
Is it OK to use AI in your job search? Experts say yes. Here's how to do it right
Lavoy, the regional director at employment agency Robert Half, suspected the candidate was using artificial intelligence to generate answers during a live job interview.
'I questioned it,' she recalled. 'And they jumped off the call.'
That experience wasn't a one-off for Lavoy, so she started asking candidates to show up in person.
With the unemployment rate around seven per cent, those on the hunt for work are looking to get an edge on fellow job seekers. Some are turning to AI to generate pristine, error-free resumés and even prepare for interviews. But that trend has many on the hiring side questioning its ethics.
Companies have started noticing the misuse of AI tools during live interviews and it has become a trend over the last couple of months, said Alexandra Tillo, senior talent strategy adviser at Indeed Canada.
Many recruiters don't mind the use of AI in job searches, Tillo said but it raises an alarm when candidates forgo all personality when writing a cover letter or rely heavily on technology during interviews rather than their own knowledge.
Similar responses to situational or behavioural questions from multiple candidates, with a delivery that lacks emotional intelligence, is what's tipping off recruiters to inauthentic candidates, she added.
'It's very hard to judge someone's skills, especially if the answer is not truly their own and it does lead to a bit of a waste of time ... (and a) lack of trust,' Tillo said.
A tough job market leaves little room for errors from candidates — likely one of the reasons some feel compelled to use AI during live interviews, Tillo speculates.
Employers are taking longer to hire the right candidate: sifting through a heap of applications and relying heavily on AI-powered application tracking systems. Meanwhile, candidates are using AI to insert the right keywords in the hopes of getting through those systems, said Ariel Hennig Wood, career coach at Canada Career Counselling.
'We're losing the personalized resumés and then we're losing the personalized response on the employer side,' she said.
But there are ways AI can be used effectively when looking for work, Wood said.
Her strategy includes step-by-step prompt engineering — telling generative AI programs and apps such as chatbot ChatGPT exactly what it needs to do for every phase of the job search.
'When it comes to employer research, AI can definitely be your best friend,' Wood said. AI could help gather insights on information ranging from a company's turnover rate to why employees like working there.
The next piece is the cover letter. She suggests starting with a generic template borrowed from AI, then personalizing it with your own voice through the right prompts.
'Instead of just saying, 'I want a job,' it should be: 'I want this job, and this is why I'm a good fit. This is why I feel connected to this role,'' Wood said.
Then tailor that research to the resumé and cover letter, while also doing an analysis of the job posting to add the right keywords, she added.
'AI needs to be used in the job search process to be effective against application-tracking systems,' said Wood.
Then, Wood suggested leveraging AI for practice interview questions — such as generating questions you might be asked or pulling out achievements from your resumé to make answers relevant to the job interview.
'You can record yourself answering the interview questions, and then it will give you AI-generated feedback, which can be helpful,' she said. But also get feedback from a friend or career counsellor, Wood added.
Once a candidate lands the job, Wood said AI can help with offer negotiations.
'It can scan the offer and flag anything that may be out of the norm,' she said. 'It could tell you ... where there could be room for negotiation in the offer.'
AI isn't just a tool to polish resumés for Karan Saraf, who is studying public relations and is on the lookout for a job. Some days, he uses it to make sense of his scattered thoughts when applying to a job, while other times, it's about role-playing interviews.
And his strategy worked, landing him interviews in a tough youth job market.
Saraf said as long as he's not plagiarizing or misleading employers, he doesn't feel the need to disclose that he leveraged AI in his job search journey.
'But then, if I'm ever asked this question, I would be honest about it,' he said. 'That's part of being an ethical AI user.'
Wood said an ethical AI user would know exactly what's in their resumé, if questioned.
'I don't believe that you need to go into an interview and say, 'By the way, I prepped with AI for this,'' she said. 'It's such a common tool now that everybody's using and if you are using it ethically, there's nothing to disclose.'
But Carlie Bell thinks that creates an imbalance between employers and job seekers. Upcoming Ontario legislation mandates companies to disclose in their public job postings their use of AI in screening, selecting and assessing applicants starting Jan. 1, 2026. Other provinces haven't yet opted for similar measures.
'It is employers ... who are going to be held to legal standards around this kind of stuff and expectations, but there is still nothing there to really guide the job seekers,' said Bell, director of consulting at Citation Canada.
Bell anticipates employers will also start expecting job seekers to disclose their use of AI for transparency both ways.
Still, using AI in a job search isn't likely to harm a candidate as long as they continue to be creative and talk about personal experiences, Bell said.
