U.N. adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taliban rule over U.S. objections
The 11-page resolution also emphasizes 'the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,' and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis.
The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two — the United States and close ally Israel — opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran.
Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government.
Germany's U.N. Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's 'near-total erasure' of the rights of women and girls.
The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten.
U.S. Minister-Counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards 'the Taliban's failure with more engagement and more resources." He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies "in accordance with the expectations of the international community.'
'For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,' he said. 'It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.'
Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions.
The resolution expresses appreciation to governments hosting Afghan refugees, singling out the two countries that have taken the most: Iran and Pakistan. Shrier also objected to this, accusing Iran of executing Afghans 'at an alarming rate without due process' and forcibly conscripting Afghans into its militias.
While the resolution notes improvements in Afghanistan's overall security situation, it reiterates concern about attacks by al-Qaida and Islamic State militants and their affiliates. It calls upon Afghanistan "to take active measures to tackle, dismantle and eliminate all terrorist organizations equally and without discrimination.'
The General Assembly also encouraged U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a coordinator to facilitate 'a more coherent, coordinated and structured approach' to its international engagements on Afghanistan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Can US President Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize?
The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most prestigious honours that can be awarded to individuals and organisations internationally. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the prize. If Trump wins, he will be the fifth US president on the list after Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama. Here is a look at how the award works: Who can win? According to the will of Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, the prize should go to the person 'who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.' In an introduction on the Nobel website, Chair of the Peace Prize Committee Jorgen Watne Frydnes says 'in practice anyone can be the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. The history of the prize shows clearly it's given to people from all layers of society from all over the world.' Who can nominate? Thousands of people can propose names: members of governments and parliaments; current heads of state; university professors of history, social sciences, law, and philosophy; and former Nobel Peace Prize laureates, among others. You cannot nominate yourself. Nominee lists are kept secret for 50 years, though there is nothing to stop those who make nominations from disclosing their choices. Who decides? The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which consists of five individuals appointed by the Norwegian parliament, is the arbiter. Members are often retired politicians, but not always. The current committee is led by the head of the Norwegian branch of PEN International, a group defending freedom of expression. They are all put forward by Norwegian political parties and their appointments reflect the balance of power in Norway's parliament. How do they decide? Nominations close on January 31, meaning Netanyahu's nomination of Trump would not be considered this year. Members of the committee can make their own nominations no later than the first meeting of the committee in February. They make a shortlist, and each nominee is then assessed by a group of permanent advisers and other experts. The committee aims for unanimity but can decide by majority vote. A final decision is often only made a few days before the prize is announced. Controversies The Nobel Peace Prize has often been seen as having a political message. The Nobel website says some recipients have been 'highly controversial political actors,' while the prize has also increased public focus on international or national conflicts. Obama won the award just a few months after taking office. Two members of the committee stepped down over the decision in 1973 to award the Peace Prize to U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Vietnamese politician Le Duc Tho for negotiating an end to the Vietnam War. One member quit in 1994 when Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat shared the prize with Israel's Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin. What does the laureate get? A medal, a diploma, 11 million Swedish crowns ($1.15 million), and immediate global attention, if they are not already famous. When are the announcement and the ceremony? The announcement of this year's prize will be made on October 10 at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo. The ceremony will take place at the Oslo City Hall on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Pak flags a threat at UN: Afghanistan could become a terror hub
