CBS viewers left shocked by risqué moment between Julie Chen Moonves and Big Brother contestant - following husband's sex scandal
The moment also triggered renewed scrutiny over her embattled legacy as the wife of disgraced former CBS chief Les Moonves, 75.
The shocking exchange unfolded during just before a live vote and eviction on the reality TV show.
It saw Chen Moonves check in with the house guests including black contestant Will Williams, a 50-year-old retired Army captain, who wanted to say hi to his wife on air.
'Shout out to my family and shout out to my babe and my chocolate drop, Gwen,' Will said.
Chen Moonves, 55, smiling playfully, leaned into the moment - and then crossed a line that many viewers couldn't believe they'd just heard.
'Will, am I your lemon drop then?', Chen Moonves asked without missing a beat.
The comment immediately set off pandemonium inside the Big Brother house.
Williams stood up in shock while the gathered house guests all erupted with laughter.
Chen Moonves appeared to recoil in embarrassment realizing what she'd just said.
'I'm just kidding. Settle down,' she said moments later, attempting to regain control as the contestants continued to howl with laughter. 'Tell your wife it was a joke! Now we have business…'
Viewers on social media exploded with many stunned that Chen Moonves would have make such a remark to a married contestant on national television.
Others questioned the racial implications of the 'lemon drop' comment, especially in the context of her husband's very public fall from grace following multiple sexual misconduct allegations.
'She said that on national TV!!! Someone's about to get real offended,' one user wrote on TikTok.
'The immediate regret in her voice and trying to walk it back - this is incredible,' another posted to X.
'My. Jaw. Dropped. It was so good,' wrote a third.
'Is this literally not racist cause lemon drops are yellow and…' a fourth asked bluntly.
The retired Army Captain initially seemed to laugh off the comment made by Chen Moonves
The viral moment, though just seconds long, immediately brought renewed attention to Chen Moonves's controversial past - and the scandal that forced her husband out of the network she still represents and broadcasts.
Although she has attempted to distance herself from her husband's public disgrace, Chen Moonves remains inseparable in the public imagination from Les Moonves, the disgraced former CEO and chairman of CBS Corporation who was forced out in 2018, after multiple women accused him of sexual misconduct spanning three decades.
Moonves, once one of the most powerful executives in Hollywood, allegedly subjected women to groping, forced oral sex, and retaliation - charges he vehemently denies.
At the time, Chen Moonves publicly backed her husband and even adopted her full married name - Julie Chen Moonves - on-air, in a move widely viewed as a symbolic declaration of loyalty while the CBS network distanced itself from the scandal.
Behind the scenes, the fallout was personal with Chen Moonves ousted from The Talk chat show, a position she later said she didn't leave voluntarily.
'That was a hard time,' Chen told ABC News. 'I felt stabbed in the back. I was, you know? I don't know if I could've reconciled if I didn't have God in my life.'
Les Moonves, the disgraced former CEO and chairman of CBS Corporation was forced out in 2018 after multiple women accused him of sexual misconduct spanning three decades
Chen Moonves has since turned to religion, publishing an audio memoir titled But First, God and leaning heavily into her faith as a way to reframe her public identity.
'Julie Chen before she found God was a self-absorbed, career-minded, vain, gossipy, fun to be with, but probably kind of a shallow person,' she confessed.
'Julie Chen Moonves, who now knows the Lord, is someone who wants to help others, who wants to look at everyone with a soft heart.'
But Thursday night's lemon-drop flirtation seemed to break from that rebranded image - and reignited questions about her role as a public figure on a major network.
Despite his ouster and years of legal wrangling, Moonves and CBS remain linked.
In 2021, he gave up a $120 million severance package in a settlement with ViacomCBS. The company then declared the matter 'resolved.'
Married in 2004, Julie and Les have remained together, raising their son Charlie.
'We leaned on each other and we knew that nothing could break us,' Chen Moonves told People while promoting her memoir last year. 'It was our love and our foundation that got us through.'
