
Why fierce rivals India, Pakistan and China are racing to woo the Taliban
No international government has formally recognised the Taliban administration, though China, India, and the United Arab Emirates are among the nations that have officially accepted its ambassadors in their capital after the militant group took control of Kabul in 2021. The Taliban administration said last year it was in control of 39 Afghan embassies and consulates globally.
But the Taliban's isolation, at least in Asia, seems to be coming to an end. Playing the role of big brother to both Kabul and Islamabad, Beijing this week sought to ease the tensions gripping the two countries stoked by terrorism and deportation of refugees.
On Wednesday, China's foreign minister Wang Yi said after his talks with Afghanistan's acting foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi and his Pakistani counterpart, Ishaq Dar, the two countries planned to upgrade their diplomatic ties and send ambassadors to each other as soon as possible.
A photo of the informal gathering showed Wang Yi holding hands with Dar and Muttaqi. "China welcomes this and is willing to continue providing assistance for the improvement of Afghanistan-Pakistan relations," he said.
Pakistan expelled more than 8,000 Afghan nationals in April in a fresh repatriation drive after the expiry of a 31 March deadline. Islamabad says the drive is part of a campaign called the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan launched in late 2023. Pakistan has in the past blamed militant attacks and crimes on Afghan citizens, who form the largest portion of migrants in the country. Afghanistan has rejected the accusations. Kabul has termed the repatriation as forced deportation.
Wang's comments comes just days after New Delhi, reeling from the Kashmir attack and near-war conflict with Pakistan, made political contact with the Taliban, with external affairs minister S Jaishankar appreciating Muttaqi's condemnation of the 22 April Pahalgam terror strike. India said it attached a 'lot of significance' to the telephonic conversation between Jaishankar and Muttaqi.
In January, Indian foreign secretary Vikram Misri met with Muttaqi as the two sides discussed expanding bilateral ties, with an increased focus on India's security concerns, boost in trade through the Chabahar Port in Iran, and Indian investments in several development projects inside Afghanistan.
The Taliban have banned girls and women from school for more than three years now and are blamed for turning Afghanistan into an 'open-air prison' for its female population due to their gender apartheid policies – one of the biggest reasons the group is isolated and denied formal recognition.
Many Western nations, including the US, said the path to any formal recognition of the Taliban will be stuck until they change course on women's rights and re-open high schools and universities to girls and women and allow their full freedom of movement. The Taliban say they respect rights in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic law and that restrictions on its banking sector and a lack of recognition are hindering its economy.After
The Taliban-ruled Afghanistan being wooed by the biggest powers in Asia, is a scenario, experts say, that was unimaginable just last year. India, Pakistan, and China are seen to be looking out for their own interests in the regional race for minerals and guarding against terrorist groups over which the Taliban have influence.
Farid Mamundzay, former Afghanistan ambassador to New Delhi till 2023, says the world should note that the competition over Afghanistan is 'not new, but it has become more public, more visible, and increasingly pursued at higher diplomatic levels'.
The three countries are focused on their strategic imperatives rather than concerns for rights or governance, he tells The Independent.
'For Pakistan, Afghanistan remains central to its concept of strategic depth, a critical arena for influence and a means to limit Indian influence along its western frontier. China views Afghanistan as vital to securing Xinjiang, expanding the Belt and Road Initiative, establishing overland trade corridors to Central Asia and Iran, and accessing its untapped mineral wealth,' says the ambassador who served New Delhi until the Taliban took control of the mission.
'India, meanwhile, sees continued engagement as essential for countering Chinese and Pakistani influence and maintaining strategic access to continental Asia,' he says, warning that the Taliban risks making war-battered Afghnanistan a pawn and not a partner in the regional race.
'In this unfolding rivalry, Afghanistan risks once again being treated less as a sovereign actor and more as a geopolitical battleground, its internal priorities overshadowed by external power plays,' Mamundzay says. 'For too long, Afghanistan's soil has hosted the rivalries of others. That pattern must end.'
As for the Taliban, the former ambassador says the increased attention from three sides boosts its international posture, political leverage and economic gains.
But this does not guarantee any safety to Beijing, Delhi, and Islamabad, says Afghanistan's former deputy foreign minister Nasir Ahmad Andisha.
