Indiana comptroller calls for SEC to delist Chinese companies
Indiana, alongside 20 other states, penned a letter last month urging the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate delisting China-based companies on U.S. stock exchanges 'to protect American investors.'
Indiana Comptroller Elise Nieshalla and other state financial officers said there is a growing risk posed by the China-based companies due to Chinese Communist Party interference and widespread failures to meet U.S. transparency, accounting and auditing standards.
'As stewards of invested public funds, we have a responsibility to protect our beneficiaries from foreign entities to seek to exploit our capital markets while evading accountability,' Nieshalla said in a press release.
CONTACT US
The letter highlights the Chinese Communist Party's crackdown on independent due-diligence firms and points to findings by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board that revealed auditing failures among Chinese companies. It also states that the CCP's systematic use of Variable Interest Entities — an organization that is controlled through contractual agreements rather than direct ownership — prevents U.S. investors from owning the company.
The state financial officers also direct the SEC to investigate potential violations of the Securities Exchange Act, including disclosure of controls and procedures, internal financial reporting mechanisms, falsified accounting records and manipulative or deceptive practices. They alleged that the CCP's efforts to suppress transparency exacerbated these issues.
'As state financial officers, part of our responsibility is to ensure that the American people's finances – and our American financial system – are protected from foreign actors who mean to do us harm,' the signatories said in the letter.
Indiana has recently purged Chinese companies from state investments.
In 2023, legislation was passed that required the Indiana Public Retirement System to divest from any entities that do military or intelligence work or are controlled by the Chinese government. Within a year, INPRS eliminated its $1.2 billion worth of investments in Chinese entities.
Delisting-Letter
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Immigration raids have invaded not just L.A. but also its psyche
It might be hard for outsiders to realize how pervasive the Trump administration's immigration raids feel here in Southern California. Friends describe relatives been pulled over for no apparent reason. Neighbors tell me of housekeepers and gardeners too afraid to come to work. Times reporters Rachel Uranga and Brittny Mejia have been in the thick of our comprehensive coverage of the raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Their reports have shown that the vast majority of those hauled away have had no prior criminal convictions. So I talked to them about the impact of the unprecedented intervention, which began six weeks ago. Rachel has been on the story since the first Saturday in June, when she went to observe the large scale raid at Ambiance Apparel, a sprawling fast-fashion warehouse in downtown Los Angeles. She found immigrant rights groups and family members, who quickly learned of the action via social media and a rapid response network set up in anticipation of a crackdown. Advocates pulled up with a flatbed truck and a bullhorn. There were lawyers, video streamers filming and a large federal presence. The day ended with a union leader arrested, agents throwing gas canisters and what became the kickoff of an unprecedented showdown. As in many 21st century confrontations, Brittny recalled how video posted on social media gave an idea of how widespread the raids were. They seemed to flood in every day for a time: detainees being tackled by agents in camouflage, vendor stands left abandoned after arrests. A few of the actions stand out because of their size, like last week's raid on Glass House Farms, the Camarillo cannabis operation. Federal officials arrested more than 300 people and one man trying to flee, Jaime Alanís Garcia, fell to his death from the top of a greenhouse. The death of the 57-year-old worker reinforced the high stakes of the raids. The arrests of 31 people at a Home Depot in Hollywood also got a fair amount of attention. Rachel got initial data from the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHRLA) that showed higher arrest levels in Hollywood, Pico Rivera and Bell Gardens. The big change Brittny and Rachel have noticed in the neighborhoods they're covering is fear. 'The Fashion and Flower District emptied out after the raids,' Rachel said. 'From Compton to Maywood to Montebello, people are carrying their passports, fearing the color of their skin could get them stopped. Day care centers stand quiet because parents are afraid if they leave their children there, they might not get to see them again.' Many immigrants are considering self-deportation, Brittny noted. 'One video in particular stood out to me, posted by Julie Ear about her mom self-deporting after being in the country for decades. I watched this play out during President Trump's first term, following a family who made the difficult decision to leave.' Brittny told me that stories about American citizens swept up in the raids are among the ones that have troubled readers the most. She and Rachel told the story of Brian Gavidia, who was questioned by Border Patrol agents about the hospital he was born in. Gavidia is now a named plaintiff in a lawsuit against the Trump administration. They have also heard from readers who support President Trump and who accuse Joe Biden of allowing millions of undocumented immigrants into the country. Brittny found one email particularly jarring. 