Tensions bring shelved Tulbul barrage back in limelight
The project in north Kashmir's in Sopore and Bandipora was stopped after Pakistan raised objections to its construction, citing the Indus Water Treaty.
According to its design, the project could have helped in maintaining water levels at three downstream hydel projects -- Uri (1,480 MW), Uri 2 (230 MW) and Lower Jehlum Power Project (120MW).
Uri and Uri 2 projects are under the National Hydro Power Corporation (NHPC) and the Lower Jehlum Hydel Power Project (LJHP) is owned by J&K government. Though the projects operate at full capacity in summers, the output falls under 20% in autumn and winter due to low water levels in Jhelum.
'The project, if completed, will be very helpful for J&K, especially in agriculture and for hydel projects. The Indus Water Treaty made it impossible to secure water for J&K. Political leaders raised the issue, pointing out how J&K was in loss, and asked Centre to compensate. Since World Bank is involved in this treaty, we can't say whether the project will be completed,' said a senior officer who was a part of the project.
On Thursday, Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah said the work on Tulbul project should be resumed.
'Now that the Indus Water Treaty has been temporarily suspended, I wonder if we will be able to resume the project. It will improve power generation of downstream projects, especially in winter,' he said.
The work on the Tulbul project, the Wular freshwater lake and Jhelum river, was stopped over Pakistan's objections. Several delegations from Pakistan visited the spot as they considered it will control the flow of water towards Pakistan.
Omar, Mehbooba exchange barbs
Omar on Friday accused Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chief Mehbooba Mufti of 'trying to please some people across the border', apparently referring to Pakistan.
'What is unfortunate is that with your blind lust to try to score cheap publicity points & please some people sitting across the border, you refuse to acknowledge that the IWT has been one of the biggest historic betrayals of the interests of the people of J&K. I have always opposed this treaty & I will continue to do so. Opposing a blatantly unfair treaty is in no way, shape, size or form warmongering, it's about correcting a historic injustice that denied the people of J&K the right to use our water for ourselves,' Omar said in a post on microblogging platform X.
Mehbooba had questioned Omar for raising the Tulbul project amid the ongoing tensions.
'J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah's call to revive the Tulbul Navigation Project amid ongoing tensions between India & Pakistan is deeply unfortunate. At a time when both countries have just stepped back from the brink of a full-fledged war—with Jammu and Kashmir bearing the brunt through the loss of innocent lives, widespread destruction and immense suffering such statements are not only irresponsible but also dangerously provocative,' Mehbooba said on X.
Now I think I'll do some real work & you can keep posting,' Omar said in his response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Neither F-35 Nor Su-57: Why India Is Taking Its Time On 5th-Gen Fighter Jets
Pakistan's reported plans to acquire China's J-35A stealth jets have added pressure on India's fifth-gen fighter jet timeline, bringing renewed focus to regional air power dynamics India's pursuit of fifth-generation fighter jets is once again in the spotlight, as the race for aerial superiority in the region intensifies. With the indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) expected to take to the skies by 2035, the spotlight is now on how India plans to bridge the capability gap in the interim. While reports suggest that India has opted against acquiring the US-made F-35 Lightning II and remains cautious about Russia's Su-57, neighbouring countries are rapidly modernising their air forces. Pakistan's reported plans to acquire China's J-35A stealth jets have introduced a new layer to the regional security landscape, prompting renewed focus on the timeline of India's fifth-generation fighter jet programme and adding urgency to discussions around future capabilities and preparedness in the evolving regional balance. India's aspiration to modernise its military and strengthen its air power has reached a pivotal moment. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been advocating for the sale of the F-35 fighter jet, even as doubts continue to surround Russia's Su-57. How Crucial Are Fifth-Gen Jets For India? The Indian Air Force (IAF) currently operates only 29 squadrons, a number reduced by the retirement of old MiG-21 aircraft and delayed purchases of new jets. The AMCA programme, developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), is expected to be ready by 2035. This twin-engine stealth jet will feature an AI-based electronic pilot, supercruise, and an internal weapons bay, but its prototype is likely to be ready only by 2027-28, with full production taking even longer. Meanwhile, neighbouring countries are enhancing their air power. China possesses J-20 stealth jets and is testing sixth-generation prototypes like J-36 and J-50. Pakistan plans to acquire 40 J-35A stealth jets by 2026-27, posing a serious challenge for India, particularly in light of recent tensions such as the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor. Why Is India Not Opting For The F-35? Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump offered India the F-35A Lightning II fighter aircraft, touted as the 'world's most high-tech stealth jet', aiming to strengthen India-US defence relations. However, India expressed little interest in this proposal. According to Bloomberg, India has indicated its reluctance to purchase the F-35, citing several strategic and political reasons. The cost of an F-35 fighter aircraft is $80 million (over Rs 700 crore), and its maintenance and spare parts are also expensive. The US retains full control over the jet's software and stealth coatings, potentially compromising India's strategic autonomy. Additionally, a substantial portion of India's defence purchases come from Russia. The US had previously excluded Turkey from the F-35 programme due to its use of the Russian S-400 defence system, raising fears in India that buying F-35s could impact its strategic relations with Russia. Why Is India Wary Of The Su-57E? Russia, on the other hand, has offered the Su-57E, including technology transfer and local production at Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). This offer is appealing to India, given the existing infrastructure of the Su-30MKI. However, there are concerns about the Su-57's stealth capabilities, and India exited its co-development programme (FGFA) in 2018 due to unmet expectations. Moreover, the Russia-Ukraine war and Western sanctions have affected the Su-57's production. What Is Pakistan's Ploy And India's Strategy? Pakistan's intentions to acquire J-35A jets are worrying for India. Pakistan, which imports more than 80% of its weapons from China, is also discussing building KAAN aircraft with Turkey, increasing pressure on India's northern and western borders. Defence experts assert that India urgently needs fifth-gen jets, as waiting ten years for the AMCA could be risky. The IAF recently presented to the government, recommending the import of 2-3 squadrons (40-60 jets). A committee led by Defence Secretary RK Singh highlighted the need for fifth-gen jets to bolster readiness on the northern and western borders. However, retired Air Marshal Anil Chopra stated that neither the F-35 nor the Su-57 are entirely suitable for India, advocating instead for focusing on AMCA and involving the private sector. What Lies Ahead For India India now faces three options to acquire fifth-gen fighter jets. According to defence experts, priority should be given to AMCA, acquiring technology from private companies and Western countries. Moreover, immediate needs could be met by increasing the purchase and production of aircraft like Rafale and Tejas Mk2. Experts have also suggested that AMCA should be developed in parallel with limited purchases of F-35 or Su-57. Pakistan's J-35A plans and China's progress in sixth-gen aircraft have challenged India's defence strategy. While both the F-35 and Su-57 have their advantages and risks, India's current stance focuses on self-reliance and the AMCA. Trump's policies and geopolitical complexities have complicated the acquisition of foreign jets. Experts have suggested that India must rapidly develop the AMCA, involve the private sector, and find an interim solution with 4.5th-gen jets. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : AMCA China F-35 fighter jet pakistan Rafale Su-57 tejas mk2 view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 05, 2025, 11:07 IST News india Neither F-35 Nor Su-57: Why India Is Taking Its Time On 5th-Gen Fighter Jets Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Russia's Rybachiy submarine base suffers damage after massive quake last week: Report
A massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake that struck Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula last week appears to have damaged part of a key nuclear submarine base, the New York Times reported, citing the before and after satellite images. Russia's Rybachiy nuclear submarine base lies near the epicentre of the 8.8 magnitude Kamchatka quake, raising concerns about its resilience.