Mars' $36 billion Kellanova deal may lead to price hikes, EU regulators warn
By Foo Yun Chee and Benoit Van Overstraeten
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Candy maker Mars' takeover of Pringles maker Kellanova could lead to price hikes because it will boost Mars' negotiating power with retailers, EU antitrust regulators warned on Wednesday as they opened a full-scale investigation into the $36 billion deal.
The move could force Mars to divest assets to address the EU competition concerns or risk the deal being blocked.
Mars announced the deal last August, among the biggest in the sector, that would bring brands from M&Ms, Snickers and Whiskas to Pringles, Pop-Tarts and Kellogg cereals under one roof.
The EU competition enforcer said the deal would boost Mars' product portfolio, giving it increased leverage to extract higher prices during negotiations with retailers and in turn would lead to higher prices for consumers.
It said both companies have a strong market position in several product markets in multiple EU countries due to their brands seen as must-have for consumers.
The Commission also cited concerns from some European retailers about Mars' increased bargaining power and that they may be forced to accept higher prices, in order to avoid not being able to offer the products of Mars and Kellanova.
"As inflation-hit food prices remain high across Europe, it is essential to ensure that this acquisition does not further drive up the cost of shopping baskets," EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said in a statement.
The Commission set an Oct. 31 deadline for its decision.
Reuters exclusively reported on June 18 that the deal would trigger intensive EU regulatory scrutiny.
European retailers have voiced worries about the power of large international suppliers of branded packaged goods and the high concentration levels in products such as breakfast cereals, carbonated drinks, confectionery and frozen desserts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
European Parliament Wants To Reduce Cost Of Sustainability Reporting Requirements
People walk by a European Union flag (Photo by) The European Parliament is debating legislation to reduce sustainability reporting requirements in the European Union. The original proposal of the European Commission included a drastic reduction of the scope of a pair of sustainability reporting directives. The member leading the drafting of the Parliament's has released his draft proposal, calling for even more cuts, alarming sustainability activists and emboldening business interests. That proposal was debated in the June 24 meeting of the Committee on Legal Affairs, known as JURI. As part of the European Green Deal, a trilogy of directives were passed by the EU to force businesses to address climate change and report greenhouse gas missions. However, the cost of these proposals on businesses and the broader impact on the EU economy became a theme during the 2024 elections. The shift to the right in EU politics embolden opponents. As a result, the Commission proposed a package of new directives to 'reduce the burden' on businesses. The Omnibus Simplification Package was officially adopted by the Commission in February. The proposal is being debated in the Council and the Parliament. In the Parliament, the debate is public and working through multiple committees, giving interest parties and MEPs the opportunity to voice their opinions. JURI, is the primary committee that will produce the legislation that will be sent to the full Parliament for a vote. MEP Jörgen Warborn, of the European People's Party, has been designated as the rapporteur to lead the drafting of the final legislation. Warborn's draft report was made public on June 6. The draft includes 82 proposed amendments. During the June 24 JURI meeting, the Committee addressed the proposed amendments. Warburn was given the opportunity to share his initial proposal and the shadow rapporteurs gave initial comments. Jörgen Warborn Warburn stated the EPP's goal in the proposal. 'We would like to go further in cutting costs, because we need to strengthen European competitiveness in order to create long-term prosperity for European citizens.' To justify the need for cuts, he stated "sustainability rests on three pillars: the environmental pillar, the social pillar, and the economic pillar… if one breaks, the stretcher collapses." He then outlined his 10 key priorities in the proposal: MEP Lara Wolters, Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Lara Wolters, of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), stated her group felt the 'Commission proposal was extremely rushed and deeply flawed.' She says that the proposal is not focused on removing the administrative burden, rather on removing accountability. She did not get into the specifics of the S&D proposal, but gave a vigorous counterargument to reductions. Countering the EPP's push to lower costs on businesses, she stated that she 'is not inspired by this… It is our job to weigh public versus private interests. But if costs are all the EPP cares about at the moment, then at least let us be honest that the costs are merely being displaced. Costs reduced for companies here are costs that the world will need to shoulder anyway. Climate denial comes at a cost. So does environmental degradation, exploitation, and inequality. So does feeding populism.' MEP Pascal Canfin, The Renew Group Pascal Canfin, of the Renew Europe Group, stated that he agrees with the EPP on the auditing of the CSRD report. He believes there is room to negotiation on that topic and reduce cost beyond the Commission proposal. He stated that he agrees in cost reduction, but that the EPP proposal does not deliver that. Focusing on capital market union, he said investors need data. The reduction in of the CSRD may save costs on paper, but will increase costs in the long term as investors spend more to gather the data. He will be offering amendments to address those concerns. Renew will also present amendments to address the single market approach and what he views as conflict with the restriction on civil liability causing market fragmentation. He also took issue with the application of the 3000 employee threshold to non-EU companies, claiming that would exempt nearly all non-EU companies from the scope. Interestingly, he stated the calculation of the employee count for non-EU companies is not based on total employees in the EU, rather total employees in a member state. MEP Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Group of the Greens/ European Free Alliance (EFA) Kira Peter-Hansen, of the Group of the Greens/ European Free Alliance (EFA), stated that they agree with simplification and "reporting must be both meaningful and manageable.' However, she agrees with the S&D that the Omnibus and the EPP proposals go beyond simplification into deregulation. She pointed out that the raised thresholds not only eliminate 80% of the companies, but also some member states as they do not have any companies large enough to comply. She encouraged the use of the EFRAG data to simplify the data points in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards to simplify reporting requirements without 'weakening impact.' She accused the EPP of 'choosing