logo
11 years after state formation, where's Telangana's history? Govt must fix information gap

11 years after state formation, where's Telangana's history? Govt must fix information gap

The Printa day ago
Everything I know about my city and state, I learned on my own when I decided to get acquainted with Hyderabad's history. Luckily, after Telangana's formation, history books were revised by the then Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government.
Kids were taught absolutely nothing about Telangana, or about the founders of Hyderabad (Golconda dynasty, 1518-1687), or the later Nizams of our city. That was the extent to which rulers in the joint state of Andhra Pradesh went to erase our history from textbooks. The cultural domination of the Andhra region pushed people of Telangana to demand a separate state, which was eventually formed on 2 June 2014.
As a Hyderabadi, I never learned about my own region—Telangana before it became a state—in school. We were only taught about Andhra Pradesh and the Indian independence movement. This was the reality of generations who grew up in Hyderabad and Telangana.
However, one aspect of the state, which is crucial to understanding modern Telangana, was left untouched on purpose—perhaps to avoid stirring the hornet's nest. That is the peasant rebellion, called the Telangana Armed Struggle (1946-51), and the Indian Army's annexation of Hyderabad on September 17, 1948.
Operation Polo was the military action through which the Hyderabad state (1724-1948) was annexed after its last Nizam, Osman Ali Khan (1911-48), decided to stay independent when the British left India in 1947. The contested bit of history had been buried by the Congress government at the Centre, largely due to its bloody aftermath—it resulted in the death of at least 26,000 to 4,000 Muslims, according to the Pandit Sunderlal Committee report.
BJP, Razakars & Hyderabad Day
Post the formation of Telangana, there wasn't much clamour about it. However, after the BRS came to power for a second time post 2018, there has been a renewed push by the BJP to observe the annexation date as 'Hyderabad Liberation Day'—a phrase coined to indirectly say that Telangana was freed from the Nizams.
The BRS ignored it for a while, but it was forced to address the issue. It marked the day as 'National Integration Day' to skirt the BJP's narrative. Added to all of this was BJP leader Gudur Narayana Reddy's movie Razakar: The Silent Genocide of Hyderabad, which also paints Muslims in a negative light.
The movie is about the Muslim militia Razakar, formed in 1947 by then Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) leader Qasim Razvi, who let his men loose on the populace, especially on Hindus. However, the movie ignores the Communist Party of India (CPI)-led peasant rebellion, and has incorporated characters such as Chakali Ilamma without attributing her support from the Left party.
Moreover, neither the textbooks nor the movie address the biggest issue that existed then—the feudal system, which was the bane of society and led to bonded labour under the Jagirdars, the state revenue collectors under the Nizams.
Also read: Congress in Telangana gave award to Razakar—a propaganda film that demonises Muslims
Fix the information gap
The then BRS government had a great opportunity to correct these omissions in our history textbooks. Had it done so, maybe we would not have a population unsure of where to even begin when trying to learn about itself. It is a fact that information about Hyderabad's history in the public domain is sparse. One has to dig deep or visit public libraries that are not exactly well-maintained.
Now that people from Andhra don't dominate our narrative and culture anymore, we must reconsider what we mention in our history books and not make the mistake of hiding the truth from the people. It is not just about informing, but giving perspective and understanding of our histories in school is also important for the formative years of children.
It allows us to counter hate and hateful narratives. The only way to do this is by honestly putting out information. Yet, the state government, which has been trying to reshape Telangana's image with a Congress stamp, oddly chose to give the Razakar movie three Gaddar Awards—an honour it recently decided to institute in 2025.
This speaks volumes about the state government's priorities. If it does not correct this wrong, then generations of children in Telangana will once again grow up learning either nothing, or information that will be full of half-truths.
Yunus Lasania is a Hyderabad-based journalist whose work primarily focuses on politics, history and culture. He tweets @YunusLasania. Views are personal.
(Edited by Ratan Priya)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress
‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress

News18

time39 minutes ago

  • News18

‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress

Last Updated: RSS's Sunil Ambekar reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building' Reacting to the repeated attacks by the Congress—the latest coming from Karnataka minister Priyank Kharge —the RSS said the political parties should 'spare" the Sangh, as it has no interest in engaging with politically driven narratives. 'Spare the Sangh from such political conversations. We are a social organisation committed to constructive work, not political rhetoric. We do our work organically," said Sunil Ambekar, the RSS's Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh, asserting that an organisation like the Sangh should not be dragged into political controversies. He further reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building". 'The RSS does not function like a political party and remains committed to its grassroots social work. People support the Sangh's work, and they get associated. Political parties should stop unnecessarily involving the Sangh in their discourse," he added. Centenary preparations A three-day Akhil Bharatiya Prant Pracharak Baithak of the RSS will be held from July 4-6 at Keshav Kunj in Delhi, with a key focus on preparations for the Shatabdi Varsh (Centenary Year) in 2025-26, Ambekar said, addressing the media. While not a decision-making forum, the meeting will review the progress of organisational work across prants (zones) and discuss the functioning of various karya vibhag (sections and zones). Issues related to Operation Sindoor, atrocities on Hindus in Bangladesh, and other geopolitical, social, and border issues, including religious conversion and Khalistani issues in Punjab, will be discussed in the meeting. Two prant pracharaks (in-charges) from Jammu and Kashmir will also join the meeting. Around 46 prant pracharaks from across states and 233 karyakartas will attend the meeting. Responding to a question on the caste census, Ambekar reiterated the Sangh's old stand that it sees no problem with the government collecting data if it is for public welfare. Regarding the recent concerns over the Kanwar Yatra and potential law-and-order issues, Ambekar said, 'Religious events like the Kanwar Yatra happen smoothly every year. Administrative coordination is routine. We also engage with members of the society to ensure peace and harmony." 'Outreach' as the key He further confirmed that extensive preparations are underway for the 100-year anniversary of the RSS, with all states and zones having submitted proposals. The centenary year will officially begin with a grand programme in Nagpur on Vijay Dashami, October 2. Regional and zonal programmes will follow along with 'Hindu Sammelan" across states. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat will also undertake a pravas (outreach tour) of four major cities—Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Kolkata—as part of the centenary outreach. Special initiatives include Grih Sampark Abhiyan (door-to-door contact), Samajik Sadbhav Baithaks (social harmony meetings), and Pramukh Nagrik Goshthis (citizen dialogues) on Hindutva and national vision. Youth engagement will be central, as over 28,571 people registered through the 'Join RSS" portal between April and June. Ambekar also outlined the Panch Parivartan vision for societal transformation—spanning social harmony, environmental consciousness, cultural pride, family bonding, and civic responsibility—which RSS volunteers will promote in collaboration with wider society. About the Author Madhuparna Das First Published: July 04, 2025, 05:12 IST

Tooling change
Tooling change

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tooling change

Beijing's weaponisation of engineers must be countered through expansion of Indian engineering beyond IT In yet another example of China's weaponisation of economic interdependencies, Beijing has ordered the pullout of Chinese engineers working at iPhone manufacturer Foxconn's Indian factories. While their strength is less than 1% of Foxconn's employees at Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, they play crucial engineering roles. The move is clearly aimed at disrupting production at these factories and comes on top of Beijing delaying the delivery of critical machinery to Indian operations. This is plain economic bullying. China is using its manufacturing heft to undermine any moves by international players to relocate their production bases to third countries like India. With US & China locked in a strategic-economic tussle – notwithstanding recent attempts at trade war de-escalation – countries like India are getting squeezed. Vietnam just agreed to a trade deal with US that involves accepting 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports to US and an even higher 40% tariff on goods transshipped through the Southeast Asian nation – the latter aimed at stymieing Chinese exports to US via Vietnam. Thus, US is trying to leverage its market size to get concessions from its trading partners, while China is trying to leverage its manufacturing capacity to keep its trading partners locked into Chinese supply chains. But when China was admitted to WTO in 2001, the West and Beijing made an implicit deal: the former will focus on innovation and high-end manufacturing, leaving mid- to low-value manufacturing to the latter. China used this to deliver massive scale and achieve engineering expertise in a wide array of intermediaries and components. As a result, Chinese tooling engineers today are the best in the world. China also refines 90% of global rare earths. And when it comes to India, Chinese supply of APIs, electronic components, chemicals, magnets etc is gargantuan. To reduce this dependency, GOI's PLI schemes have shown promise. But more needs to be done to set up indigenous manufacturing supply chains. A closer look at technical education is imperative. India produces around 1.5mn engineers annually. But only 10% of this number were expected to secure jobs in 2024. Plus, according to some estimates, India produces around 600,000 IT engineers each year. Materials engineers, more relevant for industrial manufacturing, are only in few thousands. Unless this cohort of engineers is boosted through govt investments and policies in relevant sectors, India will continue to be vulnerable to Chinese bullying over supply of critical components and human resource. India must steadily build its technical expertise to expand its manufacturing base and emerge as an alternative to China. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

AP Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal is back in news. Mount Rushmore with the four presidents' faces is the center of new political debate over potential expansion. Then-President Donald Trump stands at Mount Rushmore National Memorial on July 3, 2020, near Keystone, S.D. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts. Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history. Also Read: Big Beautiful Bill Passed: What's in Trump's megabill and when will it go into effect? These Republicans voted against it The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response. In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage. Also Read: Michael Madsen Net Worth: Actor's cause of death, financial success, movies list, iconic roles and career Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on. What are the main reasons experts oppose adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe. Has anyone else supported adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store