Russell Brand granted bail after court appearance
The broadcaster, comedian and actor faces one allegation of rape, one allegation of indecent assault, one of oral rape and two further counts of sexual assault, relating to four separate women.
Photographers surrounded his car as he arrived, and he did not speak the reporters gathered outside the court building.
Surrounded by cameras and microphones, it took him more than two minutes to walk the short distance to the court door, passing alongside blocks of photographers, who were flanked by police officers.
Brand confirmed his name and address in court, and that he is aged 49.
He is accused of sexually assaulting a woman by touching her breasts and indecently assaulting another by grabbing her arm and dragging her towards a male toilet.
Brand, who was asked to stand in court for the 12-minute hearing, was charged by post last month.
He was granted bail for the case, which will be heard at the Old Bailey.
His next court appearance will be 30 May, and he confirmed during the hearing that he understood his bail conditions.
Brand, who was born in Essex, rose to fame as a stand-up comedian, performing at the Hackney Empire in 2000 and later the Edinburgh Fringe.
He later moved into broadcasting, hosting national television and radio programmes.
The turning point in his career came in the mid-2000s, when he hosted Big Brother's Big Mouth, a companion show to the hugely popular reality series Big Brother.
It provided the springboard he was looking for and led to him becoming one of the most sought-after presenters in the UK.
Brand went on to host the NME, MTV and Brit awards ceremonies, had his own debate series by E4, and fronted the UK leg of charity concert Live Earth.
His career included hosting radio shows on the BBC, in particular for 6 Music and Radio 2, between 2006 and 2008.
Brand released a video in April in which he said he'd never engaged in non-consensual activity and was grateful for the opportunity to defend the charges in court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Bonnie Blue documentary on Channel 4 is compelling but dangerous
Bonnie Blue may have slept with over a thousand men in a day as a publicity stunt, but that's not the bit that most sticks with you from her new Channel 4 documentary. 'We're the two most misunderstood people out there at the moment,' she sighs of Andrew Tate, the YouTuber facing charges including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking, all of which he denies. Tate is a self-proclaimed misogynist, having said on the platform that he's 'a realist and when you're a realist, you're sexist. There's no way you can be rooted in reality and not be sexist.' Blue, 26, whose real name is Tia Billinger, admits she engages in 'rage bait'. In other words, she says willingly provocative things to drive her engagement. She says she likes having sex with 'barely legal or barely breathing' men, that she'd like to have a disabled gang bang and that 'lazy' women are the reason men seek her out for sex. The new documentary tells the story of the Brit who became one of the most successful porn stars on OnlyFans, and features behind-the-scenes footage from the 'thousand men' stunt. It claims to examine a woman living 'at the edges of modern morality'. But fleeting shots of the hanky-panky and the 'how did she do it' narrative – that she had a doughnut halfway through bonking a small cruise ship's worth of men to keep her sugar levels up – disguise a more sinister narrative. In general the doc is too sympathetic to a dangerous character; it might have been better to have commissioned a multi-voice piece focusing on a broader picture of the sex industry today or for director Victoria SIlver to have appeared more in the piece to share her own views to provide more balance. Bonnie Blue seems plainly out of her depth, as someone who hasn't given much thought to the radicalisation of young men There are endless attempts at trying to justify her. During the piece her mum says 'if you earn a million pounds a month, your morals would change and you'd get your tits out.' But that's the thing: we can't. None of us are Blue. She was earning a reported $1 million a month on OnlyFans before she was banned for posting increasingly outrageous content, because she is an extraordinary character with a troubling ability to climb the porn ranks. The Channel 4 documentary is wrong: she isn't on the fringes of moral society, she's parroting highly irresponsible and dangerous narratives to vulnerable, largely young, people. She says she doesn't agree with everything Andrew Tate says, but by giving him such an over-arching praise and aligning herself with him so directly, she has lost the possibility for any nuance. Someone with Blue's platform, which reaches tens of millions of impressionable people, needs to understand the harmful effect their words can have. Her stunts earned her millions of followers, for obvious reasons. Her fans, many of whom are teenagers, were able to queue up and have sex with her for free. She has brought the fantasy of online porn into the real world. 