Morgan McSweeney: Is welfare backlash the beginning of the end for Starmer's right-hand man?
And with anger growing over Labour 's welfare cuts, will the same now be true for Keir Starmer 's background fixer Morgan McSweeney?
Labour MPs are calling for 'regime change' in Downing Street, with some hitting out at the 'over-excitable boys' in Sir Keir's top team.
Many blame Sir Keir's chief of staff, the softly spoken Irishman Mr McSweeney, for ignoring the rising concerns of a huge number of Labour backbenchers over his plans to deny welfare payments to hundreds of thousands of disabled people in a bid to save £5bn a year.
The government has been thrown into chaos after more than 120 Labour MPs - enough to sink the government's large majority - signed up to a move that could scupper the cuts, despite threats of deselections and warnings over the government's potential collapse.
Backbenchers say they have been warning for months about the upset in the party over the issue, but they have been ignored.
As the PM flew back from the Nato conference in The Hague on Wednesday, one told The Times: 'We are all very happy that we have a leader who's so respected around the world… we just think he needs fewer over-excitable boys in his team.'
As Labour's former elections guru, and now Sir Keir's closest aide, Mr McSweeney has near-unrivalled influence. But he is facing criticism from some who wonder if he is better suited to campaigns than the day-to-day job of running something as large and unwieldy as the day-to-day running of government.
He is not tied to the Westminster bubble – his wife is an MP for a Scottish seat – but is seen as the ultimate Labour insider, with many giving him credit for delivering Labour's landslide victory last summer.
But he has long been considered a bogeyman of the left of the party for his drive to expunge Corbynism from Labour.
He has been accused of ruthlessly promoting loyalist MPs into safe and easily winnable Labour seats, a tactic that appears, however, not to have worked in the latest crisis.
Even before the latest row erupted, he was facing the ire of some Labour MPs over the controversial two-child benefit cap.
The PM is reportedly keen to scrap the limit, which prevents those on benefits claiming support for more than two children, one of George Osborne's 'austerity' decisions, although it would be difficult to fill the multi-billion pound black hole it would leave.
However, the Labour leader's right-hand man is thought to back the policy, arguing that voters support it on the grounds of fairness - that if working families have to consider if they could afford another child, so should those on benefits.
But Mr McSweeney is not the only senior Labour figure under fire over the welfare cuts. Labour backbenchers are also gunning for the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, who needs the £5bn the move is designed to save to balance the books.
Labour MPs told The Independent this week that either Ms Reeves had to go, or his own backbenchers would oust Sir Keir. Others pin the blame for the crisis on the veteran Labour chief whip Alan Campbell, for not seeing the rebellion coming.
Still, it is striking that, once again, a backroom figure like Mr McSweeney has been thrust to the fore when a government gets into trouble.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Far-right extremists using games platforms to radicalise teenagers, report warns
Far-right extremists are using livestream gaming platforms to target and radicalise teenage players, a report has warned. The new research, published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, reveals how a range of extremist groups and individuals use platforms that allow users to chat and livestream while playing video games to recruit and radicalise vulnerable users, mainly young males. UK crime and counter-terror agencies have urged parents to be especially alert to online offenders targeting youngsters during the summer holidays. In an unprecedented move, last week Counter Terrorism Policing, MI5 and the National Crime Agency issued a joint warning to parents and carers that online offenders 'will exploit the school holidays to engage in criminal acts with young people when they know less support is readily available'. Dr William Allchorn, a senior research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University's international policing and public protection research institute, who carried out the study with his colleague Dr Elisa Orofino, said 'gaming-adjacent' platforms were being used as 'digital playgrounds' for extremist activity. Allchorn found teenage players were being deliberately 'funnelled' by extremists from mainstream social media platforms to these sites, where 'the nature and quantity of the content makes these platforms very hard to police'. The most common ideology being pushed by extremist users was far right, with content celebrating extreme violence and school shootings also shared. On Tuesday, Felix Winter, who threatened to carry out a mass shooting at his Edinburgh school, was jailed for six years after the court heard the 18-year-old had been 'radicalised' online, spending more than 1,000 hours in contact with a pro-Nazi Discord group. Allchorn said: 'There has definitely been a more coordinated effort by far-right groups like Patriotic Alternative to recruit young people through gaming events that first emerged during lockdown. But since then a lot of extremist groups have been deplatformed by mainstream spaces, so individuals will now lurk on public groups or channels on Facebook or Discord, for example, and use this as a way of identifying someone who might be sympathetic to reach out to.' He added that, while some younger users turn to extreme content for its shock value among their peers, this can make them vulnerable to being targeted. Extremists have been forced to become more sophisticated as the majority of platforms have banned them, Allchorn said. 'Speaking to local community safety teams, they told us that approaches are now about trying to create a rapport rather than making a direct ideological sell.' The study also spoke to moderators, who described their frustration at inconsistent enforcement policies on their platforms and the burden of deciding whether content or users should be reported to law enforcement agencies. While in-game chat is unmoderated, moderators said they were still overwhelmed by the volume and complexity of harmful content, including the use of hidden symbols to circumvent banned words that would be picked up by automated moderation tools, for example, a string of symbols stitched together to represent a swastika. Allchorn highlighted the need for critical digital literacy for parents as well as law enforcement so they could better understand how these platforms and subcultures operate. Last October Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, revealed that '13% of all those being investigated by MI5 for involvement in UK terrorism are under 18', a threefold increase in three years. AI tools are being used to assist with moderation, but they struggle to interpret memes or when language is ambiguous or sarcastic.
