logo
Competing property tax bills get their day on the floor

Competing property tax bills get their day on the floor

Yahoo27-02-2025
Lawmakers are looking to address property taxes this week. (Micah Drew/Daily Montanan)
Property tax discussions have dominated the halls of the Montana capitol this week, as Republican leaders pushed back against criticism from Gov. Greg Gianforte that legislators had yet to send him a property tax relief bill to sign.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are pushing proposals on the topic, and six property tax proposals in the two chambers moved forward on Wednesday.
House Democrats moved two tax bills on the floor on Wednesday and Republicans in the House also brought a proposal to the floor Wednesday. Republican leaders in the legislature, meanwhile, spent part of Tuesday refuting comments from Gianforte during a Monday call-in session on conservative talk radio.
'I think taxes are too high,' Gianforte said. 'I laid out my agenda during the State of the State. We have a proposal that would permanently reduce property taxes, I haven't seen that bill to my desk yet. I proposed a full percentage point cut in income taxes that we funded because we were fiscally responsible over the last four years. I haven't got that bill to my desk yet. In fact, as of last week, the only bills I've got from the legislature, one renamed a bridge and the other one bought lunch money for the legislature.'
He added: 'I just wish the legislature could focus on getting the work done for the people of Montana.'
Legislative Republicans quickly sent out a joint press release highlighting when the governor got his legislation to them. House Bill 231, sponsored by Rep. Llew Jones, R-Conrad was introduced on Jan. 16, while Senate Bill 323, sponsored by Sen. Josh Kassmier, R-Fort Benton, was introduced on Feb. 13.
'The governor understands the legislative process and should have submitted his proposals earlier if he wanted them enacted more quickly,' the joint Republican House and Senate release stated.
Jones said he understands the frustration and spoke to some of the dissension surrounding the property tax discussion, even among Republican leadership.
'Some legislators are busting their asses to try to move this and some are being a little obstructionist,' Jones told the Daily Montanan. 'I know it frustrated the speaker (Rep. Brandon Ler, R-Savage), because he has been trying to get this stuff to vote. And, you know, the (Senate) President, not so much. He's been trying to get it not to vote. It's not his vision. He doesn't like that.'
Meanwhile, House Democrats found support for their bills in the Republican-dominated session. House Bill 154, introduced by Rep. Jonathan Karlen, D-Missoula, and House Bill 155, from Rep. Mark Thane, D-Missoula, both cleared significant hurdles in the House on Wednesday. They are up for a third reading on Thursday afternoon and if approved again, will be on their way to the Senate.
If nothing is done, there's worry property tax rates could spike again because of a state law that reassesses property.
'We need to come home with some kind of property tax relief, and if we don't, we're not going to get elected again. They will come after all of us,' Sen. Barry Usher, R-Billings, said Wednesday on the Senate floor.
House Bill 231, known as the 'Homestead bill,' and Karlen's HB 154 are tied together through an amendment passed in the Appropriations Committee last week.
Jones' bill tries to shift some of the tax burden onto those who are not residents of the state, but own property in Montana.
'There's a whole group of people out there that just don't pay income tax in Montana,' Jones said in an interview Thursday morning. 'They're not breaking the law. They just don't live here more than seven months a year, but they benefit from all the dollars of the income tax.'
Karlen's bill is essentially a tax credit with stipulations that renters could receive money back, instead of those breaks going directly to landlords.
Jones gave a passionate defense of his bill on the floor, saying it would directly impact 230,000 Montana homeowners, 130,000 renters and 30,000 small businesses.
'I get that some folks might be angry with me and just vote against this bill because I'm the sponsor,' Jones said on the House floor. 'You know, I get that. I may look a little like Santa Claus without hair, but I'm not always the most cuddly of personalities. I don't always claim to be an elegant speaker. I have a face made for radio, but I do usually do pretty well with numbers. This is a difficult problem to make work.'
Doubly so, Jones said, because the governor has expressed no interest in a sales tax.
'The governor said he wouldn't sign the sales tax,' Jones said. 'So you're gonna have to try to build a property tax solution with the cards that you have in your hand.'
While the Gov. Gianforte favors HB 231, Jones said the bill was his idea, not the governor's and the representative said that until he pushed the Governor's Office to model it, they felt it wouldn't work either.
'We have to find a way, because we're still selling the land in Montana,' Jones said. 'We're just selling it to a whole lot of folks that don't pay income tax here.'
Jones' bill seeks to shift away some tax burden currently on full-time residents.
If HB 154 doesn't pass and HB 231 does, rates on properties that are twice the median residential value or less drop from 0.9% to 0.74%. That amendment was added on Feb. 20.
'The way I see that coordinating language is that it's some recognition from the Appropriations Committee that the governor's bill alone will not solve this problem,' Karlen told the Daily Montanan.
However, in the Senate, Republican leadership expressed concern the tax relief in HB 231 won't benefit people that actually need it. During a Tuesday media session, Senate President Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, said tying the rates to market value means some rural communities, especially in the eastern reaches of the state, drop the property tax rate for people who aren't especially concerned with it.