Still, critics say Chen Moonves presence on Big Brother continues to raise ethical questions for CBS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'I bought £34 Fortnum and Mason meal deal – and it left me flabbergasted'
When one man purchased his lunch, he didn't expect to be parting with such a large amount of cash, but he did say it was 'worth every penny' as a 'treat' in the park Outrage has been felt across the UK when the price of the humble meal deal went up, with some options coming in at around a fiver - but one man managed to buy one that cost him a whopping £34, and he was floored. Big Brother star and food critic Henry Southan said he was "hungry" and "by Fortnum and Mason," so he was going to "get a meal deal". However, how much of a deal it actually was is questionable. He bought three items for the money he paid, and at the start of the video, he pondered whether to get an iced tea, but instead decided to get the Fortnum and Mason champagne, Blanc de Blanc, joking it was "meal deal size". "I think I'm gonna go for a bagel," he said, as he queued for it. He asked for the "dapper salmon but with no capers," as he's not a fan. While he was waiting for his bagel, Henry decided to complete his meal deal with a Scotch egg as a "snack". When he stepped outside of Fortnum and Mason, he said: "I've got my meal deal, and I need to go and find somewhere to eat it." Henry decided to sit in the park and enjoy his food, saying he was going to start with the bagel. He said the dapper smoked salmon bagel was "quite a traditional one". He claimed it included "chive cream cheese with smoked salmon, lemon, red onion, cucumber". Henry joked he was going to do an "influencer-type reveal" of his bagel, showing the perfectly positioned filling of the bagel he purchased. He also commented on how "big" the bagel was, saying there was "no attractive way" to eat it because of its sheer size. "Mmm, that is a thing of beauty," he commented after taking a big bite. Henry said: "What I love is the smokiness of the salmon, the fresh kind of crunch of the red onion and the cucumber. That is a great bagel. I think I need a drink." He then proceeded to get out the champagne bottle he'd bought, 'cheersing' the camera, and then drinking it straight from the bottle. It was then time for him to eat the snack, saying he was "excited" about scoffing it. "If you didn't know, Fortnum and Mason invented the Scotch egg". He broke it apart, and the yolk of the Scotch egg was runny, which is incredibly rare. "I have not felt this happy for a very long time," he gushed, saying: "Oh, come on, are you joking me? That is so delicious." He then got the receipt out, admitting the "champagne did cause this meal deal to become quite expensive," saying it was almost £20. But, he did say that "obviously you're not drinking this all the time," claiming it was for "special occasions". The foodie detailed the bagel was £9, but is "huge," and the Scotch egg was £5.30, but "worth every bloody penny". "So, in total for that meal deal, I paid £34.55," he admitted, joking that he "hates himself sometimes".
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DIY expert names viral painting hacks actually work this summer
Painting your home can be a messy mistake-filled nightmare - luckily, a DIY expert reveals which viral painting tips to follow and which ones you might be better giving a miss Summer is prime time to try and cover up all of the stains and cracks in your paint – but an expert warns not all painting hacks are worth following. Painting can be a difficult chore, particularly given that it can make a massive mess of your home if done incorrectly. For less experienced painters, social media is a popular resource for learning new DIY tips and tricks – the only problem? Not all of these suggestions are as effective as they seem. Luckily, DIY expert and Ronseal brand manager Jimmy Englezos has given his verdict on five of the most popular viral painting trends, so you know which to follow and which to ignore. UK households warned over common hosepipe mistake that costs you money 1. Placing a piece of paper over a hole in the wall to hide it With 25.8M views on TikTok, this hack aims to address the problem of painting a wall with a hole or a dent in the plaster by hiding the area with a sheet of paper. You simply paint over the area while holding the paper in place so that it dries, covering the hole. Jimmy advises: 'While this may look like an ideal solution for a quick cover-up, leaving the damaged area unrepaired for a time may lead to more problems down the line.' He adds: 'The best way to repair a hole or any wall damage is to use a quality filler. With Ronseal 5 Minute Filler, you can cover the damaged area, and within five minutes it will be touch dry. After a further ten minutes, it's ready to be painted over.' 2. Using a credit card to cut in to a wall It can be hard to paint with precision. According to one TikTok user, you can make things easier by applying paint to a bank card and using it to paint clean lines around door frames and other edges. But Jimmy warns that this trick isn't quite as simple as it may appear. He says: 'The paint tends to slide off the smooth surface of the card, which can cause drips or smudges and you'll also end up covering your card in paint. Also, only being able to paint the length of a credit card in one stroke each time is going to get quite tedious, which could see attention to detail diminish as you spend more time on the process. 'Instead, I recommend investing in a high-quality brush and applying paint lightly. You can also use decorators' tape to mask off edges and ensure crisp lines.' 