
Israel Takes Control of Iran's Skies—a Feat That Still Eludes Russia in Ukraine
That is a feat that the giant Russian air force has been unable to achieve in Ukraine in 3½ years of war. This setback is one of the reasons why Moscow's troops have been bogged down in grinding trench warfare, sustaining staggering losses, ever since they failed to rapidly seize Kyiv in February 2022.
On Sunday, Israel was exploiting its advantage, saying it had taken out dozens of surface-to-air missiles in western Iran and killed the intelligence chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, along with his deputy.
The two wars are very different in many respects—for one, there is no conventional land component to the Israeli campaign in Iran. But the experience of these two conflicts, closely observed by militaries around the world, reinforces what war planners have known for decades: Control over air is everything, if you can get it.
'The two campaigns are showing the fundamental importance of air superiority in order to succeed in your overall military objectives,' said retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, who oversaw allied air operations against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan in 2001.
'In the case of Russia-Ukraine war, you see what happens when neither side can achieve air superiority: stalemate and devolution to attrition-based warfare,' he said. 'In the case of the Israel-Iran war, it allows them unhindered freedom to attack where they possess air superiority over segments of Iran.'
The initial Israeli airstrikes were using the fifth-generation stealth F-35 aircraft, enhanced with Israeli modifications. Now that most of Iranian air defenses have been suppressed, older warplanes such as F-15 and F-16 are joining the fight. Israel has also started dropping short-range JDAM and Spice guided bombs, which are cheaper and much more abundant than missiles, to devastating effect.
'Over the past 24 hours, we completed an aerial route to Tehran and conducted an aerial breaching battle. IAF pilots are flying at great risk to their lives, hundreds of kilometers away from Israel, striking hundreds of different targets with precision,' said Israeli military Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir.
The Israelis now have 'the ability to use the whole suite of their offensive weapons—in greater mass, more efficiently, and spreading them out,' said retired British Air Marshal Martin Sampson, who directed British air operations against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq and now heads the Middle East office of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. 'From Israel's side, the campaign objective is to destroy and degrade—and Iran doesn't have that ability.'
The Israelis have certainly learned from Russian failures—and Ukrainian successes—as they planned their own campaign against Iran. But, military officials and analysts say, the most obvious lesson so far is that the Israeli air force is intrinsically more capable than the Russians—while Ukraine is much better at defense than Iran.
'Israel achieved surprise and overmatch over Iran's air defenses, which represented a much easier target set than Ukraine's air defenses in almost every respect,' said Michael Kofman, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment and an expert on Russian and Ukrainian militaries. 'The asymmetry in qualitative capability between Israel's air force and Russia is also vast and can be easily observed.'
Retired British Air Marshal Edward Stringer, who ran the air campaign in Libya in 2011 and headed operations for the British Ministry of Defense, said that the overall culture, sophisticated training and innovation of the Israeli air force, combined with its integration into intelligence and cyber capabilities, is a key reason why the Israelis succeeded where the Russians have failed. 'All the Russians have is pilots. They grow these pilots to drive flying artillery, and that's it,' he said.
Just like Ukraine, whose Soviet jet fighters were badly outdated by 2022, Iran doesn't have warplanes capable of surviving air-to-air combat with its foe. Unlike Ukraine, however, Tehran has spectacularly failed to organize ground-based air defenses in ways that could have significantly impeded the ability of enemy aircraft to operate over its territory.
This was, above all, the result of a fatal political miscalculation. Over decades, Tehran underinvested in air defenses and bet instead on the deterrent firepower of its own missile forces and those of its regional proxies.
'Iran never relied on air defenses alone to ward off attacks like this. The idea was always to use deterrence,' said Fabian Hinz, a military expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
But the main component of Iranian deterrence—Lebanon's Hezbollah militia—was decimated by Israel last year, and then physically severed from Iran by the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria. Subsequent Israeli bombing of Syrian air-defense installations created a superhighway that Israeli aircraft can use unimpeded on their way to Iran.
Ukrainian air defenses—primarily the Soviet-vintage S-300 and Buk systems—were much more robust and better integrated in 2022 than Iran's turned out to be once Israel attacked. Tehran relies on a mishmash of S-300, Chinese batteries and locally made air-defense systems.
Equally critical was the element of surprise. Thanks to U.S. intelligence warnings about the impending Russian invasion, the Ukrainian military command dispersed and concealed the bulk of its mobile air-defenses in February 2022. After a handful of Russian jets were downed over Ukrainian cities, manned Russian aircraft stopped operating beyond the front line—the situation that remains in place today. To strike targets deep inside Ukraine, Russia must rely on the limited supply of cruise or ballistic missiles, or on drones, which are slow and carry a limited payload. Ukraine is using its own drones to strike back.
