Lando Norris has finally matched Oscar Piastri for one thing all F1 champions need
He got his first while enthusiastically celebrating his Miami 2024 breakthrough. After his recent 2025 British Grand Prix victory, it was a fan-shield screen breaking and felling a photographer that caused the cut to his nose. At least Norris could laugh about both. Winning will do that to a person.
Advertisement
But what happened at Silverstone earlier this month was more substantial than just Norris securing his first F1 triumph at his home race, as big as that is for any driver.
His 2024 campaign was transformed by Miami, where McLaren finally completed the upgrade journey it'd been on since Austria 2023 to really topple Red Bull. It's too soon to say Silverstone will do the same to his 2025 campaign, but it was different to what had come before in one key aspect.
It was Norris's first win this season when he's been second best to Oscar Piastri across an event overall. And winning on off-weekends is a key pillar of all title-winning seasons.
Piastri has been the one usually winning on his bad days this season. His Jeddah and Miami victories this campaign both could've gone to Norris (although in each, when it came to battling Red Bull's Verstappen, Piastri forced the issue superbly both times). Canada also might've gone very differently had Norris not messed up yet again in qualifying.
But Norris has simply never done this before in F1, winning when he's not the fastest driver. In his three post-Miami wins in 2024, Norris was clearly the best driver on those weekends. Admittedly, he could have won more last season but for circumstances conspiring against him.
Back in Canada, when Norris's misjudgment while battling Piastri late on led to him crashing instantly out, 2025's firmly-established narrative had centered on the Briton's many mistakes. Had he been the one penalized for braking too sharply under the safety car (actually in both restarts, it transpired), that only would've intensified.
For Piastri, this was his first major error since crashing out in the Australian opener (and his off there was initially just a bit bigger than Norris's in the returning rain lottery). And Norris capitalized.
Advertisement
It would've been fascinating to see how things might've played out between them in the closing stages at Silverstone without Piastri's penalty coming into play. After all, there was just 1.3 seconds to separate them ahead of those final stops for slicks. And, with Norris no longer tire-saving as he had been in the early stages when Piastri was blowing the field away at the start, there was seemingly very little in it. Piastri was pushing hard to keep his teammate out of DRS and any tiny mistake on the drying surface could've been the decisive factor.
But then, when the race contained Nico Hülkenberg ending his 239-race wait for an F1 podium, wanting a better end to the contest up front was being greedy. You can't have everything, as Christian Horner has found out to his considerable cost at Red Bull last week…
What's also interesting about this Norris revival is what has changed about the McLaren MCL39 in recent races.
Back in Canada, the team introduced a front suspension tweak that made this part slightly thicker on Norris's car (Piastri has eschewed it so far). This was aimed at fixing the numbness Norris had been feeling through his 'understanding of where the grip lies comes through my hands and through the steering wheel,' as he said ahead of the Silverstone weekend.
The suspension changes should make the steering feel ever so slightly heavier, but that in turn should pay Norris back with a better feeling of how his car will react under braking and what the tires will do through corners where big braking is required.
In the aftermath of his Silverstone win, Norris insisted 'people talk about (the suspension change) probably too much' and 'it's something the team believed might give me more feeling and I just roll with that.' And his Canada and Silverstone Q3 mistakes bare this position out — it isn't a wholesale switch from imperfect to perfect.
Advertisement
But at the very least the change seems to be offering Norris further mental reassurance, along with the work he has done with his engineering team to try and iron out those costly qualifying moments that peppered the first half of his 2025.
'I certainly felt more in Austria. The car is always all over the place in Canada, so it's hard to judge things there,' Norris replied when I asked about the impact of this development at Silverstone.
'But certainly in Canada, I felt like we unlocked a little bit more, but I also don't feel like I'm still back to the level necessarily that I was at last year with (steering) feeling. But it's a complicated one at the same time because a lot of other things have changed too. So, as a team, we're working hard. Obviously, I'm working very hard with my team to understand more things and tried more stuff in the simulator, and expand my vocabulary of driving.'