'Here we're seeing the property tax problems, Gallatin, Flathead, Missoula, those homes are all going to be in the higher tax rate,' Regier said. 'And a home in Circle, that isn't as high as the median, they're going to see way lower rates than the people that are complaining about property tax.'
HB 231 is among Gianforte's legislative priorities and also seeks to push taxation more on large businesses and less on smaller ones.
Jones pointed out in an interview that part of the intention is to make sure small businesses, like a cafe, are not taxed the same as a large refinery or other big industrial business.
Karlen's bill would establish a Housing Fairness Income Tax Credit, which is aimed at property owners and also includes relief for renters.
It passed a second reading in the House, 60-40.
It would help renters by giving them a tax break that theoretically would help with increasing rents. Bills helping renters have not had much luck this session, but Karlen hopes his will help.
In order to qualify for the credit, a taxpayer is required to live in the state for at least nine months during the tax year, occupy a qualified residence for at least seven of those months, and have a household income of less than $150,000.
The credit would also benefit those who are going through a life change, like a spouse dying. In that situation, the property tax stays the same but household income would decrease.
Karlen believes there needs to be a 'rebalance' on tax policy. His credit is determined based on property taxes bills or rent-equivalent property taxes paid and there are specific thresholds based on household income.
'House Democrats, we will work with anybody to pass property tax relief,' Karlen said in a Tuesday interview. 'We are doing everything possible, working with anybody that wants to provide a real middle-class tax cut. And I think that the fact that Mark Thane's bill had more votes than any other major property tax policy seems like there's definitely interest there.'
Thane wants to establish a graduated tax rate for residential properties based on market value.
HB 155 passed a second reading on Wednesday, 87-13.
The hope is to spread out taxation among different classes of taxpayers, of which there are 18. In 2022, residential property taxpayers made up 51.85% of the total, while commercial businesses made up another 15.2%. In 2023, residential properties made up almost 58% of property taxes collected in the state.
Under Thane's proposal, residential property taxes would contribute 52.56% of total property taxes and commercial businesses would make up 16.77% of the state's property tax pie.
Additionally, the burden put on agricultural business would be 3.83%, a small decrease from 2022.
'The premise of House Bill 155 is to reduce to essentially that proportional share,' Thane said in an interview.
He's confident in his bill, but also said he's a realist — if nothing else, he said he hopes his bill helps inform HB 231.
'My interest right now is being able to continue the conversation in the Senate,' Thane said. 'To get over to Senate tax so that they understand, number one, that there are other alternatives, and number two, that there can be some pressure applied to continue to refine 231.'
Reiger mentioned Thane's bill on Tuesday, saying some of the ideas in it have some 'merit.'
'The concept of moving the rates, I think, is something that could end up in the final package,' Reiger told assembled media.
Senate Bill 32 passed a second reading on Wednesday afternoon, a proposal from Sen. Jeremy Trebas, R-Great Falls.
SB 32 seeks cuts to property tax rates for many of the classifications that have not been directly addressed in other Republican bills dealing with property taxes. Metal mines, nonproductive mining claims, and utilities would all see their rates cut under the proposal.
'I think this is the most simple, elegant, transparent attempt at reforming property tax, and it's an option for us, and you know, we're getting close to transmittal without too many options available to us,' Trebas said on the Senate floor.
Regulatory bills have to transmit by this week, while bills that deal directly with revenue are subject to a later deadline.
Residential rental properties and commercial property tax rates would increase from 1.35% to 1.65%. Trebas said in a message that rate would impact, 'non owner-occupied homes, so long and short term rentals, second homes.'
Importantly, under his proposal, owner-occupied properties would be taxed at 1.25%.
'If you want to automatically decrease ratepayers' tax or their energy bills, this is a great way to do it,' Sen. Daniel Zolnikov, R-Billings said during the Senate floor session.
Wednesday, the Senate advanced a couple of other proposals related to property taxes, one to credit residential payers from taxes paid by tourists, and another to express levies in dollars instead of mills. The Senate also 'blasted' two property tax reform bills onto the floor, a procedure to move a bill tabled in committee to the full body.
Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell, D-Helena, is also continuing to push Senate Bill 189, a bill which would reduce residential property taxes from 1.35% to 0.76%. It would also remove a higher tax rate on high-value homes.
Dunwell said she's been working with Rep. Ed Byrne, R-Bigfork, though Byrne's proposal was tabled in committee early this month.
There's hope, Dunwell said, that the 0.76% rate for residential properties might end up in HB 231.
'Unless we drop the tax rate,' Dunwell said. 'All the other stuff is lipstick on a pig.'
Keila Szpaller contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘
‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘

