logo
Pupil numbers in schools expected to drop by nearly 400,000 over five years

Pupil numbers in schools expected to drop by nearly 400,000 over five years

Independent17-07-2025
The number of pupils in state schools in England is expected to decline by nearly 400,000 by 2030 amid falling birth rates, Government figures suggest.
The population attending primary and nursery schools is expected to drop at a 'faster rate' than previously projected over the next five years, according to the Department for Education (DfE).
It comes as primary schools in parts of England, including London, have been considering closing due to falling pupil numbers and funding pressures.
The latest DfE projections, published on Thursday, suggest that 4,205,117 pupils will be in state nursery and primary schools by 2030 – a fall of 300,000 from the population in 2025.
Meanwhile, 3,135,086 pupils are projected to be in state secondary schools in 2030 – which is 97,000 lower than the actual school population in 2025.
A population bulge in England has been moving into secondary schools, but the DfE said it now expects these pupil numbers to peak in 2026/2027.
Last month, a former education secretary called for school funding to no longer be judged on a per-pupil basis because of falling pupil numbers.
Conservative MP Damian Hinds said the decline in the number of children in schools meant funding being measured on a per-pupil basis was no longer a good reflection of whether funding is increasing or decreasing.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Falling rolls can create a real headache for schools already struggling amid severe financial pressures because the majority of funding is calculated on a per-pupil basis.
'It will be vital that the Department for Education protects schools that are particularly affected by this as it has a disproportionate impact on budgets, particularly for small schools.
'There are always significant variations between different parts of the country, individual schools and even year groups and other recent data forecast the number of school places planned for 2026/27 will need to double to meet demand.
'Trends can also change over time. Rather than reducing funding, we would urge the Government to continue to invest in schools, allowing them to maintain existing staffing levels.
'This would help reduce the unsustainable levels of workload which are fuelling a recruitment and retention crisis, also enabling some schools to offer smaller classes and more targeted help for pupils who need it.'
Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'The forecast that there will be almost 400,000 fewer pupils in schools by 2030 will understandably cause concern among parents and educators about implications for their schools.
'However, it is not a given that falling pupil numbers means widespread school closures.'
He added: 'Using falling rolls to reduce class sizes would improve schools for pupils and staff, helping reduce workload and improve teacher retention, allowing more contact time with each pupil to improve educational outcomes and allowing for greater integration of pupils with Send into mainstream classrooms.
'Schools with 30 pupils per class cost the same amount to run as schools with fewer per class, but the current funding model allocates money to schools on a per-pupil basis, leaving those with smaller classes out of pocket.
'To take advantage of the slowing birthrate and improved outcomes, the Government must protect schools with falling rolls from funding shortfalls and avoid schools in this situation making cuts that harm educational provision.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I was CO of the SAS. Here are four words our Special Forces need to hear from the PM
I was CO of the SAS. Here are four words our Special Forces need to hear from the PM

Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

I was CO of the SAS. Here are four words our Special Forces need to hear from the PM

