Jury reaches verdict on 4 of 5 counts in Diddy trial, judge indicates they'll keep deliberating
The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial said Tuesday that it has reached a verdict on four of five counts against the hip-hop mogul and was unable to reach a decision on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy.
The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defense team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts.
Judge Arun Subramanian said he received a note at 4:05 p.m. Tuesday indicated that the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides.
Subramanian didn't appear keen on having jurors announce their partial verdict without first trying to decide the remaining count. He said that juries have a right to deliver a partial verdict, but indicated that's more of a last resort and that given the short amount of time the panel has been deliberated, he'd rather give them more time and wait to have a full verdict.
Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defense table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly.
Combs' mother and several of his children returned to the courtroom after the judge announced that the jury had reached a partial verdict.
Prosecutors, meanwhile, were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what's known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse.
Defense attorney Agnifilo, however, said the jury doesn't need help moving expeditiously and he doesn't want them to get any form of the Allen charge.
'I'm not asking the court to say much because I don't think this jury needs much,' Agnifilo said, arguing that this situation is different from ones where a jury has gone a while without reaching a verdict on any counts.
Racketeering conspiracy — count 1 on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise,' but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offenses, such as kidnapping and arson.
The charge falls under RICO — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act — which is best known for being used in organized crime and drug cartel cases.
The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Cassie.
Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fueled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights.'
The panel of eight men and four women asked for Cassie's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage.
They also asked to see Cassie's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the U.S., she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex.
In addition, the jury asked for Cassie and stripper Daniel Phillip's testimony about her jumping into his lap at a New York City hotel after, as Phillip testified, he suspected Combs had been slapping and slamming her around an adjacent room.
'Her whole entire body was shaking, like she was terrified,' said Phillip, who was at the hotel for a sexual encounter with Cassie sometime between 2012 and 2014.
Phillip testified that he asked Cassie, the R&B singer whose real name is Casandra Ventura, why she was with Combs if he was hitting her and beating her. He said he told her she was in real danger. Cassie, he said, 'basically tried to convince me that it was OK, it's OK. I'm fine, I'll be OK.'
Phillip and Cassie were among the first witnesses who testified when the trial began last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Cassie's Lawyer Issues Statement Amid Sean 'Diddy' Combs Verdict
Casandra 'Cassie' Fine's lawyer has released a statement following the verdict in the landmark sex trafficking trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. On Wednesday morning (July 2), the 55-year-old was found guilty of two federal counts of transporting women across state lines for the purpose of prostitution, and acquitted of racketeering and sex trafficking charges. Fine's civil lawsuit, filed against Combs in November 2023, broke the ice on public allegations of rape and abuse against the Harlem native. Under New York State's Adult Survivors Act, she accused him of sex trafficking, sexual battery, sexual assault, and violations of New York City's gender-motivated violence law. The lawsuit was settled for an undisclosed amount in less than two days. 'Although the jury did not find Combs guilty of sex trafficking Cassie beyond a reasonable doubt, she paved the way for a jury to find him guilty of transportation to engage in prostitution,' detailed Fine' attorney, Douglas H. Wigdor, in a statement to Variety. 'By coming forward with her experience, Cassie has left an indelible mark on both the entertainment industry and the fight for justice. We must repeat – with no reservation – that we believe and support our client who showed exemplary courage throughout this trial. She displayed unquestionable strength and brought attention to the realities of powerful men in our orbit and the misconduct that has persisted for decades without repercussion. This case proved that change is long overdue, and we will continue to fight on behalf of survivors.' The R&B singer not only filed the initial lawsuit against Combs, but she also testified during the shocking criminal trial. Video footage of a 2016 incident where Combs physically assaulted Fine was also included in the evidence. 'He would smash me in my head, knock me over, drag me, kick me, stomp me in the head if I was down,' detailed the 38-year-old on the witness stand. According to CNN, Judge Arun Subramanian is expected to decide today if Combs should be released ahead of sentencing. His legal team has suggested that he return to his house in Miami and follow court-mandated conditions. Combs has remained behind bars since his September 2024 arrest. More from Funkmaster Flex Blasted For Rant Targeted At Cassie Following Diddy Verdict Sean "Diddy" Combs Sex Trafficking Trial: Jury Deliberation Begins Scott Storch Recalls Diddy Parties, Claims Mogul "Tried To Flirt" With Him