'Pod Save America' host Dan Pfeiffer railed against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's accusations that the Obama administration led a 'treasonous coup' over the 2016 election. 'I don't think we should call this a scandal,' said Pfeiffer, a former adviser to President Obama, in a Friday episode of the podcast. 'Like I don't know what else to call it, a crock of s—' 'They can't even explain the allegation. It makes no sense,' he continued. 'This is the most easily debunked thing in the world.' Last week, Gabbard released a report claiming that the Obama administration manipulated intelligence to create a false narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Gabbard then doubled down on the accusation and unsealed a formerly-classified House Intelligence Committee report on Wednesday that cast doubts on the European country's interest in the 2016 election and his desire to aid President Trump. She called the Obama administration's reported actions 'the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history.' Several intelligence reviews have concluded that Russia sought to influence the contest and that President Vladimir Putin favored Trump in the election. Gabbard, at a White House press briefing on Wednesday, claimed that the evidence pointed to Obama as the main instigator of the efforts and said she was looking into possible criminal implications. President Trump backed Gabbard, calling the intelligence assessment 'irrefutable proof that Obama was seditious.' 'I guess the crime is the creating a false narrative,' co-host Jon Favreau, former Obama speechwriter, said on the Friday episode. 'I didn't think a false narrative could be a coup.' The podcast hosts join fellow Democrats in criticizing Gabbard, particularly as fervor grows surrounding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, which Democrats — and even some Republicans — have called to be released. 'It seems as though the Trump administration is willing to declassify anything and everything except the Epstein files,' said Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, in a statement. Favreau, on Friday's episode, pondered whether the the administration can 'will this scandal in to existence by repeating 'treasonous coup' over and over again.' .

House ethics panel tells Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to pay more for Met Gala attendance
House ethics panel tells Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to pay more for Met Gala attendance

Boston Globe

time12 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

House ethics panel tells Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to pay more for Met Gala attendance

