Pupil numbers in schools expected to drop by nearly 400,000 over five years
The population attending primary and nursery schools is expected to drop at a 'faster rate' than previously projected over the next five years, according to the Department for Education (DfE).
It comes as primary schools in parts of England, including London, have been considering closing due to falling pupil numbers and funding pressures.
The latest DfE projections, published on Thursday, suggest that 4,205,117 pupils will be in state nursery and primary schools by 2030 – a fall of 300,000 from the population in 2025.
Meanwhile, 3,135,086 pupils are projected to be in state secondary schools in 2030 – which is 97,000 lower than the actual school population in 2025.
A population bulge in England has been moving into secondary schools, but the DfE said it now expects these pupil numbers to peak in 2026/2027.
Last month, a former education secretary called for school funding to no longer be judged on a per-pupil basis because of falling pupil numbers.
Conservative MP Damian Hinds said the decline in the number of children in schools meant funding being measured on a per-pupil basis was no longer a good reflection of whether funding is increasing or decreasing.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Falling rolls can create a real headache for schools already struggling amid severe financial pressures because the majority of funding is calculated on a per-pupil basis.
'It will be vital that the Department for Education protects schools that are particularly affected by this as it has a disproportionate impact on budgets, particularly for small schools.
'There are always significant variations between different parts of the country, individual schools and even year groups and other recent data forecast the number of school places planned for 2026/27 will need to double to meet demand.
'Trends can also change over time. Rather than reducing funding, we would urge the Government to continue to invest in schools, allowing them to maintain existing staffing levels.
'This would help reduce the unsustainable levels of workload which are fuelling a recruitment and retention crisis, also enabling some schools to offer smaller classes and more targeted help for pupils who need it.'
Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'The forecast that there will be almost 400,000 fewer pupils in schools by 2030 will understandably cause concern among parents and educators about implications for their schools.
'However, it is not a given that falling pupil numbers means widespread school closures.'
He added: 'Using falling rolls to reduce class sizes would improve schools for pupils and staff, helping reduce workload and improve teacher retention, allowing more contact time with each pupil to improve educational outcomes and allowing for greater integration of pupils with Send into mainstream classrooms.
'Schools with 30 pupils per class cost the same amount to run as schools with fewer per class, but the current funding model allocates money to schools on a per-pupil basis, leaving those with smaller classes out of pocket.
'To take advantage of the slowing birthrate and improved outcomes, the Government must protect schools with falling rolls from funding shortfalls and avoid schools in this situation making cuts that harm educational provision.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
I look forward to meeting Swinney, says Trump as he leaves US for Scotland
US President Donald Trump has said he is looking forward to meeting Scottish First Minister John Swinney. The pair are expected to meet during the president's four-day trip to Scotland, which is expected to begin on Friday evening. Mr Trump will visit both of the golf clubs he owns in the country – Turnberry in South Ayrshire and Menie, near Aberdeen, in the coming days. Before boarding the presidential plane Air Force One to fly to Scotland, he told journalists: 'The Scottish leader is a good man, so I look forward to meeting him.' He also said he has a 'lot of love' for Scotland. Speaking to the PA news agency ahead of the visit on Friday, Mr Swinney said the meeting will be 'an opportunity to 'essentially speak out for Scotland' on international issues such as Gaza, as well as trade and the increase of business from the United States in Scotland. 'There are clearly also significant international issues upon which the people of Scotland have a view and want to have that view expressed by their First Minister,' he said. 'That relates to the awfulness of the situation in Gaza and the unbearable human suffering that is going on in Gaza. 'I want to make sure that those concerns and those views are expressed to the president of the United States. 'We have that opportunity, and I intend to take that opportunity to make sure that Scotland's voice is heard.' Mr Swinney also urged all of those set to protest against the president's visit to do so 'peacefully and to do so within the law'.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's backdoor extradition treaty to China is a monumental betrayal
Last Monday, Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser, held talks in Beijing with Wang Yi, one of the Chinese Communist Party's most senior diplomats. Sir Keir Starmer has said he wants a 'strong UK-China relationship', and both the Chancellor and Foreign Secretary have been to Beijing. Sir Keir is said to be planning a visit himself – the first by a British Prime Minister since the Conservatives realised in government that their embrace of the Chinese was, to put it mildly, naïve. Well, here's a coincidence. Yesterday, Dan Jarvis, the security minister, quietly tabled an amendment to the 2003 Extradition Act on how Hong Kong is designated, establishing a 'case-by-case' basis for extradition. According to the Home Office, this is a minor technical legal change to give full effect to the 2020 suspension of our extradition treaty with Hong Kong, after the arrest of hundreds of protesters in the territory. According to almost everyone else, however, the amendment actually bypasses the treaty and re-opens extradition. Hugo Keith KC, an extradition expert, put it thus: 'In respect of Hong Kong, it looks like the Government is seeking to reverse, through a sleight of hand, the practical consequences of suspending the treaty.' Extraditions to China were rightly suspended in 2020 after the creation of a series of new offences by China to allow them to seize Hong Kong residents for trial in mainland China. But now, it seems, the Labour government is seeking to resume extraditions – betraying the many brave Hong Kong dissidents who are standing up for democracy and freedom in what is now a Chinese province. In a letter to MPs, Mr Jarvis wrote that 'the way to resolve this situation is to de-designate Hong Kong and Zimbabwe [which is also covered by the amendment] from the act so that we can cooperate with them on the case-by-case ad hoc basis available for non-treaty partners'. He said that a prima facie case must be made for extradition and he would 'never allow a situation where Hongkongers or any other nationality is extradited for politically motivated purposes'. A Home Office source added that this was a legal technicality to allow for the rare extradition of those individuals accused of serious crimes such as rape and violence, rather than political dissidents. These arguments are pure and obvious sophistry. For one thing, no government has ever said that it is willing to extradite individuals on the basis of political expediency – and yet that is what now happens. Take the extradition treaty with the US. There have been a number of cases which arguably do not, objectively, justify extradition, but which have proceeded because the legislation enables it and the British government has not wanted a row with the US. More worryingly, China conflates violence and terror with political opposition as a matter of state policy. Pro-democracy campaigner Jimmy Lai was imprisoned for fraud and now languishes in jail to silence him. Dissidents who now live here in the UK have been accused of terrorism by the Chinese because they were involved in pro-democracy protests, and they have had bounties placed on them by the Chinese. Under the proposed changes, China will indeed no longer be a designated country for extradition, allowing the Government to pretend that it is defending dissidents – but because undesignated countries can apply for their citizens to be returned to them on a case-by-case basis, extraditions to China will in fact resume. Because anyone who thinks that the Chinese will not seek extradition of Hongkongers who fled to the UK through the 2021 scheme, which offered sanctuary from China's national security crackdown, is not so much naïve as an idiot – as is anyone who thinks they will not end up being extradited. This is a shameful, craven act by a government which seems to have turned craven diplomacy into its guiding principle.