McLaren's work behind the suspension tweak came after Norris made it 'clear to the team' that he 'certainly wasn't happy' with how the MCL39 was feeling through his steering wheel compared to the MCL38. Doing this has actually made McLaren's season more complicated, in that it now needs to manufacture twice the amount of these front suspension components — the older spec that Piastri prefers, plus the new ones for Norris. All of this will mean a cost-cap hit.
But Norris is clearly feeling boosted by McLaren's willingness to make such a change. And it seemingly hasn't decreased the development output overall in the team's quest to try and make F1's best car even better.
At Silverstone, it introduced a major floor upgrade that was only assessed in FP1 — on both cars. This is chiefly aimed at making the MCL39 better in high-speed turns, where Red Bull's RB21 has a rare, clear edge. Expect to see it back on for the next race.
McLaren is confident that its practice experiments at Silverstone showed this part to be working as it wanted. And now the best test of trying to improve in high-speed corners is next up at Spa. This is the last track featuring high-speed turns before F1 heads to track types where McLaren should utterly dominate: the lower-speed Hungaroring and Zandvoort layouts.
Advertisement
Spa's rapid nature also means the pressure is still on Norris if he is to finally get back level with Piastri on points before the summer break because the championship leader, currently eight points ahead of his teammate, is just mighty in high-speed corners. This comes down to his smooth, precise style minimizing confidence-sapping rear-end snaps.
Hungary and the Netherlands follow either side of the summer break and their long-corner-packed layouts should swing this constant pendulum of a two-horse season more firmly towards Norris.
Hanging on against Piastri at Spa would be a decent outcome for him. Nicking more success Silverstone-style would go a long way to seeing his 2025 campaign and its narrative transformed.
But, given how good he was other than at safety car restarts last time out, Piastri really doesn't have to do much to stop all that in its tracks.
(Top image: Jay Hirano/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft continue feud over Patriots coaching exit
Bill Belichick and Robert Kraft are waging their war in the court of public opinion – and neither side is winning. It has been less than two years since Belichick departed his post as the New England Patriots head coach after winning six Super Bowls in what's considered to be arguably the NFL's best dynasty. At the time, it was billed as a mutual parting of ways. The evidence suggests that the parting was far from mutual, however, with repeated sparring in the media following the bitter divorce. Belichick renewed the war again on July 16 in a statement to ESPN. 'As I told Robert multiple times through the years, I took a big risk by taking the New England Patriots head coaching job,' Belichick told ESPN. 'I already had an opportunity to be the head coach of the New York Jets, but the ownership situation (there) was unstable." The coach claimed he was urged to remain with the Jets, rather than accept the job in New England. 'I had been warned by multiple previous Patriots' coaches, as well as other members of other NFL organizations and the media, that the New England job was going to come with many internal obstacles," Belichick said. "I made it clear that we would have to change the way the team was managed to regain the previously attained success.' The statement, which seemingly came out of left field, was in apparent response to something Kraft had said a week earlier on the "Dudes on Dudes" podcast with former Patriots, Julian Edelman and Rob Gronkowski. Kraft was asked to name his best decision as owner and responded by talking about Belichick – appearing to indicate that hiring the coach was the answer. "Well, the one that got questioned the most was in '99," Kraft said. "I gave up a No. 1 draft pick for a coach who had only won a little over 40% of his games. But getting Bill Belichick to come to the Patriots in 1999 was a big risk, and I got hammered in the Boston media. But he was with us for 24 years, and we did OK." Belichick seems to have taken issue with being called a "big risk" by Kraft, but the owner isn't wrong. Trading a first-round pick for a coach with a 36-44 record was far from a safe move. New England took a leap of faith, knowing they could've handed a top draft pick over to a bitter rival in their own division. It was the latest chapter in a saga that already saw Belichick omit Kraft from his book and an Apple TV documentary about the Patriots, which portrayed the coach as the bad guy. The duo went on to experience 24 years