3. Applying paint with a tanning mitt One TikTok user demonstrated how she uses a tanning mitt to paint a door instead of a brush. She used the mitt to first apply a base layer and then add the topcoat, and while the result looks great, should home decorator's consider using a tanning mitt instead of a paint brush? Jimmy says that while you can certainly use a tanning mitt while painting, it's better used for specific jobs. He recommends: 'They can be used in tight spaces, like stair railings and bannisters, where their flexibility can help those with less experience achieve better control.' Although, he adds that you will always get 'a better finish' with a brush. If you can encounter awkward hard-to-reach areas, there are specialist brushes that you can pick up to help. 4. Mixing water into paint to help cover a larger area Looking to increase your paint's longevity? This TikTok hack suggests adding a small amount of water to your paint and mixing it to increase the paint's coverage. However, Jimmy suggests that this is often unnecessary. It also could have a negative impact on the end result. He explains: 'Most modern paints are formulated to offer maximum coverage without the need to add water. I would advise against adding water to any paint product unless expressly instructed to do so on the tin itself. 'Adding water to paint will not only result in making the paint thinner, but it can also impact durability and the number of coats required to get a nice-looking finish.' 5. Using a sheet of acetate or paper to paint skirting boards An Instagram user has suggested placing a piece of paper under the area that you are painting in order to help stop any paint from splattering on the floor. Jimmy says that this a great idea for those painting indoors. He said: 'This is a simple and cost-effective trick to avoid a mess when painting skirting boards. These can be tricky due to them running flush to carpet, or hard flooring , and protective sheets can often get in the way, or smudge paint, as they typically won't be able to neatly tuck under skirting boards to protect flooring. 'Using a sheet of paper to tuck nicely under the gap between the skirting board and flooring allows you to paint with a faster pace as the paper will catch any excess paint in the process. Painters should exercise caution when removing the paper as any considerable drips of paint will weigh the paper down and could undo this hack in seconds.' He also advises that for carpeted rooms, it might be better to use a more structured material like card or acetate.
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I saw real Bonnie Blue behind closed doors - there's one dark truth people don't see'
As a new Channel 4 documentary delves into the shocking real world of Bonnie Blue, mirror writer Ellie Fry argues that the viral adult star's dark influence over young men and women is painfully ignored Sat in a cosy cinema room packed full of press, Bonnie Blue, real name Tia Billinger, seems to be in her element. As her famous face and bright blonde curls pop up on the big screen, us viewers have no idea what's in store as we sit down to watch one of the biggest adult stars in the world appear in a brand new Channel 4 documentary, which promises to deliver full access to the real life of Bonnie Blue. But sitting there alongside her "proud" mum, other family members and small team, Bonnie knows all too well that the extreme sex empire she's painstakingly crafted is about to become even more mainstream, as the broadcaster has spared no blushes in its fly-on-the-wall hour-long show, titled "1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story". Her life behind the scenes and the inner workings of her multi-million pound businesss have been shrouded in mystery until now. But one thing Bonnie's always been desperate to promote are her extreme sex challenges. The star's troubling social media strategy, where she posts aggressively across platforms like Instagram and TikTok, means that everyone - including young girls and boys - can easily stumble across a glimpse of her explicit content, where she boasts about sleeping with married men and being "helpless" as men "take her". Sadly, Channel 4's deep dive does little to hold Bonnie accountable for the undeniable responsibilities she has as a world famous adult star promoting potentially dangerous sex stunts on social media. Our online landscape is already teeming with violent porn and unhealthy perceptions of sex, and in this bleak attention economy of viral videos and views, it seems as though there's no limit to how far Bonnie will push herself. Chillingly, the star's whole business model centres around sleeping with 'normal' men in amateur videos. What struck me watching the film is the horrifying juxtaposition of going to such extreme, unrealistic measures with everyday members of the public. Bonnie positions herself as somewhat of a saviour - relishing in giving the average man a chance to sleep with a porn star, or "teaching barely legal" virgins how to perform in the bedroom. She says in the doc: "I found my purpose in porn. I found the niche I want to focus on. And it's not just because I'm obsessed with 18-year-olds, it was such a bigger picture in terms of teaching them how to have sex; watching their face light up as they lost their virginity. I really love that." But while these gritty, 'homemade' scenes may seem real - and earn Bonnie millions of pounds - the relatability ends at the amateurs involved. The star's extreme stunts - from sleeping with 1,057 men in a day and planning to cage herself in a glass box in a sex 'petting zoo' - are merely perpetuating dangerous myths about what women need to do for their partners - and what men should expect in the bedroom. In a bid to brush away her critics, who have questioned the ethics and power dynamic in her content, Bonnie says that she talks about consent until she's blue in the face, insisting that every participant has to sign a consent form and show ID before taking part. But I can't help but notice her thirst for control over the participants she chooses - notably people who are not in the porn industry, or