Why is Palestine Action being banned and what happens next?
Here the Guardian explains what this means and what happens next.
The instrument said that Cooper, the home secretary, was making the proscription order under the Terrorism Act 2000, and that the organisations named were 'concerned in terrorism'. It uses the plural, 'organisations', because two other groups are also named – Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and Russian Imperial Movement (RIM).
Cooper said MMC was a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation whose leaders and members had have claimed a number of violent attacks globally. She said RIM was a white supremacist, ethno-nationalist organisation that sought to create a new Russian imperial state.
With respect to Palestine Action, she said its 'attacks' included at a Thales factory in Glasgow in 2022, and last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol, adding: 'The attack on the Thales defence factory in Glasgow caused over £1m worth of damage to parts essential for submarines. Staff fled for safety as pyrotechnics and smoke bombs were thrown in evacuation areas.
'Such acts do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000.'
Palestine Action posted video it said was of staff walking out of the building in Thales because activists were on the roof, writing: 'Do they look like they're running for their safety? Escaping the flares and Palestine flags?'
MPs are due to debate and vote on the proscription order on Wednesday afternoon and – assuming MPs vote in favour – the Lords are provisionally due to do so from 5pm on Thursday.
Crucially, parliamentarians cannot choose to proscribe some of the organisations on the statutory instrument and not others – it is all or nothing – leading Palestine Action to accuse Cooper of grouping them within neo-Nazi groups to ensure the order is approved.
If it is, Cooper would sign the order, probably on Friday morning, and it would come into force on Saturday subject to a legal challenge (see below).
The home secretary ignored a letter sent by lawyers for Palestine Action on the day she announced the proposed ban, in which they argued the order was 'unlawful, dangerous and ill thought out'.
Interventions from third parties, including civil society organisations, lawyers and politicians, have also failed to sway ministers but Palestine Action has been granted an urgent hearing at the high court in London on Friday, which could prevent the order coming into effect.
The group is applying for interim relief, which Mr Justice Chamberlain said, at a hearing on Monday, would 'have the effect of suspending [the order's] operation'.
If the legal challenge is unsuccessful, then Palestine Action would be banned from Saturday, making membership of it – or inviting support for it – a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
However, the group would still be able to challenge the order and seek to quash it after came into effect. A high court hearing has been set for 21 July for them to apply for permission to do this.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chris Mason: Why Labour had little choice but to suspend Diane Abbott again
Political parties, like the rest of us, are forever confronting also like the rest of us, sometimes those choices are rather limited if maintaining consistency is seen to be is this that lies at the heart of the latest chapter in the long running saga of Diane Abbott and the Labour Party.A saga whose central character is pioneering and history making: Diane Abbott was the first black woman ever elected to the House of Commons and is now the Mother of the House, the most long standing female MP, having been first elected in roots of this latest row are traced back to April 2023, when Abbott wrote a 118 word letter to The Observer can read that letter here. Her precise words then and her precise words now are worth attention, but what really matters is what led to her suspension as a Labour MP then is the very thing that has led to it now – because, crucially, she has now said she doesn't regret those initial what did she say in 2023?She wrote: "Irish, Jewish and Traveller people undoubtedly experience prejudice. This is similar to racism. It is true that many types of white people with points of difference, such as redheads, can experience this prejudice. But they are not all their lives subject to racism."In other words, she appeared to equate antisemitism with the prejudice experienced by people with ginger the time she withdrew the remarks and apologised and was suspended – and so sat as an independent was reinstated in the nick of time to stand as a Labour candidate in last year's general in a BBC interview for Radio 4 recorded in May but broadcast this week, she was asked to reflect on the whole if she regretted the whole thing, crucially she said "no, not at all."She added: "Clearly there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism."This is because, she said, someone's skin colour is instantly, visibly noticeable, whereas being Jewish, for instance, is language has changed since that letter in 2023 - she now describes antisemitism as racism, rather than a she again condemned that lack of regret is what is central here, because she is saying