Millions of phone owners get anti-theft ‘secret weapon' to stop thieves breaking into your mobile after snatching it
A phone is stolen every seven-and-a-half minutes in London
THAT'S PHONEY Millions of phone owners get anti-theft 'secret weapon' to stop thieves breaking into your mobile after snatching it
MILLIONS of phone owners are to get a new anti-theft "secret weapon" on their mobile to stop thieves accessing the device after snatching it.
The security feature means Android phones will start to reboot automatically if they haven't been used for three days.
Advertisement
3
Phone-related crime is getting worse
Credit: Getty
3
The new system means Android phones will reboot after three days
Credit: Getty
This means they will be more difficult to access if they haven't been used in a while as users have to enter the pin after a reboot.
It comes after a recent survey from the Met Police revealed phones are stolen in London at a rate of one every 7 1⁄2 minutes.
Figures show gangs and crooks took 70,137 mobiles last year — 192 a day.
That is up a third from the 52,000 nicked in 2023, Met Police statistics show.
Advertisement
Another important reason for users and authorities to be aware of the update relates to the two lock states on mobiles – before first lock (BFU) and after first lock (AFU).
In BFU, information and files on a phone are securely encrypted and completely inaccessible, even with complex extraction programmes.
Therefore if cops seize a phone as evidence they will have less time to access the device.
Phone thefts are now a £50million underworld industry, with most flogged or disassembled for parts in China.
Advertisement
People with phones still running Android 12 are advised to consider upgrading to a newer device.
Security patches fix flaws that have been discovered in the software, which stops phones succumbing to hacking.
Home Office figures show 90% of all 'theft from a person' crimes in London go unsolved, with a crook charged in only one per cent of cases.
The unsolved figure is 86 per cent in England and Wales.
Advertisement
Due to the rise in phone thefts, the Met is using tracking tech and putting plain-clothed officers in the West End and Westminster, where 40% of all thefts occur.
The City of London force is deploying bike-mounted police.
Anna McEntee, at Compare the Market, said Londoners and those visiting the capital will be concerned by the substantial rise in phone thefts last year.
She added that criminals are becoming "increasingly brazen, often using mopeds or e-bikes to make a quick getaway'.
Advertisement
The new security feature from Google is part of the April 2025 Google System release notes and is expected to apply to tablets but not wearables such as the Pixel Watch, televisions, or Android Auto Devices.
Google hasn't said if users will be able to toggle this feature or change the time limit for rebooting.
Since this feature is part of Google Play Services, those affected will see it without the phone going through a full system update.
A BFU phone remains connected to Wi-Fi or mobile data, meaning that if you lose your phone and it reboots, you'll still be able to use location-finding services.
Advertisement
3
It's designed to protect Android phones from hackers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Landmark EU tech rules holding back innovation, Google says
BRUSSELS, July 1 (Reuters) - Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google will on Tuesday warn EU antitrust regulators and its critics that landmark European Union rules aimed at reining in Big Tech are hampering innovation to the detriment of European users and businesses. The U.S. tech giant will also urge regulators to give more detailed guidance to help it comply with the rules, and ask its critics to provide evidence of costs and benefits to prove their case. Google is under pressure to address charges under the EU's Digital Markets Act that it favours its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over rivals. The charges may result in fines of as much as 10% of its global annual revenue. Earlier this month, Google proposed more changes to its search results to better showcase rival products, but critics say these still do not ensure a level playing field. "We remain genuinely concerned about real world consequences of the DMA, which are leading to worse online products and experiences for Europeans," Google's lawyer Clare Kelly will tell a workshop organised by the European Commission to give Google critics the opportunity to seek clarifications. She will say changes implemented by Google to date after discussions with the Commission and its critics have resulted in European users paying more for travel tickets as they cannot directly access airline sites, according to a copy of her speech seen by Reuters. Kelly will also say European airlines, hotels and restaurants have reported up to a 30% loss in direct booking traffic, while users have complained about clunky workarounds. Google's other lawyer, Oliver Bethell, will ask regulators to spell out in detail what the company needs to do, and critics to come up with hard evidence. "If we can understand precisely what compliance looks like, not just in theory, but taking account of on the ground experience, we can launch compliant services quickly and confidently across the EEA," he will say. The EEA is the 27 EU countries, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. "We need help identifying the areas where we should focus. That means bringing real evidence of costs and benefits that we can take account of with the Commission," Bethell said. The day-long workshop starts at 0700 GMT.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Whitehall's ambition to cut costs using AI is fraught with risk
