Changes at Trump's Justice Department could shift which local police agencies get federal grants
In a fact sheet for the Community Policing Development microgrant program, the Trump administration eliminated language that encouraged police agencies to seek federal money for initiatives to help "underserved populations," build trust in police, boost diversity in police departments and support community violence intervention.
Instead, the administration lists "immigration and border security," "violent crime prevention" and "uplifting the image of the law enforcement profession" as programs that are priorities for the highly sought-after grants, which are administered by the Justice Department's Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) division.
The instructions to local police departments for funding in 2025 mark a noticeable shift from the guidance issued by the Justice Department during the Biden administration a year earlier.
The 2024 guidance prioritized efforts at "building trust and legitimacy with the community" and "community violence intervention" initiatives, which include efforts to combat racism, trauma, poverty and other triggers to violence.
The Trump administration has shifted the grant instructions for 2025 to invite police to make a compelling argument that the money will help stiffen border security, reduce violent crime, improve police departments' public image, support "opioids and drug market interruption" and other priorities.
Both the 2024 and 2025 instructions have an "Open Topic Area" for grant applications that don't fit into any of the listed categories.
Portions of the fact sheets for the Community Policing Development microgrant program in 2024 and 2025.
Justice Department
The change of language raises the prospect of a dramatic shift in which police agencies are granted money and what programs are approved for federal help.
The Justice Department's COPS community policing development grants program has awarded more than $67 million to dozens of police agencies since 2023, including for some cities as large as New York, Boston and Los Angeles, and those as small as Bluefield, W.Va., and Bellevue, Neb., according to a review by CBS News.
The shift could imperil money from some projects that have been highly touted in small and large U.S. cities.
"These are some significant changes," said Chiraag Baines, a former Justice Department attorney and Biden administration aide. "There's a broader impact to this than just grant money. It's a statement about priorities and it could encourage police to give less priority to certain programs and initiatives if they think the Administration is going to be hostile to them."
Baines said the newly-listed priorities for projects combatting violent crime and opioid abuse are important. But he added the new language encouraging police to apply for money for projects that "uplift the image of law enforcement" is a change "that really confuses the issue. Police should be working to build trust and cooperation."
Communities have proudly announced their grant awards for "community violence interventions" during the Biden administration.
Cleveland Heights, Ohio, touted a program that got a 2023 grant as a successful initiative to reach at-risk youths. The city's announcement of the grant said the $175,000 award would be used for "foot patrols in violence-impacted areas and forming a new outreach and mentorship program for Cleveland Heights."
St. Petersburg, Fla., police are among the dozens of departments and cities to receive grants for initiatives to build "trust and legitimacy with the community" since 2021, including an approximately $174,000 grant in 2022.
The agency told CBS News it used the grant to "support 20 non-profit youth sports leagues." The police department also "collaborated with the Tampa Bay Rays Baseball team to offer softball programs for at-risk girls, increasing access and participation."
St. Petersburg won another $175,000 COPS grant, for police to help "underserved populations" in 2023. The department told CBS News it used the money for "arts and educational mentorship" for youth.
The changes mark a paradigm shift, and have inflamed criticism from congressional Democrats. Rep. Glenn Ivey, a Democrat who was once a state prosecutor in Maryland, told CBS News, "It is really a marked change in priorities from the last administration. Local communities count on these funds to augment their community policing efforts. Safer communities start with trust and security not fear and distrust. COPS grants should build up the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve, not tear them apart."
A former Justice Department official who served in prior administrations told CBS News the shifting of grant criteria is common when the department changes leadership. But the official said the shift away from community violence intervention programs is a "recipe for depriving law enforcement of the leads and witnesses that can solve cases and prevent crime. Community police cuts crime because people trust the police enough to work with them."
Justice Department officials declined to answer specific questions about the changes in grant application language.
A spokeswoman told CBS News in a written statement, "Under the direction of Attorney General Bondi, the COPS office is committed to highlighting the important work that our law enforcement partners do and to supporting law enforcement through hiring and grant assistance."
A review of prior COPS grants announcements shows a shift of language after then-President Joe Biden took office. The language in the 2022 COPS hiring grant fact sheet for police departments eliminated references from the first Trump administration that specified money was available for initiatives that focused on homeland security and school-based policing, and added language prioritizing "diversity training" projects.