'In a world where everybody's the same ... and you're trying to compete essentially against machines on both sides, what we know is that the human really matters still,' Bell said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 13, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Youtech Survey Reveals Traditional Search Still Dominates Local Discovery, AI Adoption Growing with Key Challenges Ahead
The report revealed consumers trust Google for local business search (93.2%), while AI seeks to improve accuracy and address human touch concerns. Youtech's data highlights opportunities for businesses to optimize across both traditional and AI search surfaces. LISLE, Ill., July 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Youtech, a leading global full-service digital marketing agency, today announced the findings of its latest consumer survey, shedding light on how people search for local businesses online. The research indicates that while AI assistants are gaining traction, traditional search engines like Google remain the primary tool for local business discovery, highlighting specific areas where AI needs to improve to gain wider adoption. 'Our data clearly shows that consumers value reliability and comprehensiveness when searching for local businesses,' said Wilbur You, CEO of Youtech. 'While the buzz around AI is undeniable, the numbers revealed a critical need for AI assistants to enhance their accuracy, real-time information, and integration with familiar tools to truly compete with traditional search for local businesses.' Key Survey Findings: Consumers continue to predominantly rely on traditional search engines for discovering local businesses. A significant majority, 93.2% of respondents, indicated they trust Google over AI for this purpose. Looking ahead, this preference seems likely to persist, as the report notes that AI is not yet replacing traditional search, though consumer interest is growing fast. The survey highlights that Restaurants & Food (88%), Home & Home Improvement (55.3%), and Automotive (42%) are the most frequently searched local business categories. Despite the growing presence of AI, its adoption for local business searches is still relatively low, with 56.7% of consumers having never utilized an AI assistant for this specific purpose. For those who have, usage is infrequent, with 27.3% having done so in the last week. The most critical factors identified for AI to compete with traditional search for local business discovery were more accurate, up-to-date info (39.1%) and better integration with maps (15%). This emphasizes a foundational trust deficit, as 93.2% of respondents would trust traditional Google Search more to find or evaluate a local business. Consumers prioritize the accuracy of information and trust when choosing between AI and traditional search tools. A key concern about using AI for local business searches is missing the human touch (31.7%), followed by outdated or incorrect information (28.3%). Consumers value reviews, hours, photos, and service details most for local business searches. Furthermore, real-time information, such as real-time booking, is considered extremely important and a deal-breaker, if missing, by 9% of respondents. 'Local search is pivoting, and our findings emphasize that while AI is a powerful emerging force, the bedrock of consumer trust remains firmly rooted in accuracy and relevance,' said Michael Norris, CMO of Youtech. 'Businesses that proactively refine their presence across both traditional search engines and emerging AI platforms will be best positioned to capture the attention and loyalty of today's consumers.' The survey was conducted independently by Youtech with 150 consumers from June 26–28, 2025. Full results can be found here: To learn how Youtech can help navigate changes in search, please visit About Youtech Youtech & Associates Inc. ('Youtech') is a leading, full-service digital marketing agency providing solutions to brands of all sizes. Bootstrapped in 2012 with an investment of just $600, the agency has since become an award-winning powerhouse serving over 2,000 clients, completing over 10,000 projects, and generating over $1 billion in client sales worldwide. With a strong and expanding presence in Scottsdale, alongside offices in Chicago and Dallas, Youtech is one of the fastest-growing digital marketing firms in the country. Learn more about Youtech at Company Contact Michael Norris mnorris@ Media Contact Jessica Starman media@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Everyone's Using AI In Security—Now What?