A Dragons' Den-style event this week, where tech companies will have 20 minutes to pitch ideas for increasing automation in the British justice system, is one of numerous examples of how the cash-strapped Labour government hopes artificial intelligence and data science can save money and improve public services. Amid warnings from critics that Downing Street has been 'drinking the Kool-Aid' on AI, the Department of Health and Social Care this week announced an AI early warning system to detect dangerous maternity services after a series of scandals, and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said he wants one in eight operations to be conducted by a robot within a decade. AI is being used to prioritise actions on the 25,000 pieces of correspondence the Department for Work and Pensions receives each day and to detect potential fraud and error in benefit claims. Ministers even have access to an AI tool that is supposed to provide a 'vibe check' on parliamentary opinion to help them weigh the political risks of policy proposals. Again and again, ministers are turning to technology to tackle acute crises that in the past might have been dealt with by employing more staff or investing more money. The push to digitise government, which is led by the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and his science and technology secretary, Peter Kyle, has brought the government into close contact with the biggest US tech companies. Google, Microsoft, Palantir, IBM and Amazon were all in attendance at a Ministry of Justice roundtable discussion last month. Starmer and Kyle are not alone. Countries from Singapore to Estonia have been increasingly embracing AI in public service delivery. Jeegar Kakkad, a director at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change – one of the organisations arguing for greater use of technology and which is part-funded by tech firms – put the argument like this: 'Our systems are broken. They cannot keep up with demand. You have a couple of choices: keep trying to make a broken system work with traditional approaches – more money, more immigrants to fill the gap in the workforce – or you have to use technology. 'I think the answer is technology, but we have to make sure we have agency in how we design these systems, they are human-designed and we put rules in place.' Kyle has recently been at pains to stress that the government is doing everything it can to enable big tech firms to thrive in Britain. At London Tech Week last month, he told executives about regulation and planning policies designed to make their businesses run better, saying: 'All of this adds up to a government that is on your side.' When it comes to injecting technology into public services, ministers face a choice: whether to 'build or buy'. The temptation is often to issue contracts to private companies to achieve the fastest and greatest impact. For the tech companies, a huge pot of revenue is at stake. The value of UK public sector tech contracts rose to £19.6bn last year, up from £14.4bn in 2019, according to Tussell, which researches government contracts. But introducing AI and automation into public services is riskier than using it to help drivers navigate busy roads or recommending songs to music fans. When citizens interact with public services they are often at their most vulnerable. For example, last week the Ada Lovelace Institute, an independent research body, found that 59% of the public were concerned about the idea of AI being used to assess welfare eligibility, compared with 39% of people worried about the use of facial recognition technology in policing. And the public is also showing signs of concern about the motivations of private technology companies. The same polling found the public was significantly less likely to trust private companies to deliver technology that could assess welfare eligibility or predict the risk of cancer than government bodies (although governments are less trusted than academics and not-for-profits). The institute urged MPs to launch a review of the 'role of technology companies and the bodies funded by them in shaping the policy and media narrative on the benefits of public sector AI; and the effectiveness of existing measures that aim to tackle conflicts of interest and 'revolving door' dynamics between government and the technology sector'. It said: 'At a time when AI is being offered as a solution to a wide range of public sector problems, the public are concerned about the motivations of private sector involvement. The public expects transparency and that public sector AI prioritises people over profit.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Tech firms suggested placing trackers under offenders' skin at meeting with justice secretary
Tracking devices inserted under offenders' skin, robots assigned to contain prisoners and driverless vehicles used to transport them were among the measures proposed by technology companies to ministers who are gathering ideas to tackle the crisis in the UK justice system. The proposals were made at a meeting of more than two dozen tech companies in London last month, chaired by the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, minutes seen by the Guardian show. Amid an acute shortage of prison places and probation officers under severe strain, ministers told the companies they wanted ideas for using wearable technologies, behaviour monitoring and geolocation to create a 'prison outside of prison'. Those present included representatives of Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Palantir, which works closely with the US military and has contracts with the NHS. IBM and the private prison operator Serco also attended alongside tagging and biometric companies, according to a response to a freedom of information request. Mahmood told the tech companies she wants 'deeper collaboration between government and tech to solve the prison capacity crisis, reduce reoffending and make communities safer'. She invited them to 'scale and improve' the existing use of tagging 'not just for monitoring but to drive rehabilitation and reduce crime'. The prisons minister, James Timpson, called for a 'tech-led approach to justice'. The initiative is the latest sign of the Labour government's embrace of the technology industry to help deliver efficiency savings in creaking public services from schools to hospitals. In January, Keir Starmer declared that AI was a way 'to transform our public services' and spoke about 'totally rewiring government'. The push by the Ministry of Justice follows last month's review of sentencing by the former justice secretary David Gauke, which called for fewer short prison sentences and the greater use of AI as well as possible wider use of facial recognition technology in public to help cut the overcrowded prison population by almost 10,000. At the meeting last month, which was hosted by the industry lobby group Tech UK, ministers asked the tech companies what a 'digital, data and technology-enabled justice system' could look like in 2050. Responses included: 'Real-time behaviour monitoring and subcutaneous tracking' to support the health, and 'behaviour management' of people under the control of the criminal justice system; artificial intelligence advisers to support offenders' rehabilitation; and robotics 'used to manage prisoner movement and containment' including 'self-driving vehicles [to] transport prisoners'. Human rights campaigners called the ideas 'alarmingly dystopian' and warned that the meeting suggested the government may be 'getting too close to the tech giants'. A second meeting with tech companies is scheduled for Tuesday, with Lord Timpson due to hear 20-minute pitches for new ideas at what officials are calling an 'innovation den'. A government source stressed the ideas raised so far were hypothetical talking points to bring about conversations about the future of offender management to better protect the public. The justice secretary has previously said she is 'not squeamish' about using technology such as 'gait recognition', a type of biometric monitoring of humans' unique movement patterns, which some believe could help prevent violence in jails before it happens. An MoJ spokesperson said: 'As the public would rightly expect, we continue to explore technology that will help us cut crime, effectively monitor offenders and keep the public safe.' Donald Campbell, the director of advocacy at Foxglove, a non-profit organisation campaigning for fairer use of technology which obtained the FoI response, called the suggestions 'alarmingly dystopian'. 'It is chilling to know that justice ministers have sat with the tech sector to discuss using robots to manage prisoners, implanting devices under people's skin to track their behaviour, or using computers to 'predict' what they will do in future,' he said. Other suggestions from the tech companies included using high-powered quantum computers to 'analyse past data to predict future behaviours and create diversion paths' and to automate sentencing calculations in the overstretched probation service. But there were also fears raised about the consequences of relying too much on technology. One response recorded in minutes was that: 'If misapplied, these technologies could lead to dystopian outcomes that are difficult to reverse.' Campbell said: 'The idea that tech companies can produce tools to 'predict' crime has been discredited time and again – it is disappointing to see that they are continuing to push it – and that the MoJ is so willing to listen.' Tech UK, which hosted the meeting, said it was part of efforts to create a fairer, better and more effective justice system. A spokesperson said: 'It is essential that the future of justice is shaped with transparency, accountability, and public trust at its core.' Google, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM and Palantir did not respond to requests for comment. Serco said: 'We will not be commenting on this activity'.