she doesn't regret the very words that led to her first therefore if the Labour Party wanted to be consistent, it had little choice but to do what it did last time, and suspend her context is crucial here too: Labour was riven by rows about antisemitism during Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and the party was found responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act by the Equality and Human Rights Sir Keir Starmer became Labour leader, he promised to "tear out this poison by its roots."So - as a result of Labour's recent history - an unflinching attitude to dealing with anything regarded as antisemitic has always been central to Sir Keir's a statement reacting to her suspension, Abbott has said "it is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out. My comments in the interview were factually correct, as any fair minded person would accept."Again she finds herself an independent MP, again the party has to work out what to do, and again she has to work out what she might do next - as her old political friend Jeremy Corbyn, himself outside the Labour Party, works to set up a new party on the left.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie ex-bikie who was jailed for assault has major fanboy moment with Phil Mickelson on golf major debut
It has been a long road to redemption for Australian golfer Ryan Peake, who spent five years in prison before turning his life around and earning a place the 2025 Open Championship in the UK. In 2014, at just 21, Peake became involved with the Rebels outlaw motorcycle gang in Western Australia. That same year, he took part in a violent assault on a rival gang member that left the victim with a fractured skull. Peake was arrested weeks later and sentenced to five years in prison for assault causing grievous bodily harm. He served his time at Hakea Prison, where he began to reflect on his life and slowly reconnect with his old passion for golf - encouraged by former coach Ritchie Smith. After his release from prison in 2019, Ryan Peake committed himself to rebuilding his life through golf. It has been a major turnaround for Peake, who used to be in a motorcycle gang before landing in prison He trained quietly for years, supported by Smith, working as a greenskeeper to stay close to the game while refining his swing and mindset. In 2024, his comeback became real when he secured a spot at the New Zealand Open, marking a remarkable return to professional golf. Peake earned his place at the 2025 Open Championship by claiming victory in his second crack at the New Zealand Open this year, his first professional title, which granted him automatic entry via the Open Qualifying Series. His eligibility was further confirmed when he secured the necessary clearance and used his British passport, inherited through his father, to qualify for the UK field. As if lining up against the world's best was not enough, Peake then realised that he would be playing alongside golfing great Phil Mickelson. 'I don't think he needs to introduce himself; I was well aware of who he was,' Peake said after the five-time major winner walked up to introduce himself. 'But obviously I was nervous. I wouldn't say nervous because I was playing next to Phil. It's just, I guess, your first major and things like that. But I've just got to get better at that.' The occasion got the better of Peake this time, though, with the Aussie revealing he couldn't help but get a memento from the occasion. Mickelson's caddie was handing out golf balls to fans in the crowd, with Peake asking 'what about me?'. 'He had a laugh, thought I was being sarcastic, and he said, 'are you serious?', and I said, 'no, I'm deadly serious'. I said, 'can you sign a glove as well?'. 'He's your hero growing up. My own boy is out here this week and he loves him as well. I'm not going to ask him on the 1st tee, but I'll ask him after the round.' Despite earning the rare opportunity to play alongside golfing royalty, Peake said he resisted getting tips to improve his game - even as he sunk to a disappointing six-over par 77 in the first round. 'I would have known I was in a bad place if he'd come over and started offering me help,' Peake said. 'I know everyone is going to look at it and say you take the experience in and stuff like that, but obviously very disappointed with the round. Not what I want.' Overall it was a disappointing day for the Aussies, with leading hopes Cameron Smith and Adam Scott way down the field, tied for 45th place heading into today's second round.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Police to use facial recognition cameras at Notting Hill Carnival in new crackdown on violence
