UK Mounjaro warning issued ahead of heatwave temperatures
As the temperatures rise, experts are stressing that users must store weight loss injections in a refrigerator (2-8°C or 36-46°F), especially after starting the course.
Review your ICB's local policy about treating patients with tirzepatide (Mounjaro) for weight management in a primary care setting and visit: https://t.co/03msJjjTU9 pic.twitter.com/tHs6lyJHc4 — We are Primary Care (@PrimaryCareNHS) June 12, 2025
'Weight loss injections can be adversely affected by hot weather, particularly regarding storage and stability," says James O'Loan, obesity specialist and weight loss injection expert at pharmacists Chemist4U.
"Understanding the storage instructions when using any prescribed medication is vital to keep it in optimal condition.
"Although weight loss injections can be stored at room temperature for up to 30 days (some injections are 42 days, so always check with your prescriber or refer to the patient information leaflet), this is only provided the temperature does not exceed 30°C. During hot weather, and to be on the safe side, it is always best to keep your weight loss injections refrigerated if you're able."
Can I take my Mounjaro pen on holiday?
The advice for the UK heatwave is also also worth noting for those heading on holiday or travelling during the warmer weather.
However, if you're flying, remember to pack your injections in your carry-on since the baggage hold on a plane can plummet to below-freezing temperatures.
Finding the right temperature for your pen is important: not too hot or too cold. If you inject after incorrectly storing your pen, it might not be safe for use.
How do I know if my Mounjaro pen is safe to use?
"There are a few important things to consider when checking if your weight loss pen is safe to use," says James.
"Inspect the pen to ensure it is not damaged and the medicine inside is clear, with no particles or cloudiness. The liquid should be colourless or slightly yellow. If you have left your pen unrefrigerated during hot weather and are unsure whether it is still safe to use, always consult your prescriber before injecting.
"Staying hydrated whilst taking weight loss injections is key. Weight loss injections can cause side effects such as nausea, constipation, diarrhoea and dizziness, which, without sufficient fluids, can lead to dehydration.
"We recommend drinking plenty of water throughout the day, even when you're not thirsty. If experiencing diarrhoea or vomiting, try using electrolyte drinks, rehydrate quickly and apply sunscreen whenever you are outdoors. This will help those who suffer from heightened sensitivity to UV rays.'
Do you need to tell your travel insurance you are taking Mounjaro?
Yes. Travel insurance providers are warning that the growing number of Brits turning to these breakthrough drugs for weight management could lose their cover and face huge medical bills abroad if they don't declare their usage when arranging travel insurance.
Many don't want to admit they are taking the weight-loss drugs, or think that if they buy it privately, it doesn't need to be declared.
Niraj Mamtora, director at Forum Insurance, says: 'Weight-loss medications like Ozempic are transforming lives across the UK, but too many travellers don't realise the insurance implications. If you're using these drugs, you must declare both the medication and the condition it's prescribed for.
'Failure to do so is not a minor oversight - it's a serious breach of your travel insurance contract. If you need medical help overseas and haven't declared your medication, your claim can be refused and your policy cancelled. The financial consequences can be severe.'
Recommended reading:
What happens if you don't disclose weight-loss jabs on your travel insurance?
'Non-disclosure is a gamble that's simply not worth taking," says Niraj.
"If you don't declare your medication or the underlying condition, your insurer is within their rights to refuse any claim, even if it seems unrelated.
'Many travellers only discover too late that their travel insurance claims are rejected, leaving them without support and facing potentially huge bills.
"With the average medical claim abroad now exceeding £1,700, and costs rising significantly with age, being properly covered is more important than ever.'
