Army ROTC Programs at Dozens of Campuses Are Being Shut Down or Reorganized
In total, 291 students are expected to be affected, most of them having to potentially shift to programs at other nearby campuses. Of those, 16 contracted cadets will have their programs totally deactivated and be left with few alternatives, though in some cases the service is aiming not to disrupt their tenures. Those cadets will be given the choice to transfer to another ROTC program or exit their contracts without penalty. Seniors currently in the program won't see changes, as the cuts won't kick in until after graduation. Most first- and second-year students haven't yet signed binding service contracts.
The ROTC program is among the most public-facing elements of the Army. In September, Military.com reported that the service was eyeing a roughly $100 million cut to ROTC throughout the rest of the decade. The move comes as the service is aiming to nip and tuck where it can as part of a larger reorganization effort, which includes dismantling much of the Army Reserve's aviation elements and deactivating all but two Security Force Assistance Brigades.
Read Next: Constraints on Trump's War Powers Rejected by Senate After Iran Strikes
"This rebalance and optimization effort ensures we meet the Army's requirements for officer commissioning while being good stewards of resources," Brig. Gen. Maurice Barnett, commanding general of U.S. Army Cadet Command, said in a statement to Military.com. "We are working closely with our workforce, cadets and academic partners to ensure a smooth transition while preserving the quality of our ROTC programs."
ROTC's commissioning capacity is expected to shrink by about 500 slots, though the max capacity was nowhere close to being reached, with some campuses underperforming and no need from the force to recruit that many officers. The service has actually overrecruited officers in certain fields in recent years. After the shifts, ROTC will be able to produce roughly 5,500 officers annually, even as the service's demand has hovered closer to 5,000 in recent years.
Service officials familiar with the plans described it being easier, and more cost effective, to shut down a program delivering only 10 officers per year and, if needed, widening the spigot at bigger schools, like Ohio State University or the University of Florida, two of the top 20 ROTC schools, which account for 20% of all officers commissioned through the program.
The Army emphasized that first- and second-year cadets, who typically have not yet committed to military service through formal contracts, will have opportunities to continue their training at nearby partner institutions or walk away from the contracts without any financial obligations.
Here are the host ROTC programs being shut down:
California Polytechnic State University -- San Luis Obispo (Calif.)
University of Northern Iowa (Iowa)
Western Illinois University (Ill.)
Truman State University (Mo.)
Elizabeth City State University (N.C.)
Saint Augustine's University (N.C.)
Clarkson University (N.Y.)
John Carroll University (Ohio)
University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh (Wis.)
West Virginia State University (W.Va.)
Additionally, these schools that allow students at one campus to attend the ROTC program at another will lose their affiliation with the program:
University of California -- Merced (Calif.)
Buena Vista University (Iowa)
University of Dubuque (Iowa)
Idaho State University (Idaho)
University of Nebraska -- Kearney (Neb.)
Millersville University (Pa.)
Pennsylvania Western University -- Clarion (Pa.)
Texas A&M International University (Texas)
St. Norbert College (Wis.)
The programs at dozens of other schools are being redesignated and reorganized. The full list is here.
Read Next: Upcharging on Food, Selling Booze: The Army's Plan to Privatize Dining
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump on Fed Chair: Anybody Would Be Better Than Powell
CC-Transcript 00:00You tend to announce your pick for successor to Jay Powell earlier than then, say, or as early as, say, the summer or the fall? Well, I do something about who it's going to be. Yes. I don't know. Hey, give me a break. I do. She'd be a good candidate. Anybody would be Jay Powell. You know, he's closing is unfortunate because he keeps the rate way up. I think it's Trump derangement syndrome personally. But, you know, we have a very strong country with we're the strongest country. Look, our country right now is at a level that we haven't seen for 40, 50 years. What we're doing now is nobody's seen anything like it. I told you I was with in the Middle East. The king of Saudi Arabia said to me very strongly, he said, You know what? A year ago you had a dead country. Now you have the hottest country in the world.


Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mike Johnson readies House vote on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' amid warring GOP factions
The House of Representatives is expected to take up the Senate's modified version of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" this week. The Senate passed the bill after a marathon weekend session, which included Democrats forcing a read-through of the entire 940-page text. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The bill first passed the House in late May by just one vote – and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will have a margin of just three Republicans to advance it again. Both moderate and conservative House Republicans still had various concerns about the bill as of the weekend, but it's not immediately clear if it will be enough to force GOP leaders to pause their ambitious timeline of getting the bill to the president's desk by Fourth of July. "The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July. The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay," House GOP leaders said ina joint statement. "This bill is President Trump's agenda, and we are making it law. House Republicans are ready to finish the job and put the One Big Beautiful Bill on President Trump's desk in time for Independence Day." House GOP leadership held a brief call with lawmakers on Saturday to discuss their expectations on the timing of the bill, while also urging them to air concerns about the bill with their Senate counterparts directly – rather than on social media. Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said lawmakers would be asked to return with 48 hours' notice, noting that Tuesday or Wednesday looked more likely than a Monday callback, Fox News Digital was told. That was when the Senate was expected to begin considering the bill with a vote on whether to proceed with the debate set for 4 p.m. ET, however. The chamber began the vote at 7:31 p.m. ET and passed it just after 11 p.m. Since then, House leaders have signaled to lawmakers that votes could begin as early as 9 a.m. on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., and his team began taking temperatures in the House GOP conference remotely on Sunday, even as the Senate still considered the bill. "We want to get on this as soon as possible, so be prepared," Emmer told lawmakers, Fox News Digital was told. But a source familiar with whip team operations told Fox News Digital on Sunday that conservative fiscal hawks had concerns about the Senate's version of the bill, particularly after the parliamentarian said key provisions must be stripped out. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to fast-track a massive bill advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, the border, defense, energy and the national debt. Budget reconciliation allows the party in power to sideline opposition – in this case, Democrats – by lowering the Senate's threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51. But the legislation must adhere to certain guidelines, including only adding measures that deal with the federal budget or national debt. The parliamentarian is a non-partisan, unelected Senate staffer who helps guide the chamber through its complex procedures. The parliamentarian is chosen by the Senate majority leader, without term limits, and is typically selected from someone already working in the parliamentarian's office due to their deep knowledge of its mechanisms. Measures deemed non-germane to the final bill included a provision banning Medicaid funding from covering transgender medical services and a measure aimed at slashing funding to states that allow illegal immigrants to use Medicaid services. But the Senate made its own changes to the House bill even without the parliamentarian's input; the Senate added a $25 billion rural hospital fund to offset concerns from Senate Republicans about Medicaid cuts still in the bill. A provision was also added late Saturday morning that raised tax deductions for whale hunters, an apparent bid to court Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who had various concerns about the bill. The Senate bill would also increase the debt limit by $5 trillion, compared to the House bill's $4 trillion. The U.S. debt is currently over $36 trillion. House Freedom Caucus Policy Chair Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, wrote a lengthy post on X listing his issues with the bill. "The Senate BBB has a deficit problem. 1) CBO shows the Senate bill misses the House framework by $651 billion EXCLUDING interest. Even adjusted for dynamic growth revenues - interest in light of front-loaded cost vs. backloaded savings lifts cost to $1.3 Trillion," he began. Among his other issues were the debt limit increase and the added benefit aimed at Alaska. "There remain numerous substantive problems - from illegals on benefits to funding sex change operations, no REINS Act regulatory relied," he posted. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., said on "Fox Report" on Sunday, "If it does pass to Senate and come over with those significant changes, it changes the framework that we agreed upon in the House from a spending perspective." "When you do that, there are a lot of us that are going to have pause because we're not cutting as much spending as we wanted to cut previously because of decisions that the parliamentarian has made. So it's going be challenging," Steube said. Meanwhile, multiple House GOP moderates are threatening to vote "no" over Medicaid cuts – specifically, changes that would shift a greater cost burden onto states that expanded their Medicaid populations under Obamacare. A source close to Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., told Fox News Digital that she would vote against the bill if the Senate did not adhere to the House's Medicaid language on Saturday. Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., said in a public written statement, "I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers across [California's 22nd Congressional district]." "I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R.1 – otherwise, I will vote no," Valadao wrote. On the lawmaker-only call Saturday, both Johnson and Scalise urged Republicans to keep their negotiations and concerns about the bill private. "They're not going to be reading your social media, so putting it there doesn't help. You need to reach out to them directly, they're in the thick of it," Johnson said, Fox News Digital was told.


CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump's "big, beautiful bill" could leave estimated $1.6B hole in Minnesota budget, state officials say
The Senate narrowly passed President Trump's massive spending bill Tuesday, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The bill could leave an estimated $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion hole in the Minnesota state budget, according to the Office of Management and Budget. The House will need to approve the Senate's changes to the bill before it heads to Mr. Trump's desk for signature. Democratic U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar recently voiced opposition to the bill on the Senate floor. "The largest unfunded mandate is on the backs of kids and veterans and seniors and kids with disabilities," Klobuchar said. One in five Minnesotans rely on Medicaid, according to the Minnesota Department of Health. Fellow Democratic Sen. Tina Smith says the state would be hard hit. "Nursing homes are going to have a very, very hard time balancing the books. I suspect that there will be closures as a result of these Medicaid cuts," Smith said. "And then families that rely on SNAP food assistance are going to find it much, much more difficult to feed their families." The non-partisan Food Research and Action Center says more than 458,000 Minnesotans rely on the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits to put food on the table. The bill extends the Trump 2017 tax cuts, eliminates taxes on tips and overtime and cuts federal spending by $1 trillion over 10 years. And according to the nonpartisan U.S. Government Accountability Office, the bill will add $3.3 trillion to the federal deficit. Senate passage proved difficult with a marathon vote that lasted more than 24 hours. Some Republican holdouts were concerned with the bill's impact to the deficit and its cuts to Medicaid. The GOP has a 53-seat majority in the Senate, and the measure passed 51 to 50. Minnesota's four Republican House members voted for it, including Majority Whip Tom Emmer. "Our one big beautiful bill includes the largest reduction in mandatory spending in history and brings out-of-control spending programs to account," Emmer said in a statement. But not all Minnesota Republicans are loving it. In February, 14 GOP state legislators sent Minnesota's four GOP U.S. House members a letter saying, "Drastic reductions to Medicaid funding have the potential to impact the 1.4 million people we serve and place incredible pressure on our overall state budget." The proposed Medicaid cuts would disrupt the two-year budget Minnesota legislators just recently approved. If the cuts in Medicaid do exceed the estimated $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion as state Democratic leaders have projected, the Minnesota Legislature would have to go into special session and redo the entire state budget process. Note: The video above was published on June 30, 2025, before the bill passed in the Senate.