With war in Europe and new threats to this country around every corner, from autocratic tyrants like Putin, jihadists and deranged activists, we should be supporting and encouraging those who keep us safe not seeking new legal ways to artificially transform their past acts of military necessity into alleged human rights violations. The US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth spoke recently at the US Special Operations Forces (SOF) week outlining his nation's rock-solid support and admiration for those conducting complex counter-terrorist operations alongside their many allies, including the UK. For emphasis, and in recognition of the new threat of state-sponsored 'lawfare' against these guardians of our collective security, he passed on a personal note to their commander from President Trump which simply stated: 'I have your back'. This is exactly the unequivocal message our protectors need to hear as they advance towards a suspected suicide-capable terrorist hiding within a civilian population, without the blessing of perfect intelligence, time and resources. Contrast this to the way that our own leaders – political and military – stand silent as our own Special Forces are pursued by a toxic combination of creative journalists and lawyers, each keen to prove that historical state-directed operations in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan were done in ways that should now be presented to the Crown Prosecution Service. This in many cases not due to any new evidence, incidentally – that would be reasonable – but simply because of a crafty interpretation of international laws created far from our sovereign legislature and sponsored by those that have no respect for either the realities of close quarter combat, or our need to defend ourselves. To the general dismay of potential volunteers to our armed forces and of our American allies, our public or parliamentary debate seems to dismiss the blood-stained experience of veterans as unreasonable or even fanciful. Self-effacing descriptions of the realities of combat are dismissed as mere cartoon stories and trumped by the creative opinions of human rights lawyers who seem to value the lives of our enemies ahead of those of our soldiers sent to defeat them. Energetic, combative and very well paid, these legal professionals demonstrate great skill at retrospectively transforming descriptions of close quarter combat into revisionist suggestions of human rights violations and even war crimes. No wonder recruiting numbers are falling or that our soldiers start to hesitate, fearing the long-term legal consequences of taking decisive action in a combat situation. To the many practitioners within the vital transatlantic counter-terrorism alliance it appears that the UK's application of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to the British way of war is starting to critically restrict its ability to stop terrorists and other bad actors from attacking our citizens or those of our allies. Can these staunch allies of ours still rely on the UK to deal with these common threats or are we becoming that type of fearful partner that simply prefers others to do the dirty work? To them, have we become nothing but a soft, compromised underbelly to be watched rather than the respected, self-sufficient bastion of old; a vulnerability rather than a strongpoint? Have we become a risky partner in sensitive operations, whose participation in joint operations carries the risk of inviting follow-on lawfare back into the courtrooms of our allies, even the USA? Such are the whispered and worried questions being asked in the global targeting rooms when considering UK potential contributions to today's fight. In the confusing and murky world of counter-terrorism where threats fade in and out of view in an instant, hesitation always leads to failure and death. This is a brutal reality known to both enemies and allies alike; exploited by the former, feared by the latter. There are never any second chances, and this is no place for unreliable, indecisive or gun-shy allies. Recognising this, let us hope that our own national leaders can offer the same reassuring support to our forces as shown by the US President in that simple but powerful promise to his team: 'I have your back'. For without it, they risk allowing the effect of this escalating lawfare to weaken the hand and confidence of our very special guardians just when we need them the most.

Beware the blizzard of lies: US advice on how to handle Farage's Trump tactics
Beware the blizzard of lies: US advice on how to handle Farage's Trump tactics

The Guardian

time9 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Beware the blizzard of lies: US advice on how to handle Farage's Trump tactics

