
The former West MPs with new roles in the House of Lords
The new role marks a return to politics for Harper, who lost his Forest of Dean constituency in Gloucestershire by less than 300 votes in July 2024.He added that in his new position he hoped to contribute to internal Conservative party debates around how to be competitive again and "hopefully win the next general election".Labour's Debbonaire, defeated by the Green Party in Bristol Central, expressed a similar desire to immerse herself in her new role, calling it an "incredible privilege"."It wasn't a hard decision, primarily because I went into politics because I believe in public service, like most politicians of all parties," she said. "It was a new way to serve the public, which is your first and primary duty."
She added: "Bringing my skills to work on a daily basis is really, I think, of benefit to my service to the public and the country."Critics have pointed to Debbonaire's previous criticism of the honours system and Labour's former committal to abolishing the House of Lords.However, Debbonaire said that a second chamber was necessary, and the government was following through on commitments to remove hereditary peers.Harper and Debbonaire join another familiar face who has recently taken his seat in the chamber, Bristol's former Mayor, Marvin Rees.Now known as Lord Rees of Easton, the new Labour peer made his maiden speech on 3 April.They are all back in the political fray, spending time in the House debating and voting, but also having other roles elsewhere.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home Office to share data on asylum hotel locations with food delivery firms
The Home Office will share information about asylum hotel locations with food delivery companies to tackle suspected hotspots of illegal working. A new agreement with Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats will see information about high-risk areas shared to help them uncover abuse on their platforms and quickly suspend accounts. Currently delivery riders discovered to be sharing their accounts with asylum seekers have their profiles suspended. The latest measures hope to crack down further on the practice. The gig economy firms have also been increasing real-time identity and right to work checks which has led to thousands of workers being taken off the platforms, the Home Office said. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp claimed last month to have found evidence of people working illegally for the food delivery firms during a visit to a hotel used to house asylum seekers. Asylum seekers in the UK are normally barred from work while their claim is being processed, though permission can be applied for after a year of waiting. Delivery firms met Home Office bosses earlier this month to discuss the concerns of abuse in the sector. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement. 'The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.' The three delivery companies said they were fully committed to working with the Home Office and combatting illegal working. Ministers promised a 'nationwide blitz' to target migrants working illegally as part of efforts to deter people from coming to the UK from France. Officials hope to tackle the 'pull factors' attracting migrants to the UK alongside the deal struck by Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron earlier this month to send some people who reach England in small boats back to France. More than 23,500 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel so far in 2025, a record for this point in the year.


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Asylum hotel data to be shared with food delivery firms in bid to stop illegal working
Information about asylum hotel locations will be shared with food delivery companies to tackle suspected hotspots of illegal working, the Home Office have said. A new agreement with Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats will see information about high-risk areas shared to help them uncover abuse on their platforms and quickly suspend accounts. Currently delivery riders discovered to be sharing their accounts with asylum seekers have their profiles suspended. The latest measures hope to crack down further on the practice. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement. 'The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.' The Home Office added that the gig economy firms have also been increasing real-time identity and right to work checks which has led to thousands of workers being taken off the platforms. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp claimed last month to have found evidence of people working illegally for the food delivery firms during a visit to a hotel used to house asylum seekers. Asylum seekers in the UK are normally barred from work while their claim is being processed, though permission can be applied for after a year of waiting. Delivery firms met Home Office bosses earlier this month to discuss the concerns of abuse in the sector. The three delivery companies said they were fully committed to working with the Home Office and combatting illegal working. Ministers promised a 'nationwide blitz' to target migrants working illegally as part of efforts to deter people from coming to the UK from France. Officials hope to tackle the 'pull factors' attracting migrants to the UK alongside the deal struck by Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron earlier this month to send some people who reach England in small boats back to France. More than 23,500 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel so far in 2025, a record for this point in the year.


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bond traders smell trouble: Reckless Reeves could spark a full-blown financial crisis, says MAGGIE PAGANO
There are times when the numbers published by the Office for National Statistics on the state of the economy are so mind-boggling that they become meaningless. Figures for June on the level of government borrowing are a case in point. On our behalf, Labour borrowed some £20.7billion last month – £6.6billion more than in the same month last year. It is the second highest June borrowing since records began, and was only eclipsed in 2020 at the height of the pandemic. This takes borrowing in the first three months of the financial year to £57.8billion, and if the forecasts are to be believed, suggests the total tally for this financial year will be £130billion, give or take a billion or two. That is more than any government department spends, other than health. Perhaps an extra £6billion a month doesn't sound too much. But here's a way of putting these numbers into some sort of perspective. How long do you think it takes to count to a million? If you take one number at a time – about a second each – it would take an average person 11 and a half days of continuous counting, or around 278 hours. Now estimate how long it takes to count to a billion. On the same non-stop basis, it would take someone an astonishing 31.7 years, and that's without eating or sleeping. So for June's extra £6billion, someone would have to count for roughly 192 years. That gives some context for the scale of the problems facing our public finances. If the economy was growing – and living standards rising – as a consequence of improved productivity, such a whopping debt mountain might not be such a problem. But it's not. Quite the reverse. June's horrifying monthly increase is because government spending outstripped tax receipts while the cost of interest payments on the country's nearly £3 trillion debt nearly doubled. What's more, the £16.4billion cost of interest payments on the debt was the second highest for June since 1993 due to inflation. This was £8.4billion more than in the same month last year, or put another way, £550million a day and more than £22million an hour. As Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Richard Hughes pointed out recently at the Treasury select committee, we have the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among 36 advanced economies. Which is why the UK gilt market is so skittish. Traders smell trouble ahead, particularly after the Government failed to get through even the most minor reforms to the welfare budget. Gilt yields on the 30-year benchmark government bond have been above 5 per cent for most of the year, breaking the 5.5 per cent mark last week – far higher than during the Liz Truss reign. Yet when Labour came to power, yields were below 4.5 per cent. Capital Economics claims that higher UK gilt yields since March have already cut the Chancellor's so-called 'fiscal headroom' from £9.9billion to £6.7billion. In the scale of things, the difference now comes down to a rounding error. While it is true that the cost of money has risen globally, the markets forecast that UK borrowing costs have further to climb, that the country is an outlier. What a mess. Rachel Reeves will need to whip up another £20billion to balance the books. But she doesn't have many options left, having lost the fight over cuts to the welfare budget. Her only choice is to raise taxes again. This in turn will scupper growth, leading to a state of stasis, if not a full-blown financial crisis. Trump's win Laugh all you like at Donald Trump's outlandish tariff threats but they often land him the prize. The President's latest win is the promise by AstraZeneca to invest $50billion in the US by the end of the decade as part of its plan to reach $80billion of sales. Rather than face potential tariffs of 200 per cent on imported drugs, the pharmaceuticals giant is going to build a new drug manufacturing factory for chronic diseases in Virginia. Having already lost out on AstraZeneca's plan to build a plant in the UK because of government incompetence, the powers that be must do all they can to ensure that the company will keep its primary listing in London and not switch to New York. That would be giving Trump too much of a win.