Unlike Ukraine in 2022, Iran was caught by surprise—in part because of deceptive Israeli threats to launch the attack should U.S.-Iranian talks scheduled for June 15 fail to produce progress. Instead, the war began two days earlier.
Israeli special-operations teams got into Iran covertly and destroyed key Iranian air-defense assets with short-range drones at the start of the campaign, using a method similar to how Ukrainian intelligence barely two weeks earlier blew up several Russian strategic bombers. At the same time, Israel was able to assassinate much of Iran's military leadership—another operation made possible by superior spywork.
'Basically, what Israel did with Iran is what Russia wanted to do with Ukraine: They thought they could pull off some cloak-and-dagger thing, and infiltrate and decapitate the Ukrainian regime,' said Michael Horowitz, an Israeli geopolitical analyst. 'But it turned out that the Ukrainian society has a resilience and cannot be so easily penetrated—whereas when it comes to Iran, the regime is so unpopular that it's easy to find people there who will agree to work with Israel.'
Despite Israeli strikes, which resulted in numerous civilian casualties alongside military targets, Iran continues to lob ballistic-missile salvos at Israeli cities, also causing death and destruction. Time, however, now appears to be on Israel's side—at least in the immediate future.
'It's a numbers game, and it seems like Israel has the upper hand because they can now go after the missiles that are shooting at them with direct attack. After all, the best way to shoot a missile is on the ground while it's in a container, and not in the air while it's flying,' said retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Timothy Ray, a former U.S. Global Strike Command commander. 'What the Israelis are doing is just steadily leveraging an advantage.'
Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at yaroslav.trofimov@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Australia arrests man behind arson attack on Melbourne synagogue
Australian police have charged a man in connection with an alleged arson attack on a Melbourne synagogue with worshippers in the building, the latest in a series of incidents targeting the nation's Jewish community. A man suspected of setting fire to an Australian synagogue as worshippers ate dinner inside has been arrested and charged,(AFP) There were no injuries to the 20 people inside the East Melbourne Synagogue, who fled from the fire on Friday night. Firefighters extinguished the blaze in the capital of Victoria state. Australia has experienced several antisemitic incidents since the start of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. Counterterrorism detectives late on Saturday arrested the 34-year-old resident of Sydney, capital of neighbouring New South Wales, charging him with offences including criminal damage by fire, police said. "The man allegedly poured a flammable liquid on the front door of the building and set it on fire before fleeing the scene," police said in a statement. The suspect, whom the authorities declined to identify, was remanded in custody after his case was heard at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Sunday and no application was made for bail, the Australian Broadcasting Corp reported. Authorities are investigating whether the synagogue fire was linked to a disturbance on Friday night at an Israeli restaurant in Melbourne, in which one person was arrested for hindering police. The restaurant was extensively damaged, according to the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, an umbrella group for Australia's Jews. It said the fire at the synagogue, one of Melbourne's oldest, was set as those inside sat down to Sabbath dinner. Israeli President Isaac Herzog went on X to "condemn outright the vile arson attack targeting Jews in Melbourne's historic and oldest synagogue on the Sabbath, and on an Israeli restaurant where people had come to enjoy a meal together". "This is not the first such attack in Australia in recent months. But it must be the last," Herzog said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the incidents as "severe hate crimes" that he viewed "with utmost gravity". "The State of Israel will continue to stand alongside the Australian Jewish community," Netanyahu said on X. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese late on Saturday described the alleged arson, which comes seven months after another synagogue in Melbourne was targeted by arsonists, as shocking and said those responsible should face the law's full force. "My Government will provide all necessary support toward this effort," Albanese posted on X. Homes, schools, synagogues and vehicles in Australia have been targeted by antisemitic vandalism and arson. The incidents included a fake plan by organised crime to attack a Sydney synagogue using a caravan of explosives in order to divert police resources, police said in March.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan in no hurry to recognise Afghan Taliban rule: Officials
'Pakistan is in no hurry to recognise the Afghan Taliban government and any decision will be made keeping the country's interest in mind,' Pakistan officials have said. The remarks came days after Russia became the first country to officially recognise the Taliban's rule. Moscow's decision, some observers feel, may be a prelude to other regional countries finally embracing the Taliban. However, officials in Pakistan told The Express Tribune newspaper that the decision of Russia was not a surprise, as Moscow for some time had indicated they would reconcile with the fact that the Taliban were now in charge and there was no other option but to accept their rule. The legal challenges in recognising the Taliban The Russian decision also stems from the fact that greater engagement with the Taliban government would help address the terrorist threat and advance its geostrategic interests. 