Dave Merkel (also known as "Merk") is the co-founder and CEO of Expel, a cybersecurity provider headquartered near the Washington, DC, area. The question is no longer whether AI is part of the deal when selecting a security provider. The answer is going to be a resounding "yes." However, determining whether the AI in the equation is enabling that service—and, as a result, your organization—or is simply tacked on for marketing purposes is more nuanced. The uncomfortable truth is that security budgets are plateauing (if not shrinking), while security incidents (and the average cost of a data breach) are increasing. As a result, business leaders must ask themselves: • If attacks are growing in frequency and sophistication every day, are we making the right investments to stay ahead of those threats? • Is it an efficient use of capital? • Are we getting the results/outcomes we should? • Are we continuously improving? For some, AI-enabled security services might be the key to meeting those needs. If that's the case for your organization, it's time to pivot to the next critical step: selecting vendors that move beyond adoption to show how AI adds real, demonstrable value to your security stack. Moving Past The Feature List To Achieving Business Objectives To make that shift from what it does to what they can accomplish with it, leaders have to recognize that AI isn't a magic bullet; it's an enabler for achieving specific business objectives. However, when rapidly emerging tech crashes onto the scene, it can be difficult to differentiate between a marketing play and a real value add. Doing so requires security leaders to ask the right questions—of themselves and their would-be providers. Questions like: • What are the objectives of our cyber program? Taking an outcome-first approach can help determine what specific, measurable results you're after—whether that's reducing mean time to remediate, improving threat detection speed or other important SOC metrics. • Can this tool seamlessly integrate with our security stack? Compatible integrations and interoperability not only speed up onboarding but also help avoid tool sprawl. • Does the tool provide actionable insights that align with the business risks we care about? Focus on vendors that understand your specific environment and deliver recommendations for tools that help you continuously improve, not just a steady stream of alerts. • Can it grow with our business and adapt to evolving threats? The best offerings will use AI to accelerate efficiency, allowing your organization to grow and scale without sacrificing protection. • Is there a human in the loop? Understand where the checks and balances exist in the system and ensure AI-driven decisions are easily auditable. This builds trust internally and externally, and it helps avoid fallout from hallucinations (AI-generated incorrect or nonsensical information). • What's the implication for team headcount? If your CFO approves a new solution, don't expect a simultaneous increase to your hiring budget. Knowing whether the solution keeps your headcount neutral or—better yet—helps net some efficiency only strengthens your argument. Of course, feeling confident in these answers and knowing you're ready to onboard an AI-enabled vendor is only part of the puzzle. You also have to prove that value with a compelling ROI. Proving The "Now What" To The Business And Board If you've based your argument for a new tool on efficiency gains, consider how the security team having "more time" will be beneficial to the CFO, CEO and/or board. While it can be difficult to prove a negative (i.e., cost saved on breaches that didn't happen), it's usually a matter of translating security efficiency into business value. In other words, AI-enabled investments reduce the likelihood of cyber incidents—and when they do occur, they reduce their impact. This directly translates to: • Minimal Business Disruption: Faster detection and remediation lead to less downtime and fewer breaches, creating a more resilient organization. • Less Reputational Risk: Avoiding negative PR, loss of brand trust or anything that reduces competitiveness in a market. • Fewer Unplanned Direct And Indirect Costs: Mitigating incident response, technology rebuilds, recovery and time lost when the business has to shift attention and resources to a security incident. • Meeting Regulatory And Legal Requirements: Avoiding GDPR fines, FTC and SEC consent decrees and expensive, distracting lawsuits. It also frees up resources for better optimization. AI-enabled services should give time back to the human analyst in the loop, taking over the repetitive, manual tasks and allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives like threat hunting, proactive defense and security architecture improvements. When it comes time to communicate this ROI to stakeholders, focus on business outcomes. Use clear units (dollars and percentages, preferably), show trends and employ comparables against industry frameworks (e.g., NIST CSF) to establish context. Over time, this also measures for continuous improvement and efficiency, making it that much easier to "prove the negative" (prevented breaches) to the skeptics in the room. These elements together elevate the security function and allow for the business to innovate faster—making security an enabler, not a roadblock. From Adoption To Strategic Advantage The "now what" of AI-enabled security is about moving past the flashy new tech and thinking critically about the strategic outcomes it drives for the business. Security leaders tasked with proving the ROI on these services are best served when they can solve for business-critical risks and communicate how efficiency in the security program helps drive these goals. Communicating that ROI is also about understanding who is at the table and speaking their language, whether they come from a tech background or the business and/or finance side of the house. Frame things in terms of enterprise risk and positive business outcomes that the organization really cares about, keeping in mind that finance is the common language of leadership and boards. Regardless, establish metrics that help security teams find creative and useful ways to demonstrate effectiveness and build a cycle of continuous improvement. AI alone is not a differentiator; rather, it's how it enables teams to help achieve your business goals. The next time you see a provider touting AI, ask hard questions—of potential vendors and your own program—and know the difference between better security outcomes or just marketing fluff. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is love is dead? 41% of people surveyed have used AI to break up with someone.
Has man really been replaced by machines? It looks like the Brave New World is here and it is very much not the future we were promised, and feels rather the opposite of romantic. According to a recent study conducted by Wingmate, an AI-powered relationship assistant, 41% of those surveyed have at some point used AI to break up with someone and more than half of those in the study - 57%! - would trust AI more than a friend or loved one for dating advice. While some of the stats are promising for the future of romance – over a third of people surveyed have found that using AI in their search has led to more dating matches, it does add some question of truth and authenticity in those matches as many of those same users are using AI for everything from writing bios to responding to text messages, but more than 20% are hiding that they are doing so. Dating apps have existed for a long time and have been a vital part of finding matches where we may have not otherwise, so is incorporating AI into the equation a natural part of the progression? Will it help us find and sustain love? Or is it removing the person from the equation more and more, and making even intimacy increasingly automated and impersonal? Whatever the case — and I'm honestly not sure of the answer — the dating world is feeling like murkier and murkier territory for those of us still trying to navigate single waters.