Badenoch ‘looking at Danish ghetto laws' in push for ‘active integration'
Such a declaration can trigger requirements to reduce the amount of social housing in an area, including through evicting residents and demolishing or turning their homes into private housing, and restrictions on who can move there.
We've had so many, so many people, so high numbers, people from lots of different places, which is not what immigration used to look like, and I think we need to move from passive to active integration Kemi Badenoch
Asked whether she would consider a similar policy for the UK, Mrs Badenoch told an audience at the Policy Exchange think tank on Monday she had 'looked at it' and would be talking about it more.
She said: 'I think integration is not enough. I say assimilate, I think assimilation should be the target, and if people don't assimilate, then they integrate.
'But we've had so many, so many people, so high numbers, people from lots of different places, which is not what immigration used to look like, and I think we need to move from passive to active integration.'
Saying this was 'along the lines' of the Danish policy, she added: 'We need to do what works for the UK, it's not exactly the same situation, we have a much bigger population, and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.'
The Danish law is currently being challenged at the European Court of Justice by human rights groups, who argue it discriminates against people based on their ethnicity.
During her appearance at the Policy Exchange event, the Conservative leader went on to say she wanted to see the state doing less, saying she did not want to see an 'active state' in areas outside policing and defence.
She also argued for society to do more to prevent 'unstable' families from being formed.
Asked about the role of personal responsibility in family policy, she said: 'I think that we need to start looking more at the prevention side of it.
'How do we make sure people don't start families that are unstable in the first place? I don't think that government needs to get overly involved in that.
'Society, and there is such a thing as society, needs to have some form of supporting families as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Force the 1% to cough up for their climate damage
Land ownership in Scotland is incredibly concentrated in a small number of hands. Fewer than 500 people own more than half of our private land. This motley group includes our own aristocrats, whose families have owned huge estates for centuries and whose wealth is often a result of their forebears' brutal actions during the Highland Clearances. But in recent decades they've been joined by a new group, the elite of global capitalism. The biggest landowner in Scotland used to be the Duke of Buccleuch, but now it's Danish billionaire Anders Povlsen. And the ruler of Dubai, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum isn't far behind. READ MORE: More Scots need to benefit from Scotland's screen industry, John Swinney says And he might not be in the same league as Povlsen or the Sheikh in terms of hectares, but Scotland's most infamous landowner is undoubtedly Donald Trump. Thankfully, the US president has now returned home after a brief stint of shaking hands, being drowned out by bagpipes and teeing off at his Scottish golf courses. Last year, I proposed a private jet tax which would see Trump and his cronies charged a 'super rate' of up to £250,000 every time they fly here for non-government business. This is something which should be within the powers of the Scottish Government, but is now a decade overdue. In the aftermath of the independence referendum, all parties agreed to devolve air passenger duty to the Scottish Parliament. An Act was passed by MSPs to replace it with a new Scottish air departure tax. But it can't start until the UK Government resolves an issue with the exemption for lifeline island flights – and neither they nor the [[Scottish Government]] seem to be in any rush to do that. If this was resolved, the Scottish Government could immediately bring in a super-tax on private jets, reflecting the fact that they are about twenty times more polluting than regular flights. Personally, I'd rather ban most private air travel. It is the perfect example of how the world's richest 1% are disproportionately responsible for the climate crisis. Unfortunately, full powers over air travel are still reserved to Westminster for now. Trump doesn't care about the climate, but he would care about the £250,000 tax bill every time his huge private plane arrives here. Some super-rich elites would undoubtedly take the financial hit and still fly here anyway, but the money raised could at least then be used to fund climate-friendly policies like cheaper buses and trains. And private air travel is just one example of how the super-rich play by different rules to the rest of us, all whilst avoiding paying their fair share. For too long, they have been allowed to avoid not just paying their fair share in tax, but also having their often deeply damaging activities scrutinised. All while ordinary people suffer the consequences of budgets for schools, hospitals and social care being squeezed. Tax is the price we pay for living in a civilised society, one with public services capable of meeting all of our needs throughout our lives. But the richest among us do not pay nearly enough towards maintaining the services needed for that kind of society. The Scottish Greens have long called for a wealth tax, one which would see the richest 10% of people who hold almost half the total wealth of the country taxed fairly. Introducing just a 1% annual tax on all wealth and assets above £1 million would massively boost the efforts to create a fairer, better Scotland for everyone. For context, the other 90% of Scots households hold nowhere near enough wealth to be considered for such a tax, with the average having about £214,000 in assets. This would be an extremely well-targeted tax, raising billions from those who can more than afford to pay. We are not the only people calling for a wealth tax. Just this week, leading economists from across the world have called on Labour to introduce a UK-wide wealth tax to tackle extreme levels of inequality and poverty. They have warned the Government what the Greens have argued for years: that far too much wealth is concentrated in the hands of far too few people in the UK, and it is damaging society at large. Sadly, Labour seem determined to rule this out. It is time for Keir Starmer to seriously rethink his approach and what he wants his legacy to be: a society where everyone has what they need to get by, or one where far too many children are left in desperate poverty whilst a tiny number of people hoard more wealth than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes. The Scottish Greens are clear on what we need to do: tax the super-rich now, for the good of people and planet.
Daily Record
40 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Tory MSP charges taxpayer £14,400 a year for living in former colleague's Edinburgh flat
EXCLUSIVE: Douglas Lumsden is living in ex MSP Peter Chapman's property. A former Tory MSP has made over £40,000 from the Holyrood expenses system by renting his Edinburgh flat to a Conservative colleague. Peter Chapman is receiving £1,200 a month from the taxpayer so that serving Tory MSP Douglas Lumsden can live in his property. MSPs who live far from Edinburgh are able to rent accommodation in the Capital to help carry out their parliamentary duties. But the system has been tightened over the last twenty years to protect Holyrood 's reputation. MSPs cannot rent from a close relative or a fellow member of the Parliament, but there is no bar on former MSPs being landlords. According to the online expenses system, which is available online, Lumsden 's rent costs were £12,100 in 2021/22, £13,900 twelve months later and £14,400 in 2023/24. The 'payee' for the £40,400 of claims in this period is 'Peter and Edith Chapman'. Peter Chapman, who owns a flat around fifteen minutes from the parliament, receives the rent, not Lumsden. Chapman was a Tory MSP for the North East between 2016 and 2021 before he stood down. He is now a councillor in Aberdeenshire and declares rent from an Edinburgh flat on his register of interest. Lumsden, a former councillor, has been a Tory MSP on the North East list since 2021. Former Labour MSP Neil Findlay said of renting from ex MSPs: "This practice should be reviewed. The allowances that are paid to allow MSPs whose home is far from Holyrood to live in Edinburgh during the week are funded by taxpayers' money." Lumsden was criticised earlier this year after he tabled nearly 1,000 written questions to the parliament in a single month. The question blitz was estimated to have cost the taxpayer £100,000 and he was urged to pay back the money. Some of the questions were about flagpoles, bees and jars of honey in the Holyrood shop. He denied using AI for the bombardment. When he was an MSP, Chapman quit his front bench role after lobbying councillors over a planning application he had a financial interest in. He admitted at the time he had been 'foolish' but he was cleared of breaching Holyrood 's code of conduct. A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: 'These claims were declared properly and within the rules.' A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Parliament's rules on Edinburgh accommodation for MSPs are already robust and take account of an independent review to ensure public confidence. 'At the end of each five-year session, the SPCB conducts its own review of the Members' expenses scheme to ensure it remains fit for purpose. That review provides an opportunity to reflect on whether any further changes are appropriate.'
North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
