
Britain risks being ‘dumping ground' for forced labour goods
Existing rules are failing to prevent products flown from Xinjiang, where Beijing is accused of employing Uighur Muslim people against their will, ending up on UK shelves, according to a new report.
In the 99-page document, MPs and peers on the influential Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) called on ministers to impose import bans on goods linked to forced labour.
Mandatory human rights due diligence for UK firms and penalties for flouting the requirements should also be introduced, the cross-party group said.
This would establish a legal duty for businesses to manage any risk of human rights abuse in their operations, such as by requiring suppliers to fulfil certain conditions, rather than the existing 'voluntary' approach.
Key to UK laws governing forced labour is the Modern Slavery Act 2015, but the committee warned a lack of 'enforceable legislation' is leaving loopholes in the system.
'The evidence we heard demonstrates that goods produced by forced labour are being sold in the UK,' the JCHR said.
'Cargo flights are permitted to bring goods directly from the capital of Xinjiang to the UK unhindered and media investigation has provided strong evidence that tomatoes produced under forced labour conditions are used in products sold in UK supermarkets.'
Britain's approach to imports has fallen behind other key markets like the EU and the US, which have introduced bans on goods linked to forced labour, according to the report.
'The UK's lack of equivalent legislation puts the UK at risk of becoming a dumping ground for goods that cannot be sold elsewhere,' it said.
It recommended the Government bring in a similar measure to establish who is responsible for preventing the import of such goods and what happens if goods are confiscated.
This ban should make clear that no company that uses or allows state-imposed forced labour in its supply chains can import goods to the UK, the committee said.
Concerns have also been raised over the UK's free trade deal with India, where human rights groups estimate more than 11 million people are living in modern slavery.
Meanwhile, more than a million people are estimated to live in modern slavery in the US, according to the same data, compiled by the International Labour Organisation and Walk Free in partnership with the UN.
The JCHR said the UK could learn from the EU's policy of using 'political clauses' in its deals to promote the bloc's values, as it continues negotiations with some Gulf states amid concerns about their human rights records.
It urged the Government to make it an explicit policy to include provisions concerning forced labour in future trade agreements, and to avoid entering negotiations with countries participating in state-imposed forced labour.
Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of relations with Beijing in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain and human rights concerns.
China has denied accusations it is subjecting the Uighur minority to forced labour.
Lord David Alton, chairman of the JCHR, said its inquiry had seen 'shocking evidence' of human rights abuses in a wide range of industries at the heart of UK trade.
'Most of all, we want to see strong leadership from the Government. It's intolerable in the 21st century that we profiteer on the broken backs of slave labour, from Uighur servitude in Xinjiang to child labour in the cobalt mines of the Congo, and elsewhere,' he said.
'The Government knows (the) nature of the problem and the challenge but meaningful action has been lacking.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
8 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology
Mr Farage labelled Technology Secretary Mr Kyle's remarks as 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief', and urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. We talked to mums about the Online Safety Act 👇 — Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (@SciTechgovuk) July 25, 2025 Former Reform chair Zia Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government. 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws,' Mr Kyle told Sky News. 'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Peter Kyle's comments on @SkyNews are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 29, 2025 Responding to Mr Kyle on a live stream on Tuesday morning, Mr Farage said: 'Just how low can the Labour Government sink in its desperation? 'Yes, of course they're in trouble. They're well behind us in the opinion polls. But frankly, to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile, it's so below the belt it's almost not true.' He also reiterated his demand for an apology and added: 'We're not going to get one. I think perhaps the best thing we can do is to sign the petition to repeal the Online Safety Act. That's what I'm going to do today. I think it makes sense. I'm deeply worried about the implications for free speech.' Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Yusuf has said that the laws work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-Government speech'. After being asked by Mr Farage to apologise on social media, Mr Kyle doubled down on his comments, claiming that wanting to 'overturn' the Act puts somebody 'on the side of predators'. If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. — Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025 Mr Yusuf has claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.' He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.' Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'


Scottish Sun
8 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Are you missing out on £2,212 in unclaimed cash? Forgotten bank accounts could be a goldmine