Even in a distinctively polarized political climate, federal COPS grants remain overwhelmingly popular and highly pursued by local police agencies. Grant awards are regularly touted by members of congress from both parties and publicly announced by local officials as victories for the community.
A bipartisan group of federal legislators has introduced a bill to beef up funding for overall COPS grants. Rep. Pat Ryan, a New York Democrat whose district includes smaller communities in the Hudson Valley, co-sponsored the bill and said, "Far too often, small and midsized police departments like ours lack the resources they need."
Rep. Zach Nunn, an Iowa Republican who co-sponsored the measure, wrote, "Every Iowa town deserves strong public safety, regardless of size or geography, and I'm proud to help lead this bipartisan effort to boost hiring and resources for law enforcement in our small and rural communities." Nunn's announcement said the proposal would "reauthorize the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program with double the amount of federal funding."
A spokeswoman for the Alexandria, Va., police department, which received a $175,000 grant last year to help serve "underserved populations," told CBS News, "The Department of Justice COPS Office plays a vital role in supporting law enforcement agencies across the country. Their funding and technical assistance have been instrumental in helping departments build long-standing relationships between police and the communities they serve."
Some city officials and police departments declined to comment on their federal COPS grant awards, including Dearborn, Mich., which received an $88,816 grant for "building trust" in police in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security Retirees Just Got Good News About President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
President Trump said he would eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, but the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) stops short of fulfilling that promise. The Senate version of the OBBB would help 33.9 million seniors, with an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per person, according to the White House. The White House says 88% of seniors on Social Security would pay no taxes on benefits under the Senate bill, an increase from 64% under current law. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › President Trump on several occasions during his recent campaign vowed to end taxes on Social Security benefits. Legislation currently working its way through Congress (i.e., the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act) is built around his policy priorities, but it stops short of fulfilling that specific promise. Nevertheless, there is good news for retirees on Social Security. The version of the One, Big, Beautiful Bill (OBBB) that recently passed the Senate includes provisions that would increase after-tax income for millions of seniors. Read on to learn more. The OBBB passed the House of Representatives by a single vote on May 22, and an amended version slipped through the Senate by an equally narrow margin on July 1. The bill now returns the House, where lawmakers can either approve it or make changes that would require another Senate vote. Importantly, while budget reconciliation bills are not permitted to change Social Security, both versions of the OBBB include deductions that would help millions of seniors on Social Security. The recently passed Senate bill includes the following: Single seniors (aged 65 and older) can deduct $6,000 from taxable income, and married seniors filing jointly can deduct $12,000 as a couple. The full $6,000 per-person deduction is available to single filers with income up to $75,000 and joint filers with income up to $150,000. Beyond those levels, deductions are phased out. Importantly, the new senior deductions would be additive with other tax breaks, including the standard deduction and existing senior deductions, as detailed below: Under current law, the standard deduction is $15,000 for single filers and $30,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill raises the standard deduction to $15,750 for single filers and $31,500 for joint filers. Under current law, seniors get an additional standard deduction of $2,000 for single filers and $3,200 for joint filers. The Senate bill leaves those existing deductions in place. Here's the bottom line: The Senate bill would bring the total deductions available to seniors to $23,750 for single filers and $46,700 for married couples filing jointly. Those tax breaks are more expansive than the ones approved in the House bill earlier this year, which capped the new senior deduction at $4,000 per person. The One Big Beautiful Bill does not eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, but it does include tax breaks for seniors with modest incomes. The White House estimates the new $6,000 deduction will provide some measure of financial relief to 33.9 million seniors, with an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per person. Importantly, legislation that entirely eliminated Social Security taxes would have resulted in twice as much savings for seniors, according to The Wall Street Journal. However, 88% of seniors on Social Security will pay no taxes on benefits under the Senate bill, up from 64% under current law, according to the White House. Put differently, 14.2 million seniors that currently owe taxes on Social Security would be exempted from those taxes if the bill becomes law. All things considered, the Senate bill is a win for seniors on Social Security. It does not completely eliminate taxes on retirement benefits, but doing so would actually hurt the Social Security Trust Fund and potentially expedite benefit cuts by two years. Instead, the Senate bill provides financial relief for millions of seniors, but it targets individuals with modest incomes rather than doling out across-the-board tax breaks. That's good news. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Social Security Retirees Just Got Good News About President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The House nears final vote on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as opponents flip
