logo
Eight men deported from US arrive in war-torn South Sudan

Eight men deported from US arrive in war-torn South Sudan

Eight men deported from the United States in May and held under guard for weeks at a US military base in the African nation of Djibouti while their legal challenges played out in court have now reached the Trump administration's intended destination, war-torn South Sudan, a country the US State Department advises against travel to due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'.
The immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the Supreme Court, which had permitted their removal from the US.
Administration officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the US.
This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people
'This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people,' said Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement announcing the men's arrival in South Sudan, a chaotic country in danger once more of collapsing into civil war.
The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the transfer of the men who had been put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan.
That meant that the South Sudan transfer could be completed after the flight was detoured to a base in Djibouti, where they men were held in a converted shipping container.
The flight was detoured after a federal judge found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow the men a chance to challenge the removal.
The court's conservative majority had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries.
The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger.
A flurry of court hearings on Independence Day resulted a temporary hold on the deportations while a judge evaluated a last-ditch appeal by the men's before the judge decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was a Boston judge whose rulings led to the initial halt of the administration's effort to begin deportations to South Sudan.
By Friday evening, that judge had issued a brief ruling concluding the Supreme Court had tied his hands.
The men had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said.
Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump issues blistering three-word attack on 'train wreck' Elon Musk
Donald Trump issues blistering three-word attack on 'train wreck' Elon Musk

Irish Daily Star

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Star

Donald Trump issues blistering three-word attack on 'train wreck' Elon Musk

President Donald Trump has issued a blistering rant on Truth Social against former DOGE head Elon Musk on Sunday, calling him a "train wreck" and "off the rails." Trump's savage post comes days after Musk announced the creation of the "America Party." "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said . "He even wants to start a Third Political Party , despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them." "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds," continued Trump. "Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country." Read More Related Articles Fresh Donald Trump health fear after huge bruise spotted on hand amid warning Read More Related Articles Pilot's final nine words as Air France plane plummeted into Atlantic killing 228 people "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said in his post. (Image: AFP via Getty Images) "It is a Great Bill, but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time," added Trump. "I have been strongly opposed to that from the very beginning." "People are now allowed to buy whatever they want - Gasoline Powered, Hybrids (which are doing very well), or New Technologies as they come about - No more EV Mandate," wrote the president. "I have campaigned on this for two years and, quite honestly, when Elon gave me his total and unquestioned Endorsement, I asked him whether or not he knew that I was going to terminate the EV Mandate - It was in every speech I made, and in every conversation I had." According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that." (Image: Getty Images) According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that," which allegedly surprised him. "Additionally, Elon asked that one of his close friends run NASA and, while I thought his friend was very good, I was surprised to learn that he was a blue-blooded Democrat who had never contributed to a Republican before," Trump added. "Elon probably was, also," Trump remarked. "I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life." According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that." (Image: AFP via Getty Images) Trump closed out the post by saying, "My Number One charge is to protect the American Public!" The rant comes after Musk announced that his party would enter the political ring during the 2026 midterms. "The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra," wrote Musk on X. "Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield." The rant comes after Musk announced that his party would enter the political ring during the 2026 midterms. (Image: AFP via Getty Images) It was then that someone asked Musk whether the party would appear in 2028 or the midterms. "Next year," the tech mogul replied. Musk's announcement comes one day after the Tesla CEO doubled down on comments about forming a new political party. Earlier this week, Musk announced that he planned to form the 'America party', which could result in a White House run at the next election . It comes amid his row with Donald Trump over the president's spending policy bill, which Musk has dubbed as "utterly insane" and "destructive." The tech billionaire has now asked his followers on X whether he should move forward with creating the party and also outlined how its creation could transform the American political system. "Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system," he wrote. He added: 'Should we create the America Party?' Must later described how US politics could be overhauled to make way for the party, saying: "One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts.' "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," he added. While sharing the results, which tallied 65.4% in the positive and 34.5% in the negative, Musk announced the official creation of the party. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it," Musk said. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," he added. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."

Perception trumps reality: Did the US really destroy Iran's nuclear programme?
Perception trumps reality: Did the US really destroy Iran's nuclear programme?

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Perception trumps reality: Did the US really destroy Iran's nuclear programme?

Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has contradicted US president Donald Trump's contention that the Iranian nuclear programme was destroyed by the US air attack on Iran on the night of June 22-23. Grossi has also assessed that Iran still has the technical knowhow to produce enriched uranium within months. In an Irish Examiner article last week, Iranian response in Doha was only a carefully choreographed demonstration it was pointed out that the Iranians will recover quickly and would have backup teams of nuclear scientists to continue their work. In the world of geopolitics, perception is often more important than reality. Seeking the truth Seeking the truth can be a frustrating experience in a time of mass communication, when conflicting messages are flashing by in sound bites. Logic teaches us some coping mechanisms. Let us start with the concept of perspectivism, which, to summarise, means that no one statement holds absolute truth. Truth, instead, is the sum total of many statements. For example, you are sitting in a Cork cafe. It's a beautiful morning and you are in good company. The waft of freshly-brewed coffee completes a precious moment of bliss. You open the Irish Examiner. You see the front page, but your companion sees only the back page, which somehow always manages to have a really interesting story. You both have different perspectives, but neither of you has the overall truth. The truth slowly reveals itself, page by page. The aftermath of the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities presents a similar dilemma. Did the Americans destroy Iran's programme to produce nuclear weapons or not? Before you even ask yourself the question, let's be honest, what is the answer you want to hear? Essentially, which side are you on? Most probably, your basic platform of information is what you have read or watched on TV and cinema over your lifetime. Taking sides My generation was keenly aware of the Holocaust. It was captivated by the film Exodus and identified Israel's struggle to survive with Ireland's fight for freedom. We abhorred the PLO aircraft hijackings and the murder of Israeli athletes in Munich in 1972. It took two generations to change that view and see the present leadership in Israel as the bad guys that turned Gaza into a human slaughterhouse. Whatever side you are on, let's consider the US intervention in Iran as objectively as possible. Within hours of the US bombing, selected leaking from a preliminary US intelligence report, to CNN, sensationally contradicted Trump's claim that the Iranian nuclear complexes were obliterated. The main contentious point of the leaked report was that Iran's nuclear programme was only set back for a few months. The Trump administration's overreaction to this report actually heightened the public perception that the US air attacks were not successful. Moreover, that caused more problems for the Israelis, whose stated war objective was the removal of the Iranian nuclear threat, not just its delay. The Israelis continued attacking targets in Iran even though Trump and defence secretary Pete Hegseth were claiming that the Iranian nuclear facilities were obliterated. The joint press conference held by Hegseth and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, was unprecedented. Hegseth went ballistic in his criticism of the media, blaming them for being unpatriotic. Caine gave a calm, measured presentation on the operation and explained why it would be several weeks before the full extent of damage to the facilities was known. We must remember that this mission had been planned in detail for the past 15 years at least. Over that period of time, both US and Israeli intelligence assets in Iran would have been compiling a mass of data. The bombs used in the attack, the massive ordnance penetrators, were designed with these specific targets in mind. The great Arthur C Clarke, engineer and science fiction writer, stated:"If an eminent scientist tells you something is possible, believe him. If he tells you something is impossible, don't believe him. The US Army Corps of Engineers has a simple motto, which explains its outlook on taking on tough tasks. It says: 'The very difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer.' Bearing in mind both comments, we must also not forget that it was the Americans that pulled off the greatest engineering feat of all time, landing men on the Moon and bringing them back alive. In early 1972, I remember being in Cape Kennedy watching astronauts in training for a Moon flight. On one wall the planning and preparation sequence for the Apollo Project was laid out using a concept called systems engineering. The air operation in Iran had the benefit of the most advanced technology available in the world today. Conducted in one non-stop 36-hour round trip from the US to Iran, involving air refuelling, the final run to the targets was carried out in complete darkness. In the Irish Military College, cadets and officers are always advised to keep their plans as simple as possible, to consider and anticipate every contingency, to rehearse as much as possible and allow for backup personnel and equipment. The more complicated the plan, the more likely something will go wrong. Disasters can happen. The US learned a lot from the 1980 failed rescue operation in Iran, during which eight US servicemen were killed in a helicopter crash, when Delta Force tried to free the captured US Embassy staff. The big question now is if the 400kg of enriched uranium stockpiled by the Iranians was in the Fordow facility. The Iranians say they had removed it to a safe location. US observers think it would have been too difficult to move in time, but the Iranians must have known that Fordow was a prime target. A satellite picture of Iran's underground nuclear enrichment site at Fordow in March. Picture: Planet Labs PBC/AP Iran foresees the day when its oil runs out and it will require a reliable energy source. Nuclear energy is a viable alternative and Iran should be allowed to develop a peaceful nuclear energy programme. However, it should accept international control over any enriched uranium. Trump was asked at the recent Nato meeting in the Hague about US-Iran talks. His immediate reaction was that he saw no reason for talks. Since then he has changed his mind and behind the scenes, efforts are being made to get the Iranians back to the negotiating table. Latest reports are that the US and Iran are set to resume nuclear talks in Oslo. Iran is reported to want a US guarantee before talks begin that it will not be attacked. To use an Americanism, the 'game' is not over until the fat lady sings. Dorcha Lee is a retired army colonel and defence analyst. Read More Unreliability of Donald Trump's US means a cascade of nuclear armament is on the way

Netanyahu to land in US after 'inconclusive' Gaza ceasefire talks
Netanyahu to land in US after 'inconclusive' Gaza ceasefire talks

RTÉ News​

time5 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Netanyahu to land in US after 'inconclusive' Gaza ceasefire talks

US President Donald Trump said there was a "good chance" of a hostage deal with Hamas "during the week," ahead of his upcoming meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "I think there's a good chance we have a deal with Hamas... during the coming week," Mr Trump told reporters amid mounting pressure on the Israeli prime minister to agree to a ceasefire and end the war in Gaza after almost two years. Mr Netanyahu said yesterday he hoped his talks in Washington could "help advance" a Gaza ceasefire deal. Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu are scheduled to meet at the White House - the Israeli prime minister's third visit since Mr Trump returned to power in January. Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas were under way in Qatar yesterday. Two Palestinian sources familiar with the matter said that the first session of indirect talks ended inconclusively. They added that the Israeli delegation did not have a sufficient mandate to reach an agreement with Hamas. "After the first session of indirect negotiations in Doha, the Israeli delegation is not sufficiently authorized and is not authorized to reach an agreement with Hamas, as it has no real powers", the sources said. Mr Netanyahu said, before his departure to Washington, that Israeli negotiators taking part in the ceasefire talks have clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire agreement under conditions that Israel has accepted. Israeli hostages "We've gotten a lot of the hostages out, but pertaining to the remaining hostages, quite a few of them will be coming out," Mr Trump said. He said the United States was "working on a lot of things" with Israel, including "probably a permanent deal with Iran." Mr Trump also repeated claims that US strikes "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities during the 12-day Iran-Israel conflict. Since the start of Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza, mediators have brokered pauses in fighting during which hostages were freed in exchange for Israel-held Palestinian prisoners. Of the 251 hostages taken by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Israel's military campaign, lack of food and dire humanitarian conditions for more than two million people in Gaza has killed at least 57,418 people there, mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. Hamas's October 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store