Truth, the progressive California politician Hiram Johnson once said, is the first casualty of war. Johnson's oft-cited remark was supposedly made in 1918 in reference to the first world war, which had by then caused millions of human casualties. More than a century later, truth is once again caught in the crossfire, this time as a casualty of 21st-century culture wars. If Donald Trump is the high priest of disinformation, then Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform, is showing signs of being a willing disciple, if his behaviour in the UK this week is anything to go by. Farage has proposed sending prisoners abroad – including to El Salvador, where the Trump administration has sent hundreds of deportees and suggested sending US citizens. He also suggested an extensive police recruitment drive and prison-building programme all while cutting health and education spending. In the US, the parroting of Trump's policies by a UK populist has not gone unnoticed. And for those who have studied the president's modus operandi – there is one particular tactic the British public should be braced for: the blizzard of lies and false statements that frequently overwhelms his opponents. The Trump experience, they say, contains sobering lessons for critics of Farage. US pro-democracy campaigners warn that Trump has become even harder to factcheck since his first term, thanks to a combination of factors including looser social media content moderation and a reluctance among some media owners to stand up to his intimidation tactics. The Washington Post, which tracked more than 30,000 lies or misleading statements from Trump during his presidency, lost subscribers and public trust after its billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, reportedly vetoed an editorial endorsing the Democratic nominee Kamala Harris for president. 'It's become more difficult because there's less commitment from those who are in the best position to do the factchecking,' said Omar Noureldin, a senior vice-president for Common Cause, a non-partisan group. 'Seeking the truth here comes with costs and risks.' Complicating matters is the loss of trust in institutions, with many consumers relying on social media platforms for news. 'Even the best factchecking can be unpersuasive, because we're not just facing an information crisis here, but also a trust crisis in the American information ecosystem,' Noureldin said. Media watchers say the political environment has become so deeply polarised that factchecking can even have the counter-productive effect of further entrenching misplaced beliefs. 'From a lot of research, we're reaching the conclusion that factchecking hasn't been as effective as one would want,' said Julie Millican, the vice-president of Media Matters for America, a media watchdog. 'One reason is that information and disinformation spreads faster than you can check it. It takes a lot longer to factcheck something than it does for it go viral. 'But the other thing is factchecking can backfire. People so distrust institutions that factchecking can validate the misinformation in their minds and make them more inclined to believe the lie they believed in the first place.' A 2022 report from Protect Democracy suggested this was the result of a deliberate strategy of authoritarian regimes. 'Disinformation is spread through coordinated networks, channels and ecosystems, including politically aligned or state-owned media,' the report said. 'The goal is not always to sell a lie, but instead to undermine the notion that anything in particular is true.' Further compounding the problem in the US has been Trump's appointments of allies to key government agencies that have traditionally served as sources of accurate and reliable data for factcheckers. A case in point is Robert F Kennedy Jr, who has engaged in anti-vaccine theories, Trump's pick for health and human services secretary, putting him in charge of the country's vast health bureaucracy. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'Factchecking wasn't working very well in the first place, but now you can't even get access to the facts that you need be able to factcheck as well as you used to,' said Millican. The outlook seems bleak. Yet that does not make the problems insurmountable, campaigners insist. One answer is to invest in independent, non-partisan research. A prime purpose would be to increase media literacy among young people, who primarily get news from platforms such as TikTok which can be subject to disinformation tools such as AI-manipulated videos. The aim is to teach consumers how to spot doctored footage. 'Media literacy is extremely important and something that should be invested in and taught at a young age,' said Millican. Another solution is the development of 'pre-buttal' strategies to inoculate the public against disinformation, in effect getting the truth out first. Media Matters for America and Common Cause used this approach during last year's presidential election, partly by producing videos designed to counter anticipated false narratives surrounding voting procedures in certain areas. Also important, said Shalini Agarwal, special counsel at Protect Democracy, is calling out the demonisation of vulnerable groups, such as immigrants, as soon as it happens. A crucial role is played by media, even as Trump intensifies his assault on journalists as 'fake news' and tries to exclude certain established outlets from press briefings. 'It's really important when there are opportunities for one-on-one briefings and there are multiple reporters,' Agarwal said. 'Part of it is a sense of collective action. Often, whoever is speaking at the podium won't give a straightforward answer or gives a false answer and then tries to move on – it's incumbent when that happens for other reporters to jump in and say: 'Wait. What about what the other reporter asked?'' Millican has two pieces of advice for Britain and other European countries hoping to arm themselves against any coming authoritarian onslaught: fortify the media and preserve legislation designed to combat disinformation and illegal content online – represented by the online safety act in Britain and the digital safety act in the EU. 'The first thing that's going to happen in these authoritarian takeovers is they're going to try to silence and take over the media and information landscape,' she said. 'Any efforts to rein in hate speech or misinformation on platforms will be seen as tantamount to suppression of conservative thought or free speech. 'I can't stress enough trying to buffer the pollution of your information ecosystem as much as possible. One of the first things that they're going to do is just take down any barriers they can.'

Donald Trump: ‘It's great to be in Scotland'
Donald Trump: ‘It's great to be in Scotland'

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

Donald Trump: ‘It's great to be in Scotland'

