
Are you married, divorced or single? Your relationship status can hike your car insurance by £100s – trick to cut costs
Published: Invalid Date,
MARITAL status can have an impact on what you're charged for car insurance premiums, new figures reveal.
Motorists are having to fork out up to £362.80 extra depending on whether they're single, married, separated, divorced, or widowed.
The fresh data from comparison site MoneySuperMarket are based on all car insurance policies it sold between January 1 and July 4 this year.
Policies cover single drivers for domestic and commuting uses with no additional drivers, with the main policyholder holding a full UK driving licence for a minimum of one year.
The data reveals single drivers paid the highest amount for motor insurance - an average of £859.04 for an annual policy.
Meanwhile, drivers who put their marital status down as separated paid £496.24 - £362.80 less.
Widowed drivers forked out £515.57, while married drivers paid £721.35.
The data indicates someone legally changing the marital status on their car insurance policy could potentially save hundreds of pounds too.
For example, someone inputting divorced instead of single could pay around £349 less while still being accurate in describing their personal situation.
However, it's worth bearing in mind insurers factor in a range of variables when determining policy prices, including age, profession and where you live.
Alicia Hempsted, car insurance expert at MoneySuperMarket said: "Insurers consider lots of factors when pricing a premium, such as age, length of no claims discount, marital status, occupation, location, driving experience, and the make and model of the car.
Five ways to cut your insurance costs
"Insurers use a model to assess an individual's risk and price the policy accordingly."
"This means that no single factor determines the price."
The reason you may pay more for your car insurance based on marital status is usually down to the perceived risk associated with that group of people.
For example, single drivers are usually seen as more risky while married couples often benefit from lower rates because they're seen as more financially stable and less accident-prone.
The main factors that affect car insurance premiums
INSURERS make a judgement call on you as a driver when deciding what to charge you for a premium.
Ultimately, it's all about how risky you are deemed and the likelihood of you being in an accident and needing to claim.
The main factors that determine what you are charged for your car insurance include:
Annual mileage - the higher this is, the more statistically likely you are to have an accident
Occupation - some jobs are seen as riskier than others like footballers and journalists
Car model - if a car is expensive to repair or new parts are costly
Address - if you live in a high crime area or one prone to flood a lot
Age - younger drivers generally pay more than older motorists
Remember, you can get the best price for your car insurance by shopping around and using price comparison sites.
How else to cut car insurance costs
Tom Banks, money expert at GoCompare, previously shared his top tips for cutting costs.
Be accurate about mileage
Look at your mileage for previous years so you can estimate your upcoming usage as much as possible and get the most accurate premium.
Make your car more secure
Decreasing the security risk of your car will mean you are less likely to be targeted by thieves.
You can buy steering wheel locks, alarms or even wheel clamps.
You can pick up steering wheel locks from as little as £20 online, car alarms from £20 and wheel clamps for around £35.
Avoid making modifications
This will make your vehicle more attractive to thieves.
It will also make your car or van more expensive to repair which could lead to a higher premium quote.
What is car insurance?
Consumer reporter Sam Walker talks you through what car insurance is and what it covers you for...
Car insurance pays out if your vehicle is stolen, damaged, catches on fire or is involved in an accident.
As a minimum, it protects you against any damage you case to other road users, the public or their property - these are called third parties.
You only need to claim on your car insurance when an accident is your fault.
If another motorist is to blame, their insurance should pay out instead.
Car insurance, unlike home insurance, is a legal requirement and if you don't have it you can be fined up to £1,000.
You can also have your vehicle seized and destroyed.
However, you don't need to insure your car if it is classed as "off-road", or holds a statutory off road notification (SORN).
The vehicle has to be kept on private land and not a public highway though.
Park wisely
It's worth parking your vehicle in a garage or driveway, if you have one.
Parking off-road can lower the chances of it being vandalised or stolen.
Pay annually
Paying annually will almost always see you pay less overall compared to paying monthly.
Paying monthly sees you charged interest and additional fees on top of your premium.
