logo
Society ‘struggling' to respond to link between smartphones and youth extremism

Society ‘struggling' to respond to link between smartphones and youth extremism

Leader Live13 hours ago
In an interview as the 20th anniversary of the July 7 attacks is marked, Jonathan Hall KC said current methods used by extremists to influence potential recruits are 'a million miles' from the tactics used in the run up to 2005.
Suicide bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Hasib Hussain, 18, and Jermaine Lindsay, 19, set off bombs on three Tube trains and a bus, killing 52 people in the single worst terrorist atrocity on British soil.
Ringleader and recruiter Khan appeared to be a pillar of the community, steering local youths away from crime and drugs by organising outdoor activities and helping to set up a gym in a mosque basement, but was in reality a fanatic.
Mr Hall told the PA news agency the wide availability of smartphones has transformed radicalisation since then.
'The principal distinction from the era of 7/7 is the smartphone era,' Mr Hall said.
'That has changed the landscape. It has led to a different model of radicalisation.
'With 7/7 the indications were that Mohammad Sidique Khan was grooming people, there was a youth club, they went and did rafting together.
'Those sorts of outdoorsy, in person, group grooming activities, those feel a million miles away from the online world of radicalisation.
'I'm not aware of any sane person who seeks to argue the current wave of very young people becoming involved in terrorism, or extreme violence where it's not ideological, that that's not related to the internet and to the ready availability of smartphones.
'There's a very live debate about the ethics, the legality and the practicalities of which response is best.
'But we are absolutely grasping at straws and struggling, at the moment, as a society to work out what the correct response is.
'No one in their right minds would allow their children to allow a stranger into their bedroom, but that's what we've done with phones.'
The attacks exposed the deadly threat from homegrown terrorists with 'appalling clarity', Mr Hall said.
'What 7/7 did, is it revealed with appalling clarity that our fellow citizens are willing to kill us.
'That very unsettling insight is as true today as it was back then, except you now have to bring in British citizens who have been inspired by extreme right-wing ideology to join the predominant Islamist threat.
'But that was the real kicker from 7/7. I think it really brought home this idea of the homegrown threat.'
Commander Dominic Murphy said July 7 was 'a seminal moment' for counter-terrorism policing, leading to a series of changes that continued after the five terror attacks in the UK in 2017.
He said that while Islamist groups are still the main threat to the UK, right wing terrorism is a growing problem, and there is concern that younger people are being drawn into extremism.
In 2024, 39 of the 248 people arrested for terrorism offences were aged 17 and under, while children aged 11 to 15 made up the largest proportion of those referred to anti-extremism scheme Prevent (2,729 out of 6,884).
'Islamist remains our main threat. We do see a growing right-wing terrorist problem,' Mr Murphy said.
'We're increasingly seeing younger people involved in that right-wing threat as well, which is deeply concerning for us.
'But of course, we also see people that don't have a clear or fixed ideology.
'We can't say clearly that they're an Islamist terrorist, we can't say clearly that they ascribe to a right-wing ideology.
'Nonetheless, they're consuming large amounts of violent media online, and they might have a mixed or unclear ideology – that means, of course, we still need to be concerned about the threat to the public.
'It's diversified a lot even since 2017 and I think the online environment and the world environment adds a whole new layer of challenge to the threat that we face.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Racing chiefs must ban Oisin Murphy immediately after drink-drive conviction
Racing chiefs must ban Oisin Murphy immediately after drink-drive conviction

Daily Mirror

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Racing chiefs must ban Oisin Murphy immediately after drink-drive conviction