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Could Jeremy Corbyn's new party shake up politics?
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has confirmed he is launching a new political party, promising to "build a democratic movement that can take on the rich and powerful".It doesn't have a name yet but the MP for Islington North says the plan is for the group to fight May's local elections ahead of the next general election, which is likely to take place in four years' new venture has the potential to shake-up the political landscape, with Labour and the Greens appearing to be the most at risk of losing votes. Polling of around 2,000 Britons by More In Common last month - on whether they would vote for a hypothetical Corbyn-led party - suggested it could pick up 10% of the vote. This would potentially take three points off Labour's vote share and extend Reform UK's lead in the polls by the same pollster's UK director, Luke Tryl, says that if this plays out at a general election Labour risks losing seats outright to Corbyn's party, while a splintering of the left-wing vote could also allow Reform UK or the Conservatives to make gains."In an era of very fragmented politics, small shares could make the difference across the board, and it is totally conceivable that the performance of this left-wing party could be the difference between a Labour-led government and a Nigel Farage Reform-led government on current polling," adds Mr party could gain support in parts of the country where pro-Gaza independents have performed strongly such as Birmingham, parts of east and north London and north-west England. More In Common's research suggests a Corbyn-led party would be most popular with those aged under 26 so inner-city student areas could also be key of these urban areas are holding local elections in May, which will mark the first real test for the new party. However, polling suggests the Green Party - where many disgruntled former Labour voters have already turned - stands to lose the most support from a Corbyn-led Greens were second to Labour in 40 constituencies at last year's general election but an insurgent left-wing party could eat into their depends on whether the Greens form electoral pacts with the new party, with both sides agreeing to stand down in seats where the other has a stronger chance of winning. The four pro-Gaza MPs who formed an independent alliance with Corbyn after the general election are expected to make up the core of the new party, along with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana. But how could they work with the Greens?Corbyn has suggested he will cooperate with the Greens but whether they will agree a formal deal remains to be Schneider, a close ally of Corbyn who is involved in the new group, tells the BBC it would make "perfect sense for our new party to have some form of pact with the Greens".Green Party leadership candidate Zack Polanski has also said he will "work with anyone who wants to take on Reform and this government". However, his rival, Green MP Adrian Ramsay, warned his party must not become "a Jeremy Corbyn support act" and maintain its "distinct" identity and broad appeal beyond the traditional Ford, a professor of political science at the University of Manchester, says a Corbyn-led party is a big threat to the Greens."Corbyn has a level of name recognition, a level of celebrity, that no one in the Green Party can possibly match," he tells BBC Radio 4's PM programme."Now, they have one big advantage which is that they have a core issue, the environment, which is one that Corbyn doesn't necessarily seem particularly interested in."So there is a world in which they could divide up the pie, so to speak, but they're going to need to think hard about that or they risk being pushed aside." Another poll of more than 2,500 Britons by YouGov earlier this month found that while 18% say they are open to voting for a new left-wing party led by Corbyn, just 9% of these would not consider voting for any of the five existing significant national the fractious and unpredictable state of politics, 11% of this group were also open to voting for Reform UK.A lot could change in the four years there is likely to be before the next general Tryl argues that if Labour presents that election as a choice between Sir Keir Starmer and Reform UK's Nigel Farage as prime minister, many on the left may choose to vote tactically. In this scenario, voters who are sympathetic to Corbyn's party could hold their nose and back Labour to stop a Reform candidate winning in their has also been a chaotic start for the party, with confusion over the name and who will lead it, after Sultana appeared to jump the gun by announcing her intention to form a new party with Corbyn earlier this sources have dismissed their former leader's latest venture, saying "the electorate has twice given their verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn-led party" at the 2017 and 2019 cabinet minister Peter Kyle went on the attack on Times Radio, accusing Corbyn of "posturing" and of not being "a serious politician". Mr Schneider argues the impact of the new party will not be limited by how many MPs it manages to claims more than 200,000 people have already signed up to get involved in less than 24 hours. There's no guarantee all of them will go on to join the party but it suggests some enthusiasm for the idea amongst sections of the public."We're going to be having a huge outside influence on the political debate in this country," Mr Schneider says."Of course the long-term goal is to win elections and enter office and be really in power. "But in order to have real sustainable power you need to have people coming with you and have your foundations in the society you want to be building up." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