'Most Americans don't want Mexican criminals living here illegally,' the email read. 'These judges are [trash imogi.] They are paid off by [billionaire political donor George] Soros. I hope Trump defies that idiot judge and ICE brutalizes as many illegals as they can.' Suzy McLaughlin says, ''Abbott Elementary.' I never get sick of this show and the stellar cast and smartly crafted scripts bring me joy every episode!' Email us at essentialcalifornia@ and your response might appear in the newsletter this week. Today's great photo is from Times photographer Carlin Stiehl. The Times recently explored the history of homelessness in L.A. where unhoused people on Skid Row talked about current conditions in their own words. Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Carmakers face uncertainty as tariffs and earnings collide
Investors in auto firms, which sit squarely in the bullseye of President Donald Trump's trade war, are about to find out if earnings back up the sector's scorching rebound from this year's lows. A gauge of stocks of U.S. carmakers and suppliers has soared more than 40% from its tariff-fueled April depths, handily beating the S&P 500 Index's 26% gain. Meanwhile, the MSCI World Auto and Components Index has climbed 30% in that period, outpacing the MSCI World Index's 25% advance. Investors dove into the beaten-down shares during the furious rally unleashed when Trump paused most of his aggressive levies in April. But the recovery, which has since stalled out, creates a conundrum: While the shares are now much more costly, the tariff outlook hasn't grown much clearer as the sector gets ready to announce quarterly profits starting next week. Add to that headwinds around the affordability of new vehicles, rising global competition from Chinese brands like BYD Co., and China's efforts to regulate the sector, and some analysts are wary of making broad bets on the industry at the moment. 'Auto stocks have bounced back, but the setup into earnings is murky,' said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. 'This is a market for selectivity, not broad exposure.' General Motors Co., Tesla Inc. and Volkswagen AG release earnings next week, with Ford Motor Co., Stellantis NV, Mercedes-Benz Group AG and BMW AG coming the week after. Japan's Toyota Motor Corp., the world's No. 1 carmaker, and China's Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. are due to report next month. Most companies are poised to announce numbers for the three months through June — after a stretch in which Trump unveiled a slew of tariffs on auto imports, goods from Mexico and Canada, steel and aluminum and nearly all U.S. trading partners. Many of the measures have been paused, but this month brought a fresh blow as Trump announced tariffs on copper and unleashed ultimatums on counterparts including Japan, Brazil, the European Union and Mexico. The impact of the potential tariff regime on automakers, which have a sprawling global supply chain and are uniquely exposed to the risk, is a key theme investors and analysts will be watching. 'It is a fluid situation still and investors were not really prepared for the latest round of tariffs that were announced earlier this month,' said Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA Research. He has a hold-equivalent rating on the U.S. auto sector, citing valuations and tariff-related uncertainty among other reasons. Wall Street is already lowering expectations for some of the biggest carmakers. Analysts' second-quarter average profit estimate for GM has dropped 18% over the past six months and Ford's has sunk 30%, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. For EV giant Tesla it's declined 47% over the same period, with a potential hurdle looming as a federal tax credit for consumer purchases of electric vehicles ends in September. The overarching question is how companies are handling tariff-triggered cost increases. A Bank of Japan report this month showed the country's automakers slashed prices of exports to the U.S. — a sign they were sacrificing profits to stay competitive. Industry analysts expect Toyota to fare better than its domestic peers given its sizable profits, and see Honda Motor Co. benefiting from extensive local manufacturing. Volkswagen's sales dropped 16% in the U.S. in the second quarter, a sharp reversal from the 4.4% growth in the first three months of the year before the new levies took effect. This week, Sweden's Volvo Car AB said it was taking an impairment charge of about $1.2 billion due to delays to some electric models and climbing tariff costs. Its CEO on Thursday urged the EU to cut tariffs on the U.S. to help a trade deal. In contrast to the U.S. sector's performance, the Stoxx 600 Automobiles and Parts gauge of European producers has trailed the rebound in the region's broader Stoxx 600 from an April low. 'The European mass-market players will be fighting for their piece of a pie in a pie that is pretty much stable, or unchanging, over the medium- to longer-term, with more competitors,' said Rella Suskin, an analyst at Morningstar Inc. 'So someone's got to lose share somewhere.' A fast-emerging theme for European carmakers that have reported sales for the second quarter has been weakness in China — one of the world's largest auto markets — where domestic companies have become tough competitors. German sportscar maker Porsche AG said its global deliveries fell 6% in the first half of the year, and warned of a difficult road ahead due to fierce competition in China and slowing momentum in the U.S. BMW AG's sales stagnated in the second quarter as deliveries in China dropped, and Mercedes-Benz Group AG's vehicle sales declined in both the U.S. and China. 