of success together, something neither side wants to let go of now. Recent history shows that they were better off together anyway. Kraft's Patriots fired Belichick's successor, Jerod Mayo, after one season with a 4-13 record. Belichick, on the other hand, has become unrecognizable in his post-Patriots life. Between various media appearances and the ongoing circus surrounding his relationship with 24-year-old Jordon Hudson, the 73-year-old is far from the person NFL fans knew for over two decades. Now Belichick is in the college ranks, set to make his debut as the head coach at the University of North Carolina in the fall. It's his latest attempt to move on in his football life, while trying to prove he can still coach at a high level. Once known for his cut-up hoodies and intimidating sideline demeanor, the ruler of the "Evil Empire" could've opted to walk away and ride into the sunset to await his moment of enshrinement at the Hall of Fame. Belichick ran his Patriots teams on the idea that they would move on from players a year early, rather than a year late. That seems to be the same concept Kraft employed to move on from the long-time coach. The previous unflappable, stoic coach finally met his match. And he's not going down without a fight. All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Extreme Heat Is Putting 2026 World Cup Athletes at Risk
Chelsea defied expectations on July 13 with a stunning 3-0 win against reigning European champions Paris Saint-Germain in the Club World Cup final. Players battled through scorching 85°F heat at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, a persistent problem throughout the four-week tournament. Extreme temperatures peaked when a record-breaking heat dome settled over the U.S. in late June. Amid a heat emergency in Philadelphia, Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca said it was 'impossible' to train properly because of the 98.6°F weather. Midfielder Enzo Fernandez said the 96°F heat during Chelsea's semi-final on July 8—a 3:00 p.m. kick-off at MetLife Stadium like the final—was 'very dangerous.' It was so hot at one point that he 'had to lie down on the ground' after feeling 'really dizzy.' The severe conditions have raised concerns ahead of the 2026 World Cup hosted in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The Club World Cup, held across 12 venues in the U.S., was a smaller dress rehearsal of next year's tournament, but it also tested players' capacity to withstand the realities of a warming world and how organizers and teams plan to protect them. 'Extreme temperatures can be particularly harmful as the body produces heat while exercising and needs to release that heat in order to cool down,' says Madeleine Orr, assistant professor of sport ecology at the University of Toronto. 'But if the ambient temperature and humidity are too high and it's impossible to sweat effectively, that can lead to trouble pretty quickly, starting with symptoms like fatigue, cramping, and nausea, progressing to more serious outcomes like exertional heat stroke if there's no cooling intervention.' Climate change is making extreme heat an increasingly significant issue across sports. In 2020, Australian rugby league player Keith Titmuss died aged 20 from exertional heat stroke after a pre-season training session. In 2021, Daniil Medvedev raised the prospect of dying to the umpire while playing tennis at the Tokyo Olympics, and 75% of athletes surveyed by World Athletics in 2023 said their health and performance had been negatively impacted by climate change. The inaugural edition of the expanded Club World Cup has now increased fears that extreme heat will intensify the effects of soccer's already overpacked schedule and how that will impact player welfare (an issue over which FIFPRO—the union representing over 66,000 professional soccer players globally—and domestic leagues are taking legal action against FIFA). To help alleviate concerns about players being overworked, FIFA claimed to reach 'consensus' over minimum rest periods with players' representatives on July 12, agreeing 72 hours between matches and three weeks holiday between seasons. FIFPRO, however, wasn't invited to the meeting where this decision was made. Those present included officials from organizations expelled from FIFPRO for corruption and former board members who were voted out of office. FIFA did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Ahead of the Club World Cup final, FIFPRO president Sergio Marchi said in a statement to TIME: 'We have been warning about the overcrowded schedule, the lack of physical and mental rest for players, and the lack of dialogue on the part of FIFA. This way of organizing tournaments … [is] based solely on a logic of economic profitability, not