The House of Representatives is barreling toward a final vote on President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," with Republicans increasingly likely to send a massive piece of legislation that will be felt across the economy for years to come to the president's desk. Approval is far assured but White House and Republican leaders inched closer to victory Thursday morning after a pressure campaign and yet another all-night session on Capitol Hill appeared to satisfy Republican holdouts concerned about things like the multi-trillion dollar price tag and health care cuts. House Speaker Mike Johnson predicted to reporters that a final vote would come at around 8 am ET but the timing could be flexible as legislators raced to give the president a signature political victory by approving the bill before his self-imposed July 4 deadline. "We have the votes," Johnson added as he pushed through final negotiations at about 3 am ET. Johnson then secured a procedural victory as the House voted 219-213 at about 3:30 am to begin formal debate on the measure with only one Republican — Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania — voting no. Read more: Taxes, energy, and healthcare: 3 ways Senate's Trump megabill impacts the business world What appears to have moved many of these recalcitrant lawmakers into the yes column was not any changes to the bill itself — this morning's vote is set to include zero changes to the 870-page bill that passed the Senate earlier this week — but with promises of things like executive actions to address their concerns. As for Trump, the final vote couldn't come soon enough with the president posting at about midnight "What are the Republicans waiting for???" The early morning back and forth was just the latest twist in days of negotiations over a reconciliation package set to reshape wide swathes of the US economy — especially in areas of taxes, energy, and healthcare. The package also include a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase and is projected to unleash a wave of new borrowing that will lead the US national debt to surpass $40 trillion in the coming years. Economists have likewise noted the final price tag, which could lead to $4 trillion in new debt, and critiqued an accounting gimmick Republicans employed to hide much of that red ink. It's a bill also set to be felt keenly in American pocketbooks with provisions that include new credits like no taxes on some tips, cuts to student loans and the Pell Grant program, an increase in state tax deductions, and even so-called MAGA accounts for young children. The process proved exceptionally contentious in recent days, largely over the healthcare provisions that are set to extract hundreds of billions in government savings but cause millions to lose their coverage. Clean energy was another key last minute flashpoint with Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk perhaps the loudest voice in opposition there. That portion of the bill saw provisions being added and subtracted in rapid succession during the Senate debate (which sent solar stocks gyrating). The final product didn't include at least one of the harshest ideas but is nevertheless set to have the US government move away from any significant role in renewable energy in the years ahead. A first step there will be felt quickly with a plan to eliminate electric vehicle credits on September 30 of this year. Democrats for their part are promising to make the bill a political albatross for Republicans and talk nonstop about the packages between now and next year's midterm election. In particular focus are the healthcare provisions that — according to an accounting from the Congressional Budget Office that came in over the weekend — could cause 11.8 million additional Americans to become uninsured by 2034. The combination of provisions that led to deep opposition from Democrats but also harsh words from Republicans even hours before the final votes. In just one example, GOP Rep. Keith Self of Texas posted Wednesday night that the bill was "morally and fiscally bankrupt" before voting early Thursday morning to proceed to a final vote. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's who stands to gain from the ‘big, beautiful bill.' And who may struggle
President Donald Trump has promised that the 'big, beautiful bill' passed by the Senate and being considered by the House of Representatives will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in American history. Of course, the ultimate beauty of this sweeping legislation is very much in the eye of the beholder. The bill could end up boosting some workers and industries, while others may be left worse off. Corporate America Big business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable, applauded the Senate's passage of the bill on Tuesday. Corporations are betting they will benefit from the legislation making permanent the tax breaks in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Manufacturers Manufacturers are especially happy that the bill would make significant changes to how the US tax code treats the construction of new manufacturing facilities. If the bill passes, businesses would be allowed to fully and immediately deduct the cost of building new manufacturing facilities. This temporary