'China is probably a lost cause for all foreign brands, except for Tesla,' Piper Sandler analyst Alex Potter wrote in a note to clients this month. The rise of Chinese EV makers such as Geely is also pressuring BYD, the country's top automaker, which saw its domestic passenger car sales decline the past few months. China this week pledged to rein in 'irrational competition' in its EV sector after BYD and other automakers cut prices to lure buyers. For Wall Street, partsmakers look like a bright spot. With car manufacturers facing intense political pressure to forgo price increases as tariffs hit, auto suppliers are showing signs of being able to pass along that expense. In Europe, for example, analysts favor tiremakers in particular as the companies successfully raise prices to offset US tariff costs, which Citigroup Inc. says reflects an early pass-through to consumers. 'We think more local players, especially Michelin, can benefit from this trend in a profitable way,' analysts led by Ross MacDonald wrote in a note this week. Dey, MacDonogh and Yang write for Bloomberg.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Americans support Trump ending Biden's green grift
The radical Left and the Biden administration treated climate policy not as an energy or environmental strategy, but as a political religion — one funded by the American taxpayer to the tune of more than $1 trillion. President Trump is right to shut off the 'green' subsidy spigot, and recent polling shows that Americans are supportive. The Orwellian-named 'Inflation Reduction Act' set aside $393 billion in green energy subsidies, funding everything from electric vehicle rebates to wind and solar tax credits. That may sound good in a press release, but it hasn't delivered for hard-working Americans. In fact, a recent Associated Press–NORC poll found that 72 percent of Americans say they haven't personally benefited from the federal government's climate initiatives. Worse yet, 60 percent of respondents believe the policies aren't worth the cost. Those numbers underscore what Texans—and energy-producing states—have long known: top-down green energy mandates don't work, nor do they help American families. Instead, they burden them. They raise utility bills, overload unreliable electric grids, and put America's energy security in the hands of hostile foreign nations like China and Saudi Arabia. Over the last twenty years, Texas has become the wind and solar capital of the nation, while electricity from natural gas has stagnated and coal use has diminished. Wind and solar have grown to about 37 percent of power on Texas' electrical grid, while coal power has decreased 21 percent over the decade. More than $140 billion in private capital has poured into wind, solar, and batteries in Texas, fueled by tens of billions in taxpayer dollars and a rigged price market. And what has it gotten us? Wind and solar have failed the grid time and time again, and they completely abandoned Texans just when power was needed most during Winter Storm Uri. They have also contributed to electricity prices rising 28 percent from 2020 to 2024. The Biden administration made 'Net Zero by 2050' the cornerstone of its energy policy. But this arbitrary goal isn't grounded in engineering, economics, or energy reality. It's driven by international climate conferences and activist talking points. Even the Associated Press admits that 42 percent of Americans aren't willing to pay even one dollar more on their electric bill for climate change, yet leftist Democrats keep forcing costly green mandates down our throats. 'Net Zero' has become a catchphrase for policies that force Americans to pay more for less energy, while weakening our nation's ability to compete globally — all to virtue-signal on the environment. Here's what radical environmentalists won't admit: the U.S. is already leading the world in emissions reductions. Thanks to the increased use of clean-burning natural gas, U.S. carbon emissions are down more than 20 percent in the last twenty years — a market-driven achievement, not a bureaucratic one. Texas has played a major role in this progress, proving that energy abundance and environmental responsibility aren't mutually exclusive. Meanwhile, the same administration that demonized fossil fuels was happy to enjoy their benefits. The oil and gas industry supports over 10 million American jobs and contributes nearly $2 trillion to our economy, about 8 percent of our GDP. Moreover, oil and natural gas still supply over 80% of America's energy, power millions of homes and vehicles, and fuel the very economy that underwrites Biden's climate spending spree. Texas does energy the right way. We lead the nation in oil and gas production. We have built the most resilient energy workforce in the world. And we do it while delivering billions in tax revenue, job creation, and energy security — not empty promises wrapped in green ribbon. Trump's move to roll back these subsidies isn't anti-environment — it's pro-reality. It is a return to policies that trust innovation and competition instead of federal micromanagement. It's a rejection of climate alarmism and an embrace of energy abundance. The American people want affordable, reliable energy. They want policies that put working families ahead of political agendas. They don't want to be forced into buying electric vehicles they can't afford, powered by grids that can't stay on. It is time we stop pretending the federal government can subsidize its way to a sustainable future. True sustainability comes from markets, not mandates — from Texas oilfields, not Washington boardrooms.