have never filmed such extreme content before - and wonder where that stems from. It seems as though she deliberately profits from the vulnerability and innocence of the young men and women who agree to appear in her films. And this connection to the everyday public is exactly where that danger lies - it feels so within reach, despite being so extreme. The star's ex husband Oliver Davidson, who appears fleetingly in the film, explains her strategy perfectly. "She really connects with the fans," he says. "Most people, if they do porn, they seem out of reach. You're never going to meet them. You're never going to be able to film with them. Whereas Bonnie puts a location online, and then obviously her fans can actually film with her. It's like a defining moment in porn, where she's completely changed the game." But the normalisation of such severe porn will soon seep into the psyche of young people being fed the content by the giants at Meta and TikTok. And this marketing strategy puts Bonnie at risk too. The star admits in the film that she hasn't left the house alone in the last six months, and fears being attacked by acid on the street. The documentary is radically uncensored in its depiction of Bonnie's work and shows explicit sex scenes, something Channel 4 says is "editorially justified" and "presented in a non-gratuitous manner". Seeing what happens behind the scenes is no doubt shocking, but it's the lesser known 'challenges' involving young women that are more disturbing to me. In the show, the more viral Bonnie gets, the further she leans into these extreme sex acts, as she begins relying on the use of young girls in her content. One scene shows Bonnie filming a sex tape with multiple other young female OnlyFans creators and a male porn star. Interviewing the women who have been recruited to take part in the stunt, filmed in a school classroom, the documentary's director reveals that the creators aren't being paid to take part. One young woman, who profits on OnlyFans with solo work and content with her partner, tells the camera that she's never done anything this "adventurous" and looks visibly nervous. Another timidly admits that the only time she's ever seen live sex is in Amsterdam in the red light district. A third creator, a 21-year-old woman, admits her subscribers love her content because she looks so much younger than she is. In an admission that makes my stomach churn, Bonnie says of the classroom stunt: "The fact that they are so nervous actually works in my favour, because their reactions are going to be more realistic." Bonnie seems to relish in stamping out the innocence of her participants. Yes, they've all consented. But the undercurrent of exploitation, in a classroom full of young women who have never filmed porn before, never mind extreme content, feels palpable. What message does that send out to young boys watching her videos, whose perceptions of consent and power are being shaped by such content? To me, the star appears to hide behind the guise of empowerment - both of herself and virgins, young content creators and 'normal' men - when in reality she is profiting from their vulnerability and glorifying rape culture with her 'challenges'. Her petting zoo stunt, that got cancelled after OnlyFans decided to permanently ban her from its platform at the final hour, would have seen Bonnie "tied down" in a glass box in a house in London, where strangers would come and do "whatever they wanted". Bonnie bragged in the documentary: "I am going to be completely helpless, tied down, gagged, choked". Alarmingly, a recent government review found porn involving non-fatal strangulation (NFS) was "rife" and that its prevalence online was contributing to choking becoming commonplace in some people's sex lives - particularly among young people. Even more disturbingly, the UK courts have seen an alarming rise in women's lives ending after what those accused of their deaths say were 'sex games gone wrong'. To the feminists who challenge her behaviour, Bonnie hits back, saying in the doc: "You fought for women's rights for years and years. You've fought for us to have control over our body and be empowered by that. I'm now living by that. "And suddenly you want me to shut up, have a couple of kids, get married and stay quiet, but I don't want that. If anything, I'm an image of what you've just been asking for for years and years. And suddenly you see it, and you're now thinking, f***, we don't want this woman to speak proudly of sex." As a woman who openly brags about using rage-bait as the cornerstone of her business model, spamming multiple TikTok and Instagram accounts a day with content designed to outrage, it's hard to take anything Bonnie says seriously. But she certainly refuses to take any responsibility for the influence she may have over the younger generation. When asked how she feels about young teenagers coming across her content, Bonnie admits she "forgets" to think of it from that point of view. She then says bluntly: "There's also a parent's responsibility to say, hey, there's people in the world that do mass murders. [It] doesn't mean you do that." Even if it's not Bonnie's job to educate young people on safe and healthy sex, there's something sinister in wanting to profit from those who may be vulnerable. In one part of the show, she admits: "I really want to do a disabled gang bang". Rage-bait or not, where do we draw the line at accepting such statements? And who is being "empowered" here? Channel 4 failed to press Bonnie on that vile remark. It's a show that leaves more questions than answers, and feels more like an advert than a documentary. It's too early to say just how much of an impact this new trend of extreme sex stunts will have on young people, but it feels like a nightmare waiting to happen - and, as the show does thankfully note, Bonnie clearly has no interest in taking accountability for the fallout.
