Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg can issue their own currency - Stablecoin bill critics send chilling warning to Donald Trump
stablecoin
bill, passed on a 308-122 vote, sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for the cryptocurrency, which is tied to a stable asset, often the U.S. dollar, to reduce price volatility. It passed the Senate with bipartisan support in June. However, the stablecoin bill has drawn sharp criticisms from critics who claimed that the bill paves way for Big Tech companies and other conglomerates to issue their own private currencies.
Crypto Week
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Data Science
Degree
Data Analytics
Operations Management
PGDM
Design Thinking
Cybersecurity
Management
Healthcare
Artificial Intelligence
Product Management
Project Management
Technology
MCA
Data Science
healthcare
CXO
Public Policy
Others
Digital Marketing
MBA
others
Leadership
Finance
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIT Madras
CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK DABS India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
30 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
After Trump declared it 'crypto week,' the bills were stalled for more than a day amid disagreements among House Republicans about how to combine the legislation. In the end, GOP leaders put the three bills for a separate votes, leaving the fate of the other two bills unclear in the Senate. The internal dissent could foreshadow challenges ahead for the more sweeping crypto legislation that Trump has demanded and the industry has poured millions into advancing.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
The stablecoin measure is seen by lawmakers and the industry as a step toward adding legitimacy and consumer trust to a rapidly growing sector. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in June that the legislation could help that currency 'grow into a $3.7 trillion market by the end of the decade.'
The bill outlines requirements for stablecoin issuers, including compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering and sanctions laws, and mandates that issuers hold reserves backing the cryptocurrency. Without such a framework, Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee in a statement warned, 'consumers face risks like unstable reserves or unclear operations from stablecoin issuers."
Live Events
New Market Structure for Cryptocurrency
After the votes, House Republicans strongly urged the Senate to take up the second bill, which would create a new market structure for cryptocurrency.
Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wis., said the 294-134 vote on that legislation shows broad bipartisan support and a 'massive energy' on the issue. But it is so far unclear whether the Senate would consider the House bill or try to write its own.
That legislation aims to provide clarity for how digital assets are regulated. The bill defines what forms of cryptocurrency should be treated as commodities regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and which are securities policed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In general, tokens associated with 'mature' blockchains, like bitcoin, will be considered commodities.
The third bill, passed on a narrower 219-210 margin, prohibits the U.S. from offering what's known as a 'central bank digital currency,' which is like a government-issued form of digital cash.
Warning from Democrats
While the bill has significant bipartisan support, it has also faced pushback from Democrats who say the legislation should address Trump's personal financial interests in the crypto space.
Some Democrats also criticized the bill for creating what they see as an overly weak regulatory framework that could pose long-term financial risks. They've also raised concerns that the legislation opens the door for major corporations to issue their own private cryptocurrencies. 'If this bill passes, it will allow
Elon Musk
and
Mark Zuckerberg
to issue their own money. The bill still permits Big Tech companies and other conglomerates to issue their own private currencies,' said Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee.
A provision in the stablecoin bill bans members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins. But that prohibition does not extend to the president and his family, even as Trump builds a crypto empire from the White House, they claim.
In May, the Republican president hosted a private dinner at his golf club in Virginia with top investors in a Trump-branded meme coin. His family holds a significant stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto project that launched its own stablecoin, USD1.
Trump reported earning $57.35 million from token sales at World Liberty Financial in 2024, according to a public financial disclosure released in June. A meme coin linked to him has generated an estimated $320 million in fees, though the earnings are split among multiple investors.
FAQs
Q1. What is Stablecoin bill?
A1. The Stablecoin bill, passed on a 308-122 vote, sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for the cryptocurrency, which is tied to a stable asset, often the U.S. dollar, to reduce price volatility.
Q2. Who is President of USA?