Advertisement As a guest of Vogue, Ocasio-Cortez and her partner received tickets to the gala valued at $35,000, as well as customized clothing, hair and makeup styling and a hotel room to prepare for the high-society event. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The congresswoman worked with an attorney to comply with House ethics rules and paid for most of the goods and services with personal funds, but the ethics panel found 'the payments were significantly delayed and some payments fell short of fair market value.' In a statement, Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff, Mike Casca, said: 'The Congresswoman appreciates the Committee finding that she made efforts to ensure her compliance with House Rules and sought to act consistently with her ethical requirements as a Member of the House. She accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she's done at each step in this process.' Advertisement Representative Mike Kelly Representative Mike Kelly speaks during a hearing on the Secret Service's security failures regarding the assassination attempts on Donald Trump, Dec. 5, 2024, in Washington. Rod Lamkey/Associated Press The House Ethics Committee issued a formal reproval Friday of Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., following a yearslong investigation into an insider-trading allegation over his wife's purchase of stock in a steel company in his Butler-area congressional district. The panel also said Kelly and his wife, Victoria Kelly, should divest of any stock in the company, Cleveland-Cliffs, before the congressman takes any further official actions related to it. While the committee said it 'did not find evidence' that Kelly 'knowingly or intentionally caused his spouse to trade based on insider information,' its report also said it 'did not receive full cooperation from Mrs. Kelly and was therefore unable to determine whether her stock purchase was improper.' However, the report said, 'Representative Kelly's failure to acknowledge the seriousness of the alleged misconduct' and of the investigation itself was a violation of the code of official conduct. The committee did 'not find a clear violation' of conflict of interest. The congressman said in a statement Friday, 'My family and I look forward to putting this distraction behind us.' Kelly noted the investigation has 'unnecessarily' lasted for nearly five years, and in the time since the Cleveland Cliffs Butler Works plant faced an uncertain future. 'Throughout this process, I have fought for the 1,400 workers at the plant, I've spoken with these workers, and they appreciate the hard work we have done to fight for those jobs and for Butler,' Kelly said. The investigation was launched after a July 2021 referral regarding allegations the congressman's wife may have purchased stock based on confidential or nonpublic information he had learned during official duties. Advertisement The Ethics Committee staff reviewed more than 25,000 pages of documents, the report said, and interviewed people including the congressman. It found Kelly had advocated for so-called Section 232 tariffs for the product the plant produced even after Mrs. Kelly held stock in Cleveland-Cliffs. 'He took several actions to specifically benefit Cleveland-Cliffs during the time his wife had a direct financial interest in the company,' it said. Representative Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Representative Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, D-Fla., speaks at an event, July 7, 2022, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. Wilfredo Lee/Associated Press The House Ethics Committee announced Friday it had unanimously voted to reauthorize an investigative subcommittee to examine allegations involving Florida Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick. In May, the Office of Congressional Ethics referred several allegations to the House Ethics committee, including claims Cherfilus-McCormick, a Democrat, accepted campaign contributions tied to official actions and requested community project funding for a for-profit entity. The south Florida congresswoman has previously faced scrutiny over her campaign activities and the use of her congressional office. And earlier this year, a Florida state agency sued a company owned by her family, alleging it overcharged the state by nearly $5.8 million for pandemic-related work and has refused to return the funds. In a statement, Cherfilus-McCormick underscored that the ethics panel had not reached any final decision and that the further review does not mean she made any violations. 'I fully respect the process and remain committed to cooperating with the Committee as it works to bring this inquiry to a close,' she said. Representative Henry Cuellar Representative Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo, speaks during a campaign event, May 4, 2022, in San Antonio. Eric Gay/Associated Press The House Ethics Committee also reauthorized its investigation into Rep. Henry Cuellar over whether he engaged in multiple illegal abuses of his office. The committee launched its investigation into the Texas Democrat last year after the Justice Department indicted Cuellar on numerous federal charges, including bribery, conspiracy and money laundering. Advertisement The committee said in its reauthorization that lawmakers are 'aware of the risks associated with dual investigations' and cautioned that 'the mere fact of an investigation into these allegations does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred.' Cuellar's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti and Matt Brown contributed.

After Lara Trump opts out, president endorses RNC Chair Whatley for NC Senate race
After Lara Trump opts out, president endorses RNC Chair Whatley for NC Senate race

USA Today

time12 minutes ago

  • USA Today

After Lara Trump opts out, president endorses RNC Chair Whatley for NC Senate race

North Carolina is a pivotal battleground state and the Senate race is one of the premier contests of the upcoming midterm elections. There won't be a Trump on the ballot in North Carolina's Senate race, but the president is still putting his imprint on the marquee 2026 matchup. Lara Trump, President Donald Trump's daughter-in-law and his first choice for the U.S. Senate seat in the state where she was born, announced July 24 she won't be running. So the president went to his second choice, endorsing Republican National Committee chair and former North Carolina GOP Chair Michael Whatley in a July 24 social media post. Whatley was Trump's handpicked candidate to lead the RNC during the 2024 election cycle, helping him win the popular vote and secure victories in every swing state, including North Carolina. Whatley co-chaired the RNC with Lara Trump, who resigned after the election. Lara Trump is married to the president's second child, Eric Trump. More: Where did Trump's children go to college? See which schools they attended North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis opted not to seek re-election in 2026 after he announced his opposition to Trump's signature tax legislation, criticizing the bill's cuts to Medicaid. Whatley would give Trump a staunch supporter in the Senate if he wins, with the president declaring, "I need him in Washington." Whatley hasn't announced his plans, but is expected to run for the seat, according to media reports. Trump also endorsed a replacement for Whatley to chair the RNC, Florida state senator and former Florida GOP chair Joe Gruters. More: Melania Trump may get name on the Kennedy opera house. What has she done as first lady? Gruters is a longtime Trump supporter who co-chaired the president's 2016 campaign in Florida with current White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. "I'm looking forward to advancing President Trump's America First agenda as the next chair of the RNC," Gruters said in a statement. More: How Trump and 'terrific guy' Jeffrey Epstein's party boy friendship ended badly North Carolina is a pivotal battleground state and the Senate race is one of the premier contests of the upcoming midterm elections, which will decide if Republicans maintain control of Congress and the ability to enact Trump's agenda. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate. Democrats are expected to closely contest the North Carolina race. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper is considered a top potential Democratic candidate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store