Plus we explain how you can track down other missing accounts which could make you £2,500 richer every month CASH IN Are you missing out on £2,212 in unclaimed cash? Forgotten bank accounts could be a goldmine Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SAVERS could be missing out on £2,212 in unclaimed cash - here is how you can track yours down. Child Trust Funds are a type of tax free savings accounts, which were set up for every child born between September 2002 and January 2 2011. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Teens could be coming into a collective £4.7billion worth of Child Trust Fund cash Credit: Getty - Contributor The Government deposited £250 for every child born between that period or £500 if they came from a low income family. When the child turned seven, an extra £250 or £500, depending on their families' economic status, was deposited. In 2010, this was scaled back to £50 for better off households and £100 for those on a lower income. The scheme was eventually axed in 2011, was later replaced with Junior ISAs. Parents of friends can deposit up to £9,000 into the child's account tax-free. The money is usually invested into shares. HMRC previously estimated that the average amount of savings tied up in each account is £2,212. Youngsters can take control of these accounts at 16, but can not withdraw the cash until they are 18. If you think you are entitled to a Child Trust Fund, you can track it down using a Government tool. You can find this by searching for "find a Child Trust Fund" on What Does My Tax Code Mean? A Simple Guide to Your HMRC Letter You'll need to have a few personal details to hand to do the search, including your date of birth and National Insurance (NI) number. Your NI number remains the same for your entire life. It's made up of two letters, six numbers and a final letter. You can find this number on your payslips or by downloading the HMRC app, which can be downloaded on the Apple or Google Play Store. When you're done filling this out, HMRC will then send you a letter revealing what company has your Child Trust Fund. There are a number of third party groups offering to search for Child Trust Funds but it's worth noting that they will charge a fee so you might lose a chunk of your money. Other ways you may have forgotten cash And it is not just a Child Trust Fund that could have thousands squirrelled away. Millions of workers have forgotten about old pensions from previous employers. There are 3.3million lost pots worth a combined £31billion - up from 2.8million worth £26 billion two years ago, according to the Pensions Policy Institute. An easy way to track the cash down is by using the Government's free Pension Tracing Service. This can be found by visiting You could then consolidate your pension and help boost your retirement by over £20,000. You can also track down lost bank and building society accounts using free online tools. For example, My Lost Account can help customers trace missing bank account. You should get a response from providers within three months.


Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Europe's absurd US investment pledge brings risks
BERLIN, July 29 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump is a master of the art of making brash promises he has no intention of keeping. Ursula von der Leyen appears to have done the same to clinch the European Union's controversial tariff deal with its largest trading partner. But the European Commission president's vague pledge that $600 billion of European investment will flow stateside in the next three years is risky. If the U.S. president decides that the Europeans have failed to keep their end of the bargain, he will have an excuse to tear up the agreement. Just a day after announcing the deal that will impose a 15% charge on most European imports to the U.S., the two sides seemed at odds on many details – including the EU's investment promise. The White House said, opens new tab on Monday that the 'massive' pledge would be 'in addition' to current investment flows from the bloc, which it said exceed $100 billion a year. By contrast, the European Commission said, opens new tab on Tuesday that EU companies had simply 'expressed interest' in investing such an amount in the U.S. by 2029 – but didn't specify it would be on top of existing flows. In either case, it would be a big increase. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Europeans last year sent some $205 billion of new investments, opens new tab across the Atlantic. Strip out the $53 billion from the United Kingdom, and the EU number is closer to $150 billion. If the White House is correct, EU firms would have to more than double their investment spending every year until 2028 to deploy an extra $600 billion. Even the EU's more modest interpretation implies a sustained one-third jump from 2024 levels. This is as implausible as the EU's equally brash promise to import American energy worth $750 billion. Neither pledge may be binding. The deal clinched by Trump and von der Leyen has not yet been formalised in a document signed by both parties. Commission officials hope such a text might be signed by August 1, when the U.S. tariffs come into force. But even then Brussels cannot direct investment decisions by private European companies. Unlike Japan, which promised a similarly vague $550 billion investment fund, the EU cannot even support or subsidise U.S.-bound investments, as these powers belong to its members. Any transatlantic investment drive is also at odds with policies to encourage investment and boost productivity at home. Whether the lure of the U.S. market will trigger an outbreak of enthusiasm among European investors in the next few years is dubious. Tariffs may help persuade carmaker Volkswagen ( opens new tab and luxury giant LVMH ( opens new tab to produce more in the world's largest economy. But they must also factor in the effect of trade barriers on supply chains, Trump's unpredictable policies, and the consequences of higher import prices on U.S. growth and inflation. If Trump's trade deals fail to deliver the economic bonanza he promises his voters, he may look for an excuse to revisit the EU deal. Von der Leyen will then regret having made a vague promise that she knew she could not deliver. Follow Pierre Briancon on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.