Chipmaker STMicro makes first loss in over a decade, hit by restructuring costs
AMSTERDAM:
STMicroelectronics
reported a second-quarter loss on Thursday, its first in more than a decade, underperforming market expectations as it was hit by
restructuring costs
.
The company's shares fell 11% in early trade, on track for their worst day since July last year.
The Franco-Italian chipmaker, which makes power chips for
Tesla
's drivetrains and eSim modules for Apple's iPhones, posted a loss of $133 million for the quarter, missing the average $56.2 million profit analysts expected in an LSEG poll.
The
operating loss
included a $190 million impairment, restructuring charges and other costs, STMicro said in a statement. Without the restructuring and impairment costs, profits would have reached $57 million, the company added.
STMicro's heavy reliance on in-house manufacturing, representing about 80% of sales, has burdened it with underused factories and high staff costs when the market slows, unlike rivals Infineon and NXP that use more contract manufacturing, analysts say.
Chipmakers exposed to the struggling automotive, industrial, and consumer chip markets such as STMicro, Texas Instruments , or NXP have faced a sales slump, hit by low demand, high inventories, and
geopolitical disruptions
.
STMicro, one of Europe's largest chipmakers, unveiled a cost-cutting plan last year to restructure its manufacturing facilities and save hundreds of millions of dollars by 2027.
The plans, which included cutting 5,000 jobs in France and Italy over the next three years, started a spat between the French and Italian governments, who jointly own a stake of 27.5%in the firm.
STMicro's Chief Executive Jean-Marc Chery defended his plan after the Italian government sought to oust him and accused the management of insider trading.
STMicro has not provided guidance for the full year of 2025. In June, the company said it saw the early signs of an upcycle, or a period of increased market demand, which would allow it to achieve its second-quarter revenue goal of $2.71 billion.
Revenue rose to $2.76 billion from $2.52 billion in the second quarter, ahead of that target. STMicro said it is now expecting revenue in the third-quarter to reach $3.17 billion, ahead of analysts expectations of $3.10 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lenskart gets shareholder approval for $250 million IPO fundraise
Indian eyewear retailer Lenskart secured shareholder approval to raise $250 million through a fresh share issue, setting the stage for a public offering that could reach $1 billion, including existing investor sales, according to sources. It is aiming for an IPO valuation of about $10 billion. 'The company got approval for the $250 million IPO fundraise. The offer for sale (OFS) would be decided later,' said a person familiar with the matter. The company plans to file its prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) soon, joining a wave of technology startups—including trading platform Groww, e-commerce firm Meesho, and education company PhysicsWallah—that are preparing to go public in 2025. Lenskart's move comes as the $5 billion company—recently marked up to $6.1 billion by Fidelity—seeks to capitalize on robust growth in India's retail market. The Gurugram-based firm reported 43 per cent revenue growth to Rs 5,427.7 crore in FY24 from Rs 3,788 crore in FY23, while narrowing its losses by 84 per cent to Rs 10 crore in FY24 from Rs 63 crore in FY23. The IPO approval includes a pre-listing fundraising round of $51 million and a new employee stock plan covering 7.2 million shares. Lenskart operates more than 2,500 stores globally and is investing $200 million in a manufacturing facility in southern India. Lenskart continues to deepen its penetration in India while rapidly scaling its international presence, including in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. With a unique click-and-mortar business model, it is disrupting the eyewear industry by offering an omni-channel customer experience across online platforms, mobile applications, and stores. Globally and in India, Gurugram-based Lenskart competes with players such as Titan Eyeplus, Specsmakers, Vision Express, Warby Parker, and Italian eyewear conglomerate Luxottica Group.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump once decried the idea of presidential vacations. His Scotland trip is built around golf
Edinburgh: During sweaty summer months, Abraham Lincoln often decamped about 5 kilometres north of the White House to the Soldiers' Home, a presidential retreat of cottages and parkland in what today is the Petworth section of northwest Washington. Ulysses S Grant sometimes summered at his family's cottage in Long Branch, New Jersey, even occasionally driving teams of horses on the beach. Ronald Reagan once said he did "some of my best thinking" at his Rancho Del Cielo retreat outside Santa Barbara, California. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science Data Analytics Design Thinking MBA Healthcare healthcare Management Finance Project Management Technology Cybersecurity Digital Marketing Product Management CXO Operations Management Data Science Artificial Intelligence Leadership PGDM others Public Policy Degree MCA Others Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Donald Trump 's getaway is taking him considerably farther from the nation's capital, to the coast of Scotland. The White House isn't calling Trump's five-day, midsummer jaunt a vacation, but rather a working trip where the Republican president might hold a news conference and sit for interviews with US and British media outlets. Trump was also talking trade in separate meetings with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Live Events Trump is staying at his properties near Turnberry and Aberdeen, where his family owns two golf courses and is opening a third on August 13. Trump played golf over the weekend at Turnberry and is helping cut the ribbon on the new course on Tuesday. He's not the first president to play in Scotland: Dwight D Eisenhower played at Turnberry in 1959, more