Chief racing correspondent David Yates, aka Newsboy, urges the BHA to do its job in the wake of the four-time champion jockey's appearance at Reading Magistrates Court Everyone is equal before the law - a fundamental legal principle that, in theory, applies equally to both Oisín Murphy and a chalk jockey who has ridden a mere handful of winners. Now it's up to the British Horseracing Authority to apply it. Murphy is in the very elite category of Flat jockeys. He's won four championships and will very likely capture a fifth if the BHA allows the 29-year-old to carry on riding after his conviction for drink driving at Reading Magistrates Courts last Thursday. ‌ Murphy, who was banned from driving for 20 months and fined £70,000, also rides for some of British racing's most powerful players. ‌ We are not yet at the halfway point of the 2025 Flat season, but Murphy has won Group races in Britain carrying the colours of Juddmonte, Sheikh Ahmed Al Maktoum, Prince AA Faisal, King Power Racing and Jeff Smith, on horses trained by Andrew Balding, John and Thady Gosden, André Fabre and Ed Walker. So the British Horseracing Authority will need to stand up to - or at least inconvenience - some of the sport's biggest names if it revokes Murphy's licence to ride. But it has no choice but to do exactly that. Murphy's previous brushes with racing authority are well chronicled. Banned for three months by French regulator France Galop in November 2020 after testing positive for cocaine, the Irishman was stood down from riding at Newmarket the following October thanks to a failed breath test, hours after reportedly being involved in a fracas in one of the town's pubs. ‌ The latter offence - the breath test, not the incident in the pub - and an identical transgression at Chester in May 2021 were also on the rap sheet when Murphy appeared before the BHA in February 2022 to face a charge of misleading its officials over his holiday destination during the COVID-19 pandemic in September 2020. A disciplinary panel found he had lied about his whereabouts in that Murphy had been in Mykonos - at the time Greece was on the government's COVID 'red' list of countries - while claiming to have been in Lake Garda, Italy, which was not. ‌ The panel handed down a 14-month ban, of which the relevant part to last Thursday's court case relates to the additional conditions attached Murphy's licence when he returned to race-riding in February 2023. The BHA didn't make the details public, but stated they 'include the need for Mr Murphy to remain sober and avoid the use of any illicit substances or social drugs'. ‌ The phrase about remaining sober is a woolly one, and no figures were published in terms of micrograms of alcohol per millilitres of breath to set a bar for the increased testing Murphy faced. But there's no need for any numbers, given the information put before district judge Sam Goozee in court last week. We learned, and it seems the BHA learned at exactly the same time, that Murphy, who courtesy of 'a misunderstanding' did not provide a roadside sample to police officers after driving a Mercedes A Class into a tree in the early hours of April 27, was tested at 7am that day. The reading showed he had 66 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath. The legal limit is 35 so, seven hours after the crash - and just under eight hours before the start of Southwell's card on which he was booked for four mounts - Murphy, who didn't make it to Nottinghamshire, was still almost twice over the limit. ‌ Factor in that the threshold for jockeys is 17mcg per 100ml of breath and Murphy was four times over the riding limit that morning. There's no precise formula to work out how quickly alcohol leaves the system - it depends, among other things, on the metabolism and size of the person in question. ‌ But the very notion that Murphy, four times over the riding limit on the morning of four booked rides, was not in egregious breach of the BHA requirement to 'remain sober' is laughable. The BHA would be failing in its regulatory duties if it didn't revoke a jockey's licence in such circumstances, and that applies just as equally to a rider of Murphy's status as one significantly lower down the food chain. Such an omission would place in danger every other jockey, and every horse, taking part in a race. The life-changing injuries suffered by Freddy Tylicki at Kempton Park in October 2016 give all too stark an illustration of how tragically this can play out. In the wake of Thursday's case, a 'disappointed' BHA, while permitting Murphy to carry on riding, said: 'His conduct fell a long way short of the standard we expect of all licensed individuals, in whom we place trust that they will represent our sport to the best of their abilities, upholding our collective reputation and ensuring racing is a safe place for all.' Words are all very well. Now is the time for action.

Dubai teen Marcus Fakana's jail hell - 'severe' trauma and forced to watch rapes
Dubai teen Marcus Fakana's jail hell - 'severe' trauma and forced to watch rapes

Daily Mirror

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Dubai teen Marcus Fakana's jail hell - 'severe' trauma and forced to watch rapes

