
Kuwaiti student sues Bangor University after being 'dragged' off stage for pro-Palestine protest
Aishah AlBader has filed a legal claim against Bangor University in Wales for assault, battery, false imprisonment and breach of her human rights.
The claim stems from an incident that took place during her graduation ceremony last year. AlBader planned to walk across the stage as she graduated with a pillowcase bearing the message "Bangor University invests in genocide".
But AlBader, who was part of a local student group that campaigned for Bangor University to divest from companies complicit in possible Israeli war crimes, was stopped by four security guards who dragged her off the stage before removing her from the building.
Multiple videos of the incident that gained more than 150,000 views showed several security guards dragging AlBader off the graduation stage from behind in front of hundreds of people.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The incident, AlBader said, left her physically wounded and embarrassed.
She is now launching her case against Bangor University in the hope that it will stop other students attending British universities from being punished for speaking out "against injustices across the globe and in Palestine".
"Knowing that Bangor University continues to invest in companies complicit in this devastation, I felt I could not simply accept my degree in silence. I knew I had to use that platform to centre those oppressed and dehumanised in Palestine," AlBader said in a statement through her lawyers.
'I held up a pillowcase reading 'Bangor University invests in genocide'...I was dragged off stage, injured, and humiliated'
- Aishah AlBader
"I held up a pillowcase reading 'Bangor University invests in genocide'...I was dragged off stage, injured, and humiliated.
"I lost professional opportunities I had worked hard to earn and lived in fear and uncertainty of the future.
"My parents travelled thousands of miles to watch my graduation, and it should have been a moment of joy and pride. I don't believe that holding a pillowcase should ever provoke violence, and the pillowcase I held at my graduation revealed a truth that the university is desperate to hide."
Right to protest
As part of the claim, AlBader's lawyers sent a 20-page letter to Bangor University detailing how she was forcibly removed from the stage by security guards when she attempted to protest the institution's investment portfolio peacefully.
Alexander Hogg, a solicitor representing AlBader, also criticised Bangor University for its actions and described his client as taking a "brave" decision to hold the Welsh university to account.
"Ensuring that universities are held to account when they violate students' right to protest and free speech, such as in the case of my client, not only protects the right to protest and speak out against what is happening in Palestine, it protects the right to protest and speak out on all issues of public importance for everyone," said Hogg.
UAE deported student who wore Palestinian keffiyeh at graduation ceremony Read More »
"Safeguarding freedom of expression and the right to protest requires upholding them not only when it is convenient but when it is uncomfortable – such as during graduation ceremonies when principled students draw much-needed public attention to universities' unethical investments."
Following Israel's war on Gaza in October 2023, UK campuses have been set alight with campaigns targeting universities' investments with companies suspected of being complicit with Israeli war crimes.
Last year, several UK university protest groups launched encampments and occupations aimed at pressuring their institution to divest from Israeli companies and other companies suspected of being complicit in Israeli war crimes and end partnerships with Israeli institutions.
These encampments led 28 universities to launch disciplinary action against pro-Palestine activists on campus since October 2023, with some, according to an investigation by human rights group Liberty, collaborating with private surveillance firms to spy on their students.