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Evil terrorist confesses he masterminded 7/7 bombings – but could be freed in DAYS despite ‘grave concerns from cops'
FURY erupted last night over the imminent release on to British streets of a terrorist who has admitted being a mastermind behind 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings. Despite his confession while in US custody Haroon Aswat, 50, could still be freed from a secure unit onto UK streets without a full risk assessment within days. 4 4 According to US court documents obtained by The Sun, the al-Qaeda fiend confessed he was a 'mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK'. But he could be released from a secure psychiatric unit within days thanks to a legal loophole blocking him from being subjected to stringent risk checks. Click here to watch The Sun's documentary on the horrific 7/7 bombings - Britain's worst ever terror attack Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'This despicable man was behind one of the most deadly attacks in modern history. He should never experience freedom again." In April, we told how worried counter-terror chiefs — who believe Aswat, 50, is a continuing threat to national security — had to apply for permission to keep tabs on him. But he will be subject only to a notification order requiring him to register his address and tell police of his future travel plans. We put in legal requests for the disclosure of statements made to the High Court during the application for the notification order. Aswat was arrested but never put on trial for the 7/7 bombings which claimed 52 lives and injured 800 on the capital's Tube trains and buses. But it can now be revealed that he confessed to his role while in a US jail in 2017 following his extradition on other terror charges. The US District Court document states: 'The defendant's crimes are incredibly serious. He is a terrorist and foot soldier of al-Qaeda trained to commit acts of violence. 'His comments while in prison and his numerous disciplinary violations indicate he still supports al-Qaeda and remains dangerous. Al Qaeda 'mastermind' linked to 7/7 attack set to be freed to walk UK streets despite fears he is 'still a risk' 'In 2017 he told staff he was associated with al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden was his 'commander' and that he would 'behead all of you'. 'In March 2017 the defendant stated, 'if you think I am a terrorist, I don't shy away from my responsibility', and also stated he was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK.' In his witness statement Det Chief Supt Gareth Rees, head of operations for the Met's SO15 Counter Terrorism Command, said of Aswat: 'He has spoken positively of his time with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and expressed aspirations to reconnect with them. 'Based on my experience, this is conduct which gives me grave concerns about the risk which the defendant poses to the UK's national security and to the public. 4 'The assessment of medical practitioners is that he currently has capacity to make complex decisions and understand complex restrictions when mentally stable. 'However, he may temporarily lose capacity if he were to relapse into a psychotic state.' Aswat trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan months before the 2001 terror attacks which claimed more than 3,000 lives. Documents also revealed his name on a ledger recovered from a house in Pakistan where the 9/11 'architect' Khalid Sheikh Mohammed stayed. In 1999 Aswat helped Finsbury Park mosque hate preacher Abu Hamza set up a US terror camp. In 2002 he stayed at an al-Qaeda safe house in Pakistan where he met two 7/7 bombers. In 2005 police traced 20 calls to a phone linked to Aswat made by the 7/7 bombers before their attack. That year Aswat was arrested in Zambia while possessing a terror manual and suspected bomb parts. He was deported to the UK and held under a US arrest warrant. Aswat fought extradition on mental health grounds but after a nine-year battle was sent to the US in 2014. A year later he pleaded guilty to terror charges. His 20-year jail term was cut to seven years because of time detained here at Broadmoor Hospital. Aswat, of Batley, West Yorks, was deported back to the UK in December 2022 and is held under the Mental Health Act at Bethlem Royal Hospital in South London. Doctors say he is well enough to be released 'in the relatively near future' but UK law means he cannot be formally risk-assessed while detained. 4 A report compiled in 2022 by psychiatrist Dr Richard Taylor concluded he still posed a serious risk. It highlighted Aswat has 'continued to express violent extremist Islamic ideology' even when in a relatively stable mental state. Other police officers who gave statements to the High Court in April also expressed concerns. Det Sgt David Taylor said: 'I assess the defendant has a significant involvement within Islamist extremism, involvement in terrorism and a long-standing association with others holding radical beliefs. 