Facial recognition cameras will be used at this year's Notting Hill Carnival for the first time in an unprecedented crackdown on violence. Visitors to Europe's biggest street party will be scanned for wanted knife offenders, rapists, robbers and those suspected of serious violent crimes. Scotland Yard wants to prevent a repeat of the bloodshed of recent years. Festivities last year saw eight stabbings. One resulted in a murder and second man was beaten and kicked to death. Senior officers believe it will make 'Carnival' - behind only Rio de Janeiro's celebration in terms of size - safer, but the plan has proved controversial with organisers and has raised civil liberty concerns. Police will use mobile live facial recognition, or LFR, cameras around the perimeter of the three-mile parade route as part of a beefed-up security operation involving 7,000 officers every day over the Bank Holiday weekend from August 23-25. There will also be knife arches and prevention orders to keep known thugs away. It comes after an extra security budget of almost £1million was signed off last week following police warnings of a potential 'mass casualty event' caused by crushing. Rory Geoghegan, founder of the Public Safety Foundation, said: 'Using live facial recognition at events like Notting Hill Carnival is common sense. 'It helps police identify suspects wanted for serious crimes - people who should be in prison, not walking our streets or hiding in crowds. 'The public rightly expects the police to use every lawful tool to keep us safe.' About 2million people a year attend the three-day West London carnival which celebrates its 60th anniversary next year. But its reputation has been marred by violence. Last year Cher Maximen, 32, was fatally stabbed with a zombie knife in front of her three-year-old daughter, when a gang fight broke out next to her. And visiting chef Mussie Imnetu, 41, was beaten to death by a self-described 'monster' after a row outside a nearby restaurant. The killers in both cases have been jailed for life. Yesterday shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Live facial recognition now identifies wanted and dangerous people with no racial bias and with accuracy levels far in excess of manual identification. 'Last year eight people were stabbed and two people were tragically killed at the carnival. 'Using facial recognition will help protect people from brutal attacks like these. It is right that police use every tactic at their disposal to catch criminals and protect the public.' But a spokesman from the Notting Hill Carnival Trust said: 'There are concerns within Carnival's community that this technology is inaccurate and problematic. 'We will work with the Metropolitan Police to seek assurances about its use.' LFR cameras were tried out at the event in 2016 and 2017. But the pilot was abandoned when questions were raised about the technology, then in its infancy, after the system wrongly flagged 102 people as potential suspects. Yesterday, the Met's Lindsey Chiswick, the national lead on facial recognition, said: 'I can understand why there may be some concern. It was different technology back then. The accuracy rate was low.' Since then, the technology has become far more accurate, with Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley hailing LFR as the most significant investigative advancement since DNA testing. Graphic shows a breakdown of all the arrests police made at Notting Hill Carnival last year 'There is no bias in the system and its accuracy has been tested independently through the National Physical Laboratory,' Ms Chiswick said. 'We are using it at Notting Hill Carnival to mitigate the risk to public safety. 'A large number of people attend the carnival and it is very difficult to locate those that pose a public safety threat. 'A single officer would have to memorise 10,000 odd suspects to pluck them out of a busy crowd. 'This is a celebration we want the public to safely enjoy, this technology is an accurate tactic that helps us achieve that.' She stressed that the cameras will be used on the approaches to and from the carnival rather than in the streets where the parades take place, allowing officers to safely intercept suspects before they reach the crowds. Operational tests reveal that now just one in 33,000 scans result in a false alert. Images of pedestrians walking past a LFR van are fed into a computer using biometric software to measure 28 facial features. The data is then compared with a bespoke watchlist tailored to the carnival which will include around 11,000-15,000 suspects. If a match is detected, an alert is sent to officers on the street who review it and decide if they should make an arrest after conducting further checks such as court orders. If someone is not wanted by police, their biometrics are immediately deleted. The cameras will also be on the lookout for missing people, including teenagers at risk of criminal or sexual exploitation. Scotland Yard already deploys the tactic at crime hotspots, concerts and major sporting events. Earlier this month, the Met announced that LFR had led to more than 1,000 arrests in London since 2024, resulting in 773 charges or cautions. Rebecca Vincent, of civil liberties and privacy group Big Brother Watch, said: 'We know that LFR is less accurate in scanning minority faces, so using it to target attendees of this beloved cultural celebration is particularly sinister. 'This planned deployment is even more concerning given the continued lack of a legislative basis, leaving police to write their own rules with no accountability or oversight.' Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, in charge of carnival policing, said the 'priority is to keep people safe, including preventing serious violence, including knife crime and violence against women and girls'.