Students at Bangor University also held an encampment for approximately 400 days, before the university issued a 250-page eviction notice against them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
How Netanyahu's demented hubris could shatter the region
Despite an uneasy ceasefire in the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, there's no telling what will come next, particularly from a volatile US administration led by Donald Trump that has elevated self-contradiction, confusion and policy U-turns to an art of geostrategic chaos. Much will depend on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's next moves and Iran's reactions; less will hinge on the US itself. Since his re-election, President Trump has taken a back seat to Netanyahu. He has been largely reacting, often appearing unpleasantly surprised, to the latter's strategic moves and cynical manipulations - just as Russian President Vladimir Putin has for a long time been playing the US president. His recent bombing of Iran only aggravated the West's "Israel problem", by surrendering and sacrificing Washington's own national interests and professed values to an untrustworthy and purely self-interested Israeli "ally". Trump, who has portrayed himself as an anti-war president, proclaimed in 2019 that great nations do not start forever wars. He is uninterested in exporting liberalism or democracy abroad. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But Netanyahu deliberately defeated Trump's stated non-interventionism by cornering him on Iran - a situation where he felt he had no choice but to intervene, if only to save face, at personal political risk. Relentlessly pushed by Netanyahu, Trump opted for limited "surgical" strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. He was careful to quickly declare that the bombing marked the end of the episode, and that he had no desire or intention to engage in further military actions against Iran. But will Netanyahu let him retreat in the longer term? Though still a decisive player in the Middle East, Trump's US is no longer the driving force of the bloody regional mutations under way. Israel, unfortunately, plays that role. Counterproductive war Despite the chaos that unfolded last month, it appears that few if any of the proclaimed objectives were reached with regards to removing the Iranian nuclear threat. And what unfolded will likely backfire against both Israel and the US in the long run, for several reasons. Firstly, it may indirectly solidify the Iranian regime by unifying the population around national defence in the face of Israeli-US aggression. Secondly, it may push Iran to accelerate its nuclear programme and ultimately develop the bomb as a means of self-protection. Finally, it may convince Iran to abandon the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which, unlike Israel, it has signed. Iran has now suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and banned its inspectors. All of that being said, there is no denying that with his war on Iran, Netanyahu masterfully killed several birds with one stone. The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe He at the very least delayed Iran's nuclear programme, if only for a limited period of time. He sabotaged both US-Iran diplomatic talks and a planned French-Saudi summit where European states might have formally recognised a Palestinian state. He also diverted international attention away from Gaza, thus making it easier for Israel to continue its ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Additionally, as most EU states were criticising Netanyahu harshly on Gaza and several, including Britain and Spain, had suspended commercial deals or trade talks with Israel, he silenced those critiques, recreating overnight a western consensus around Israel. Most importantly for Netanyahu, his approval rating soared thanks to the war on Iran, thus ameliorating his extremely precarious political standing within Israel. Last but not least, he finally managed to reach a major goal he had been working towards for decades: getting the US to bomb Iran. That in itself was a major foreign policy victory for Netanyahu. Larger goals From a broader geostrategic perspective, Netanyahu's war on Iran was just the latest development in his multi-fronted attacks on Tehran's allies. After targeting Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen - the tentacles of the octopus - he went after the head of the "axis of resistance": Iran itself. While systematically presenting these operations as defensive, Netanyahu's real goal is to keep the entire region in a state of vulnerability, by destabilising regimes and spreading chaos. The evidence that Israel's predatory aggression is typically not motivated by self-defence was underscored by Netanyahu's attacks on post-Assad Syria. Through territorial incursions, strikes on Syrian military assets and land conquest, in addition to pitting minorities against the regime in classic divide-and-conquer tactics, Netanyahu aims to further weaken Syria - even though the new regime has displayed no intention to target Israel. After ceasefire, Iran is preparing for the long war with Israel Read More » Ultimately, Netanyahu's goal is to install a new regional order centred on unchallenged Israeli supremacy and domination. He is open about his "new Middle East" project, which - while sold as a pacification strategy - actually involves crushing all adversaries, especially the Palestinian people. On the map he brandished at the United Nations in September 2023, Palestine had disappeared, with both Gaza and the occupied West Bank displayed as part of Israel. Tel Aviv was portrayed as the new centre of gravity in a region reduced to a few Gulf states, along