than a half century before Trump bought it, after meeting with French President Charles de Gaulle in Paris. But none of Trump's predecessors has constructed a foreign itinerary around promoting vacation sites his family owns and is actively expanding. It lays bare how Trump has leveraged his second term to pad his family's profits in a variety of ways, including overseas development deals and promoting crypto-currencies, despite growing questions about ethics concerns. "You have to look at this as yet another attempt by Donald Trump to monetise his presidency," said Leonard Steinhorn, who teaches political communication and courses on American culture and the modern presidency at American University. "In this case, using the trip as a PR opportunity to promote his golf courses." Presidents typically vacation in the US Franklin D Roosevelt went to the Bahamas, often for the excellent fishing, five times between 1933 and 1940. He visited Canada's Campobello Island in New Brunswick, where he had vacationed as a child, in 1933, 1936 and 1939. Reagan spent Easter 1982 on vacation in Barbados after meeting with Caribbean leaders and warning of a Marxist threat that could spread throughout the region from nearby Grenada. Presidents also never fully go on vacation. They travel with a large entourage of aides, receive intelligence briefings, take calls and otherwise work away from Washington. Kicking back in the United States, though, has long been the norm. Harry S Truman helped make Key West, Florida, a tourist hot spot with his "Little White House" cottage there. Several presidents, including James Buchanan and Benjamin Harrison, visited the Victorian architecture in Cape May, New Jersey. More recently, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama boosted tourism on Massachusetts' Martha's Vineyard, while Trump has buoyed Palm Beach, Florida, with frequent trips to his Mar-a-Lago estate. But any tourist lift Trump gets from his Scottish visit is likely to most benefit his family. "Every president is forced to weigh politics versus fun on vacation," said Jeffrey Engel, David Gergen Director of the Centre for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, who added that Trump is "demonstrating his priorities." "When he thinks about how he wants to spend his free time, A. playing golf, B. visiting places where he has investments and C. enhancing those investments, that was not the priority for previous presidents, but it is his vacation time," Engel said. It's even a departure from Trump's first term, when he found ways to squeeze in visits to his properties while on trips more focused on work. Trump stopped at his resort in Hawaii to thank staff members after visiting the memorial site at Pearl Harbour and before embarking on an Asia trip in November 2017. He played golf at Turnberry in 2018 before meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Finland. Trump once decried the idea of taking vacations as president. "Don't take vacations. What's the point? If you're not enjoying your work, you're in the wrong job," Trump wrote in his 2004 book, "Think Like a Billionaire." During his presidential campaign in 2015, he pledged to "rarely leave the White House." Even as recently as a speech at a summit on artificial intelligence in Washington on Wednesday, Trump derided his predecessor for flying long distances for golf - something he's now doing. "They talked about the carbon footprint and then Obama hops onto a 747, Air Force One , and flies to Hawaii to play a round of golf and comes back," he said. Presidential vacations and any overseas trips were once taboo Trump isn't the first president not wanting to publicise taking time off. George Washington was criticised for embarking on a New England tour to promote the presidency. Some took issue with his successor, John Adams, for leaving the then-capital of Philadelphia in 1797 for a long visit to his family's farm in Quincy, Massachusetts. James Madison left Washington for months after the War of 1812. Teddy Roosevelt helped pioneer the modern presidential vacation in 1902 by chartering a special train and directing key staffers to rent houses near Sagamore Hill, his home in Oyster Bay, New York, according to the White House Historical Association. Four years later, Roosevelt upended tradition again, this time by becoming the first president to leave the country while in office. The New York Times noted that Roosevelt's 30-day trip by yacht and battleship to tour construction of the Panama Canal "will violate the traditions of the United States for 117 years by taking its President outside the jurisdiction of the Government at Washington." In the decades since, where presidents opted to vacation, even outside the US, has become part of their political personas. In addition to New Jersey, Grant relaxed on Martha's Vineyard. Calvin Coolidge spent the 1928 Christmas holidays at Sapelo Island, Georgia. Lyndon B Johnson had his "Texas White House," a Hill Country ranch. Eisenhower vacationed in Newport, Rhode Island. John F Kennedy went to Palm Springs, California, and his family's compound in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, among other places. Richard Nixon had the " Southern White House " on Key Biscayne, Florida, while Joe Biden travelled frequently to Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, while also visiting Nantucket, Massachusetts, and St Croix in the US Virgin Islands. George H W Bush was a frequent visitor to his family's property in Kennebunkport, Maine, and didn't let the start of the Gulf War in 1991 detour him from a monthlong vacation there. His son, George W Bush, opted for his ranch in Crawford, Texas, rather than a more posh destination. Presidential visits help tourism in some places more than others, but Engel said that for some Americans, "if the president of the Untied States goes some place, you want to go to the same place." He noted that visitors emulating presidential vacations are out "to show that you're either as cool as he or she, that you understand the same values as he or she or, heck, maybe you'll bump into he or she."
