logo
"No Need For India To Speak": Kiren Rijiju On Dalai Lama's Succession Plan

"No Need For India To Speak": Kiren Rijiju On Dalai Lama's Succession Plan

NDTV12 hours ago
New Delhi:
Union Minister of Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju asserted that the choice of the Dalai Lama's successor should rest solely with the spiritual leader himself, reflecting the belief of his followers worldwide amid China's recent statement on the matter.
"I am a devotee of the Dalai Lama. Anybody in the world who follows the Dalai Lama wants his successor to be chosen by the Dalai Lama himself," Mr Rijiju said.
Emphasising that there should be no ambiguity on the matter, he added, "There is no need for us to be in confusion regarding the Dalai Lama issue. All the people who follow Buddhism as their religion and his followers think that the Dalai Lama should choose his successor on his own. There is no need for us or the Government of India to speak on this."
Refusing to directly address Beijing's remarks, Mr Rijiju said, "I don't want to react on China's statement. The people who follow the Dalai Lama think that he will choose his successor. I am not saying anything on behalf of the Chinese government or Government of India."
Notably, Union Ministers Kiren Rijiju and Rajiv Ranjan will be visiting Dharamshala as representatives of the Government of India to attend the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday on July 6.
Dalai Lama is the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhism. The current Dalai Lama is the 14th in the lineage.
Meanwhile, Hollywood actor Richard Gere has also joined in celebrations in Dharamshala in Himachal Pradesh ahead of the 90th birthday of the 14th Dalai Lama.
Speaking to reporters, he said, "...Once I went to the Dalai Lama when I was feeling very tired. I asked His Holiness, Can I stop now? He said yes, you can stop when I stop, which is never. This is not a commitment for one lifetime. This is many lifetimes of commitment, not just for Tibet but for the people of Tibet who have been highly abused for many decades by the Chinese Communist party..."
Earlier on July 2, Tibetan Spiritual Leader, the Dalai Lama, stated that the Gaden Phodrang Trust, a foundation established by him, can only recognise future reincarnations, and no one else has the authority to decide on the matter. This statement rules out any say for China in the process of naming the next Dalai Lama.
In a statement on Wednesday, Dalai Lama stated, "The process by which a future Dalai Lama is to be recognized has been clearly established in the 24 September 2011 statement which states that responsibility for doing so will rest exclusively with members of the Gaden Phodrang Trust, the Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. They should consult the various heads of the Tibetan Buddhist traditions and the reliable oath-bound Dharma Protectors who are linked inseparably to the lineage of the Dalai Lamas. They should accordingly carry out the procedures of search and recognition in accordance with past tradition."
"I hereby reiterate that the Gaden Phodrang Trust has sole authority to recognise the future reincarnation; no one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter, he added.
However, China's Foreign Ministry emphasised that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama must be approved by the central government in Beijing.
Spokesperson Mao Ning stated that Tibetan Buddhism is a religion with Chinese characteristics and that the reincarnation process must follow traditional methods, including the drawing of lots from a golden urn.
"Tibetan Buddhism was born in China and is a religion with Chinese characteristics," spokesperson Mao Ning said in a news briefing.
The atheist Chinese Communist Party, which annexed Tibet in 1951, has in recent years stepped up its long-standing efforts to influence the Tibetan Buddhist religion and forcibly assimilate the population in Tibet as part of a broader effort to control ethnic and religious minorities. It replicated many of these practices during a fierce crackdown on the Muslim Uyghur population in the Xinjiang region.
The Dalai Lama fled Tibet in 1959 after a failed popular uprising against Chinese control, and relocated to northern India, where he set up a government-in-exile in Dharamshala. In 1989, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for advocating peaceful solutions based upon tolerance and mutual respect.
The Dalai Lama has long been cautious about Beijing's attempts to meddle with the reincarnation system of Tibetan Buddhism, a tradition deeply rooted in the spiritual and cultural heritage of Tibet. At the heart of this issue is the belief that enlightened spiritual masters like the Dalai Lama can choose the place and time of their rebirth through the force of compassion and prayer.
A significant point of contention is the reincarnation of the Panchen Lama, the second-highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism. In 1995, Beijing installed its own Panchen Lama, disregarding the Dalai Lama's choice for the role. The Dalai Lama's chosen Panchen Lama, a six-year-old boy at the time, has since disappeared from public view.
In Tibetan tradition, the Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas have played key roles in recognizing each other's reincarnations. This mutual recognition process is essential to maintaining the integrity and authenticity of the reincarnation system.
Beijing's interference in the reincarnation system is seen as an attempt to exert control over Tibetan Buddhism and undermine the Dalai Lama's spiritual authority. By installing its own candidates for key spiritual roles, Beijing aims to shape the future of Tibetan Buddhism in a way that aligns with its own interests.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China fears US will turn focus on it if Russia defeated in Ukraine war: Report
China fears US will turn focus on it if Russia defeated in Ukraine war: Report

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

China fears US will turn focus on it if Russia defeated in Ukraine war: Report

BEIJING: Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi has told EU leaders that Beijing does not want to see Russia losing its war with Ukraine because the US would then shift its whole focus towards China, a candid admission that surprised officials in Brussels, a media report said. Wang's comment during his talks with EU's Kaja Kallas - bloc's de facto foreign affairs chief - would confirm what many in Brussels believe to be Beijing's position, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported on Friday. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning parried the question about Wang's comments at a media briefing. Wang is currently on a tour of the EU. Some EU officials involved were surprised by Wang's remarks, the Post reported. However, Wang is said to have rejected the accusation that China was materially supporting Russia's war effort, insisting if it was doing so, the war would have ended long ago. During a four-hour debate on a wide range of issues, Wang was said to have given Kallas a lesson in realpolitik, part of which focused on Beijing's belief that Washington would soon turn its full attention eastward. One interpretation of Wang's statement in Brussels is that while China did not ask for the war, its prolongation may suit its strategic needs, so long as US remains engaged in Ukraine, the Post reported.

'National interest over deadline': Piyush Goyal on India-US trade deal progress
'National interest over deadline': Piyush Goyal on India-US trade deal progress

Hindustan Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'National interest over deadline': Piyush Goyal on India-US trade deal progress

India will not hurry into signing a free trade agreement under pressure from any deadline, commerce minister Piyush Goyal said on Friday, when asked whether a deal could be reached with the US in time for a July 9 deadline set by Washington. Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal speaks at the inauguration of the 16th Toy Biz International B2B Exhibition.(Jitender Gupta/ANI) Speaking on the sidelines of the 16th Toy Biz International B2B Expo in New Delhi, Goyal emphasised that India is ready to make trade deals in the national interest but it 'never negotiates trade deals with a deadline'. When asked specifically about prospects of an interim US deal by July 9, he said any agreement would be announced only when 'fully finalised, properly concluded and in the national interest.' The minister's comments came as India's negotiating team, led by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, returned to Delhi Thursday after week-long talks in Washington. Despite having a draft interim agreement in hand, people familiar with the discussions said, key issues around automobiles and agriculture remain unresolved. The government has refused to fully open its agriculture sector, particularly around genetically modified crops and dairy products. The country remains unwilling to allow items like soybean and corn unless certified as non-GM, since GM crops are banned domestically. 'India was, however, willing to give some product-specific concessions where its farmers were completely protected,' said one of these people, asking not to be named. On dairy, India cited two main concerns: the subsistence-level nature of its farming, where millions depend on just one or two cows or buffaloes, and religious sensitivities around US cattle feed that includes non-vegetarian products. 'The livelihoods of millions of farmers are at stake as they could not compete with America's commercial-scale dairy farms,' said a second person, speaking on condition of anonymity. To protect its farmers, India has softened its initial demand for the US to completely revoke the 26% 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariff that President Trump announced April 2, the second official stated. The tariff comprises a 10% baseline levy already in effect and an additional 16% country-specific tariff set to trigger July 9. India had originally sought withdrawal of all retaliatory tariffs but appears willing to accept partial relief in exchange for limited agricultural concessions. Outside of these negotiations, India on Friday told the World Trade Organization that it plans to go ahead with levies on some US goods in retaliation to Washington's higher tariffs on automobiles and their components. US' safeguard measures would hit $2.9 billion imports annually from India with $723.75 million in duties. 'Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the US,' according to a notification sent to the WTO. The current negotiations focus on an 'early harvest' deal covering goods alone, which would serve as a precursor to the first tranche of a comprehensive Bilateral Trade Agreement expected by October 2025. That broader deal would include services and investment provisions. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump agreed in February to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 through a full-scale agreement. Goyal noted India is simultaneously negotiating trade deals with multiple partners, having recently concluded agreements with the UAE, Australia and UK, while talks continue with the EU, New Zealand, Oman, Chile and Peru. 'FTAs are possible when both sides benefit,' Goyal said in Hindi. 'National interest should always be supreme.' The two sides will continue engaging virtually as the July 9 deadline approaches, the people cited above added.

'India won't negotiate based on timelines': Goyal on India-US trade deal ahead of July 9 deadline
'India won't negotiate based on timelines': Goyal on India-US trade deal ahead of July 9 deadline

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

'India won't negotiate based on timelines': Goyal on India-US trade deal ahead of July 9 deadline

Earlier, sources had said that the India-US trade deal will conclude in the next few days as an Indian delegation has returned from Washington after holding high-level talks with officials from the Trump administration read more Union Minister of Commerce and Trade Piyush Goyal has asserted that India will not sign a trade deal based on a timeline, but set its own terms to negotiate an agreement. His comments came ahead of July 9, when the pause on retaliatory tariffs will expire. Earlier, sources had told News18 that the India-US trade deal will conclude in the next few days as an Indian delegation has returned from Washington after holding high-level talks with officials from the Trump administration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Whether it is the European Union, New Zealand, Oman, the United States, Chile, or Peru, negotiations for agreements are underway with many countries. A free trade agreement happens only when there is mutual benefit," the minister said When the deal is made while safeguarding India's interests, keeping in mind that national interest will always remain paramount, then India is always ready to make deals with developed countries… India never makes a trade deal based on a timeline; when the deal is good, fully matured, and in the national interest, then we accept it," Goyal added. Refresh for updates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store