logo
From the memoir: A former Army general recalls how soldiers opted to fight for India's freedom

From the memoir: A former Army general recalls how soldiers opted to fight for India's freedom

Scroll.in10-06-2025
On 7 December 1941, Japan came into the war against the United States. This naturally brought in Britain on the side of US, and India, as part of the British Empire, also became involved in the war with Japan. For her defence against Japan, India depended on Singapore as her bastion in the east.
By the surprise attack on Pearl Harbour and the capture of the Philippines by the Japanese, Singapore was considerably weakened. Singapore's defences faced the sea, with the land approaches in the rear, undefended. Further, the Japanese had organized an elaborate espionage system in Singapore with the help of the local Chinese inhabitants living in the city, who gave up-to-date and accurate information on the day-to-day movements of British and Indian troops. Again, no one then believed that an attack could be mounted on Singapore by land, because of the extraordinarily long lines of communication through an inhospitable country. So, Singapore was unprepared from a land attack by Japanese – the bastion found itself unprepared, and it fell unexpectedly and rapidly.
After the fall of Singapore, the Japanese drive towards Rangoon gained momentum. Rangoon was evacuated on 7 March 1942, and thousands of Indians began their track to India through the difficult jungles of the Arakan. Here, the forethought of the British in building communications became apparent. The fall of Rangoon had brought the war close to us, as Gen. Alexander's forces withdrew to the Eastern Gates of India, after fighting retreating battles in Burma against overwhelming odds, over such routes which we had helped to build.
Defence measures had, therefore, to be concentrated in India, but full support for the war was lacking because Britain had failed to exercise sufficient effort in getting India to commit herself in the early days. This was unfortunate, as in September 1939, a wave of sympathy for England and against the totalitarian countries and against Hitler, had spread throughout the country, and there was a general feeling that India could have been easily persuaded to declare war against totalitarian aggression. But technically, India was at war when Britain was, and India was deemed committed without her leaders being consulted. It had even provided the troops which had helped delay the first German attack on Paris. The principal political party, the Indian National Congress, which was then fighting for India's political freedom, felt that as Britain was not prepared to recognize India's freedom after the war, Indians would come more and more to believe that this was not India's war despite Japan entering it, and the war reaching the very borders of the country.
It was against this background that, in 1942, Gandhiji launched the Quit India Movement, which later that year turned to overt action. So, the relations between the British and the Congress became further strained.
In retrospect, events appear to have been the natural outcome of the failure to get the cooperation of the Congress leaders, when it was still possible, in the early days of the war.
In spite of these political differences inside the country, events in India moved fast. With Hitler's invasion of Poland, the army in India was mobilised in September 1939, and Indian troops began arriving in Suez from October 1939 onwards. The role assigned to this force was the Middle East and Africa, but some ancillary units were sent to France to provide transport cover to the British Expeditionary Forces. Among them was Capt Anis Ahmed Khan, who was earlier with us in the Madras Pioneers. During the retreat from Dunkirk, he was taken prisoner and remained in Germany throughout the war. I was disappointed that although we were the first troops to leave India for overseas duty, we did not contact the enemy till 1941, whereas those who left India after us, contacted the enemy almost immediately.
During the Second World War, Indian Army units fought gallantly in France, Italy, Africa, the Middle East, Malaya, Burma and Indonesia, whilst at the same time protecting the North-West Frontier of India and carrying out their role of internal security within the country. These duties necessitated tremendous expansion. In October 1939, the strength of the army was approximately half a million, whilst in October 1944, it rose to over 2 million. Throughout this momentous period, our troops made substantial contributions to the Allied cause in the different theatres of war.
About this time, news reached India of the formation of the Indian National Army (INA), under the dynamic leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose. When Singapore fell on 15 February 1942, some 60,000 Indian troops had joined what was named the 'Indian National Army'. This was to be the army of free India, with a provisional government under the presidency of Subhas Chandra Bose.
But according to British Military Law, these men had committed the offences of mutiny, desertion and waging war against the king. For them, therefore, it was a very serious step particularly as their comrades, that is men of sister battalions of the same regiment and drawn from the same stock, were winning glory and admiration for their fellow soldiers, British and American, in North Africa, France and Italy.
Perhaps the reason why some of these troops went over to the enemy was because of nationalistic fervour. Were these men right? These soldiers were recruited in the INA under the command of Capt. Mohan Singh, who made his choice from a genuine conviction and was prepared to suffer, and did, in fact, suffer for his beliefs. Further, the personality of Subhas Chandra Bose was overwhelming. But, in Military Law, the offence of mutiny cannot be condoned. This fact is of interest to the future leaders of our army. To new India, the Indian Army can only be a valuable asset if it preserves its loyalty and discipline. This question is of particular interest because there have been talks of independent states. It will equally be an offence if a soldier, in the event of a conflict with a state, prefers to fight for the state to which he belongs rather than to India as a whole.
In December 1942, my name appeared in Indian Army Orders, to attend the Staff Course at the Command and Staff College, Quetta. About the same time, my posting orders came through appointing me to command an infantry battalion. I preferred this posting to an appointment of the staff. 'Staff' led to closer contact with senior commanders and gave an insight into higher military thinking. On the other hand, 'command' meant association with troops on active device, an experience to which I had been looking forward. I had had ample experience of regimental work; and was now anxious to 'command', particularly under conditions of modern war. So, I opted for 'command' in the hope of proceeding with a unit to a theatre of war.
The 'command' came on 27 December 1942, of a newly raised battalion, the 6/19 Kumaon Regiment, which was then located at Bannu, on the North-West Frontier of India. The brigade commander felt that the battalion was not in very good shape, and I was given the task of preparing it for war in the shortest possible time. The regiment had good officers, six British and five Indian, the VCOs were men of experience; and the soldiers were young and active.
What was required, however, was coordinated work and hard and intensive training; stress was also to be placed on discipline and firepower, as we had then to learn the special techniques required for conducting operations on the frontier, appreciating that the Pathans had a reputation for springing surprises, that they were good marksmen and very mobile on steep slopes. The Pathans carried merely a rifle and a bit of food. They were tough, used to the terrain and consequently very active. We, on the other hand, were handicapped with heavy boots and equipment and were not so mobile. We thus gave the enemy the advantage of mobility, and freedom to select the point of attack. The Pathans were also very clever with their ambushes, to which the only answer was to keep fully alert. An example of alertness is given in advance through Shakti Tangi at a time when no enemy had been seen. The intelligence officer of the South Wales Border Regiment spotted a cleft in the very close horizon, through which he could see daylight. Suddenly, daylight was blotted out, and he sensed that it was the enemy.
As the men of the South Wales Borders took cover, there was a burst of enemy fire.
The North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) has six frontier districts of the Punjab compared to six tribal areas administered directly by the Government of India. On the other side of the NWFP was the buffer state of Afghanistan, separating the two empires, the Russian and the British. The Durand Line, between Afghan territory and tribal areas which the British administered, bordered a belt of territory in which some tribes were vaguely regarded as British and others as Afghans; but neither were wholly subject to the authority of either power, though they were treated as British 'protected' persons. The tribes could thus play off the Amir of Afghanistan against the British, while the Amir intrigued with them to keep the British busy. People living in these areas were, therefore, very 'unsettled'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Will raise a glass of Johnnie Walker': How UK CEOs reacted to India-UK free trade deal
‘Will raise a glass of Johnnie Walker': How UK CEOs reacted to India-UK free trade deal