Nineteen-year-old Marcus Fakana has now been released from a hellish Dubai prison, following what has been a traumatic year for the teenager after he was jailed for having sex with another teen British teen Marcus Fakana has at last been freed from a Dubai prison - and it's likely his 12 months of hell will have resulted in significant trauma. Nineteen-year-old Marcus, from Tottenham, north London, had been staying with family in the United Arab Emirates city when he struck up a holiday romance with another teenager, who was also from London, at the Hilton Dubai Palm Jumeirah. ‌ The pair had consensual sex, but as the girl was still a few weeks off her 18th birthday, the then 1 8-year-old Marcus faced severe consequences under the harsh legal system of the UAE, where sex between under-18s is illegal. ‌ Local police officers were tipped off by the girl's mother, and Marcus was put behind the bars of the notorious al-Awir prison, where he spent his birthday and New Year's far from home, in squalid and dangerous conditions. Holiday romance gone wrong Marcus and the girl had intended to continue their relationship once they returned to the UK. However, everything changed on August 31, 2024, when, while still on holiday, Marcus was taken into police custody. ‌ Speaking previously about the summer fling, Marcus told the Mirror: "We had a wonderful time. I couldn't wait to see her again. Then police knocked on our hotel door." For three long days, Marcus was held at the "notorious" Al Barsha Police Station, where, according to the campaign group Detained in Dubai, he was unable to make a phone call or even speak with his worried parents. And things got even worse from there. After being arrested, it was expected that Marcus would be handed a suspended sentence for the consensual act and allowed to fly home. Instead, a judge ordered that the construction apprentice be locked up for one year in the infamous al-Awir prison. ‌ In December 2024, Marcus stated that he had been "shocked beyond belief" by the sentence. Speaking previously to the Detained in Dubai while on bail, Marcus pleaded for mercy from Sheikh Mohammed Al Maktoum, the absolute ruler of Dubai, expressing that he had not intended to break any laws. He begged, "My family and I are devastated and in shock. I never intended to break the law. It didn't occur to me at the time, and for that, I'm sorry. I am asking His Highness, Sheikh Mohammed Al Maktoum, to please forgive me and pardon me. Let me go home. Please give me my life back." Sentence horror ‌ Back in January, friends and supporters gathered in Westminster to call for Marcus' release, with many condemning his harsh sentence as an injustice CEO Radha Stirling, of Detained in Dubai, an advocacy group that played an important role in bringing Marcus home, said at the time: "Marcus has been in jail for over a month now. Marcus spent New Year's and his birthday behind bars in Dubai, desperately hoping for a pardon. "He wasn't aware the girl was slightly under 18, and he didn't intend to break the law. He didn't intend to offend the country or break the law, and we'd like nothing more than to see him reunited with his family and back in London." ‌ She added, "Their relationship was completely legal in the UK, and it is easy to see how tourists can get in trouble. Marcus is, of course, very thankful to the public for all of the support, and he has received so many letters from people. "He's positive that he will get a pardon, and that's what he's focused on right now. It's obviously a very traumatic time and experience. Keep writing to your MPs, keep boycotting Dubai and keep making sure this is at the forefront of everyone's thoughts while he is in prison. Let's not forget about him." ‌ Cruel conditions Located some 30km from influencer hotspot Dubai, al-Awir Central Prison is a far cry from the luxury shopping malls and high-end restaurants associated with the glamorous city. According to a report earlier this year, rape is an "every day occurrence" at the jail, with both inmates and guards subjected to frequent violent assaults. Male prisoners must have shaved heads at all times, while female inmates, who are kept in separate buildings, reportedly have to wear head coverings. They are packed into overcrowded cells, with as many as 20 inmates battling for three beds. ‌ In an interview with The Independent in 2017, ex-managing director of Leeds United, David Haigh, who was held for nearly two years on trumped-up fraud charges, described the conditions he faced while locked up in Dubai. According to David: 'The only way to describe being in prison in Dubai is hell. I was held for 22 months and I'll never forget it – the stench, the dirt, the smell, the heat, and the lack of any information whatsoever." Remembering how he was punched, Tasered, beaten and raped during his time in a cell, David reflected: 'The worst of this abuse was perpetrated by the prison guards and police. I lost a lot of weight through stress. ‌ 'Once, when I asked for some painkillers, a guard hit me over the head with a broom handle. When someone's beating you or hurting you in whatever form, in a weird way, you can deal with that. What I found more harrowing was seeing them do it to other prisoners in front of everyone.' Some prisoners have been forced to endure horror illnesses without being offered medical care. Others have allegedly been tortured into giving confessions. Karl Williams, a Brit who was locked up at the prison for a year in 2012, had electric shocks administered to his testicles and saw men being stabbed to death. In a memoir detailing his ordeal, he said: "I saw men get stabbed in the neck and others sliced down their faces. Blood splattered every surface as prisoner after prisoner was sliced." Williams, along with fellow Brits Grant Cameron and Suneet Jeerh, were reportedly given electric shocks and had guns held to their heads. ‌ Mr Williams wrote: "They pulled down my trousers, spread my legs and started to electrocute my testicles. It was unbelievably painful. I was so scared. I started to believe that I was going to die in that room." In another terrifying case, Suneet Jeerh, a 25-year-old man from Ilford, east London, was locked up in 2013 after being arrested with two pals from Wanstead who cops caught with "spice" - a synthetic form of cannabis - in their car. His sister, Davena Kumar, said conditions at the prison were horrific and that her brother, who appeared "skinny" and "not himself" when she went to visit him, was allegedly forced to watch other men being raped as a "lesson". Inmate Dinchi Lar spent three months at the jail after she shared a video of fellow Nigerian passengers who, like her, had been detained for hours on arrival to Dubai Airport. She was arrested, charged and sentenced for "breaching the privacy of government employees at Dubai airport' and 'sharing a video of them online without their consent". ‌ "I was really shocked. I didn't commit murder, I didn't steal… I posted a video of harassment of myself and my fellow countrymen," she told ITV. "It was the most frightening experience of my life, absolute torture, and all because I went to the police about what happened in the hotel room," she told The Sun. "I will never forget the jail, it's the worst place I have ever been. They kept the lights off in the day so we'd be eating in pitch blackness. Then they turned them on at night so no one could sleep," she added. Describing the conditions as "demoralising", "humiliating", and "traumatising", Dinchi, who claims she only saw the sun once for 15 minutes during her three-month stretch, said: "There's nothing like personal space... you are sleeping and somebody is in your face. You're literally sleeping on top of another person." ‌ Harrowing rapes Speaking with the Ilford Recorder, Marcus' sister Davena Kumar revealed that her brother had been separated from friends and forced to watch other prisoners being raped. ‌ Davena told the publication: 'He's sharing a cell with someone who's been sentenced for life. They've made him watch other men being raped like it's a lesson.' Opening up about Marcus' condition one month into his sentence, Davena shared: "He was skinny and he wasn't himself. He was banging on the door, calling my name, and I just wanted to hug him.' Return home and lasting trauma ‌ Remarking upon Marcus' return home, Detained in Dubai CEO Radha described the teenager as an "extraordinary young man caught in a deeply unjust system". Radha said, "Marcus should never have been put through this. He was supposed to spend a short few days with his family, but ended up spending nearly a year in the tourist destination. We are thrilled that after an intensive campaign, he was officially pardoned and is home safe, surrounded by those who love him. "This was an extraordinary young man caught in a deeply unjust system. We thank everyone who stood by Marcus and helped bring him home." ‌ While celebrating that Marcus is now "back where he belongs", Radha went on to emphasise the "trauma" he's been left with, due to the "severe" impact of the decision. She added, 'Marcus is back where he belongs. But no one should have to endure this. He was 18 at the time, and the British woman involved is now 18 too, a fact she did not divulge to him at the time. We hope his story will prompt serious reconsideration of the UK's travel advice and its engagement with the UAE on human rights issues. "Dubai could have chosen to fine and to deport him. Instead, the 18-year-old was sentenced to one year in prison. The impact on his life has been severe and there was no need for him to endure such trauma."

