the cable service which contains live coverage of any anti-terrorist operation by security forces, wherein media coverage shall be restricted to periodic briefing by an officer designated by the appropriate Government, till such operation concludes.'
The Ministry had said in its April 26 advisory, "Such telecast is in violation of Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021 and is liable for action thereunder. Therefore, all TV channels are advised not to telecast live coverage of anti-terrorist operations and movement by the security forces in the interest of national security. Media coverage may be restricted to periodic briefing by an officer designated by the appropriate Government till such operation concludes."
The government has requested all stakeholders to continue exercising vigilance, sensitivity, and responsibility in coverage, upholding the highest standards in the service of the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Delhi court extends judicial custody of Tahawwur Rana
New Delhi: Special Judge Chander Jit Singh passed the order after Rana was produced before it through video conference after expiry of his judicial custody granted earlier. Rana is a close associate of 26/11 main conspirator David Coleman Headley alias Daood Gilani, a US citizen. He was brought to India after the US Supreme Court on April 4 dismissed his review plea against his extradition to India. On November 26, 2008, a group of 10 Pakistani terrorists went on a rampage, carrying out a coordinated attack on a railway station, two luxury hotels and a Jewish centre, after they sneaked into India's financial capital through the sea route. As many as 166 people were killed in the nearly 60-hour assault.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
RTS panel can now take suo motu cognizance of delay in service
With the Haryana government amending Haryana Right to Service Act, 2014, the Right to Service Commission will now be able to take suo motu cognizance in case the designated officer or grievance redressal authority does not decide on the application or appeal within the stipulated time period. According to a notification chief secretary Anurag Rastogi has issued, a new provision has been added replacing Rule 9 of the Haryana Right to Service Rules, 2014. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) A government spokesperson said that if undue delay is found in the disposal of the application or appeal, the Commission will be able to pass appropriate orders. According to a notification chief secretary Anurag Rastogi has issued, a new provision has been added replacing Rule 9 of the Haryana Right to Service Rules, 2014. These rules will be called 'Haryana Right to Service (Amendment) Rules, 2025'. 'If before the application for availing any notified service, the matter concerned is pending before any court or the revisional authority of the concerned department, then the Commission shall not exercise its powers under section 17 of the Act against the designated officer or the first or second grievance redressal authority until a final decision is given by the court or the revisional authority,' the spokesperson said.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
M A Baby writes: CAA, NRC and now SIR: Government is following a path that leads to disenfranchisement, exclusion
The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), the National Register of Citizens (NRC), and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar seek to disenfranchise citizens, and change the nature of citizenship in India. Collectively, they carry echoes of the most disturbing episodes of 20th-century history and augur a dangerous, exclusionary path that independent India has consciously avoided thus far. Two main perspectives exist regarding citizenship: Citizenship by birth (jus soli) and citizenship based on race and culture (jus sanguinis). Of these, the Indian Constitution upheld the modern perspective of citizenship by birth, after the discussions on citizenship that took place in the Constituent Assembly in August 1949. Even in those discussions, arguments were raised in favour of making religion the basis for citizenship. However, the Constituent Assembly rejected this argument and adopted the position that the granting citizenship based on religious identities does not befit a modern democratic society. Thus, Articles 5 to 11, which deal with the question of citizenship, were formulated, and Article 5(a) unequivocally stated that anyone born in the territory of India would be an Indian citizen. With the CAA, religion is a factor in deciding Indian citizenship. The Sangh Parivar claims that the CAA will not affect existing citizens. However, the Union Home Minister stated both inside and outside Parliament, 'chronology samjhiye' — that is, to understand the chronology. What is that chronology? First the CAA, then the NRC; that's the order. Those who are unable to produce proper documents will have to undergo verification based on the CAA criteria in order to be included in the NRC. How can one then say that the CAA will not affect existing citizens? During the preparation of the NRC, the citizenship of those who are unable to provide precise details, including the birthplace of their parents, will fall under the shadow of doubt. We saw a clear picture of this when the NRC was implemented in Assam. Around 19 lakh people were excluded. Two-thirds of those excluded were women. Although the Sangh Parivar's primary targets are religious minorities, even others — especially Adivasis, the poor and uneducated, transgender people — may not possess the requisite documents. Their citizenship, too, will come under question. It is estimated that about 42 per cent of people in India do not have birth certificates. Crores of our brothers and sisters could cease to be Indian citizens for want of necessary documents. They will either be locked up in detention centres or become a populace devoid of civil rights. This is the dark reality that is staring us in the face. The recent moves by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the guise of the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar suggest that a backdoor effort is underway to prepare the NRC. The SIR process has raised concerns about the disenfranchisement of marginalised groups, especially minorities. This has to be seen as part of a broader pattern of using bureaucratic processes to exclude certain sections from political participation. Against the backdrop of these developments, we need to recall that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) drew inspiration from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy during its formative years in the 1920s and 1930s. Balkrishna Shivram Moonje's — president of the Hindu Mahasabha and mentor of RSS founder K B Hedgewar — visit to Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini in 1931 was a pivotal moment in the cross-pollination of ideas between Italy and Hindu nationalist circles in India. In his diary, Moonje praised Mussolini's vision for the 'military regeneration of Italy' and explicitly stated that 'India and particularly Hindu India need some such institution for the military regeneration of the Hindus'. Inspired by what he saw, Moonje established the Central Hindu Military Education Society in 1935 and the Bhonsala Military School in Nashik in 1937, aiming to militarise 'Hindu India'. The RSS later adopted aspects of this model, with notable similarities in recruitment and organisational structure to the Opera Nazionale Balilla — the Italian fascist youth organisation. Moonje's efforts and admiration for Mussolini's methods have left a lasting impact on the organisational development of the RSS. Early RSS leaders, including their second chief, M S Golwalkar, and ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, openly admired aspects of Adolf Hitler and Mussolini's regimes. They were especially influenced by the concept of 'cultural nationalism' and the fascist model of organising society around a dominant ethnic or religious identity. Golwalkar's book We or Our Nationhood Defined (1939) explicitly referenced admiration for Hitler's policies, arguing that India should be defined as a Hindu nation and that minorities should be treated similarly to how Nazis treated Jews. This book played a key role in shaping the RSS's ideology and tied the organisation to fascist thought. In his Bunch of Thoughts, Golwalkar described Muslims, Christians and communists as India's 'internal threats'. Those who lament that progressive values of secularism and socialism are foreign concepts are in fact using regressive foreign ideas and methods to carry forward their divisive communal agenda. Soon after enacting the discriminatory Nuremberg Laws in 1935, Nazi Germany completely abolished all democratic rights and stopped conducting elections. Taken together, the CAA, NRC and SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar that are being implemented and deemed appropriate for present-day India are a disturbing portent. The writer is general secretary of the CPI(M)