provision is retroactive to January 19, 2025 and continues for construction that begins before January 1, 2029. And in a bid to incentivize more chipmaking in America, the legislation would enhance tax credits for semiconductor firms building manufacturing facilities in the United States. Small businesses and partnerships The National Federation of Independent Business, the leading small business lobbying group, praised the legislation for making permanent a special deduction for the owners of certain pass-through entities who pay businesses taxes on their individual tax returns. That deduction, which applies to small businesses and partnerships formed by lawyers, doctors and investors, would get increased in the House version of the bill from 20% to 23%. The Senate bill kept it at 20%. High-income Americans The net income for the top 20% of earners would increase by nearly $13,000 per year, after taxes and transfers, according to an analysis of a near-final version of the Senate bill by Penn Wharton Budget Model. That amounts to a 3% average increase in income for those households. For the top 0.1% of earners, the average annual income gain would amount to more than $290,000, according to Penn Wharton. Americans living in high-tax states should also benefit from the Senate version of the legislation because it temporarily increases limits on deductions for state and local taxes for householders making up to $500,000 annually to $40,000 per year for five years. However, millionaires who lose their jobs will not be able to collect unemployment benefits, according to a recent provision added to the Senate bill. Workers who receive tips and overtime Certain workers will receive an extra tax break through 2028. Employees who work in jobs that traditionally receive tips could deduct up to $25,000 in tip income from their federal income taxes, while workers who receive overtime could deduct up to $12,500 of that extra pay. However, highly compensated individuals, who make more than $160,000 in 2025, would not qualify. Low-income Americans Many people at the lowest end of the income ladder would be worse off because the package would enact historic cuts to the nation's safety net program, particularly Medicaid and food stamps. Among the many changes to these programs would be the addition of federally mandated work requirements to Medicaid for the first time in its 60-year history and the expansion of the work mandate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps. Parents of children ages 14 and up are among those who would have to work, volunteer, take classes or participate in job training to keep their benefits. Millions of low-income Americans are expected to lose their benefits because of the work requirements and the bill's other measures affecting Medicaid and food stamps. Notably, few of those dropped from Medicaid coverage would have access to job-based health insurance, according to a Congressional Budget Office report about the House version of the package. The health provisions won't only hit low-income Americans. The Senate is also tightening verification requirements for the Affordable Care Act's federal premium subsidies, which could also leave some middle-income Americans uninsured. All told, the bill could result in more than 10 million more people being uninsured in 2034, according to a CNN analysis of the bill and CBO forecasts. Hospitals Hospitals are not happy with the health care provisions of the bill, which would reduce the support they receive from states to care for Medicaid enrollees and leave them with more uncompensated care costs for treating uninsured patients. 'The real-life consequences of these nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts – the largest ever proposed by Congress – will result in irreparable harm to our health care system, reducing access to care for all Americans and severely undermining the ability of hospitals and health systems to care for our most vulnerable patients,' said Rick Pollack, CEO of the American Hospital Association. The association said it is 'deeply disappointed' with the bill, even though it contains a $50 billion fund to help rural hospitals contend with the Medicaid cuts, which hospitals say is not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall. Clean energy and EVs The Senate removed a last-minute excise tax on wind and solar that experts warned would have been a 'killer' for the clean energy industry. However, the Senate bill still strips tax incentives for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects by 2027 and gives developers stringent requirements to claim them. The American Clean Power Association slammed the legislation as a 'step backward for American energy policy' that will eliminate jobs and raise electric bills. Electric vehicle makers could also be left worse off because the GOP bill ends EV tax credits of up to $7,500 at the end of September. Previously those tax credits were scheduled to last through 2032, providing a powerful incentive for car buyers. Deficit hawks The Senate version of the package would increase the deficit by about $3.4 trillion over the next decade, according to CBO. Adding trillions to the debt risks lifting already elevated interest rates. That in turn will make it more expensive for Americans to finance the purchase of a car or a home and for businesses to borrow money to grow. Not only that, but higher rates would force the federal government to devote even greater resources to finance its own mountain of debt. The CBO expects US federal government interest costs to surpass $1 trillion per year. US spending on interest has already more than tripled since 2017, surpassing what the federal government's entire defense budget. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
