BBMP, 9 other municipal staff to go on mass leave
The protesting staff allege that more than 6,000 posts of officers and other employees across various departments in BBMP alone are lying vacant. Due to this, the existing staff are forced to work under tremendous pressure, often managing additional workloads without adequate manpower.
In addition, employees have complained that many staff members have been suspended without any prior notice. Several appeals to withdraw such suspensions have gone unanswered, pushing the staff unions to resort to collective action. The protestors have put forth a charter of demands, including the immediate withdrawal of the Logsafe attendance system, which they claim is impractical for non-executive staff like officers, clerks, gardeners, and gangmen. They want BBMP to scrap this system and revert to a simpler attendance process.
One of the main demands is the immediate filling up of more than 6,000 vacant posts across BBMP's 225 wards to ease the workload on current employees.They have also asked the civic body to stop what they allege are illegal departmental inquiries against BBMP's school principals and headmasters for minor issues under the guise of dereliction of duty.
Another demand is that the post of Special Commissioner (Administration) should remain independent and not be attached to any other zone. They want the Special Commissioner (Administration) and Deputy Commissioners (Administration) to strictly follow the powers delegated to them and not dilute the responsibilities of the Chief Commissioner. The employees are also demanding immediate promotions for Assistant Executive Engineers to the post of Executive Engineers and for Executive Engineers to be promoted to Superintending Engineers without delay. Further, they have urged the BBMP to continue its revenue services—such as khata transfers, registrations, bifurcations, and amalgamations—under the e-Aasthi system according to existing norms, without unnecessary changes.
The unions want all officers and staff deputed illegally on loan service to be sent back to their parent departments immediately. They have demanded timely promotions for all eligible staff across cadres and extension of state government health schemes and medical benefits to BBMP employees as well.
Additionally, the service seniority list of all officers and employees must be finalized and published without delay. The protestors have also raised the issue of health supervisors in BBMP's health department. These 'B' group officers should be given necessary user ID and password access for licensing duties, they say.
They have also demanded the immediate scrapping of the posts of marshals appointed illegally within BBMP limits. Apart from BBMP staff in Bengaluru, employees of Hubballi-Dharwad, Tumakuru, Mangaluru, Shivamogga, Davanagere, Mysuru and Belagavi municipal corporations have also extended their support and will join the mass leave and protest.
Employee unions have warned that if their demands are not met, they will intensify the agitation in the coming days, potentially affecting civic administration in multiple cities across the state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
No extradition treaty, no problem: Pakistan can still hand over Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar to India
Bilawal Bhutto's extradition offer could be a sham. But while no formal treaty exists, Pakistan can still legally extradite Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India if it chooses to do so. Here's how read more Although India and Pakistan do not have a formal bilateral extradition treaty, extradition of terrorists is possible under international law and customary practice. Two important facts before we proceed ahead: one, India proposed an extradition treaty with Pakistan in 2004, Islamabad is yet to respy; two, India made a formal extradition request for terrorists living in Pakistan in 2023, Islamabad still has an opportunity and option to respond positively to it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Pakistan's former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto, the son of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto who was assassinated by terrorists, has stirred the political pot of Pakistan saying Islamabad can extradite terrorists Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India as a 'goodwill' gesture to face justice for the crimes they have committed over decades. Hafiz Saeed is a United Nation-proscribed terrorist and Lashkar-e-Taiba founder wanted in India for the 2008 Mumbai attacks besides others. Masood Azhar, the head of Jaish-e-Mohammed, is wanted for a number of crimes of terrorism including the 2003 Parliament terror attacks. With regard to India's extradition request, Pakistan's foreign office has acknowledged it but emphasised the absence of a formal extradition treaty between the two countries. Despite this, international legal principles allow extradition even without a treaty, provided certain conditions are met, such as the offence being recognised as a crime in both countries (double criminality) and political considerations permitting the handover. India has submitted detailed requests with supporting documents, urging Pakistan to hand over Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar. The process is complicated by political tensions, legal hurdles, and Pakistan's historical reluctance to extradite terror suspects. However, the lack of a treaty does not legally bar Pakistan from extraditing these individuals. The decision ultimately rests on Pakistan's government, balancing diplomatic pressures and internal politics, largely controlled by its army generals, who see enmity with India and jihadi propaganda to push cross-border terrorism in India as core issues linked to their survival and prominence in the country that has failed to arrest socio-economic collapse and sectarian violence in decades. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How Pakistan can do it: It just requires some political will The primary mechanism for bringing an accused individual from Pakistan to India for prosecution is extradition, a formal process governed by international law and treaties. This involves a request from India through diplomatic channels, followed by legal procedures in Pakistan, including verification of the offence and the individual's identity, and ultimately, a decision on whether to extradite. Extradition process involves: Request: The process begins with a formal request from India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or another relevant law enforcement agency to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). The MEA then forwards the request to the Pakistani government through diplomatic channels. Fugitive's or accused's location and identity: The request includes information about the accused individual's location in Pakistan, the charges against them, and supporting evidence. It is crucial to establish that the offence for which extradition is sought is a crime in both India and Pakistan (principle of double criminality). Legal proceedings in Pakistan: Once received by Pakistan, the request is forwarded to an inquiry magistrate who will assess the validity of the request, confirm the identity of the fugitive, and determine if the offence is extraditable. Extradition decision: If the magistrate finds the request valid, they will forward it to the Pakistani government, which makes the final decision on whether to extradite the individual to India. Surrender: If extradition is approved, the individual is formally handed over to Indian authorities, usually at a designated location such as an airport. All this is possible within the established principles of international law, namely: Double criminality: The offence must be considered a crime in both the requesting (India) and requested (Pakistan) countries. In this case, terrorism is a crime in both the countries. And top Pakistan functionaries, including the country's former Army chief-turned-President Pervez Musharraf, have acknowledged the role of terrorists, including those sought by India. Sometimes, the principle of reciprocity is invoked for extradition when countries agree to extradite individuals to each other under similar circumstances. Here, the problem is there's no individual who lives in India and is responsible for a crime in India. Absence of extradition treaty: While treaties streamline the process, extradition can still occur even without a formal treaty, based on international law and customary practices. But there are challenges and excuses Political relations is a big challenge in the India-Pakistan case. Pakistan's government has built its political capital on India-bashing propaganda. It will need to build a narrative that is acceptable to its army generals, more than the public. The extradition process is highly sensitive and can be influenced by the political relationship between the two countries. Legal hurdles: The process can be lengthy and complex, involving legal challenges and appeals in both countries. Excuse of double jeopardy: Generally, the principle of double jeopardy (being tried twice for the same offence) does not apply between different countries, unless specifically agreed upon. But Pakistan can still claim that it didn't find any evidence of terrorism against terrorists wanted by India and proscribed by the international community. The final excuse, of human rights concerns: Extradition requests are also evaluated to ensure that the individual's human rights are protected during the extradition process and in the receiving country. Though Pakistan has dismal human rights record, repeatedly highlighted by international agencies, in Balochistan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but it can still make an excuse that it suspects human rights violation of terrorists responsible for scores of deaths in India by means of cross-border terrorism despite the fact that countries from Portugal to the US have extradited criminals to India to face the force of law.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bilawal Bhutto's extradition 'offer' sparks LeT row