‘Discussions continue' over US steel tariffs deal ahead of deadline, says No 10
‘Discussions continue' over US steel tariffs deal ahead of deadline, says No 10

Western Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Western Telegraph

‘Discussions continue' over US steel tariffs deal ahead of deadline, says No 10

The US president has said he plans to start implementing tariffs on the US's trade partners on July 9. The UK has already managed to negotiate a deal with the US which eliminates the threat of tariffs to British car and aeroplane manufacturers. Our work with the US continues to get this deal implemented as soon as possible No 10 spokesman But a reprieve for the steel industry is yet to be finalised, leaving open the threat that the current 25% tariff rate could rise to 50% after the July 9 deadline. Mr Trump is reportedly stepping up pressure on countries who could soon be subject to the tariffs, urging them to negotiate trade deals with the US. But amid signs of confusion within the US administration, trade secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested America's trade partners will see the levies begin on August 9, after receiving a letter outlining them on July 9. Asked if the Government was confident a deal would be reached on UK steel, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Our work with the US continues to get this deal implemented as soon as possible. We have very close engagement with the US, and the US has been clear that it wants to keep talking to us to get the best deal for businesses and consumers on both sides No 10 spokesman 'That will remove the 25% tariff on UK steel and aluminium, making us the only country in the world to have tariffs removed on these products. 'The US agreed to remove tariffs on these products as part of our agreement on May 8. It reiterated that again at the G7 last month. The discussions continue, and will continue to do so.' Pressed again whether ministers were confident British producers would not be hit by the 50% tariff, the Downing Street spokesman said: 'As I say, discussions continue. 'We have very close engagement with the US, and the US has been clear that it wants to keep talking to us to get the best deal for businesses and consumers on both sides.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store