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Kolhapuri slip: Luxury houses need to grasp India's domestic sensibilities
Retailing for as little as $10, India's beloved Kolhapuri sandals are a staple in wardrobes across the sub-continent. So, when global luxury brand Prada debuted a new type of footwear at Milan Fashion Week that bore a stark resemblance to them, it didn't take long for fury to build online. The saga underscores how much power the South Asian giant's digital tribe holds, where online outrage regularly influences public debate—especially when citizens perceive their heritage as under attack. International firms eyeing one of the world's fastest-growing markets should weigh the risks of such cultural missteps. The Italian fashion house's troubles began when it introduced its menswear collection in June. The sandals, described as 'leather footwear," displayed an open-toe braided pattern that was strikingly similar to Kolhapuri sandals made in the Indian states of Maharashtra and Karnataka. (Your columnist has several pairs of Kolhapuris in her wardrobe.) Also Read: Line of conscience: Why didn't luxury brands speak up? Historically, the sandals were produced for specific communities. For farmers who worked in the fields, they were robust and able to withstand wear-and-tear; for the courtier class and nobles, they were more delicate and ostentatious. In 2019, the footwear was awarded Geographical Indication status, viewed as a mark of authenticity. Other Indian items to have received this tag include Darjeeling tea and Alphonso mangoes. But Prada did not credit India for the designs, prompting a brutal social media backlash. The nationalistic sentiment whipped up by this controversy boosted sales of the traditional sandals. India's online community accused the brand of cultural appropriation and the furore forced the fashion house into damage-control mode. It issued a statement saying it recognized the sandals were inspired by traditional Indian footwear. The luxury brand's experience is a reminder that in India, foreign firms have to be aware of how reputational risk could affect future revenue. Internet penetration is rising, with 55% of the population connected. Social media is growing fast, too: It's estimated to be home to 462 million social media users. India is a rising global power, one that international brands are keen to break into. But local and foreign firms face challenges: Bureaucracy, shoddy infrastructure and unique consumer behaviours that include a fierce defence of India's rich heritage. All these factors call for a sensitive approach. Also Read: Bling battle: Yes, US luxury brands can take on European labels Success in the market lies in the ability to balance local authenticity and global appeal—and the willingness to 'learn to love and speak to India," as Francois Grouiller, chief executive officer of the luxury consultancy IndLux recently noted. Foreign brands can't afford to ignore India's luxury market, which reached $7.74 billion in 2023 and is projected to approach $12 billion by 2028. Other estimates predict the sector could more than triple by 2030, growing to upward of $85 billion. The number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals—people with a net worth of at least $30 million—is expected to grow 50% by 2028. These forecasts come with the obvious caveats—most notably, there is still a huge wealth gap in the country. While India's 100 million wealthiest folks are splurging, 400 million of their middle-class counterparts have cut back. Global economic conditions are less supportive, as US President Donald Trump's tariffs fuel trade tensions and put pressure on future growth. Still, viewing consumers as a long-term opportunity rather than just a short-term play would help these firms thrive. Even more important is understanding that India is home to a diverse market with distinct needs. Some brands have grasped this already—high-end jeweller Bulgari offers a pricey Mangalsutra necklace inspired by a chain traditionally worn by married women—tapping into the desire for luxury with home-grown sensibilities. Also Read: Luxury brand Prada is eyeing its rival Versace but such a merger seems flawed The Italian brand is not the first—and neither will it be the last—to fall afoul of cultural norms. Earlier this year, Gucci made the mistake of calling Alia Bhatt's custom-made sari-lehenga a gown. Another online frenzy was set off in May, when a viral trend was criticized for calling the dupatta a Scandinavian scarf. Prada doesn't own retail stores in India, depending instead on the super-rich diaspora and wealthy Indians who travel overseas. But the firm—whose shares have lost about 30% since February as investors took fright at its Versace purchase—isn't taking chances. In a conciliatory move, it's now working with traditional artisans to understand the history of Kolhapuris. Prada has learnt the hard way that cultural fluency is no longer a 'nice to have'—it's central to survival. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China.