'We, of course, will take a decision keeping in view our interest. I can tell you there is no hurry,' said a Pakistani official when asked whether Islamabad would also recognise the Taliban rule. A source, however, did not rule out the possibility of Pakistan taking a more pragmatic approach if other regional players follow the Russian footsteps. At his weekly news briefing on Friday (July 4, 2025), Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan reacted cautiously to Moscow's decision, saying it was a matter between two sovereign states. In any case, the source said, Pakistan has a robust engagement with the Taliban ruled Kabul. 'The de facto recognition is there,' the source said. Pakistan has given no hints about officially recognising the Taliban government, but agreed to upgrade the diplomatic ties. Last month, after a trilateral meeting of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Chinese Foreign Ministers in Beijing, Islamabad and Kabul decided to elevate their diplomatic ties. UAE accepts credentials of Taliban Ambassador in major diplomatic win for Afghanistan's rulers Both sides are in a process to fulfil their responsibilities before formally appointing ambassadors in each other's capitals. China is thought to have played a key role in brokering the deal in the hope that greater engagement between Pakistan and Afghanistan would address security concerns. One of the reasons that Pakistan has not yet recognised the Taliban government is the unresolved issue of terrorist sanctuaries in Afghanistan. But the Afghan government recently took certain steps, which Pakistan thinks could make a difference. One major such move includes the Taliban government's crackdown on Afghan nationals who were joining the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Sources said that it is in the Taliban's interest to address the security concerns of Pakistan and other neighbouring countries. Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have gradually improved since the visit of Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar to Kabul. Afghan Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is expected to travel to Islamabad later this month. He was to visit Pakistan last month, but the trip was delayed owing to the Iran-Israel war. During his visit, the two sides would review bilateral ties and decisions taken when Dar was in Kabul in April, according to the report.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
West Asia: Can IMEC do what the Abraham Accords couldn't—deliver peace?
The Israel-Iran conflict is over, at least for the time being. The war in Gaza, however, rages on. Despite frequent attempts to get the warring parties to agree to a ceasefire, it remains elusive. The Donald Trump administration, with Egypt and Qatar as key interlocutors, had recently proposed another ceasefire of 60 days. While initial reports suggested that Israel has agreed to the contours of the ceasefire, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his statements later, denied it, and Hamas is yet to take a call on it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The positions of Israel and Hamas in it are acutely divergent. While Hamas is looking at a complete end to the war accompanied by full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, Israel is looking for the release of its hostages with no guarantees on ending the war till Hamas is totally removed from Gaza. With this being the case, an early ceasefire in Gaza looks unlikely. Meanwhile, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran has opened doors for American diplomacy in the region. Expansion of the Abraham Accords is being seen as the preferred instrument in it. There are inputs that Lebanon and Syria could be next to join the Abraham Accords now that they are effectively out of the Iranian sphere of influence. With the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, the Al Shaara-led regime has suddenly become the favourite in Washington. Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa (previously Abu Mohammad al-Joulani with ISIS and Al-Qaeda links) was welcomed in the White House with open hands, economic sanctions on Syria are being removed, and there are economic packages being worked out to help rebuild Syria. The same is the case in Lebanon, where the government has assured the US and Israel that Hezbollah will not be allowed to regain strength in South Lebanon. Concurrently, efforts to restart the normalisation process between Israel and Saudi Arabia are being pursued. In fact, well before the Israel-Iran conflict broke out, President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and the West Asian region in May 2025 as his first visit abroad after taking over the presidency. Despite a successful visit in which a Saudi investment of almost $600 billion was promised, no headway could be made as far as normalisation of ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia is concerned, with the Gaza war and the Palestine issue remaining key sticking points. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If the normalisation with Saudi Arabia does not move forward, the entire project of Israel being mainstreamed into the West Asian region will remain an unfinished project. It may be recalled that one of the primary reasons for the outbreak of the Gaza war was the process of this normalisation which was nearing fruition in September 2023. In the last week of September 2023, Israeli Tourism Minister Haim Katz became the first Israeli minister to head an official delegation to Saudi Arabia to take part in a conference of the United Nations Tourism Organisation. He was soon followed by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi on October 3, leading an Israeli delegation to the Universal Postal Union's 2023 Extraordinary Congress. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS), as well as Israel's PM Netanyahu, also spoke publicly of the deal, the contours of which indicated that Saudi Arabia would have gotten a defence pact with the US as well as a nuclear program. Israel was to offer 'assurances' to the Palestinian groups, but there would be no clear outcome on the two-state solution. If Saudi Arabia and Israel had established formal diplomatic relations without a permanent solution to the Palestine issue, it would have dealt a death blow to the struggle of the Palestinians. Before any more progress on normalisation could take place, the war broke out on October 7, triggered by the Hamas terror attack into Israel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the Gaza war as well as the recent Israel-Iran conflict, Saudi Arabia had to join other Arab/Muslim nations in the region to strongly condemn Israeli strikes into Gaza as well as the unilateral strikes on June 13, violating the territorial integrity of Iran. In such a situation, it is very unlikely that Saudi Arabia will relent soon and move towards normalisation. Any major expansion of the Abraham Accords is therefore likely to remain remote in the near future except, possibly, adding Lebanon and Syria to it. What can then be the path towards peace and economic progress in the region? Can economy and connectivity work where diplomacy is currently facing headwinds? Here is where the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) comes into the picture. It may be recalled that IMEC was one of the most successful outcomes of India's G20 Summit in Delhi in September 2023. Coming as a surprise announcement at the Summit, it immediately caught the imagination of policymakers, businesses, and industry. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In its concept, it is a bold and transformative connectivity project with a vision to connect India with Europe across the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula, creating an alternate link to the Suez Canal, which has faced frequent disruptions due to conflicts in the region. It envisions a multi-modal economic corridor involving multiple businesses, integrating railways, ports, highways, energy networks, and digital infrastructure to enhance trade, investment, and connectivity across the three continents. When implemented in full, IMEC promises to unlock new opportunities for multi-dimensional trade through multi-modal transport linkages across regions that have traditionally been close trade partners. It has the potential to facilitate faster and more efficient movement of goods, bypassing existing bottlenecks, reducing shipping delays, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and cutting costs. It also aims to secure regional supply chains, improve trade accessibility, and facilitate the economic prosperity of people and countries along the alignment of the project. One of the key and very interesting parts of the architecture unveiled at the G20 Summit was the alignment, which passes through Jordan and Israel, culminating at the port of Haifa, before its onwards sea passage to Europe. Interestingly, Egypt, which was traditionally a gateway from the region, was excluded from the original architecture despite having better-developed ports and rail infrastructure, giving a clear indication that IMEC was being seen as an instrument of economic connectivity as well as a geopolitical instrument to include Israel. However, even before it could take shape, the war in Gaza erupted, putting it on a backburner. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In recent months, however, IMEC has come alive again. Whether it was PM Modi's visit to Washington earlier in February, the AI Global Summit in France in February, or the visit of EU Commissioners to New Delhi in March, one common thread is the mention of IMEC and the commitment to see that this project is implemented at the earliest opportunity. S Jaishankar, India's External Affairs Minister, during his recent visit to Brussels in June, held extensive talks with the EU delegation. Among the talks, key points of discussion included the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and projects like IMEC, which can not only enhance connectivity but also unlock many other opportunities for collaboration. During recent discussions on IMEC, there is also a clear realisation that the originally proposed alignment may require a modification, and perhaps, the inclusion of Oman in the East and Egypt in the West will offer more options, which are less conflict-prone, to advance the IMEC project. In the West Asian region too, there is a strong positive outlook towards getting IMEC off the ground. India is already working bilaterally with the UAE and Saudi Arabia on coordinating many issues, like plugging the missing links and key regulatory mechanisms, which would be essential for smooth transit of goods through IMEC. The EU too has woken up to the huge promise of IMEC and has started deliberations on it. France and Italy, key signatories of IMEC from Europe, have also nominated special envoys for IMEC. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If signatory countries in the IMEC and others like Egypt, Oman, etc, do decide to move forward, it can create a huge opportunity for the three regions. India, which is seen to anchor the project, can play a very important and pivotal role in kick-starting the project. With close and strategic relationships with Israel as well as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and the EU, India can play a key role in putting collective economic prosperity as the driving factor, putting the conflict on a backburner. Focused and collective efforts on a shared vision of enhanced trade, connectivity, green energy, and prosperity can perhaps do what diplomacy is not able to do—end the cycle of conflict in West Asia. Maybe IMEC can do what the Abraham Accords was aimed for—lasting peace in West Asia. Col Rajeev Agarwal is a West Asia expert and a Senior Research Consultant at Chintan Research Foundation, New Delhi. His X Handle is @rajeev1421. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD