logo
The Indoor Lab Expands Executive Team, Welcomes Greg Moya as Chief Operating Officer

The Indoor Lab Expands Executive Team, Welcomes Greg Moya as Chief Operating Officer

Business Wire06-05-2025
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Indoor Lab, the world's leading agnostic LiDAR perception software company, today announced the expansion of its leadership team with the appointment of Greg Moya, former Chief Technology Officer of Computer Vision at Dell Technologies, as its new Chief Operating Officer (COO).
Greg Moya brings decades of experience in enterprise-grade computer vision, edge computing, and AI-driven operational systems. At Dell, he led the strategy and development of cutting-edge computer vision platforms, helping to deploy intelligent infrastructure across a global customer base. His expertise will now help drive The Indoor Lab's aggressive growth strategy as it scales its platform across cities, airports, and other critical infrastructures.
'Greg's visionary leadership and deep technical expertise in scalable perception platforms make him the perfect addition to our team,' said Patrick Blattner, CEO and Founder of The Indoor Lab. 'As we prepare for a major expansion phase, his operational insight will be key to accelerating our mission of creating central nervous systems for the world's most vital spaces.'
The Indoor Lab is pioneering the use of agnostic LiDAR perception software to enable real-time awareness and automation. By acting as the 'central nervous system' for airports, cities, and other high-traffic environments, the company is redefining how organizations approach safety, efficiency, and intelligent infrastructure.
'I'm thrilled to join The Indoor Lab at such a pivotal time,' said Greg Moya, new COO. 'The opportunity to help shape the future of real-time perception and play a role in revolutionizing public infrastructure is truly exciting.'
This leadership expansion comes at a moment when demand for accurate, privacy-safe, and scalable perception systems is surging. The Indoor Lab's patented solutions are already in use at major international airports and urban environments, with plans to expand across new industries and geographies in 2025 and beyond.
About The Indoor Lab
The Indoor Lab is the leading LiDAR perception software company developing real-time "central nervous systems" for cities, airports, and critical infrastructure to enhance safety, efficiency, and operational awareness. Our flagship enterprise platform, OVERWATCH, is recognized as the gold standard across aviation, urban environments, government agencies, and entertainment venues. With a fully agnostic approach to lidar sensor integration and a powerful analytics AI engine, OVERWATCH delivers unparalleled visibility, automation, and decision intelligence for physical spaces.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teradyne, Inc. (TER): A Bull Case Theory
Teradyne, Inc. (TER): A Bull Case Theory

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Teradyne, Inc. (TER): A Bull Case Theory

We came across a bullish thesis on Teradyne, Inc. on Hunterbrook's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on TER. Teradyne, Inc.'s share was trading at $107.43 as of July 31st. TER's trailing and forward P/E were 37.31 and 32.15, respectively according to Yahoo Finance. Logistics robots filling packages in a warehouse, preparing for delivery. Hunterbrook Media, in collaboration with Citrini Research, reveals that Teradyne (TER) may be the hidden supplier behind Amazon's highly publicized new warehouse robot, Vulcan. Amazon claims Vulcan marks a major leap in automation, featuring a robotic arm with a 'sense of touch' capable of picking and stowing items at human-like speed. However, buried beneath the headlines is the fact that Vulcan's robotic limbs are actually built by Universal Robots, a Danish company acquired by Teradyne in 2015. Visual evidence from Amazon's own promotional materials clearly shows the Universal Robots logo and Robotiq grippers — accessories tailored specifically for Universal Robots' arms. As Amazon moves to automate 80% of its 14 billion hand-stowed items annually, this could translate to a ~$400 million opportunity for Teradyne's robotics division, which currently accounts for just 10–15% of company revenues. The implications extend beyond Amazon, as the Vulcan's capabilities showcase the progress made by combining AI and robotics. Innovations like vision-language-action models and Nvidia's Isaac Sim — integrated directly into Teradyne's robots — are enabling robots to reason spatially and act with precision in complex environments. Nvidia claims these integrations are 50–80x faster than legacy systems, potentially setting a new standard in industrial automation. Despite slumping shares tied to a cyclical downturn in Teradyne's core semiconductor testing business, this Amazon collaboration signals a pivotal moment. With no recent insider stock sales for the first time since 2018, and earnings around the corner, Teradyne may be on the brink of a robotics-driven revaluation. Previously we covered a bullish thesis on Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) by The Antifragile Investor in May 2025, which highlighted its role in chipmaking, strong service margins, and high switching costs. The company's stock price has appreciated approximately 14.55% since our coverage. This is because the thesis played out as expected. Hunterbrook shares a similar view in its thesis on Teradyne (TER) but emphasizes robotics-led upside. Teradyne, Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 49 hedge fund portfolios held TER at the end of the first quarter which was 61 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of TER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot
Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot

Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the On August 1, Oppenheimer analyst Jason Helfstein lowered the price target on the stock to $245.00 (from $250.00) while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The rating affirmation comes amid frustrated investors over a lack of positive second half 2025 AWS commentary. This is because capacity issues are anticipated to persist until at least year-end. Nevertheless, CEO Jassy has reiterated that artificial intelligence is the 'the biggest technology transformation for a lifetime.' This is already evident considering AWS AI revenue is continuing to grow triple-digits year-over-year and its usage is still early within AWS. The firm doesn't see any consumer weakness despite tariff impacts remaining. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is an American technology company offering e-commerce, cloud computing, and other services, including digital streaming and artificial intelligence solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?
Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?

BY We've spent decades building frameworks to help people lead teams: courses, certifications, coaching, culture decks. All aimed at shaping better managers of humans. But that's no longer enough. Because for many workers, their first report won't be a person. It'll be an agent. In June BNY Mellon onboarded 1,000 digital workers while JPMorgan Chase is building AI teams at scale. This isn't theoretical. The new direct reports are already clocked in and they don't need coffee, feedback, or PTO. The problem? Most organizations are still running on legacy management models built for human hierarchies and not set up to manage machines. Leading humans versus governing agents When you manage people, you guide behavior. You motivate, delegate, coach, and course correct. It's a loop built on trust and conversation. When you manage an AI, none of that applies. You don't coach a model. You govern it. You define inputs, monitor outputs, escalate issues, and answer for the consequences. And you do that in real time. In AI-led teams, leadership is less about motivation and more about judgment. The ability to assess, adjust, and act across decision chains is what separates performance from liability. It's knowing what good looks like. It's catching the drift, asking the right question before the system generates the wrong answer, and being accountable for outcomes, even when you didn't directly produce them. The HR model is out of sync HR isn't ready for this shift. Most performance frameworks still assume linear paths, human reports, and long-term role tenure. But digital agents break that logic. They don't climb ladders. They execute tasks. They can outperform junior staff one day and be outpaced by a new model the next. You don't manage their growth. You manage the conditions in which they operate. That shift puts pressure on organizational design itself. Hierarchies built for human oversight don't hold when decision loops involve systems acting faster than approvals can be processed. That means rethinking how we define productivity, collaboration, and leadership. It means building new metrics for how human employees interact with agents, not just what they produce on their own. Are they designing good prompts? Are they escalating ethical concerns? Are they reviewing outputs critically or rubber-stamping them? These are the new leadership signals. Most performance reviews aren't built to detect them. Prompting is a leadership act Prompting isn't a technical skill; it's a management one. The way you frame a prompt shapes what an agent does. Vague prompts lead to vague results. Biased prompts produce biased outcomes. And poor prompting isn't just inefficient. It can become a legal or reputational risk. Yet most companies treat prompting like its keyboard wizardry. Something for the engineers or the 'AI power users.' That's a mistake. Everyone managing agents, from interns to executives, needs to learn how to design clear, intentional instructions. Because prompts are decisions in disguise, shaped by where they sit in the organizational context and why they're being made. The ethics chain is breaking In traditional teams, ethics and escalation follow a chain of command. Something goes wrong, someone flags it, and a manager gets involved. But with agents acting independently and often invisibly, the chain breaks. You can't escalate what you don't notice. And too often, companies haven't defined what ethical escalation looks like when the actor is synthetic. Who's accountable when an AI produces a discriminatory recommendation? Or leaks sensitive information? Or makes a decision a human wouldn't? If your answer is 'the tech team,' you're not ready. Governance can't sit in the back office. It needs to be built into team workflows. The best companies are training their people to pause, question and report, not just accept what the system spits out. Chain of thought and chain of reasoning aren't just cognitive tricks. They're how human teams will spot drift, bias, and breakpoints in the AI value chain. And that skillset is only going to grow in importance. The bottom line AI won't replace all managers, but it will redefine what management means. Leading agents demands flexing a different muscle and most organizations haven't trained for it. This isn't about replacing soft skills with hard skills, but rather it's replacing passive management with active stewardship: less people-pleasing and more decision accountability, fewer status meetings and more escalation pathways. Managing machines still means leading people. But the people you lead need new tools, new rules, and a different playbook. The companies that get this right won't be the ones with the flashiest tech. They'll be the ones that know how to change the game by managing what they've built. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Brudenell (DCB) is the executive director of Decidr, Australia's only publicly listed AI company. With 25+ years of experience working across AI infrastructure, model development, and business transformation, David has held senior leadership positions in public, large private and startup companies from Sydney to San Francisco, including Appen (ASX:APX), Pureprofile (ASX:PPL), Eclipx (ASX:FPR), Flare (purchased by MYOB in 2023) and more. More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store