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
7 minutes ago
- Finextra
Sainsbury's sells travel money business to Fexco
UK supermarket group Sainsbury's is offloading its travel money business to Ireland's Fexco. Financial terms were not disclosed. 0 Fexco will take over all operations of Sainsbury's Travel Money, including digital platforms and more than 220 bureaux within the supermarket's stores. Services will continue to operate under the Sainsbury's brand with the company receiving an ongoing share of revenue and rental income. The deal increases Fexco's UK retail footprint to more than 460 locations, making it a top five player in the sector. Bláthnaid Bergin, CFO, Sainsbury's, says: With specialist expertise and a strong track record in foreign exchange, Fexco Group is a strong fit for our business. I'm also pleased to confirm that there will be no immediate changes, and customers can expect the same high level of service they know and trust.' Sainsburys has been withdrawing from financial services in the last two years, selling its retail banking operations to NatWest, offloading is mortgage book to Co-operative Bank, and handing over its ATM business to NoteMachine.


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down
The chief executive of Ofwat is to step down as the embattled water regulator prepares to be abolished. David Black will leave the role at the end of August and an interim chief executive will be appointed in due course. The Government last month announced the regulator would be axed in a regulatory shake-up that comes as part of its response to public outrage over rising bills, sewage pollution and large bonuses for bosses. Ofwat may not be formally axed until at least 2027, with the process to overhaul the current system likely to be complex. The regulator said Mr Black, who took over as chief executive in 2021 and had worked in various roles at Ofwat since 2012, had decided the time is right for him to pursue new opportunities. In a statement on Tuesday, he said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' The four bodies responsible for regulating the sector have faced intense criticism for overseeing companies during the years where they paid out to shareholders and accrued large debts – while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Currently, Ofwat oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, the Drinking Water Inspectorate ensures that public water supplies are safe, while the Environment Agency and Natural England have regulatory functions to monitor the industry's impact on nature. Under Government plans, measures will be rolled out to merge their regulatory responsibilities into a 'single, powerful' regulator – one for England and another for Wales. The move was recommended by an independent review into the sector, which was commissioned by ministers to answer public fury over the ailing state of the water sector. Led by former Bank of England governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, the review advised far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in industry. As part of its own response to the crisis, Ofwat said it would allow firms to raise average bills from 2025 to 2030 to help finance a £104 billion upgrade for the sector as part of its so-called price review, published in December. In his statement on Tuesday, Mr Black said: 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104 billion, along with a further £50 billion investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come.' Consumer groups at the time warned that the increases were 'more than what many people can afford', with companies able to raise average bills by £157 in total over the next five years to £597 to help finance the £104 billion. Ofwat chairman Iain Coucher said: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. 'He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers. 'On behalf of the board and everyone at Ofwat, I would like to thank David for his leadership and his service over the last 13 years and to wish him every success in the future.'


Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Embattled Ofwat boss resigns amid sewage crisis
David Black has resigned as chief executive of Ofwat, just weeks after the Government called for the beleaguered water regulator to be scrapped. The watchdog confirmed on Tuesday that Mr Black will step down from his position at the end of August, with an interim successor to be announced in due course. It brings an end to Mr Black's tumultuous stint in charge of Ofwat, which has been subject to increasing criticism over its failure to tackle sewage spills. He has been the chief executive of Ofwat since April 2022, having initially joined the regulator in 2012. His planned departure comes after a review published last month by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which called for the water regulator to be abolished. In a damning assessment of Ofwat, the former deputy governor of the Bank of England criticised the 'deep-rooted, systemic' problems in the water sector, which have led to worsening pollution. It added that Ofwat had failed to prevent businesses in the water industry from 'making imprudent financial decisions'. This culminated in the crisis at Thames Water, which is facing the threat of nationalisation after failing to tackle a £17bn debt pile. Prior to the Cunliffe review, Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, said Ofwat was 'clearly failing' as it had created a regulatory system that allowed the industry to 'get away with it'. He went further last month by scrapping Ofwat altogether, as he said that a new regulatory body will be introduced to mark the 'biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation'. He added that a new regulator for the water industry would be given legal powers to intervene if customers are overcharged. The date of Ofwat's abolition has not yet been announced. After announcing his departure, Mr Black said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat, over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104bn, along with a further £50bn investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come. I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' Iain Coucher, the Ofwat chairman, added: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers.'