'This engagement, while it might look pragmatic at the moment and allows Delhi to be friends with enemy's enemy, in the long run, this is doomed to fail,' he says.
For the time being, the Taliban is enjoying the popularity from the three power centres.
'There is no doubt in this regard that the Islamic Emirate has strengthened its comprehensive relationship with big countries, like China, Russia, Iran, and even India, in accordance with its interests,' Abdul Mateen Qanay, the spokesperson for the Taliban's interior ministry, tells The Independent.
He adds that the Taliban's interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani and foreign minister Muttaqi have made renewed efforts to repair Afghanistan's ties with Pakistan. On being asked if this is a new chapter for the Taliban, Qanay says: 'Yes, that's exactly right'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Shock as Britain turns its back on Afghans who loyally helped UK forces during two decades in Afghanistan with sudden closure of lifeline ARAP scheme
Hundreds of Afghans in line for sanctuary in Britain in return for their loyalty to the UK were 'betrayed' today when ministers suddenly cut a lifeline to help them. The Afghans, owed a debt a gratitude for working alongside British troops and officials during the UK's two decades in Afghanistan, face retribution from the vengeful Taliban warlords now running the country. The Daily Mail's award-winning 'Betrayal of the Brave' campaign led to a scheme being set up to resettle thousands of Afghans in Britain. But today, without warning, the Government suddenly closed the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) to new applicants. The decision, slipped out without any announcement, spread panic among those who had been hoping to make a new life in safety in the UK. The scheme's shock closure – from 3pm today - was confirmed in an 'explanatory memorandum' in a Home Office policy document. The decision – and lack of announcement – flies in the face of the public pledges made by former Defence Secretary Ben Wallace when he set up the scheme. Mr Wallace said in 2020: 'We want to send a message to the world that if you work with the British wherever we are deployed, we'll look after you.' Today former frontline interpreter Rafi Hottak, who was blown up on patrol with UK forces in Helmand, said he felt betrayed by the sudden announcement. 'I am deeply shocked and saddened by the news that the UK Government is scrapping the ARAP scheme – a programme that was meant to honour Britain's moral obligation to the brave Afghan men and women who stood shoulder to shoulder with British forces in Afghanistan,' he said. 'Many of these individuals put their lives on the line for the UK mission. Today, they live in hiding, facing persecution, torture, and death at the hands of the Taliban. Thousands have been waiting for years without a decision on their applications, clinging to hope that the country they served would not abandon them. That hope is now being extinguished.' Former Sergeant Major Colin Dawson, who served two tours in Afghanistan and battled to help those he worked with escape the Taliban, said : 'If we have abandoned people out there – and it seems we have – it is very wrong. We have a duty of care to these people who served with us. 'After all these years there are still people left behind who we should be helping. Many people have been rescued and we should be grateful for that but my experience of ARAP has been negative, I have tried to help one interpreter whose family is still in country – they have been beaten and abused – but ARAP has failed to reply. The last occasion was only last week. It is immensely frustration, these people are in desperate need and yet hope, it seems, is being taken from them.' Professor Sara de Jong, a founding member of the Sulha Alliance which campaigns for interpreters and those who worked for Britain, said: 'The sudden announcement that ARAP closes comes as a shock to the Sulha Alliance and our community of Afghan interpreters and other locally employed civilians. Perversely, the Government's own ARAP website has not even been updated yet and states that the scheme "remains open". Perversely, the Government's own ARAP website has not even been updated yet and states that the scheme "remains open". 'The closure is implemented in a very odd way, by adding as a criteria for eligibility that applicants must have "submitted their application before 15:00 BST on 1 July 2025".' Afghan applicants deserved advance notice of this new rule, especially as the UK Government prided itself in teaching Afghans about good governance and transparency. 'There is no information on what will happen with applicants who have submitted a request for a review of a negative decision, many of whom have been waiting for months if not years.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Afghan resettlement scheme for those who supported UK troops suddenly closed by government