US President Donald Trump arrived in Scotland on Friday night for a five-day private visit The president was met by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray as he disembarked The visit is expected to include meetings with PM Sir Keir Starmer and FM John Swinney Trump will split his time between his golf resorts at Turnberry and Menie Police Scotland has launched a major security operation, with road closures and extended shifts for officers across Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire Demonstrations are expected in Aberdeen, Edinburgh, and near Trump's golf courses The visit comes amid renewed scrutiny over Trump's past ties to Jeffrey Epstein, fuelling conspiracy theories in far-right circles Trump said he would meet Starmer on Friday night to 'do a little celebrating' and discuss the US-UK trade deal He also confirmed he would meet with the Scottish First Minister who he said was 'a good man' US President Donald Trump has arrived in Scotland to begin a five-day visit. The visit is officially private, rather than presidential, but Trump is expected to meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney while he's in Scotland. Air Force One – the presidential aeroplane – was in the air for approximately seven hours before touching down at Prestwick Airport at around 8.30pm on Friday. The US president was greeted by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray as he walked off Air Force One at Prestwick. After disembarking from the aircraft, the president told reporters that it was 'great to be in Scotland.' He left Prestwick Airport in his motorcade at about 8.50pm on Friday, bound for his golf course at Turnberry on the west coast of Scotland, south of Ayr. Mr Trump spent around five minutes speaking to journalists before leaving in his armoured car known as The Beast. European countries need to 'get your act together' on migration, and 'stop the windmills', Donald Trump said as he arrived in Scotland. Asked by reporters at Prestwick Airport for his advice to European leaders on reducing immigration, the US president said: 'I say two things to Europe: Stop the windmills. You're ruining your countries. I really mean it, it's so sad. 'You fly over and you see these windmills all over the place, ruining your beautiful fields and valleys and killing your birds, and if they're stuck in the ocean, ruining your oceans. 'Stop the windmills, and also, I mean, there's a couple of things I could say, but on immigration, you'd better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore.' Donald Trump also praised Sir Keir Starmer as 'a good man' and confirmed they will be meeting on Saturday. Speaking to reporters as he arrived in Scotland, the US president said: 'I like your Prime Minister, he's slightly more liberal than I am – as you probably heard – but he's a good man. He got a trade deal done. 'You know, they've been working on this deal for 12 years, he got it done – that's a good deal, it's a good deal for the UK.' Mr Trump added: 'I'll be seeing him tomorrow, I guess tomorrow evening'. @stvnews Plane spotters anticipate arrival of Air Force One. #stvnews #scotland #donaldtrump ♬ original sound – STV News Crowds gathered at the perimeter of Prestwick Airport to catch a glimpse of Air Force One on Friday evening, and there was a major police presence around the airport. Standing on the White House lawn before boarding Air Force One, Trump said he would be meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Friday night after he lands in Scotland. 'We're also going to do a little celebrating together because we get along very well', he said. 'The UK has been trying to make a deal with us for like 12 years and hasn't been able to do it, and we got it done. [Starmer] is doing a very good job, he's a good Prime Minister, and a good guy. We're going to meet at Turnberry and Aberdeen.' The President also confirmed that he would be meeting with Swinney during the visit. Trump said he had a 'lot of love' for Scotland, and called the Scottish leader a 'good man'. 'I look forward to meeting him,' Trump said. On Thursday, Murray said the UK will extend a 'warm welcome' to the President. It comes as Trump seeks to downplay his previous connections with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The Epstein case feeds into far-right conspiracy theories about child abuse rings formed of members of the global elite, propagated by some of the President's closest allies. Tight security measures are in place ahead of the visit, including road closures and restrictions in and around Turnberry, Maidens, and Prestwick Airport. A deer was euthanised on Friday morning after it was knocked down by a police vehicle at Donald Trump's golf course in Aberdeenshire ahead of the US President's arrival. New Arc Wildlife Rescue said it was called to Trump International Golf Links at around 5.30am on Friday. Due to the animal's injuries, it had to be euthanised at the scene. Trump's visit is also set to spark protests across the country over the weekend. STV News The Stop Trump Coalition is organising events in Aberdeen city centre and outside the US consulate in Edinburgh on Saturday – similar gatherings during Trump's visit to Scotland in 2018 attracted thousands of demonstrators. Protests are also expected around Trump's golf courses at Turnberry and Menie. First Minister John Swinney has urged protesters to express their views 'peacefully and lawfully'. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen will meet US President Donald Trump in Scotland on Sunday. Ms von der Leyen made the announcement on X, saying: 'Following a good call with @POTUS, we have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store