human sustainability.' FIFA guidelines usually permit one cooling break midway through each half when the Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) reaches 89.6°F. This standard is used around the world to determine when heat reaches a dangerous level, taking into account temperature, humidity, wind speed, sun angle, and cloud cover. But scientists are concerned that the 89.6°F mandate underestimates player strain because WBGT only considers environmental factors. Following FIFPRO's intervention early in the tournament, FIFA lowered the threshold for cooling breaks at the Club World Cup to 82.4°F, as well as increasing water, ice, and towels around the pitch. While Major League Soccer's WBGT threshold is 84.2°F, FIFPRO states that matches should be postponed if the WBGT exceeds 82.4°F. Three Club World Cup matches exceeded these levels, including Benfica vs. Bayern Munich where temperatures peaked at 104°F in Charlotte, N.C. on June 24. 'I don't think I have ever played in this much heat before,' said 21-year-old Andreas Schjelderup after scoring for Benfica in a 1-0 victory. 'I don't think it's healthy.' In a June 30 FIFPRO media briefing attended by TIME, the union's medical director Vincent Gouttebarge explained that FIFPRO's WBGT threshold aims to prevent players' core temperature—usually between 96.8°F and 100.4°F—from exceeding 104°F. At this point, there's a risk of heat stroke where 'you don't sweat anymore because dehydration occurs,' he said, 'you have a lack of muscle control, you can barely walk, in some cases your cognitive process is affected, and, in the worst case, you can lose consciousness.' 'FIFA seems quite happy with 89.6°F as a threshold because there have not been any serious heat-related illnesses in the sport up to this temperature,' says Christopher Tyler, reader in environmental physiology at the University of Roehampton, London. 'But this is not the best evidence because players can down-regulate their intensity to lower heat strain,' for example, by sprinting less. 'The speed of the game is not the same, everything becomes very slow,' said Enzo Fernandez ahead of the final. 'Let's hope that next year they change the schedule,' he continued, protecting players and providing fans with a 'beautiful and attractive football spectacle.' Following his side's quarterfinal defeat against Real Madrid in 90°F afternoon heat, Borussia Dortmund manager Niko Kovac echoed this sentiment by suggesting evening kick-offs would raise the intensity of matches 'much higher.' On June 21, Dortmund subs watched the first half of their match against Mamelodi Sundowns from inside the locker room to avoid the blazing midday 90°F heat in Cincinnati, Ohio, conditions Kovac likened to a sauna. Almost 50% of Club World Cup matches were scheduled at either noon or 3:00 p.m. FIFPRO WBGT estimates shared with TIME, however, determined that if World Cup matches are played during the afternoon in Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City, Miami, and Monterrey, there would be an 'extremely high risk' of heat-stress injury. To estimate the WBGT in 2026 World Cup host locations during an average summer, Queen's University Belfast published a study in January 2025 that used meteorological data from 2003-2022. The researchers found that in June and July—the same period that the World Cup will take place—average temperatures in 14 out of 16 host cities experienced afternoon temperatures that frequently exceeded 82.4°F, while six cities typically exceeded the 89.6°F threshold. Beyond changing the schedule, other solutions like cooling vests and cold-water immersion are becoming more common. Amid the Philadelphia heat wave, Chelsea used large fans to spray water on the players to cool down, while teams like Real Madrid prepared for the tournament using heated tents to help players acclimatize to conditions they'd have to play in. Another option is deploying stadium roofs to shield against heat. Five 2026 World Cup stadiums in Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, and Vancouver have roofs, which FIFA president Gianni Infantino said will 'definitely' be used more for daytime matches. However, only 37.5% of matches are due to take place across these five venues. FIFA could also schedule matches 'proactively based upon forecast conditions,' says Tyler, but this isn't without its challenges. Last-minute scheduling that's dependent on the weather would create broadcasting and sponsor conflicts by scheduling more matches at times that aren't ideal for the global television audience, particularly in Europe and Asia. This 'scheduling Tetris,' as Orr describes, is even more complex after FIFA expanded the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, meaning 104 matches instead of 64 and