Council Awards $180,000 In Grants To Local Community Groups
Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) has awarded $180,000 in grants through its Community Fund 2025-2026 to support 28 groups across the district.
QLDC Community Partnerships Manager Marie Day said the funding round focused on supporting local initiatives that deliver strong wellbeing outcomes and reflect community needs.
'This year's fund of $180,000 was allocated through the Annual Plan. Despite the relatively limited funding, we were delighted to be able to support an impressive range of projects and organisations that look to make a meaningful impact, enhancing the wellbeing and connectivity of our community,' said Ms Day.
'From youth and environmental initiatives to arts, culture and social services, the 28 successful applicants represent the vibrant diversity of our district and the dedication of those working to make it better,' she said.
Applications for the 2025-2026 round closed on 30 April and were assessed by a panel of elected members and staff, with the final decisions made by Full Council in late June. Groups had the option to present their applications in person in May, offering valuable insight into their work and impact.
Ms Day acknowledged the challenging environment many community groups continue to face.
'We recognise that rising costs and economic pressures make it tough for many groups to sustain their services. While this year's fund was smaller, the demand for support remains high, and we're committed to ensuring community voices remain at the heart of our funding priorities,' she said.
Full details of the fund recipients are available on the Council's website at www.qldc.govt.nz/community-fund.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Residents urged to have say on future of airport
The wider Upper Clutha community is being encouraged to share their views on the future of Wānaka Airport — but one group says those in Queenstown appear to be pre-determining the outcome. The consultation is being led by French engineering firm Egis on behalf of the Queenstown Lakes District Council. Last month, the Wānaka Stakeholders Group launched its own proposal for the airport, advocating for a development model centred on strong local input. The group is pushing for a plan that reflects the interests of the entire Upper Clutha region, emphasising community involvement in governance, management, accountability, and investment decisions. The public consultation is seen as a critical opportunity for residents to shape the future direction of the regional airport. Group chairwoman Meg Taylor said the council was proceeding with a "dual process" — an application for qualifying aerodrome certification and a Wānaka Airport future review, both to be completed by 2027. "While it would be nice to think that this is simply a matter of ensuring much-needed upgrades to the aerodrome, the narrative around this project is murky. "What does concern us is that while safety and efficiency is an important consideration, council and Queenstown Airport Corporation have been consistently working to expand the airport and enable increased commercial flights ahead of consultation with the public and before the Wanaka Airport future review." Ms Taylor said the council was asking the Upper Clutha community what it wanted to happen at the airport, but risked pre-determining that outcome. The stakeholder group said the airport already has a strong community and would not want to lose that. It has supported commercial aviation such as tourism and agriculture, as well as general aviation for private pilots. The group said people wanted Wanaka Airport to avoid "growth-at-any-cost and over-tourism". This review will explore the airport's long-term role, its economic impact and its integration into New Zealand's broader aeronautical network. Following the first round of engagement, Egis will develop several possible scenarios for the airport. There will then be a second round of engagement in early August. Two in-person community sessions will take place — today at Studio Space, Paetara Aspiring Central from 4pm-7pm and tomorrow between 9am and 11am at the Wānaka Recreation Centre.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Tauranga's Rates Hike Approved Amid Protest
Tauranga homeowners will pay an extra $180 to $1124 in rates for 2025 after the council approved its budget. Tauranga City Council adopted the 2025/26 Annual Plan at a meeting on Thursday with a 9.9 percent overall rates increase. About 60 people gathered before the meeting to protest the rates increase. It was the second rally organised by Jan Gyenge. In May, around 250 people marched down Devonport Rd calling for a 0 percent rates increase for 2025. Gyenge said Thursday's rally was to let the councillors know people were still not happy with the 9.9 percent rates increase, given it was nowhere near the 0 percent they called for. There would be another protest at midday Sunday outside the council building at 90 Devonport Rd, she said. The 9.9 percent increase was down from the 12.5 percent initially proposed. Gyenge and three others spoke in the public forum asking the council to reduce the rates. Gyenge's request to speak at Wednesday's meeting was initially declined because the council said her perspective had been heard before, but it had a last-minute change of heart. She asked the councillors to "stop the wastage". Gyenge talked about the council's spending and chastised it for a planned playground opening event in Bethlehem, with free food and face-painting. "It's a little amount, relatively, but these little amounts add up. This expenditure has to stop." Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the council took more than $30 million out of its operating budget to get to the 9.9 percent increase. This included cutting 98 staff, with more likely still to come as the council underwent a management review. Drysdale said there was a lot of work to do in Tauranga after "chronic underinvestment" in facilities and infrastructure. "We do understand the tough financial position a number of households find themselves in. This [annual plan] strikes a good balance of keeping the investment in our city for what we need for the future while making it as affordable as possible." Councillor Rick Curach said the council had a big job ahead to look for further savings, but he was confident they could reduce the forecasted rates in the 10-year plan. Rates increases were not in line with people's wage increases, and many in the community found it "increasingly difficult" to afford them, he said. "I look forward to finding more and more savings and not having such a huge cost on our community." Councillor Glen Crowther said he would support the Annual Plan, but the council had to deliver a lower rates increase next year. It also needed to look at its capital projects and reorganise them to "lock in some affordability", he saidm and figure out what the public could afford and come up with a plan that met those requirements. "We are here to serve the public. We are not here to deliver a plan." Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular said people wanted new playgrounds, sports fields and facilities, but the council needed to understand how to get more value from its "significant expenditure". Drysdale said they were approving a budget by adopting the Annual Plan but that did not mean they needed to spend it all. "We want to find every saving that we can, and I think there's big opportunities to continue to save money." The council could deliver the same assets for significantly less money if it looked at its processes and did things differently, he said. "This is setting a budget\ - now the real hard work starts as we try to deliver under that budget." How much will your rates increase? Capital value $355,000 - $180.83 (8.3%) Capital value $885,000 - $320.72 (9.2%) Capital Value $1.12m - $382.75 (9.4%) Capital Value $3.929m - $1124.22 (10.2%) - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Queenstown council wants Environment Court to make decision on discharge into Shotover River
The Shotover River where Queenstown Lakes District Council discharged 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater in March. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton The Queenstown Lakes District Council wants its retrospective application to discharge treated effluent to Shotover River to go directly to the Environment Court. In late March, the council enacted emergency powers under the Resource Management Act to pump at least 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater into the river each day from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant after its disposal field failed. The council submitted a retrospective resource consent to the Otago Regional Council in May and asked for it to be publicly notified. The Queenstown Lakes District Council has now applied to the regional council to directly refer its resource consent to the Environment Court. District council property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery said it believed that this would provide the most efficient and robust approach given the nature of the consent. "Shotover River is a significant natural resource and comes with considerable cultural and community values. "As such, we believe it is beneficial for the evaluation of and decision on council's application to be made in an experienced and well-resourced court," Avery said. If approved, it would mean the regional council would no longer be the decision-maker in the first instance - the Environment Court would. Earlier this year, the regional council took the district council to Environment Court over repeated resource consent breaches at the plant . It resulted in the [. district council being ordered to pay at least $235,000] in costs and fix the issues at the plant The Queenstown Lakes District Council said that meant the Environment Court was already well acquainted with the matter and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter". Public notification, submission timeframes and assessing the application would still fall under the regional council's jurisdiction, and it would still need to provide that assessment and a report before the matter was heard by the court. The district council said the Environment Court would be able to properly test evidence to assist decision makers. "Referring the matter to the Environment Court would result in a faster decision, ensure access to the necessary resourcing in a cost-effective way, and provide a simple process that the public can engage with and take part in if they wish to," the district council said. "Rights of appeal would remain intact." If the regional council declined the request, it would stay as the decision maker and a council hearing would be held. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