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Sentencing Date Set For Fall
A sentencing date has been set for Sean 'Diddy' Combs following his federal conviction. According to CNN, the 55-year-old will learn his fate on Oct. 3, 2025, after being found guilty on two federal counts of transporting women across state lines for the purpose of prostitution. The decision, made on Tuesday (July 8), came after Combs' legal team requested an expedited hearing process from Judge Arun Subramanian, asking for a September date, the aforementioned date before coming to an agreement. Combs faces up to 10 years in prison on each count. As reported by Rolling Stone, his defense team is reportedly pushing for the minimum sentence of 21 to 27 months behind bars. The prosecution, however, said the sentencing guidelines called for 51 to 63 months imprisonment, and noted it would likely be seeking an even longer sentence. Judge Subramanian has previously noted that the time Combs has already spent in behind bars will count towards his final sentence. The Harlem native has been jailed since his initial arrest in September 2024. Judge Subramanian denied the defense team's request for the Hip-Hop producer to be released on bail until sentencing. 'It is impossible for the defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he poses no danger,' relayed Judge Subramanian, per The Guardian. 'At trial, the defense conceded the defendant's violence in personal relationships, saying 'it happened' in relation to Cassie Ventura and Jane,' he continued. 'This highlights a disregard for the rule of law and a propensity of violence.' After the Bad Boy Records founder was found guilty of the lesser charges and acquitted of the more serious racketeering and sex trafficking charges, many celebrated the news. Celebrities, including Tiny Harris and Boosie Badazz, made exclamations on social media, while some fans gathered outside the courthouse, spraying baby oil. 'I feel incredible. I feel good,' shared Sean Combs' mother, Janice Combs, after the verdict. 'First thing I'm gonna do is hug my Pops,' added the Grammy winner's son, Christian Combs. 'We were hopeful, but you never know,' continued Justin Combs. 'I am so happy.' More from D.L. Hughley Slams "Morally Bankrupt" People Celebrating Diddy Verdict Cassie's Lawyer Issues Statement Amid Sean "Diddy" Combs Verdict Sean "Diddy" Combs Sex Trafficking Trial: Jury Deliberation Begins
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Sean Combs Trial Alternate Juror ‘Believed' Cassie and Jane, but ‘Intent' Was Issue
When Sean Combs was acquitted of two sex trafficking charges after harrowing testimony from R&B singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a more recent ex-girlfriend who testified under the pseudonym Jane, some surmised the jury simply didn't believe the women. But there's another possible explanation, experts and an alternate juror who sat through the seven-week trial tell Rolling Stone. The verdict may have hinged on jurors' appraisal of Combs' 'intent.' It's possible jurors believed that either Cassie or Jane, or both, felt coerced by Combs into at least one commercial sex act with a male escort, but that still wasn't enough for a conviction on sex trafficking. Jurors were required to find that Combs intended to commit sex trafficking, or at least that he recklessly disregarded how his actions might compel someone into sex trafficking, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian said in his instructions. More from Rolling Stone Sean Combs' Sentencing Set for October Sean Combs Alternate Juror Speaks Out Beating RICO Charges Doesn't Make Diddy a Hero It's a high bar to clear, especially with the element of reasonable doubt, the juror and experts say. 'Both women, I believe they were very credible. They wouldn't go up there and want to lie. I believe the women. [But] I think having a smoking gun for intent, that was one of the things we were looking for,' the alternate juror, who asked to be identified only by his first name, George, tells Rolling Stone. 'I was looking for something that would prove intent. And the defense did raise some doubt whether there was intent to coerce.' While George was effectively excused last week just as deliberations started, he heard the same live testimony from the govenment's 34 witnesses and filled up three spiral notebooks with notes. He says that for him, the hard evidence in the case — the text messages and the so-called 'freak off' videos — fell short of proving that Combs knew the women felt coerced. According to George, the freak-off videos shown to jurors on privacy screens not visible to the courtroom gallery depicted some sexual activity, but they were mostly 'just talking and rubbing oil.' He says in some of the footage, Ventura appeared to be setting up candles or otherwise helping with 'the ambiance' of the alleged drug-fueled threesomes that could last for days while Combs recorded video and masturbated. George says 'nothing in the video' showed a bright line of coercion. In other words, any distress or thoughts of coercion going on in the minds of the participants wasn't visible to him. Even so, he believed the women's testimony about feeling coerced, he reiterates. 