Texas may cut ties with ABA, But at what cost to future lawyers?

Time of India

09-07-2025

For decades, a law degree from a Texas institution carried with it a silent promise, that its holder could walk into a courtroom not just in Dallas or Houston, but in any state across the country.
That promise, anchored by American Bar Association (ABA) accreditation, now stands on shaky ground.
The Texas Supreme Court is reconsidering a rule that, since 1983, has required aspiring attorneys to graduate from an ABA-accredited law school in order to take the state's bar exam. What began as a procedural review has evolved into a high-stakes debate over legal standards, political ideology, and the portability of professional degrees in a fractured nation.
At the heart of the issue lies a fundamental question: Should one state's skepticism of a national institution be allowed to redraw the career trajectories of thousands of future lawyers?
A rule under siege
The review was initiated by the Texas Supreme Court in April, weeks after Florida launched a similar move questioning ABA authority. The Florida Supreme Court, made up entirely of Republican appointees, pointed to concerns over the ABA's now-paused diversity mandate and its 'active political engagement' as reasons to reconsider the group's role in legal education.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m.
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
Texas, where all elected judges are Republican, has signaled a similar wariness. The court has yet to announce any final decision or timeline, but its actions have already sparked a sense of unease across law schools statewide.
The ABA, the nation's oldest and most influential legal accreditor, has faced increasing pushback in recent years, particularly from conservative leadership. Once regarded as a politically neutral authority, it is now often seen by its critics as straying into ideological territory.
That shift has led the federal government to revoke the ABA's power to vet judicial nominees and has barred federal attorneys from participating in ABA events.
Yet for law students and legal educators, this fight isn't about partisanship; it's about practical consequences.
Texas deans push back
In a united front, the deans of eight of Texas' ten ABA-accredited law schools sent a letter to the state's highest court urging it to maintain the requirement.
They argue that the ABA's accreditation process, though rigorous, offers consistency, transparency, and, most importantly, national mobility.
According to the National Association for Law Placement, roughly 12% of Texas law graduates from the Class of 2023 took jobs in other states. Without ABA accreditation, these graduates could find themselves ineligible to practice outside Texas, effectively boxed into a single state's jurisdiction.
For many, this loss of flexibility would be devastating.
The deans also emphasized the value the ABA brings in terms of data collection, outcome reporting, and public accountability. Stripping away this layer of oversight, they argue, would not only isolate Texas law graduates but could also undermine public trust in the legal education system itself.
A fractured consensus among legal leaders
Interestingly, not all voices from within Texas's legal education system are aligned.
Robert Chesney, dean of the University of Texas School of Law, the state's highest-ranked law school, chose not to sign the joint letter. Instead, he submitted a separate comment encouraging the court to explore alternative pathways, such as recognizing multiple accrediting bodies or allowing case-by-case exemptions.
Chesney's tone was cautious but forward-looking, acknowledging the need for innovation and cost reform while still stressing the importance of preserving national mobility for graduates.
His nuanced stance suggests a willingness to evolve, but not at the expense of opportunity.
Another notable absence came from Texas A&M Law Dean Robert Ahdieh, who also refrained from joining the group letter. Ahdieh later commented that while competitive pressures might improve the ABA's performance, safeguarding the ability of Texas law graduates to practice across the country must remain 'critical.'
The political underpinnings
Though framed as a policy review, the roots of this debate run deeper, into the broader political climate of mistrust in long-standing institutions.
The ABA, once an uncontroversial gatekeeper, has increasingly become a lightning rod in the national culture wars. Its stances on judicial independence, diversity, and rule-of-law norms have made it a target of conservative administrations.
Texas' potential departure from the ABA requirement may be less about educational outcomes and more about reshaping the legal landscape to reflect shifting political ideologies.
In doing so, it risks turning legal education into a patchwork of regional standards, with Texas charting a course that isolates its students rather than empowering them.
What's at stake for students?
Beneath the institutional battles and political rhetoric, students remain the most vulnerable stakeholders. Today's first-year law student in Texas may not know whether their degree will carry the same weight in New York or California when they graduate.
Employers outside the state may hesitate to hire, uncertain of the new standards. Prospective students, wary of a narrower future, may opt for schools elsewhere.
In effect, a Texas law degree, once seen as a passport to practice anywhere, could become a local credential with limited reach. This erosion of trust in portability could diminish the appeal of Texas law schools and discourage top talent from applying.
A precedent in the making
The Texas Supreme Court has yet to decide whether it will uphold, revise, or eliminate the ABA accreditation requirement.
But as it deliberates, legal educators, students, and national observers are watching closely.
Because what Texas decides won't just shape its own legal education system, it could trigger a broader reckoning over who gets to define professional standards in America.
If Texas chooses to walk away from the ABA, it won't just be challenging an institution, it may be redrawing the boundaries of legal opportunity itself.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!