many times more fans. The Club World Cup isn't the first time that extreme weather has prompted schedule-change requests. At the 1986 World Cup in Mexico, 65% of matches were scheduled to kick off at 12:00 p.m. despite temperatures exceeding 100°F. Before leading Argentina to glory, Diego Maradona said at the time: 'It should be part of the rules once and for all that the organizers should take the soccer players into account. Without us, there would be no spectacular. We are the indispensable ingredient to the World Cup. At least the hours of the games should be set to the time in which we play best, not when there is the most heat.' Four decades later, the reality of climate change has kicked in and FIFA's critics are hoping the governing body adapts faster to the rising threat of extreme heat. FIFPRO's Marchi said in the statement shared with TIME that the 'extremely hot' periods Club World Cup matches were played in are 'unacceptable conditions' that 'cannot be allowed to happen again under any circumstances' at the World Cup, demanding that FIFA puts players 'at the heart of every decision.' In FIFPRO's June 30 media briefing, the union's general secretary Alex Phillips said FIFA is 'likely to be more flexible' over World Cup kick-off times after seeing the effects of extreme heat on the Club World Cup, but added that 'we have absolutely no power to force them to.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Red Bull Unlikely to Rebound After Horner Exit, According to Schumacher
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Red Bull's competitiveness will be under the scanner when Formula One returns next weekend for the Belgian Grand Prix, given the sudden ousting of former team principal Christian Horner. Former Formula One driver Ralf Schumacher believes Red Bull will be unable to add significant performance to its car, especially in 2026, which could push Max Verstappen to Mercedes. Red Bull hasn't had a great start to the 2025 season. The campaign began with Verstappen struggling with his RB21 F1 car, which followed speculation about his potential switch to Mercedes. Following the British Grand Prix, Red Bull decided to part ways with Horner, adding to the team's uncertain future, especially considering that F1 enters a new era of regulations next year. Horner has been replaced by former Racing Bulls team principal, Laurent Mekies. Related: Red Bull to Part Ways With Yuki Tsunoda After 2025 Season: Report Red Bull has been developing the power units for the 2026 car for the first time, collaborating with automotive giant Ford under the Red Bull Powertrains banner. But with the team struggling to solve issues on the current car, Schumacher doubts Red Bull's 2026 car, designed by technical director Pierre Waché, will match the performance of the cars designed by former Red Bull technical director Adrian Newey, who moved to Aston Martin this year. Revealing that Horner's exit won't change the technical side of things at Red Bull for the short-term future, Schumacher said on the Backstage Boxengasse podcast: Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing talks with Gianpiero Lambiase, Head of Racing of Oracle Red Bull Racing in the garage during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Great... Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing talks with Gianpiero Lambiase, Head of Racing of Oracle Red Bull Racing in the garage during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain at Silverstone Circuit on July 05, 2025 in Northampton, England. More"The change of team principal will not change anything in the technical team for the time being. Designer Pierre Waché will continue to build the car next year. "It almost looks as if he will not be able to close this gap, replace Adrian Newey in any way and build a car capable of winning. Red Bull will therefore face a difficult time." Mercedes driver George Russell admitted recently that his contract extension discussions were on hold due to the team's ongoing talks with Verstappen. Team principal Toto Wolff also acknowledged the discussions, but stressed that Russell and Andrea Kimi Antonelli will likely form the 2026 driver lineup. Despite the assurance, rumors surrounding Verstappen and Mercedes continue to do the rounds after Horner's exit. Schumacher added that the four-time world champion will have to consider a Mercedes switch if he intends to find performance next year. He said: "Verstappen is in a dilemma. The signs are not good for Red Bull at the moment. If Max Verstappen wants to have short-term success next year, he will have to look elsewhere. "I therefore believe that the journey is heading towards Mercedes. I could imagine that he himself is still struggling because he is naturally attached to Red Bull."