'They sit at home wanking wondering what it's like to fuck me. So just come fuck me,' she says. But as the documentary also examines, she is sexist, suggesting in reductive generalised statements that it's women's fault that men aren't sexually satisfied. On stage during a press event for the documentary she spoke flippantly about 'fat' women. As she puts it: 'I'm happy to piss off the women because they're not my target audience.' Bonnie Blue isn't likeable or unlikable – just incredibly frustrating She worked for five years as a successful recruitment consultant, and through her porn persona you can see how she brings the bullishness of her former job into new territory. Bonnie Blue says in the doc that 'if you don't like it, stop wanking to it' and is firm on the notion that it's up to parents to teach their children about sex, not her (she also notes that Tate is a 'marketing genius'). But Blue isn't selling jobs in the NHS anymore, she's potentially damaging the mental health and confidence of millions of young people, and teaching a whole generation of young men that women's bodies are disposable. It comes amid worrying data: more sexual crimes than ever against under-18s are being committed by other under-18s. I'm not here to moralise about whether or not having sex with a thousand men in a day is wrong. It doesn't sound great to have under one minute with a sexual partner, and surely that's going to get in the heads of some of those men. But Blue's careless messaging and inability to take any responsibility is deeply troubling. I understand why they made it: Blue is someone we need to be having conversations about. The mainstreamisation of porn is going nowhere as the proliferation of online creators continues, but Channel 4's documentary may end up bolstering her toxic narratives. At the media Q+A, even director Victoria Silver seemed uncomfortable being asked how she felt personally about her subject. Blue does seem to have a deep-rooted love for men She comes across as someone plainly out of their depth, who hasn't given much thought to mental health or the radicalisation of young men. She seems content to bulldoze her way to another million, unwilling or unable to take responsibility for her actions. She isn't likeable or unlikable, more just incredibly frustrating. There are glimmers of a distinctive form of compassion: she is perhaps most believable and truly herself when she says how much she enjoys pleasuring men. Interestingly, the only man she had thrown out of the thousand men stunt was someone penis size-shaming other men. I do think she probably has a deep-rooted care for men. The documentary is also utterly compelling, you cannot take your eyes off her and the outrageous things she says. It's just a shame that her love might also be deeply damaging. airs on Channel 4 on Tuesday 29 July at 10pm
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Is 'Big Brother' on tonight? How to watch, stream Friday episode of 'BB: Unlocked'
The first episode of "Big Brother: Unlocked" airs tonight with a special guest and two of the show's biggest winners commenting on the new season. Big Brother 24 winner Taylor Hale and season 16 winner Derrick Levasseur will be leading a bi-weekly show every other Friday with never before seen footage from the show. Here's what to know about Friday night's episode. When is "Big Brother" on tonight? "Big Brother: Unlocked" airs Friday, July 25, at 7 p.m. CT. The episode will air never-before-seen footage, exclusive interviews and behind-the-scenes moments from inside the house. During the show, the two will be joined by a rotating third guest who could be a celebrity or another "Big Brother" alum from the show's first 25 years. Who is Taylor Hale, Derrick Levasseur? Fans of "Big Brother" should know the names Derrick Levasseur and Taylor Hale fairly well. Hale was the winner of the 24th season of the show, making her the first Black woman to win the $750,000 prize and the America's Favorite Houseguest title, the first to achieve this feat during the same season. Since winning, Hale has returned on a couple of occasions, most recently hosting the Jury Roundtable, which is often hosted by "Big Brother" 2 winner Dr. Will Kirby. Levasseur is known as one of the show's strongest winners who won the 16th season while evading a seat on the final chopping block until the Final 3. The undercover cop was known for leading one of the most dominant alliances. What is 'Big Brother: Unlocked?' "Big Brother: Unlocked" is a behind-the-scenes look at the game of "Big Brother." These episodes will feature recurring segments like 'BB Fantasy Draft,' 'Big Move/Bad Move' and 'Binge Worthy or Cringe Worthy.' Throughout the season, Hale and Levasseur will be joined by mystery celebrity guests and surprise show alumni to break down the drama and deliver their insights. It will air every other Friday at 7 p.m. CT. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Is 'Big Brother' on tonight? How to watch Friday's special episode Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Loro Piana Placed Under Judicial Oversight Due to Alleged Worker Exploitation