A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Japan's US dilemma
Written by Vanshika Saraf In the space of a few weeks, Japan has found itself at the centre of a geopolitical storm. On the one hand is a jarring economic fallout with its most important ally, the United States, and on the other, a major recalibration of its defence orientation. Japan plans to deploy long-range missiles on its southwestern islands by 2026, a historic departure from its post-war pacifist posture. Simultaneously, the reimposition of tariffs on Japanese automobile and steel exports by the Trump administration has raised profound concerns in Tokyo about the stability and reciprocity of its alliance with Washington. This unfolding tension illustrates a paradox. Japan is rearming to secure American support while facing an economic squeeze from that very ally. For India, this emerging contradiction presents a critical moment of opportunity and responsibility. The opportunity lies in Tokyo's growing willingness to diversify its strategic and economic relationships. The responsibility stems from the fact that the health of the US-Japan relationship is integral for the Quad to succeed. In 2024, Japan unveiled its largest defence budget, as part of a broader plan to double spending by 2027. It now plans to deploy long-range cruise missiles, capable of striking military bases in China or North Korea, to strengthen deterrence capabilities amid rising tensions in the East China Sea. Late last month, it also carried out its first-ever missile test on domestic soil at the Shizunai Anti-Air Firing Range. But such assertiveness comes with challenges. Domestically, Japan's pacifist constitution and fiscal constraints limit the extent of militarisation. Public opinion remains cautious, and defence spending, even under current commitments, barely crosses 2 per cent of GDP. More importantly, Japan's defence upgrades are premised on continued US military backing, including interoperability, intelligence sharing, and nuclear deterrence cover. However, the reliability of that cover is now in question. The second Trump administration's protectionist outlook has resurfaced longstanding doubts in Tokyo about the durability of the alliance. As the US demands more from its allies while offering diminishing assurances, Japan's dependency on a single power is beginning to look untenable. The imposition of tariffs on Japanese automobiles and steel products by Washington has reopened old wounds. These sectors are core to Japan's export economy and national innovation ecosystem. It signals that security alliances no longer guarantee economic goodwill. Moreover, Japan's vulnerability to trade coercion is not limited to the US. China's increasing use of informal embargoes, on semiconductors, rare earths, and tourism, means that Tokyo now finds itself squeezed between its top two trading partners, neither of whom are fully reliable. This economic dilemma has spurred internal calls, particularly from opposition parties, for Japan to diversify its trade architecture and reduce reliance on the US market. In this recalibration, India features as a natural partner. First, defence and technology cooperation between India and Japan should move beyond joint exercises like JIMEX and Malabar to co-production and co-development. Joint R&D in unmanned systems, electronic warfare, and hypersonic are areas where both countries lag compared to China and the US. A co-production deal on missile components and air defence systems will also reduce reliance on Western original equipment manufacturers. Second, economic collaboration must be re-energised. The India-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), which came into effect in 2011, has not undergone a formal revision despite several rounds of discussion and joint reviews. India should accelerate the upgradation of the CEPA to include new elements like digital trade, e-commerce, fintech and mutual recognition of standards. Finally, New Delhi and Tokyo must ensure that their newly institutionalised economic security dialogue continues to be a regular annual affair. Focusing on the weaponisation of trade, supply chain resilience, and financial sanctions, the first round of the India-Japan Dialogue on Economic Security, Strategic Trade and Technology took place in November 2024. As both countries face the ripple effects of the US-China rivalry, they need coordinated strategies to defend their economic sovereignty. Prime Minister Ishiba is under pressure to deliver a precarious US–Japan trade deal by August 1 or face 25 per cent U.S. tariffs. Before that, on July 20, Japan will head to the polls for a crucial Upper House election. The ruling LDP–Komeito coalition currently commands the upper house, but polls suggest they could lose their majority. 124 of 248 seats are at stake, with the coalition needing to secure 50 seats to maintain its majority. Recent NHK surveys show the LDP's support is at 24 per cent, its lowest since 2012, while populist parties like Sanseito are gaining ground. Although losing the upper house would not mean an immediate change in government, it could mean crippled governance, creating the prospect of legislative deadlocks. Tokyo is clearly entering a new phase of geopolitical agency. It is no longer shielded from the turbulence shaping global politics. The country is being pushed slowly from the comfort zone of technocratic governance and soft balancing into a harsher landscape. For decades, Japan has served as a quiet anchor of regional order, but that paradigm is increasingly under strain. A deeper, more symmetrical India-Japan partnership could serve as a stabilising force in the Indo-Pacific. The writer is a Research Analyst for the Indo-Pacific Studies Program at the Takshashila Institution
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rupee gives up gains, settles 4 paise lower at 86.16 against U.S. dollar
The rupee gave up initial gains to settle 4 paise lower at 86.16 (provisional) against the U.S. dollar on Friday (July 18, 2025), dragged by foreign fund outflows, rising global crude oil prices and a steep decline in domestic equity markets. However, a weak greenback against major currencies prevented a sharp depreciation in the local unit, forex traders said. At the interbank foreign exchange, the rupee opened higher against the U.S. dollar at 85.99 and moved in the range of 85.97-86.23 before closing at 86.16 (provisional), down 4 paise from its previous close. The rupee declined 20 paise to settle at 86.12 against the U.S. dollar on Thursday (July 17, 2025). Foreign investors turned sellers while "dollar buyers bought heavily to take rupee lower before we saw the Reserve Bank of India stepping in to control the pace of the fall", said Anil Kumar Bhansali, Head of Treasury and Executive Director, Finrex Treasury Advisors LLP. 'We expect the rupee to remain in the weakening mode till the deal with the U.S. is finalised and if it is not done, then we could see the rupee travel to 87 levels. For Monday, we expect the rupee to trade in the range of 85.90-86.40,' he said. Negotiations between India and the U.S. are underway to iron out pending issues for a trade deal, the Ministry of External Affairs said on Thursday (July 17, 2025). The comments came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington is 'very close' to the trade pact with India. Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, rose sharply by 1.17% to $70.33 per barrel in futures trade. The dollar index, which gauges the greenback's strength against a basket of six currencies, was down 0.36% to 98.38. In the domestic equity markets, the Sensex declined 501.51 points to settle at 81,757.73, while the Nifty dropped 143.05 points to close at 24,968.40. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) sold equities worth ₹3,694.31 crore on a net basis on Thursday (July 17, 2025), according to exchange data.
New Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
CBS to end Stephen Colbert's ‘The Late Show' in May 2026 after comedian blasts Trump settlement
NEW YORK: Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show", long a staple of late night US television, will end in 2026, the CBS network said Thursday, days after the comedian blasted parent company Paramount's $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump as "a big fat bribe". CBS said in a statement the cancellation was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night," and was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at (parent company) Paramount." "Next year will be our last season," the host announced on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" on Thursday to boos and shouts of disbelief. "The network will be ending the show in May (2026)."