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Will raise a glass of Johnnie Walker': How UK CEOs reacted to India-UK free trade deal

Businesses across India and the United Kingdom have welcomed the free trade agreement between the two countries with open arms. The agreement, which was signed on Thursday after negotiations that lasted for around three years, will make it easier for traders of both India and UK to do business with the other country. The India-UK free trade agreement was signed on Thursday during PM Modi's UK visit where he met his British counterpart Keir Starmer(Bloomberg) While for India, 99 per cent exports will see duty-free access to the UK, unlocking nearly $23 billion in opportunities for labour-intensive sectors, the United Kingdom will enjoy a collective uplift in wages of £2.2 billion (around $2.85 billion) each year and could also see cheaper prices and more choice on clothes, shoes, and food products, along with several tariff slashes. Also read: Duty on single malt cut by half: What gets cheaper with key India-UK trade deal With this trade deal, several UK businesses will have better access to the Indian market and vice versa. Many products made in the UK, such as cars, medical equipment, cosmetics, and whisky among others, will potentially be available in India for more affordable prices. How UK businesses reacted to the FTA Tufan Erginbiligic, Chief Executive Officer of luxury car maker Rolls-Royce, welcomed the agreement and said that the FTA will benefit Rolls-Royce and their customers, paving the way for future aerospace growth in India. 'India is an important market for our business, with over 90 years of partnership with Indian industry and the Indian Government. We welcome the provisions in this Free Trade Agreement, including those that bring closer alignment with international standards for trade in civil aerospace. These agreements will benefit Rolls-Royce and our customers, paving the way for future aerospace growth in India,' he said. Also read: India-UK sign FTA, PM Starmer calls it 'most significant' deal since EU exit His remarks come as Airbus & Rolls-Royce will soon begin delivering Airbus aircraft – with over half powered by Rolls-Royce engines – to major Indian airlines as part of around £5 billion worth of contracts recently agreed. Johnnie Walker chief on India-UK FTA Nik Jhangiani, the interim Chief Executive of Diageo - the UK company behind iconic scotch whisky brands such as Johnnie Walker, said that the 'agreement marks a great moment for both Scotch and Scotland.' 'We'll be raising a glass of Johnnie Walker to all those who have worked so hard to get it secured,' he said. Under the FTA, it will be easier for British firms to also export whisky to India with tariffs slashed in half, reduced immediately from 150 per cent to 75 per cent and then dropped even further to 40 per cent over the next ten years. Jean-Etienne Gourgues, Chivas Brothers Chairman and CEO, said that the FTA is 'a sign of hope in challenging times for the spirits industry'. 'India is the world's biggest whisky market by volume and greater access will be an eventual game changer for the export of our Scotch whisky brands, such as Chivas Regal and Ballantine's,' he said. 'The deal will support long term investment and jobs in our distilleries in Speyside and our bottling plant at Kilmalid and help deliver growth in both Scotland and India over the next decade,' he added. William Bain, head of trade policy at British Chambers of Commerce, said that the FTA 'will open a new era for our businesses and boost investment between two of the world's largest economies.' 'Currently around 16,000 UK companies are trading goods with Indian companies, and there is high interest in our Chamber Network to grow that. This deal will create new opportunities in the transport, travel, creative and business support sectors alongside traditional strengths in finance and professional services,' he said.

Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8
Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8

The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was adjourned in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers' abstention, rescheduling the hearing for August 8. BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed the suit in 2018, alleging objectionable remarks against Amit Shah during the Karnataka elections. Gandhi, who surrendered and received bail earlier this year, recently claimed innocence, alleging a political conspiracy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The hearing in a defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was adjourned on Thursday in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers abstaining from court has now fixed August 8 as the next date of case dates back to 2018, when BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed a defamation suit against Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader had made objectionable remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah during the Karnataka Assembly election Santosh Kumar Pandey, appearing on behalf of Vijay Mishra, said the court was the hearing had to be deferred due to lawyers asbstaining from work due to Bar association MP-MLA court had issued a warrant against Rahul Gandhi in December February 2024, Gandhi surrendered before the court and was granted bail on two sureties of Rs 25,000 July 26, 2024, Gandhi recorded his statement in court, claiming innocence and stating that the case was part of a political conspiracy against him.

From Cars And Chocolates To Scotch And Salmon: What Gets Cheaper With India-UK Trade Deal
From Cars And Chocolates To Scotch And Salmon: What Gets Cheaper With India-UK Trade Deal

NDTV

time20 minutes ago

  • NDTV

From Cars And Chocolates To Scotch And Salmon: What Gets Cheaper With India-UK Trade Deal

On Thursday, the India-UK Free Trade Agreement was signed and formalised, during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the UK, where he met his counterpart Keir Starmer. The deal was signed by commerce minister Piyush Goyal and Jonathan Reynold, his British counterpart. The trade deal had been under negotiations for three years and is expected to boost bilateral trade between the two economies by $34 billion annually. The FTA will bring significant benefits to India by opening new avenues of growth, skill development, and employment opportunities for Indians across multiple sectors. The FTA will benefit not just the youth looking to build careers in information technology, financial services, professional services, management consultancy, architectural and engineering, and more, but will also support young entrepreneurs, and Indian graduates to pursue careers in the UK. "Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change," said PM Starmer. 26 British companies have announced new business in India. How India benefits from the trade deal Now, Indian industries and people will be able to access medical devices, aerospace parts made and imported from the UK at a much cheaper cost. British products such as soft drinks, cosmetics, chocolates, biscuits, lamb, salmon and cars will also be easily accessible to Indians, as the average tariffs will drop from 15 per cent to 3 per cent after the Free Trade Agreement comes into effect. Electric vehicles will see a tariff cut from 110 per cent to 10 per cent within a quota. After the trade deal comes into operation, it will be easier for British firms to export whisky and other products to India per PTI. Import duty on whisky will fall from 150 per cent to 75 per cent immediately and to 40 per cent over 10 years. Apart from products, the trade agreement also makes it easier for Indians to live in the UK as firms and freelancers will have access to 36 service sectors in the UK with no 'Economic Needs Test'. Indian professionals will now be able to work in 35 sectors in the UK for 2 years even without an office in the country. The commerce ministry has stated that the move could benefit more than 60,000 IT professionals each year. Major beneficiaries include TCS, Infosys, Tech Mahindra, HCL Technologies, and Wipro. Indian professionals will also be exempted from UK social security payments for 3 years under the agreement. The deal also helps professionals such as chefs, yoga teachers, musicians and other contract-based workers by helping them enter the UK job market. How UK benefits from the trade deal The deal will lead to major cuts in Indian tariffs with reductions secured on 90 per cent of tariff lines. In 10 years, 85 per cent of these will be exempt from tariffs. UK businesses will gain expanded access to public procurement opportunities in India. British companies will be able to bid on non-sensitive government tenders valued above Rs 2 billion. This means, the UK can potentially participate in 40,000 tenders each year, collectively worth around Rs 4.09 lakh crore. The UK will be able to create over 2,200 jobs as a direct result of the trade agreement. UK workers will also see a wage hike of up to 2.2 billion pounds each year. British people will see cheaper prices and more choice on clothes, shoes, and food products.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store