(File Photo/AP) The Rybachiy submarine base used by Russia's Pacific Fleet is located on the remote Far East coast of Russia, merely 80 miles (about 120 kilometres) away from the epicentre of the July 30 earthquake. The satellite imagery of the nuclear submarine base showed visible damage to one of its floating piers, The New York Times reported citing commercial satellite photos taken by Planet Labs. The imagery showed that one segment of the pier appears to have detached from its anchor point. From the satellite perspective, the structure looks disjointed, with visible misalignment compared to its earlier state. However, the rest of the facility, including five submarines and several other vessels, appeared undamaged and securely moored. According to the NYT, international nuclear monitoring agencies reported normal radiation levels in the vicinity. Hindustan Times could not independently verify the authenticity of the claim in the report. By the time this report was filed, Russian authorities had not officially confirmed the damage. Base located close to epicentre The Rybachiy base, built during the Soviet era, is a strategically important site for Russia's naval operations in the Pacific. It has been the subject of recent military upgrades, including the installation of two new floating piers since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Earlier, The Metro reported that the base's proximity to the epicentre has alarmed military analysts and sparked questions about the facility's long-term resilience to extreme seismic events. Russia quake aftermath Despite the earthquake's powerful 8.8 magnitude, no fatalities or major injuries were reported in the Kamchatka Peninsula. The nearby city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, which shares a bay with the Rybachiy submarine base, sustained only minor damage. Tsunami warnings were sounded across the Pacific, including in French Polynesia and Chile, but the waves remained offshore and did not reach the city centre. The surrounding Kamchatka region also saw volcanic activity and multiple aftershocks in the days following the quake with a magnitude 5.0 earthquake hitting approximately 108 kilometres southeast of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy on Tuesday. The Rybachiy base is believed to host some of Russia's most powerful nuclear-powered submarines, including the Alexander Nevsky, Vladimir Monomakh, and K-44 Ryazan. Access to the base and the surrounding town of Rybachiy is tightly restricted due to its strategic importance.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
What will it take to restore J&K statehood
Six years after the Centre's unprecedented decision to reorganise the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir into two Union Territories — J&K and Ladakh — calls to restore statehood have been getting louder. Last month, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made a forceful plea to the Centre for restoring statehood. 'We're not asking for something that is not our due. Statehood is the right, it was promised to the people,' he had said on July 20. What would restoration of statehood mean for J&K? What would it take for that to happen? Statehood will empower CM The J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in Parliament on August 6, 2019. It gave the Centre, through the Lieutenant Governor, a heightened legislative role in J&K, and put the bureaucratic apparatus in the UT under the Union Home Minister. Both policing and public order were placed within control of the Centre. Subjects on the Concurrent List in the Constitution were taken off the plate of the legislative Assembly as well. The Act also barred the UT's legislature from introducing bills with any fiscal, monetary or taxation implications without the recommendation of the L-G. This is particularly limiting since virtually every policy decision requires taxation, expenditure or revenue adjustments. So a restoration of statehood would effectively empower the elected government in J&K and vastly reduce the powers of the L-G, who, according to Section 53 of the Reorganisation Act, has the 'final' say on almost every administrative and legislative decision. '…The decision of the Lieutenant Governor in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done by the Lieutenant Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion…,' Section 53 states. Act of Parliament will be needed The J&K Reorganisation was without precedent — no state had ever been reduced to a UT before. But granting statehood would not be without precedent. Five UTs have previously been granted statehood by Parliament: Himachal Pradesh in 1971, Manipur and Tripura in 1972, and Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram in 1987. Additionally, the state of Goa was carved out of the then UT of Goa, Daman and Diu in 1987. For statehood to be restored to J&K, the Reorganisation Act would have to be repealed, and the Centre would have to introduce a fresh bill in Parliament, which then would have to be passed in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Article 3 of the Constitution empowers Parliament to form a new state out of the territory of any other state or UT, as well as to change the area or name of a state. But a bill to this effect can only be introduced on the recommendation of the President. Since the President acts only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers — led by the Prime Minister — this essentially means that it is up to the Centre to recommend the introduction of the bill for restoration of statehood.