populistic, symbolic changes over actual needed changes that would benefit from a revision." Further, she stated that 'removing climate transition plans completely is not just wrong, it is irresponsible.' She encouraged the adoption of a risk-based approach over the Commission proposal of mapping the value chain, claiming it would increase costs for companies. Finally, she objected to the removal of civil liability in the CSDDD. MEP Arash Saeidi, The Left Group Arash Saeidi, of The Left, opened by stated that 'there are men, women, and children whose rights are being breached and they're just being seen as cogs in the wheel of a production - modern slavery, textiles workers, forced labor to produce our electronics.. workers killed on sites. The CSDDD is designed to put an end to impunity and finally holding companies legally accountable from environmental damage and infringement of human rights.' He stated that The Left will present a proposal to reject all the proposed changes and stay with the existing text in the CSRD and CSDDD. Political parties and MEP had until June 27 to submit amendments. On July 15, the shadow rapporteurs will meet to discus the amendments and begin negotiations. To pass, the proposal needs majority support. Committee opinions are being drafted by Economic and Monetary Affairs, known as ECON, Environment, Climate and Food Safety, known as ENVI, Foreign Affairs, known as AFET, International Trade, known as INTA, and Employment and Social Affairs, known as EMPL. Those will be sent to JURI for consideration. I suspect Warborn's proposal is a negotiation tactic. By promoting a position that is more extreme than the original Commission proposal, the EPP has room to negotiate. However, the recent proposal by the Council was also to the right of the Commission. The final Parliament proposal may end up being the middle ground. JURI is expected to adopt the final language to reduce the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive on October 13. Following the vote of the Parliament, designated representatives from the Parliament, Council, and Commission will enter into "trilogue" negotiations. The proposals from each of the three bodies will vary. The trilogue will negotiate the differences to produce a final directive. That directive will be sent to the Council and Parliament for a final vote in December or January.
CNET
3 hours ago
- CNET
Facing Billions in DMA Fines, Apple Lets EU iPhone Users Install Apps Outside the App Store
In a scramble to sidestep penalties that could soar into the billions, and with Brussels regulators watching closely, Apple has agreed to let Europeans download iPhone apps from outside its own App Store. With just hours left before an EU compliance deadline, the company said residents of the 27-nation bloc will soon be able to grab apps from rival marketplaces or straight off a developer's website. The change rolls out later this year with iOS 18.6 and iPadOS 18.6, and also lets users set a different browser engine and choose a third-party wallet at checkout. For everyday EU iPhone owners, that means the download button could pop up in more places than just Apple's storefront. After you select the new setting, iOS shows a one-time permission sheet confirming you're leaving Apple's marketplace. The app then passes a quick notarization scan meant to weed out malware. Apple notes that off-store downloads work only inside the EU, and disappear if you stay outside the bloc for more than 30 days. Cost to developers Developers do gain fresh distribution freedom, but there's a price tag. A new two-tier Store Services fee asks for 5% of outside sales in exchange for basic services like app reviews and support, in what's called Tier 1, or 13% for the full bundle of perks, including automatic updates and App Store promotions in Tier 2. Apple will take a 5% "Core Technology Commission" on any purchase made outside its own payment system. That new cut will phase out the current €0.50-per-download fee and become the sole charge across the EU when a unified pricing model arrives on Jan. 1, 2026. Apple insists "more than 99 percent" of devs will pay the same or less under the revamped math. Why now? In April, the European Commission fined Apple €500 million ($585 million) for blocking developers from steering users to cheaper payment options, and warned that daily penalties of up to 5% of global revenue could follow if it failed to comply. Throughout the back-and-forth, Apple has accused the commission of "moving the goalposts" on what counts as compliance, with a spokesperson saying the company has invested "hundreds of thousands of hours" to meet the EU's evolving demands. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney blasted the 5% tier as a "malicious compliance scheme" that "makes a mockery of fair competition." If regulators decide Apple still hasn't gone far enough, the iPhone maker could face steeper sanctions, or even be forced to separate its App Store business.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Valeo to supply ‘Smart Safety 360' to European OEM
Valeo has been chosen to supply its Valeo Smart Safety 360 (VSS360) to a European original equipment manufacturer (OEM) vehicle platform. The integration of VSS360 is expected to enhance the safety around vehicles and streamline the development of autonomous driving capabilities. The system combines hardware, software development expertise, and system integration skills to ensure comprehensive safety around vehicles. It is designed to minimise accidents, enhance driver assistance, and contribute to the progression of autonomous vehicles while adhering to safety standards. Offering a 'cost-optimised' solution, the Valeo Smart Safety 360 is claimed to provide best-in-class driving and parking performance in a scalable 1-box or 2-box ADAS configuration. It eliminates individual electronic control units (ECUs) and minimally impacts the architecture of the vehicle. The system is tailored to scale from basic EU General Safety Regulation (GSR) compliance to advanced Level 2+ functions, and complies with the US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 127. For the European premium OEM, the Valeo Smart Safety 360 is said to ensure peak performance and system dependability through the integration of cameras, radars, and ultrasonic sensors, all developed, manufactured, and integrated by the company, leveraging computer vision technology. Valeo noted that radar fusion will be incorporated into its smart front camera, and an extra Parking ECU will facilitate hands-free parking, manage up to four surround-view cameras, and control 12 ultrasonic sensors. Valeo BRAIN division CEO Marc Vrecko said: 'This new award for Valeo Smart Safety 360 underscores Valeo's leading position as a comprehensive provider of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems solutions (ADAS), capable of meeting the stringent safety and performance demands of the automotive industry. It reflects our constant drive to innovate for ever-safer mobility.' Earlier this year, Stellantis and Valeo introduced Europe's first remanufactured LED headlamp alongside a remanufactured infotainment display screen. "Valeo to supply 'Smart Safety 360' to European OEM" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