'I believe the defendant's US conviction, historic involvement with Islamist extremist groups and previously reported mindset alongside his vulnerable and fragile mental health do pose a potential risk to the security of the UK.' Det Insp Karen Bradley warned of danger if Aswat was excluded from normal risk checks applied to terrorists after release. She said: 'In my professional judgment, I believe that Mr Aswat still poses a potential terrorist risk.' The High Court was told that, owing to his detention, Aswat was not allowed to be assessed under Extremism Risk Guidance protocols. Under the notification order, he will not be under surveillance or wear a tag and can travel abroad if he tells cops in advance. Granting the order, Mr Justice Jay noted: 'No formal terrorist risk assessment has been carried out since the defendant's return here. 'The circumstances of his detention have precluded that. 'However, on the basis of the material which is available the defendant has been assessed by various police officers that he remains a risk to national security.' We had to formally notify Aswat of our request for more details before the Met Police agreed to release them and also agreed to notify medics caring for him prior to publication. Papers also revealed police and courts were obliged to consider his human rights when applying for the notification order. A Government spokesman said: 'Protecting our national security is the very first priority of this government and if any individual poses a threat to that security, the police and intelligence services have a range of powers they can apply to deal with that threat. 'We will always do whatever is necessary inside the law to protect the public from any risk posed by former terrorist offenders or people of terrorist concern.'
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer takes on Khan in battle over Heathrow's third runway
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to face down Sir Sadiq Khan and Labour backbenchers to force through a third runway at Heathrow. The west London airport has unveiled the details of its long-awaited £50bn expansion plan, which it said could lift capacity by 80pc to 150m passengers a year. The proposals have the support of the Prime Minister and the Chancellor, who believe airport expansion is essential to boosting Britain's growth. However, the plans have provoked a backlash from Sir Sadiq, who has long opposed a third runway, and some Labour backbenchers. The Mayor of London said on Thursday that airport expansion was not compatible with net zero. Ministers fear Sir Sadiq could launch a legal challenge that would delay expansion by years and add to costs even if it proved unsuccessful. The Prime Minister is prepared to use new laws to block Sir Sadiq from turning to the courts in a bid to get spades in the ground at Heathrow before the end of this parliament. Whitehall sources signalled they were looking at legislation that would stop the Mayor from dragging the decision through the courts. This includes planning reforms announced earlier this year to end the 'challenge culture' that Sir Keir said had delayed many vital infrastructure projects. 'We are looking at introducing legislation to curb the ability of campaigners to use judicial reviews to block infrastructure projects,' said one government source. It follows decades of opposition from environmental campaigners to a third runway at Europe's busiest airport. A source said ministers were preparing for criticism from within Labour. Sir Sadiq said: 'I remain unconvinced that you can have a new runway at Heathrow, delivering hundreds of thousands of additional flights every year, without a hugely detrimental impact on our environment.' The Labour Mayor did not say whether he would seek a judicial review once the plans were formally lodged but warned that he would 'be keeping all options on the table in how we respond.' John McDonnell, Labour's former shadow chancellor, whose Hayes and Harlington constituency would be affected by the proposals, vowed to fight Heathrow expansion 'all the way'. Mr McDonnell said he was already in talks with leaders from other London boroughs about mounting a legal challenge and had 'put money aside' for a long court battle. 'I think it's inevitable there'll be legal action,' he said. 'We've consistently opposed it, and every time we've been to court on this issue, we've won.' Rachel Reeves was largely responsible for reviving the third runway project as part of her push for growth, and allies of the Chancellor said the expansion plan had her 'full-throated' support. In a rebuke to the Mayor, a source said Ms Reeves would do 'what it takes to deliver a third runway'. 