Insurance claims related to undeclared conditions or medications can be refused, even if the issue seems unrelated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Why thousands of people are missing out on NHS jabs for agonising shingles virus
Widespread confusion over who is eligible for the NHS shingles jab means thousands are going unprotected against the agonising infection, a survey has revealed. The poll found one in five over-65s either did not know what shingles was or were unaware the NHS offered a vaccine to prevent it. Fewer than half said they had been vaccinated, while nearly seven in ten admitted they did not understand who was eligible. More than 50,000 elderly Britons develop shingles every year, and nearly one in four of any age will have it at some point in their lives. The condition is linked to chickenpox – a highly contagious childhood illness that causes itchy, spotty rashes. While chickenpox is usually mild, the virus that causes it – varicella-zoster – lies dormant in the body and can reactivate later in life, especially as the immune system weakens with age. This can cause shingles – a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the chest or abdomen, but can strike anywhere on the body. Currently, anyone turning 65 is offered a shingles vaccine, and remain eligible until they are 80. But those who turned 65 before September 1, 2023, must wait until they are 70. 'I am not surprised by these findings at all,' said Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious disease expert at the University of East Anglia. 'A combination of confusing eligibility criteria – which even confused me, to be honest – and a lack of promotion of the vaccine campaign means that many people are going unprotected from what can be an extraordinarily painful and debilitating virus.' The jab is available privately at high street pharmacies such as Boots and Superdrug – but the two required doses cost £460 in total. 'I'm part of that group who has to wait until they turn 70 for the vaccine, and I did consider going private because of how painful shingles can be,' Professor Hunter added. 'It is a very effective and safe vaccine, and people should make sure they get it as soon as they're eligible on the NHS.' The study of more than 2,000 over-65s by GSK – the British pharmaceutical firm behind the jab – also found that most respondents wrongly believed they were still eligible for the NHS shingles vaccine after turning 80, when that is the cut-off age. A third of respondents also said they did not trust the Government for information on vaccines. Shingles is often accompanied by headaches, nausea and weeks of severe pain – and in some cases it can prove fatal. Around 50 Britons over 70 die from shingles each year. The vaccine reduces the risk of infection by 90 per cent, yet uptake has historically been low – less than half of all 71-year-olds are vaccinated. The latest figures show fewer than one in five of those who turned 65 this year have received the jab. The current two-dose vaccine, Shingrix, replaced a less effective version in September 2023. But due to high global demand, the Government opted to phase in eligibility. As reported by The Mail on Sunday, campaigners have urged ministers to end what they call 'discrimination' against the three million people aged 66 to 69 who are currently ineligible. Senior citizens group Silver Voices has called on the NHS to scrap the age restriction, warning it puts millions at unnecessary risk. One man who regrets missing out on the jab is 72-year-old Daniel Hill. While on holiday in Majorca he noticed a strange rash of blisters, about four inches wide, on his back. Concerned, but not alarmed, he visited a local clinic, where a doctor diagnosed shingles and prescribed antiviral medication. He was offered painkillers, but he declined them. But he said that moments after leaving, the pain struck 'like someone had taken an axe to my back'. The pensioner spent the rest of the trip in agony, confined to bed. 'You really don't want to get shingles,' he said. 'I wish I'd known the vaccine was available on the NHS – I was eligible but had no idea. 'It's so important to check if you qualify and, if you do, get vaccinated to avoid the terrible impact it can have.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
NHS figures reveal impact of five-day resident doctors' strike
The NHS has said 93% of planned operations, tests and procedures went ahead during a recent strike that saw fewer than a third of resident doctors walk out. Early data shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients than it did during last year's industrial action. Thousands of resident doctors - previously known as junior doctors - took part in the five-day strike, which ended on Wednesday morning. The overall number that walked out was down by 7.5% (1,243) on the previous strike in late June last year, according to early analysis of management information collected by NHS England. There are roughly 77,000 resident doctors working in hospital and community health services, meaning they make up about half of all doctors in the NHS. While most patients received treatments as planned, NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey said: "We should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted." NHS staff are working to ensure cancelled appointments can be rescheduled as soon as possible but "a repeat of this action will be unacceptable" for the patients affected, he added. "So, I would urge the Resident Doctor Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives." 1:26 Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "I want to again thank staff from across the NHS who have put in an incredible shift to make sure that the NHS was open to as many patients as possible over the five days of unnecessary strike action. "Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear - these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS." The dispute between the BMA and the government largely centres on pay - but Mr Streeting has repeatedly said there is no money for an increase, adding that it "should be clear to the BMA by now that it will lose a war with this government". He has said talks could lead to improvements in the working lives of resident doctors. 3:22 Earlier this week, the co-chairs of the BMA's Resident Doctor Committee, Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, said they "look forward" to returning to the negotiating table. A statement added: "The BMA has been willing to negotiate throughout this dispute, and we remain committed to finding a resolution. "We are very clear on what is needed to settle this pay dispute, and we hope the secretary of state is now equally clear that a credible offer must be brought to the table to achieve a settlement and prevent further strike action."