with Sudan, Jordan and Egypt; the rest of the neighbouring countries were not even labelled. This demented hubris is reminiscent of the ancient Pax Romana. And just like the fate of the recalcitrant populations who resisted then, it is not hard to figure out what could happen to any who reject this new hegemon. The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe, whose racist neocolonial states have themselves long used Israel as an attack dog to keep the Arab and Muslim populations of the region weak, divided and vulnerable. That fact, too, was admitted in a remarkable moment of candour and truth by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, when during the latest G7 summit, he thanked Israel for "doing the dirty work for all of us". If anyone wants to know what the new face of a world dominated by Israel would look like, that's easy: just look at Gaza. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli forces bulldoze Palestinian farmland for second day
Israeli bulldozers continued to raze agricultural land in the village of Raba, east of Jenin in the occupied West Bank, for a second consecutive day, according to local officials cited by the Wafa news agency. The land clearing is reportedly part of preparations for constructing a military road near the Jabar al-Masalma area on the village's outskirts. Israeli troops also raided the town of Turmus Aya, northeast of Ramallah, and sealed off the only exit from the town of Tuqu, southeast of Bethlehem, Wafa reported.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Israeli army refusal of full withdrawal from Gaza stalls ceasefire talks
The Israeli army's refusal to fully withdraw its troops from Gaza are stalling its indirect negotiations with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal, sources told The National on Sunday. The latest Israel-Hamas negotiations began in the Qatari capital Doha on July 6 amid high expectations fuelled by upbeat comments made by US President Donald Trump that suggested a deal was in reach. The talks have over the past week made significant progress, but not without hiccups over key issues like the distribution of humanitarian assistance to Gaza and what comes after a proposed 60-day truce ends, according to the sources. Held on two floors at a suburban Doha hotel, they are taking place with mediators from the US, Egypt and Qatar at hand to enable the process. Success of the talks would herald the third ceasefire since the Gaza war began in October 2023 following a deadly, Hamas-led attack on southern Israel communities. The last ceasefire collapsed in March this year, when Israel resumed military operations after nearly two months of quiet. The first truce in the war was in November 2023. It lasted one week. The sources said Israeli negotiators were due later on Sunday to present Hamas representatives with maps showing areas the military intends to withdraw from and those it aims to stay in. They said Israel wants to hold on to at least five areas in Gaza, including a narrow but strategic strip of land that runs on the Palestinian side of the Gaza-Egypt border as well as another corridor that is close by. Israel also wants to keep outposts in the north and south of the territory, including an area close to the spot outside the southern city of Rafah where it is reportedly planning to provide humanitarian aid to about 600,000 Palestinians, according to the sources. Hamas, said the sources, has agreed to allow Israel to set up a security zone that is 1km deep and runs on the Palestinian side of the Gaza-Israel border, but it is adamant that the Israeli army pulls out from everywhere else in the coastal enclave. Hamas is also demanding that the security zone is patrolled by an international force, said the sources. A Palestinian source told AFP on Sunday that Israel's proposals to keep its troops in Gaza were holding up a deal. It quoted a senior Israeli official it did not name as accusing Hamas of inflexibility and deliberately trying to scuttle an accord. Besides the 60-day truce, the main terms of the proposed deal is for Hamas to free 10 living hostages and for humanitarian assistance to flow into the territory where hundreds of thousands are facing hunger. They also include the release of about 1,000 Palestinians held in Israeli jails and negotiations during the initial truce on ending the war completely. If Hamas agrees to a deal, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he would be prepared to enter talks on a more permanent end to hostilities. The Israeli leader, who is under domestic and international pressure to end the war, said last week that neutralising Hamas as a security threat was a prerequisite for any long-term ceasefire talks. That includes disarmament, he said. Failure to do that would mean Israel would have to do so by force, he warned. Hamas has vehemently rejected calls for surrendering its arms but suggested a willingness to lay down and store them in the case of an end to the war. Mediators had in the meantime asked both Israel and Hamas to postpone discussions until Mr Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, arrived in the Qatari capital, according to AFP. The source did not say when that would be, but the sources who spoke to The National said he was unlikely to travel to Qatar before a deal becomes within reach. The Hamas attack on southern Israel communities in October 2023 left about 1,200 dead, mostly civilians. The assailants also took another 250 hostage. Of the hostages, 49 remain, with about 27 who died in captivity. Israel's response to the October 2023 attack has to date killed at least 57,882 Palestinians, also mostly civilians, and wounded more than twice that number, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.