'The Chancellor is determined Britain remains the best connected place to do business,' the source said. Ms Reeves has previously stated she wanted 'spades in the ground' by the next election and planes using the runway by 2035. The Chancellor said the new proposals submitted by Heathrow showed Britain was 'one step closer to expanding our biggest airport' in a move she said would 'boost investment in Britain, increase trade for businesses, and create up to 100,000 jobs.' Heathrow's £49bn plan will see a new runway constructed to the north-west of the airport, which will extend over the M25. Two new terminal buildings will be built and existing facilities expanded. The number of annual flights would jump from 480,000 today to as many as 756,000. Heathrow bosses said the new 2.2-mile landing strip would lift capacity to 150 million passengers a year, almost 80pc more than the number who used the airport in 2024. Construction will start as early as 2029, with the runway operational by 2035, though the full expansion of the terminals could take until 2060. The runway itself is projected to cost £21bn. The new terminals would cost £12bn and the modernisation of the existing ones some £15bn. The project will involve the destruction of about 750 homes in the area and the construction of a new section of motorway between junctions 14 and 15 of the M25. Heathrow has said expansion would boost UK GDP by almost 0.5pc by 2050. The plans revive those approved by Parliament in 2018, which means they may not face a further Commons vote unless the Government decides to deviate significantly from that blueprint. It also makes it less likely that the runway will face opposition from within the Cabinet. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, said: 'I am pleased to have received the initial Heathrow expansion proposals – a significant step towards unlocking growth, creating jobs, and delivering this vital national infrastructure to drive forward our Plan for Change. 'We'll review proposals over the summer and move quickly to progress this transformational project.' Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, previously opposed Heathrow expansion but more recently insisted it would be 'ridiculous' to resign over the issue. He said the Government's position was that airport expansion could go ahead so long as it was compatible with the UK's legal-binding carbon budgets. It is understood that this position remains unchanged. The latest budget, published by the independent Climate Change Committee earlier this year, did not explicitly rule out airport expansion. However, it did say that the aviation industry's emissions – which primarily come from aircraft exhausts – needed to fall by 17pc between 2023 and 2040. It means Heathrow must set out ways to reduce the emissions of aircraft that use the hub in order to argue that a third runway is compatible with net zero. In its report, the Climate Change Committee said the aviation sector could lower emissions through greater investment in green technologies such as sustainable aviation fuels, hydrogen fuel cells or electric aircraft, or by reducing demand for flying. Another potentially contentious element of the plans is its impact on the M25, the country's busiest motorway. Heathrow's plans call for the M25 to be diverted into a tunnel at a cost of £1.5bn so that a full-length runway can be built above it. Airport bosses insisted this would not cause disruption to motorists. A new section of road 130 meters west of the existing M25 would be built in its entirety. Vehicles would then be diverted onto the new section at an agreed time so that the current M25 could be closed and the runway extended towards the east. Thomas Woldbye's Heathrow's chief executive, said: 'It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow. We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity. 'With a green light from [the] Government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit for purpose regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country.' Eighty-four million passengers flew from Heathrow in 2024, averaging 230,000 per day. This put it ahead of rivals including Amsterdam Schiphol, Frankfurt and Paris Charles de Gaulle. However, these airports, which have up to six runways, continue to threaten Heathrow's status as Europe's main airport hub. Supporters of a third runway say expansion is needed to support Britain's global trade ambitions. The plan submitted to the Government on Thursday is not the only proposal for how to build a third runway. Hotel tycoon Surinder Arora, who is one of the biggest landowners at Heathrow, earlier this week unveiled an alternative proposal that he claimed would be cheaper and avoid the need to rebuild the M25. Heathrow argues that the motorway would need to be redeveloped regardless to handle the extra traffic expected from expansion of the airport. It currently has no rail connections to the west, with the Elizabeth Line and Heathrow Express services terminating there, and will not be served by HS2.