MILAN — A Milan Court has put Loro Piana into a judicial administration procedure concerning alleged worker exploitation in the Italian luxury brand's supply chain. Loro Piana in a statement on Monday evening said it 'acknowledges the notification received from the Court of Milan's Preventive Measure Section today regarding labor practices by undisclosed and unauthorized subcontractors of one of its suppliers.'The Italian luxury company stated that 'in breach of its legal and contractual obligations, the supplier did not inform Loro Piana of the existence of these subcontractors. Loro Piana was made aware of this situation on May 20, and, as a result, the maison terminated all relations with the concerned supplier in less than 24 hours.' Furthermore, 'Loro Piana firmly condemns any illegal practices and reaffirms its unwavering commitment to upholding human rights and compliance with all applicable regulations throughout its supply chain. Loro Piana is committed to ensuring that all its suppliers comply with the maison's highest quality and ethical standards in line with its Code of Conduct. In this perspective, Loro Piana has been constantly reviewing and will continue to strengthen its control and audit activities.'According to media reports, Loro Piana sells cashmere jackets with a price tag of 3,000 euros, which, through its subcontractors, would allegedly actually cost only 100 euros. The firm denied this claim. 'The reported cost figures are not representative of the amounts paid by Loro Piana to its supplier, nor do they consider the full value of all the elements, including, among others, raw materials and fabrics.'Looking ahead, Loro Piana concluded by stating that it 'expresses its full willingness to cooperate with the relevant authorities on this matter and intends to provide the utmost support for any further investigations.' More from WWD Rihanna's Son Riot Completes Dior Look With Edgy Dr. Martens Oxfords at 'Smurfs' Premiere Rihanna Makes 'Smurfs' Premiere a Fashionable Family Affair in Saint Laurent, With Sons RZA and Riot in Dior Louis Vuitton Notifies U.K. Customers of Data Breach Loro Piana is controlled by the LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton and is helmed by chief executive officer Frédéric Arnault, who succeeded Damian Bertrand last month. Bertrand is now chairman of the brand and has moved to become deputy CEO of Louis is only the latest luxury brand to incur in such a probe. Dior, also part of LVMH, and the Giorgio Armani Group have also been investigated for allegedly using suppliers who subjected workers to poor conditions, including inadequate wages, and potentially misleading consumers about their commitment to ethical standards, labor practices and artisanal production. Both brands have seen the judicial administration procedures lifted after taking steps to improve their supply chain and labor practices. In February, a Milan court ordered the revocation of the judicial administration imposed since April last year on Giorgio Armani Operations, a unit of the namesake designer's fashion group, over the labor practices of its Chinese-owned subcontractors. At the time, the Armani Group said in a statement that the decision to revoke the judicial administration was made because the company has taken all the necessary corrective action and 'already had a structured and tested system of controls and protection of its supply chain.' The revocation came ahead of the one-year deadline initially expected, it pointed out. The statement underscored that the decision was also made because the court recognized the group's craftsmanship as Armani's suppliers 'are often to be identified as highly qualified artisans, especially regarding Italian production, characterized by the highest level of sophistication and quality.' Last year, judges also placed an Italian subsidiary of Dior, which produced handbags for the French brand, under the same form of special administration, again for lack of control over its supply chain. In May, the French fashion house was cleared of any wrongdoing and said it remains 'committed to upholding our values of transparency and respect throughout our supply chain. This further underscores the maison's steadfast and historic dedication to pursuing both rigorous Made in Italy products and the highest standards of ethics and excellence.' Alviero Martini was also investigated over alleged worker exploitation, and in May, a unit of Valentino specialized in bags was placed under judicial administration for a year by the Milan court after worker abuse was uncovered at subcontractors. Following the move, Valentino said it had intensified its supplier evaluation process across its supply chain in recent years and would cooperate with the relevant authorities to 'fully understand the circumstances that have led to the measures taken by the judiciary in this specific case.' Best of WWD The Biggest Legal Battles Shaping the Fashion Industry Today PETA Asks Lululemon About Slaughterhouse Practices China's Livestreaming Star Viya Fined $210 Million for Tax Evasion Solve the daily Crossword