Bilawal Bhutto (File photo) NEW DELHI: Former Pakistani foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto 's comments on offering extradition of wanted Pakistani terrorists to India seems to have hit a raw nerve with Lashkar-e-Taiba chief Hafiz Saeed 's son Talha. Reacting sharply to remarks Bhutto made in a recent interview, Talha accused him of making an "irresponsible offer". Instead of offering extradition of Pakistani citizens, Talha said Pakistan govt should be demanding the extradition of Indian leaders. He also questioned Bhutto's credibility, alleging that his family has a history of towing the Western and Indian narrative against Pakistan. During the interview with Qatar-based Al Jazeera on Friday, Bhutto had asserted that his country had no objection to extraditing terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India as a "confidence-building measure". Pakistan is ready to extradite "individuals of concern" to India provided New Delhi showed "willingness" to cooperate in the process, Bhutto had said while responding to a question about extraditing LeT chief Saeed and Jaish-e-Muhammed kingpin Masood Azhar as a gesture of good faith. In a video issued on Sunday, Talha claimed that Bhutto's statement about his father had brought shame to Pakistan globally. "Bilawal Bhutto's suggestion to hand over his father to India, a hostile country, is unacceptable and will be opposed by us and our community," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Show Off Your Talent: Enter the Ultimate Creator Contest! Tocsin Media & Marketing LLC Undo Both Saeed and his son Talha are listed as global terrorists by US treasury department. Shortly after Talha's video, Pakistan Markazi Muslim League, political offshoot of LeT/Jamaat-ud-Dawa, released a statement claiming India was involved in terrorism in Pakistan and Indian State was the mastermind of vicious terror campaigns in Pakistan and around the world.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Scheduled Caste survey: Here's why Bengalureans are upset
1 2 Bengaluru: Confusion and anger continue to mount over Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike's (BBMP) Scheduled Castes Comprehensive Survey 2025, with residents questioning its methods, intent, and execution. What began as a data-gathering exercise has drawn criticism for appearing hurried, opaque, and error-ridden — prompting the suspension of at least eight officials. BBMP, on its part, has also tried to clarify. But first, let's look at the criticism. Criticism You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru The main point of contention is BBMP's practice of affixing stickers outside homes declaring them "surveyed", often without any interaction with the residents. Numerous individuals have reported that these stickers were placed even when no one was home, and no questions were asked. The stickers carry a QR code that allows self-reporting, but this nuance has largely gone unexplained to the public. Residents from various neighbourhoods — including Jayanagar, Sulthanpalya, and Chickpet — have expressed concern that surveyors are bypassing verification altogether. In one Brahmin-majority area, advocate Gururaj Kulkarni reported stickers placed on homes of over 80 families without any interaction. "Officials are supposed to collect data on SC/ST households, but they're randomly pasting labels instead," he said. Criticism has also poured in online. Users on social media have questioned the logic behind stickering without surveying, with one resident calling it a "waste of crores of taxpayers' money". Prominent Dalit leader Prakash Ambedkar labelled the survey as "bogus" and posted on X: "What kind of legitimate survey involves secretly pasting notices on homes without speaking to the residents or collecting any actual information?" Tagging Lok Sabha leader of the opposition Rahul Gandhi and chief minister Siddaramiah, he asked, "Why are you planning to cheat the Scheduled Castes?" What BBMP says "The stickering was only to ensure that in our first round, the particular family was visited and no SC family goes without coverage." While SC households can get themselves self-surveyed through the QR code in the sticker, he also stated that non-SC households should not bother about it. "If you are non-SC, this is not for you," BBMP special commissioner (welfare), Suralkar Vikas Kishor, clarified. He also admitted to poor execution of the process with stickers being pasted randomly. "What has happened is our team has passed the sticker without interacting with the household, which is wrong, and for that, we have suspended officials across BBMP in different zones. We'll be continuing that action if we find these kinds of things are happening," he told TOI. Eight suspensions TOI had earlier reported that BBMP had suspended two officials over the matter. Now, the total number is up to eight. The suspended officials are Ramesh, revenue collector (East zone), Peddaraju, revenue inspector (East zone), Sendil Kumar, revenue inspector (RR Nagar), Kavita, revenue inspector (East), Ramanjeyalu, assessor (West), Praveen Kumar, assessor (RR Nagar), Hanumanta Raju CT, assessor (West), and Subhashini, revenue collector (South). The survey, which began on May 5, is part of a statewide drive to gather data on SC households. But BBMP's execution has cast doubt on its credibility. Officials say corrective measures are being taken — but public trust, at least for now, appears in short supply.