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
NHS cancelled thousands of appointments during resident doctor strikes
Thousands of patients had their NHS appointments cancelled during the five-day resident doctors' s trike last month. However early data also shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients during the latest doctors' strike compared with last year's industrial action, the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. The number of resident doctors who walked during the recent strike was also down by 1,243 - 7.5 per cent, the DHSC said. During the five-day strike in June and July 2024, 61,989 inpatient and outpatient appointments were rescheduled, and 23,001 staff were absent from work due to strikes at the peak of the action. However, the DHSC has claimed that during the most recent dispute, the NHS saw less disruption this time around. NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey noted that care was still disrupted for thousands of people. He said: 'While this is really good news for the vast majority of patients whose treatment went ahead, we should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted. 'NHS staff will continue to work hard to ensure patients can get their rescheduled care as soon as possible, but for those patients – and for all our staff who had to work extra shifts or with different responsibilities – a repeat of this action will be unacceptable. 'So, I would urge the Resident Doctors Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the Government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives.' The full data on cancellations is yet to be released; however, NHS England and the DHSC have released an 'early' analysis. The impact on A&E waiting times is not clear. Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, said: 'Due to the dedication of NHS staff and a different operational approach from previous strikes, we have managed to significantly reduce disruption to patients, with early indications showing that 10,000 extra patients are receiving care compared to previous strike action. 'Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear – these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS.' He added: 'I want to end this unnecessary dispute and I will be urging the BMA to work with the government in good faith in our shared endeavour to improve the working lives of resident doctors, rather than pursuing more reckless strike action.' The DHSC claims the drop in cancellations was due to a change in the NHS's approach, which aimed to maintain planned care rather than cancel it as happened during previous rounds. The government has claimed it maintained 93 per cent of planned appointments, procedures and operations. The claims come as the DHSC faces winter disruption from nurses and other healthcare workers after their unions warned members had rejected the 3.6 per cent pay award given to them for 2025-26. Across the strikes in 2023 and 2024, which also included nurses and ambulance workers, around 1.5 million planned appointments were cancelled across England. Resident doctors, represented by the British Medical Association, staged strike action over a pay dispute in which the union is calling for a 29 per cent pay rise. It says this is to address a 22 per cent decrease in real terms pay since 2008. Following the strikes, the BMA opened a new dispute with the government over specialist training posts, claiming tens of thousands of resident doctors face not having specialist jobs at the end of the summer. The government has repeatedly said it will not move to increase pay. According to the DHSC and NHS England, some trusts managed to maintain more than 90 per cent of planned care, including West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust which maintained 98 per cent and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which maintained 95 per cent. A BMA spokesperson said:'We recognise that for any patient to receive care – urgent or planned – during the period of strike action is of course beneficial for them and we recognise the efforts senior doctors, along with other healthcare workers, will have made to provide that care.' The BMA added: 'Even with NHS England's determination to carry on as if the strikes were not happening, we know that operations will have been postponed, and clinics rescheduled. But all of that could have been avoided if the Health Secretary had been serious in his intent to find a negotiated settlement with us. The strike could have been averted, as could any future ones, if Mr Streeting had come, and will come, to the table with a credible offer that resident doctors in England can accept.'