'I really give credit and kudos to Cassie for coming in early on, heavily pregnant, testifying for days on end, and getting cross-examined. To put yourself through that — that testimony was very important,' he says. 'Listening to both women, I did find them credible. But there were holes … Sometimes everything didn't exactly fit.' Two former federal prosecutors who secured the 2021 racketeering conviction of R. Kelly in Brooklyn say proving intent is notoriously difficult. 'I thought the government built a compelling case as to trafficking Cassie on at least some occasions. But the reality is that it's very hard to prove that a defendant had the requisite intent to compel a person to perform labor, or engage in commercial sex, even if his conduct arguably had the effect of compelling the labor,' Elizabeth Geddes, the former EDNY prosecutor who delivered the closing arguments in the R. Kelly case, tells Rolling Stone. 'Put another way, the jury could have credited that Cassie felt compelled to engage in the freak-offs for fear of otherwise enduring serious harm but found that there was not enough evidence to prove that Combs' intent was for her to do so.' Maria Cruz Melendez, the other lead prosecutor on the R. Kelly case — now a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom — says proving intent is 'one of the hardest elements' of prosecuting a crime. 'Essentially, it's because you have to enter the mind of the defendant and then prove his intent to the jurors so they can say beyond a reasonable doubt that they knew what Combs was thinking when he engaged in the alleged conduct,' she says. 'So, it's understandable that some jurors will have a hard time with that, absent a confession or other type of admission that, from their perspective, is crystal clear.' She says the law recognizes confessions aren't the norm, so jurors are allowed to look at circumstantial evidence and the actions of defendants. 'But ultimately, each juror is different,' she says. 'What constitutes reasonable doubt for each person is different. That's part of the challenge — whether you've met each individual juror's threshold for reasonable doubt. And, in many ways, it is the same for meeting the intent element.' When the jury's unanimous verdict was read, Combs covered his face, let out a massive sigh and pumped his fist by his side. He was acquitted of two counts of sex trafficking and a single count of racketeering conspiracy. The jury convicted him on two lesser counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He is due to be sentenced in early October. In a letter to the court after the verdict, Combs' defense calculated his expected sentencing guidelines to range between 21 and 27 months. Lead defense attorney Mark Agnifilo said he planned to argue Combs is 'entitled' to 'a below-guidelines sentence' considering he wasn't a 'pimp' making money off the escorts. Prosecutors, meanwhile, said the correct calculation for Combs' sentencing range was at least 51 to 63 months imprisonment, meaning about four to five years. Federal judges aren't required to follow sentencing guidelines and may treat them as a starting point while considering other factors, including certain evidence at trial they considered credible. In the Southern District of New York, judges stuck to guideline ranges 34.5 percent of the time in the last fiscal year, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. 'Today is a great victory for Sean Combs. It's a great victory for the jury system,' Agnifilo told reporters outside the courthouse last week. 'Today is a win. Today is a victory of all victories for Sean Combs.' In his closing arguments, Agnifilo told jurors they were faced with a 'tale of two trials.' He said one trial was 'told from the mouths of witnesses,' while the other was based on the text messages and videos. He said the texts exchanged between Ventura and Combs around the time of their breakup in 2018 were 'some of the most beautiful things I've ever read.' He called the couple's relationship a 'great modern love story.' Summing up the heart of the defense case, Agnifilo said Combs owned the fact he was violent at times, but domestic violence didn't make Combs a sex trafficker leading a criminal enterprise. Agnifilo challenged jurors to search through the hundreds of text messages between Combs and Ventura. 'You won't find one, you won't find one where she is like, 'I didn't like that sex. I am not attracted to you. I don't like our sex life,'' he argued. In her four days of grueling testimony, Ventura said she regularly faced physical beatings and threats at the hands of Combs, so she learned to feign enthusiasm as a survival tactic. 'It was always in the back of my mind that I would somehow be hurt by him,' she said. 'Make the wrong face, and the next thing I knew, I was getting hit in the face.' Still, George said the text messages Ventura and Jane exchanged with Combs raised doubt. 'The general feel of the messages was that they knew what they were doing, they knew what was happening,' he said. 'Beyond a reasonable doubt, that's such a high standard. But believe me, if we did find there was true intent, and there was an opportunity to convict [Combs] on any of the charges he was found not guilty on, the jury would have done that.' After the verdict, Agnifilo said the jury got the verdict right, 'or at least right enough.' He then said the defense planned to keep fighting in the face of the two prostitution convictions. 'We're not going to stop until [Combs] walks out of prison a free man to his family,' the lawyer vowed. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