The fox has reported a break-in at the henhouse. No phrase captures the absurdity of this moment better than this old cliche. Pakistan has urged the United Nations to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a "breeding ground for terror".The warning, delivered by Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, focussed on the threat posed by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other militants operating from Afghan a UN General Assembly session on Afghanistan, Ahmad claimed that groups like the TTP, al-Qaida, and ISIS-K are exploiting "ungoverned spaces" in Afghanistan to launch attacks, including recent cross-border incursions into Pakistan. He cited "credible evidence" of TTP collaboration with Baloch separatists such as the Baloch Liberation Army to target Pakistani infrastructure. The speech conveniently ignored Pakistan's decades-long support for the Afghan Taliban, which Islamabad nurtured as a proxy is widely known that Pakistan sheltered the Taliban's leaders, from its formation in 1994 to its resurgence in is a parallel truth to it — the very force Pakistan once nurtured now appears increasingly estranged from TTP, an offshoot of the Taliban, has unleashed waves of deadly violence across the country over the years. In 2024, nearly 15,000 Taliban fighters reportedly mobilised towards the Durand Line after Pakistani airstrikes targeted TTP positions inside Pakistan is acting shocked as the blowback hits its own Ahmad's speech also blamed "Indian-backed terrorists" for border infiltrations — a familiar Pakistani trope deflecting blame onto New Delhi. Meanwhile, he glossed over Pakistan's history of harbouring militants such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), which target both India and must also be noted in light of Pakistan's ridiculous claims in the UN is that following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, it was the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) that played a significant role in the ensuing ISI, long accused of maintaining ties with the Taliban, reportedly provided logistical support and strategic guidance to the group during its rapid takeover of involvement helped the Taliban exploit the power vacuum left by the US, enabling their swift return to Pakistani ambassador's plea for international aid to handle Afghan refugees and revive Afghanistan's economy carries its own TTP now conducts daily attacks on military outposts, suicide bombings in urban centres, and targeted assassinations. Over 558 people were killed in 2024 alone by the TTP, while border regions like North Waziristan have reportedly become ungovernable because of the TTP's rise in Pakistan mirrors the Afghan Taliban's Islamabad reckons with its role as an incubator of terrorism, its "warnings", such as the one given at the UN, will continue to be met with scepticism. Pakistan's latest statement at the UN is both historical amnesia and audacious hypocrisy. Terrorism, which Pakistan used as a policy against India, has boomeranged.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
How one tiny Myanmar town controls the globe's rare earth supply and is holding the world hostage
Bhamo, a town in the northern hills of Myanmar, home to just 166,000 people, may appear to be a small town, but it is where almost half of the world's heavy rare earths are found, like the minerals essential for electric cars and wind turbines, as per a report. The Civil War That Could Disrupt EVs Worldwide Since December, Kachin Independence Army (KIA), an ethnic militia, has been fiercely fighting Myanmar's junta for control of Bhamo, which is a civil war that started after the military's 2021 coup, as reported by Reuters. The town is within 100 kilometres of the Chinese border and is a strategically vital garrison town, according to the report. The takeover of Bhamo would grant the KIA control of the primary rare-earth mining area, something that has shaken China and caused supply chain disturbances globally, as per the Reuters report. China's Critical Role in Rare Earth Processing The heavy rare earths are usually shipped to China for processing into magnets that power electronic vehicles and wind turbines, as China has a near-monopoly over the processing of the minerals, as reported by Reuters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo ALSO READ: SoFi stock surges 7% on Trump tax plan hype — earnings buzz builds ahead of July 29 Beijing's Ultimatum China has now reportedly threatened to stop buying the minerals mined in KIA-controlled territory unless the militia stops trying to seize full control of Bhamo, Reuters reported, citing people familiar with the matter. Live Events A KIA official told Reuters that, in May, China had made its demand, and a KIA commander pointed out that Beijing was represented by foreign ministry officials at the talks, according to the report. The ongoing fight in the region has limited mining operations, and rare-earth exports from Myanmar and now China is "using its dominance to shore up Myanmar's beleaguered junta, which China sees as a guarantor of its economic interests in its backyard," wrote Reuters in its report. While China's foreign ministry told Reuters that it was not aware of the specifics of deliberations with the KIA, but said that, "An early ceasefire and peace talks between the Myanmar military and the Kachin Independence Army are in the common interests of China and Myanmar as well as their people," as quoted in the report. ALSO READ: Wolfspeed stock soars over 100% after shock CFO appointment — who is Gregor van Issum? The KIA official revealed that Beijing had offered a greater cross-border trade with KIA-controlled territories if the militia stopped efforts to seize Bhamo, as reported by Reuters. The official said, "And if we did not accept, they would block exports from Kachin State, including rare-earth minerals," as quoted in the report. An independent Myanmar-focused analyst, David Mathieson, pointed out that Beijing is not seeking to resolve the wider civil war, but it wants fighting to stop as it wants to advance its economic interests, and said that, "China's pressure is a more general approach to calming down the conflict," as quoted in the Reuters report. Conflict Disrupts Mining and Exports The ongoing conflict in Bhamo started just after the KIA wrested control of the main rare-earth belt in Kachin last October, and since its takeover, the KIA has increased taxes on miners and throttled production of dysprosium and terbium, sending prices of the latter skyrocketing, as reported by Reuters. FAQs Who is fighting over Bhamo? The Kachin Independence Army is fighting Myanmar's military junta for control of the region, as per the Reuters report. What happens if China follows through on its threat? Global supply chains could be shaken, prices for rare earths could spike, and manufacturers might struggle to get the materials they need, as per the Reuters report.