The Afghan resettlement scheme for those who served alongside British troops is being suddenly closed as of 3pm on Tuesday. The changes have been snuck out in an explanatory memorandum to new immigration rules published by the Home Office. The Ministry of Defence's resettlement programme for Afghans for fought and served alongside British troops, called the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), will close to new applicants as of Tuesday. Under the new rules, an Afghan applicant must have applied for help on or after 1 April 2021 and before 3pm BST on 1 July 2025 to be considered eligible. No announcement has been made about the closure of the scheme on Tuesday. Charities slammed the government for "shutting down a lifeline" for Afghans living in fear from the Taliban. Gunes Kalkan, head of campaigns at Safe Passage International, said the move would leave 'people, including the children and families we support, in dangerous situations with no hope of rescue'. He added: 'We are shocked that the government has today quietly announced the closure of the resettlement routes for Afghans - a lifeline for those who continue to be persecuted and forced into hiding from the Taliban. 'Instead of closing down safe routes, this government must open more and continue to help Afghans to reach protection and loved ones'. Defence secretary John Healey said at the end of last year that resettlement schemes for Afghans to come to the UK will be merged and eventually closed down, but did not give a time frame for when this would be. According to government data up to the end of May 2025, 21,316 people have been brought to the UK under the Arap scheme. The operation of the scheme has come under criticism for mistakes made by caseworkers that saw hundreds of people who should have been eligible for UK relocation rejected and left to the mercy of the Taliban. The High Court heard in May that the process for determining whether former members of Afghan special forces who served alongside British troops can be resettled to the UK was a 'disaster area' so terrible it could be likened to a 'crime scene'. The MoD is currently undertaking a review of thousands of applications of Afghans linked to specialist units after inconsistencies were found in how their resettlement applications were handled. The changes published on Tuesday affect future principal applications. People who have already been found eligible for the Arap scheme will still be able to make applications to bring their family members to safety.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Foreign agents must register with UK authorities from TODAY or face jail… but Labour is accused of 'kowtowing' to Beijing as China is spared from the toughest rules
Agents of foreign states must register their roles in the UK from today or face the threat of jail under a new scheme. The new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) came into effect on Tuesday as ministers look to crack down on covert action by foreign governments. The scheme requires anyone carrying out 'political influence activities' on behalf of a foreign power to register with the Government or face prosecution. The maximum penalty for not registering is five years in prison and a fine. But Labour has been accused of 'kowtowing' to Beijing by excluding China from the most stringent requirements. So far, only Iran and Russia have been placed in the 'enhanced tier'. This requires anyone working for certain states to declare any activity, not just political work. Senior Tories said it was 'shameful' that China would not be subject to the toughest rules after being left off the 'enhanced tier'. The Government was claimed to be on 'bended knee' to Beijing as it chases deeper ties with China as part of PM Sir Keir Starmer's and Chancellor Rachel Reeves' scramble for economic growth. FIRS, which cover activities such as political communications or lobbying, was introduced in 2023 as part of efforts to strengthen national security. China has been repeatedly accused of seeking to covertly influence British politics and academia. A 2023 report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee found China had engaged in 'aggressive' interference. This included seeking to 'penetrate or buy academia to ensure that its international narrative is advanced and criticism of China suppressed'. Tory MP Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'The Conservative government introduced measures to crack down on hostile states. 'Then Labour quietly exempted one of the biggest of all. This Government's systematic kowtowing to China is shameful. 'We Conservatives will continue to keep the pressure on Labour, until they finally stop protecting Beijing and start protecting Britain.' Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader, is among a group of parliamentarians to have been sanctioned by Beijing over their criticisms of China's actions. He said: 'China carries out cyber attacks on the UK daily, it's trashed the Sino-British agreement on Hong Kong... threatens to invade Taiwan, supports Russia in their brutal invasion of Ukraine, supports Iran and is carrying out genocide in Xinjiang. 'Why on earth has the Government decided China doesn't pose a significant threat to the UK? 'The Government seems to be on bended knee rather than standing tall in the face of the threat China poses. It's time to call China a threat to us as they clearly are.' Luke de Pulford, of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'FIRS is the latest casualty of the UK's China policy. 'A scheme designed to address state threats won't include our biggest state threat, which makes about as much sense as it sounds.' Commenting on FIRS coming into effect on Tuesday, security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'We welcome legitimate engagement with all countries. 'But we will not tolerate covert attempts to manipulate our political system or society. 'FIRS scheme gives us the tools to confront growing threats to our national security, one of the foundations of our plan for change, without compromising the openness that defines our democracy.'